• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • Přišli jste skrz odkaz na příspěvek, který již neexistuje.

  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    FALUCIUSVědecké vtipy
    DUNICAN
    DUNICAN --- ---
    a co vas vede k domnence, ze dnes lide veri v mensi mnozstvi bohu nez v minulosti?
    MHO
    MHO --- ---
    QUENDULUIN: Je záporný bůh ďáblem? Pokud ano, musíme bohužel nechat lineární aproximaxi ve hře.
    QUENDULUIN
    QUENDULUIN --- ---
    FILSHAVE: Samotná matematika nám na tohle neodpoví -- při její aplikaci se musíme řídit zdravým rozumem a ptát se: Je možné věřit v záporný počet bohů? Pokud ne, je třeba lineární aproximaci rovnou vyloučit...
    FILSHAVE
    FILSHAVE --- ---
    ULTRAMARINE: Hmmm... Budou v budoucnosti pouze ateiste, nebo se z lidi stanou bozi? Resp. Ma se pocet bohu v zavislosti na case aproximovat linearne, polynomem vyssiho radu a nebo exponencialou?
    ULTRAMARINE
    ULTRAMARINE --- ---
    RAGUPKI: Podivej se v kolik bohu verili lide v minulosi v ruznych casech a extrapoluj do budoucnosti...
    GREATDRAKE
    GREATDRAKE --- ---
    RAGUPKI:
    Podívej se na to, jak vypadalo porno před 40 lety. Podívej se, jak vypadá teď. Extrapoluj 40 let do budoucnosti....
    PISKVOR
    PISKVOR --- ---
    RAGUPKI: Aha, pardon - oci mam a nevidim :)
    SIRIEN
    SIRIEN --- ---
    ZABIK: Deleuzeho moc neznám, ale měl nějaké záležitosti kolem identity a rozdílu - konkrétně nevnímal rozdíl jako důsledek různých identit, ale vnímal různé identity jako důsledek rozdílů. Smazáním rozdílů tedy vznikne kopie Deleuzeho... nejspíš?

    To žes nepochopil Kanta je myslím poměrně autenticky Kantovské :D (jinak jde o narážku na tuším že první formulaci kategorického imperativu: Jednej tak, jako by se maxima tvého jednání měla na základě tvé vůle stát obecným přírodním zákonem - Tvé jednání (kouzlo) se tudíž promítne jako přírodní zákon - zrcadlí se a afektuje všechny ve hře.
    RAGUPKI
    RAGUPKI --- ---
    PISKVOR: Title je tam, kam patří :-)
    RAGUPKI
    RAGUPKI --- ---
    ARMADILLO: Musím reagovat stripem :-)

    ZABIK
    ZABIK --- ---
    ZABIK: Tak jsem nebyl líný a trochu googlu... Ale ten Nietzsche je celkem slabý a přiznám se, že Kanta a Deleuze jsem nepochopil...



    SEJDA
    SEJDA --- ---
    ARMADILLO: ukazou ti propojenost internetu vs. versus propojenost tvojeho "neuronoveho" pocitace, ktery budes nosit v kapse, ne ?
    ZABIK
    ZABIK --- ---
    VON_GILOTINE: Neexistuje takových kartiček víc? Preferoval bych filosofy, ale nemusí to být jenom oni. Hlavně ať to není chuck norris na deset způsobů...
    ARMADILLO
    ARMADILLO --- ---
    ARMADILLO
    ARMADILLO --- ---
    HAN_SOLO: Hezky :)) tesim se jak to bude vypadat za dalsich dvacet - tricet let.
    HAN_SOLO
    HAN_SOLO --- ---
    ARMADILLO
    ARMADILLO --- ---
    ARMADILLO
    ARMADILLO --- ---
    SEJDA: Presne tak jak pises to urcite kazdy dnes musi pochopit :)))

    PATISLAV: Nezapomen, ze tohle byly tezky '80ky. To uz gramofon zas nebyl moderni :)

    HYENA: Haha, zajimava myslenka. To bude asi tim, ze je to spis technologie pozdeji doby - imho o 20 let pozdeji. Tezko se v roce 1971-1980 pouzivala pro spotrebitelske ucely (ale tezko rict, takovej pametnik nejsem).
    HYENA
    HYENA --- ---
    ARMADILLO: Nikde nevidím GPS, resp. v té době GNSS Transit?
    SALVATOR
    SALVATOR --- ---
    The story of Schroedinger's cat (an epic poem)

    May 7, 1982
    Dear Cecil:

    Cecil, you're my final hope
    Of finding out the true Straight Dope
    For I have been reading of Schroedinger's cat
    But none of my cats are at all like that.
    This unusual animal (so it is said)
    Is simultaneously live and dead!
    What I don't understand is just why he
    Can't be one or other, unquestionably.
    My future now hangs in between eigenstates.
    In one I'm enlightened, the other I ain't.
    If you understand, Cecil, then show me the way
    And rescue my psyche from quantum decay.
    But if this queer thing has perplexed even you,
    Then I will and won't see you in Schroedinger's zoo.

    — Randy F., Chicago

    Cecil replies:

    Schroedinger, Erwin! Professor of physics!
    Wrote daring equations! Confounded his critics!
    (Not bad, eh? Don't worry. This part of the verse
    Starts off pretty good, but it gets a lot worse.)
    Win saw that the theory that Newton'd invented
    By Einstein's discov'ries had been badly dented.
    What now? wailed his colleagues. Said Erwin, "Don't panic,
    No grease monkey I, but a quantum mechanic.
    Consider electrons. Now, these teeny articles
    Are sometimes like waves, and then sometimes like particles.
    If that's not confusing, the nuclear dance
    Of electrons and suchlike is governed by chance!
    No sweat, though — my theory permits us to judge
    Where some of 'em is and the rest of 'em was."
    Not everyone bought this. It threatened to wreck
    The comforting linkage of cause and effect.
    E'en Einstein had doubts, and so Schroedinger tried
    To tell him what quantum mechanics implied.
    Said Win to Al, "Brother, suppose we've a cat,
    And inside a tube we have put that cat at —
    Along with a solitaire deck and some Fritos,
    A bottle of Night Train, a couple mosquitoes
    (Or something else rhyming) and, oh, if you got 'em,
    One vial prussic acid, one decaying ottom
    Or atom — whatever — but when it emits,
    A trigger device blasts the vial into bits
    Which snuffs our poor kitty. The odds of this crime
    Are 50 to 50 per hour each time.
    The cylinder's sealed. The hour's passed away. Is
    Our pussy still purring — or pushing up daisies?
    Now, you'd say the cat either lives or it don't
    But quantum mechanics is stubborn and won't.
    Statistically speaking, the cat (goes the joke),
    Is half a cat breathing and half a cat croaked.
    To some this may seem a ridiculous split,
    But quantum mechanics must answer, "Tough shit.
    We may not know much, but one thing's fo' sho':
    There's things in the cosmos that we cannot know.
    Shine light on electrons — you'll cause them to swerve.
    The act of observing disturbs the observed —
    Which ruins your test. But then if there's no testing
    To see if a particle's moving or resting
    Why try to conjecture? Pure useless endeavor!
    We know probability — certainty, never.'
    The effect of this notion? I very much fear
    'Twill make doubtful all things that were formerly clear.
    Till soon the cat doctors will say in reports,
    "We've just flipped a coin and we've learned he's a corpse."'
    So saith Herr Erwin. Quoth Albert, "You're nuts.
    God doesn't play dice with the universe, putz.
    I'll prove it!" he said, and the Lord knows he tried —
    In vain — until fin'ly he more or less died.
    Win spoke at the funeral: "Listen, dear friends,
    Sweet Al was my buddy. I must make amends.
    Though he doubted my theory, I'll say of this saint:
    Ten-to-one he's in heaven — but five bucks says he ain't."

    — Cecil Adams
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam