• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • zobrazit sekci

    Velký společenský experiment na starém kontinentu a zemí z něj vzešlých. Je přínosné aby Evropa nadále ztrácela svou původni tvář? Pohled na několik dekád experimentu na Západě.



    Nehodlám popírat, že tohle je pokus o nový domov staré diskuse, s jiným domovníkem. Přál bych si, aby se diskuse odehrávala zhruba ve stejných mantinelech jako v původním klubu.

    Proto také přijmu pravidla 1-4 původního klubu, která se mi zdají velmi příčetně nastavena . Pravidlo 5 je otazník. Identity s RO v původním klubu budou mít, bohůmžel, kratší zápalnou šňůru.

    But you can do that with Europe. So, you can say, we did the Holocaust in Europe. You can even get away with that in London. Sorry, sorry, we? And then you take the other one, post-colonialism, which you refer to. Post-colonialism, and post-colonial guilt is suffered in almost equal measure by, for instance, Britain, which undoubtedly ran quite a lot of the world in the past, and Sweden, which did not. So, there's a strange thing that has emerged, which I try to explain in the book, where we end up summing up ourselves by our collectively worst moments. The flip side of that is, we look at everyone else only by their best. So, in recent years, for instance, we've heard an awful lot, certainly since 9-11, about the Islamic neo- Platonists. No one talked very much about the Islamic neo-Platonists until this last 20 years. But the Islamic world is best represented by the Islamic neo-Platonists, whereas Europe is best represented by Auschwitz.

    Douglas Murray (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQXHc-tJMXM)

    "Chcete-li zničit národ, je potřeba odstřihnout jej od kořenů." ― Aleksandr Isajevič Solženicyn

    "Dokud se neshodneme na definicich, jsou nazory irelevantni."

    “Everyone is in favor of free speech. Hardly a day passes without its being extolled, but some people's idea of it is that they are free to say what they like, but if anyone else says anything back, that is an outrage.” ― Winston Churchill

    "It will be seen that, as used, the word ‘Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless. In conversation, of course, it is used even more wildly than in print. I have heard it applied to farmers, shopkeepers, Social Credit, corporal punishment, fox-hunting, bull-fighting, the 1922 Committee, the 1941 Committee, Kipling, Gandhi, Chiang Kai-Shek, homosexuality, Priestley's broadcasts, Youth Hostels, astrology, women, dogs and I do not know what else. All one can do for the moment is to use the word with a certain amount of circumspection and not, as is usually done, degrade it to the level of a swearword." ― George Orwell




    1 Feb 2023 RO za hROmadne mazani vlastnich prispevku pres vaROvani
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam