Řada republikánů rovněž souhlasí s blízkým Trumpovým spojencem a senátorem Lindseym Grahamem, podle nějž je věrnost voličů republikánů Trumpovi tak silná, že bez něj strana nemůže uspět.

Kritičku Trumpa Cheneyovou odvolali republikáni z vysoké stranické funkce — ČT24 — Česká televize
https://ct24.ceskatelevize.cz/svet/3310993-kriticku-trumpa-cheneyovou-odvolali-republikani-z-vysoke-stranicke-funkce

Traitor! Commie! :))

Republikáni na sjezdu strany vybučeli Romneyho. Jste jak otrávené šipky, reagoval senátor - Novinky.cz
https://www.novinky.cz/zahranicni/amerika/clanek/republikani-na-sjezdu-strany-vybuceli-romneyho-jste-jak-otravene-sipky-reagoval-senator-40358930#dop_ab_variant=0&dop_source_zone_name=novinky.sznhp.box&dop_req_id=0PBhapS5wgB-202105020737&dop_id=40358930&source=hp&seq_no=4&utm_campaign=&utm_medium=z-boxiku&utm_source=www.seznam.cz

NO HOAX: Trump 2016 Campaign Coordinated with Russian Intelligence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCCESQcP7rY


poslední dva Trumpovy skandály za poslední dny, oba dost velké na to, aby zpečetily kariéru jakéhokoli jiného politika

NJAL: že ty mu taky hned zbaštíš ...

normálně slaví, kalí, chlastá a ptsd je jen taková story pro šéfa a manželku neasi

Hunter peklo, to je des...

Daily Mail Exposes Hunter Biden Bombshells After 'Tell-All' Book Holds Back
https://wearechange.org/daily-mail-exposes-hunter-biden-bombshells-after-tell-all-book-holds-back/

KEMAL: A to jim nikdo nerek, ze alkohol neni na deprese?

NJAL: imho fskutcnsti 3 mesice v lihu

Trump je hovado idiot, pochvalil Xiho za treatment Ujguru.

Trump je Crook. 100 procentne, to ho vystihuje.

Ale Biden je taky zkorumpovenej, Hunter treba.

Chudacci; take mate tuhle specialni variantu PTSD? :-)

Jim Acosta says journalists dealing with 'post-Trump stress disorder' | Washington Examiner
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/jim-acosta-post-trump-stress-disorder

Hmmmmm.... Oblacnost se nejak zatahuje nad Silikunda Valley.... Nejvetsi sranda ovsem je, ze v zalobe je cilem institut prezidenta a ne Trump jako soukroma osoba, takze nez tuhle zalobu vykopli, stal se na chvili zalovanym Biden :-)

Donald Trump, then President of the United States, blocked several users from interacting with his Twitter ac-count. They sued. The Second Circuit held that the com-ment threads were a “public forum” and that then-Presi-dent Trump violated the First Amendment by using hiscontrol of the Twitter account to block the plaintiffs fromaccessing the comment threads. Knight First Amdt. Inst. at Columbia Univ. v. Trump, 928 F. 3d 226 (2019). But Mr. Trump, it turned out, had only limited control of the ac-count; Twitter has permanently removed the account fromthe platform.
(...)
The disparity between Twitter’s control and Mr. Trump’s control is stark, to say the least. Mr. Trump blocked several people from interacting with his messages. Twitter barred Mr. Trump not only from interacting with a few users, but removed him from the entire platform, thus barring all Twitter users from interacting with his messages.1
(...)
Any con-trol Mr. Trump exercised over the account greatly paled in comparison to Twitter’s authority, dictated in its terms ofservice, to remove the account “at any time for any or no reason.” Twitter exercised its authority to do exactly that. Because unbridled control of the account resided in the hands of a private party, First Amendment doctrine may not have applied to respondents’ complaint of stifled speech.
(...)
But what-ever may be said of other industries, there is clear historical precedent for regulating transportation and communica-tions networks in a similar manner as traditional common carriers. Candeub 398–405. Telegraphs, for example, be-cause they “resemble[d] railroad companies and other com-mon carriers,” were “bound to serve all customers alike, without discrimination.” Primrose v. Western Union Tele-graph Co., 154 U. S. 1, 14 (1894).2 In exchange for regulating transportation and communi-cation industries, governments—both State and Federal—have sometimes given common carriers special government favors. Candeub 402–407. For example, governments havetied restrictions on a carrier’s ability to reject clients to “im-munity from certain types of suits”3 or to regulations thatmake it more difficult for other companies to compete withthe carrier (such as franchise licenses). Ibid. By giving concurring these companies special privileges, governments placethem into a category distinct from other companies andcloser to some functions, like the postal service, that the State has traditionally undertaken.

Supreme Court tosses dispute over Trump blocking critics on Twitter - CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-dismisses-trump-twitter-block-case/
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/040521zor_3204.pdf