Nové studie: To konspirační teoretici jsou zdraví a ti vládou ošálení jsou potrhlí a nepřátelští
http://www.nwoo.org/view.php?cisloclanku=2013070144

:-)

Tomáš Keltner: Bodyguard velkých i malých duší

24.7.2013 11:31

Tohle je jiný kouč, než na jaké jste zvyklí. Svou průpravu nezískal jako psycholog nebo absolvent MBA, ale v tajných službách a ve válce. Tomáš Keltner proto ví, že vaším jediným skutečným nepřítelem je váš strach.

...

I když strávil několik let v tajné službě, dělal bodyguarda zahraničním prezidentům a několika našim ministrům a prošel zeměmi s válečným konfliktem jako člen elitní jednotky SOG, kde získal i nejvyšší prověrku NBÚ a NATO, dnes píše knihy pro děti, jejich rodiče i všechny ostatní o tom, jak si začít věřit a stát se opravdu svobodnou, sebevědomou, nikým a ničím neovládanou bytostí. V nejvyšších patrech systému a vybaven informacemi, o kterých běžný smrtelník nemá ponětí, totiž pochopil, že „sovy nejsou tím, čím se zdají být“, a demokracie, svoboda a lidská práva bývají prázdnými pojmy, jež nemívají s realitou nic společného. „Existují tři zpravodajské moudrosti. První říká: Nikdy nikomu nevěř. Druhá: Nikdy nevíš všechno. A třetí: Všechno je jinak,“ usmívá se šestatřicetiletý řečník, spisovatel a učitel.

...

„Z církví se staly korporace, jež mají za cíl hromadit majetek a moc a ovládat. A místo aby pravdu náboženství uchovávalo, dělá pravý opak – informace zkresluje a záměrně dezinformuje.“

...

„Věci, které jsem viděl, dost ovlivňovaly můj vnitřní svět. Zajímavé pro mě byly třeba okamžiky, když se dělal v televizi nějaký rozhovor – hlavně to, co se dělo předtím, než se pustila kamera, a když se vypnula. Tohle kdyby někdo zachytil a pustil národu, tak tady podle mě skončí politika.“

...

Mezitím si bolestně uvědomoval, že začíná sloužit něčemu, čemu nechce, a stále jasněji viděl, že je všechno „připravený a naplánovaný“. „Došlo mi, proč jsou válečné konflikty na těch konkrétních místech a ne jinde stále dokola po věky věků.“ Díky svým postojům se záhy dostal do pozice nechtěného. Před odchodem z jednotky byl označen za neřízenou střelu, kterou je třeba zneškodnit, protože by prý mohl zaútočit na politiky, které měl chránit. „To byl samozřejmě nesmysl,“ usmívá se dnes nad koncem jednoho válečníka.

Tehdy mu ale do smíchu nebylo. „My se tady můžeme bavit o tom, jestli volit levici nebo pravici, jestli nové strany, pak zda změnit volební systém. Ale když to celé projdete, nakonec zjistíte, že politici nevládnou. Nad nimi je další vrstva, další vrstva a další vrstva, kam se nedá dostat skrz nějakou demokracii – a to jsou ti, kteří vládnou, mezinárodní bankovní kruhy, vlastníci Fedu a podobně. Ale ti taky nejsou ti hlavní, o těch nejdůležitějších nikdy neuslyšíte. Málokdo chápe, že většina takzvaných konspiračních teorií má naprosto pravdivý základ, protože začal mluvit někdo zevnitř, kdo na to neměl žaludek. Často tyto takzvané teorie ale sám tvoří či dotváří systém, aby je mohl posléze zesměšnit a odvést pozornost.“ A dodává: „To, co říkám a píšu, tím jsem si jistý, protože jsem si to mnohokrát ověřil. Pak je mnohem víc věcí, které nemám odvahu říkat a psát, a to už o nich dávno nepochybuju, přestože to nemůžu dokázat a argumentovat. Prostě někde jste byl, něco jste viděl a víte, že nejste blázen.“

...

Tomáš Keltner: Bodyguard velkých i malých duší - E15.cz / Zen
http://zen.e15.cz/z-duse/tomas-keltner-bodyguard-velkych-i-malych-dusi-1008864

kdo ještě neviděl, tak doporučuju,
zdařilá tisková konference režiséra Olivera Stonea z Karlových Varů .
Oliver Stone press conference Karlovy Vary film festival 2013 - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bpn3hAKAjDA

wertyz | Bohemian Grove – rajce.net
http://wertyz.rajce.idnes.cz/Bohemian_Grove/

- 441 fotek

Monsanto Buys BLACKWATER the largest mercenary army in the world | SouthWeb Org
http://southweb.org/blog/monsanto-buys-blackwater-the-largest-mercenary-army-in-the-world/

David Icke on the Secret of the Universe & DMT - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79u0Zh4ebus

První zprávy - Domácí - Bojovník proti očkování se nezalekl tlaku farmakorporace GSK
http://www.prvnizpravy.cz/...vy/zpravy/bojovnik-proti-ockovani-se-nezalekl-tlaku-farmakorporace-gsk/

vynikajici dokument. doporucuju ! ;)

Crossroads: Labor Pains of a New Worldview | FULL MOVIE - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5n1p9P5ee3c


Crossroads* won the 2013 Free Speech Award by American Insight:

CROSSROADS SYNOPSIS:

*Crossroads: Labor Pains of a New Worldview* is a documentary exploring the depths of the current human condition and the emergence of a worldview that is recreating our world from the inside out.

Weaving together insights and findings from biology, psychology, network science, systems science, business, culture and media, the film reveals the inner workings of the human experience in the 21st century, urging viewers to step out of the box and challenge their own assumptions about who we really are, and why we do what we do.

*Crossroads* places evolutionary context to today's escalating social unrest, natural disasters, and economic failures. It illuminates the footsteps of an integrated worldview, penetrating its way through the power of social networks to the forefront of our personal and collective awareness.

A refreshing reality check for all viewers and a clarion call for those who carry the seeds of the emerging worldview.

Scientists and thinkers featured in *Crossroads* include: Amit Goswami, Neale Donald Walsch, Elisabet Sahtouris, Bruce Lipton, Peter Joseph, Caroline A. Miller, Nicholas Christakis, James Fowler, Michael Laitman, Ervin Laszlo, Dean Radin, Dave Sherman, Annie Leonard, Jairon G. Cuesta, and John St. Augustine.

ABOUT CROSSROADS' FILMMAKER:

Joseph Ohayon, a filmmaker, writer and speaker based in Israel and New York, is best known for his relentless quest to put pieces together and look at the big picture. Joseph directs, writes, and hosts documentaries and talk shows on Israeli and US television, and also lectures on the need to adapt to an increasingly interdependent world.

Crossroads Official Site: http://www.crossroadsfilm.com

;)

New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile

Category: Activism&Resistance Created on 13 July 2013 Written by Kevin Barrett

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 - a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan - was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist - a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory - accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called “conspiracists” or “conspiracy theorists.”

Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people don’t like being called “conspiracy theorists”: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! “The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”

In other words, people who use the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.

DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved “state crimes against democracy.” An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the “Kennedy assassinations” in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime.

Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed “conspiracy theory” label impedes cognitive function. She points out, in an article published in American Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief.

In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong “confirmation bias” - that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the “conspiracy theory” label) to avoid conflicting information.

The extreme irrationality of those who attack “conspiracy theories” has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled “Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion,” they wrote:

“If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid… By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.”


But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the “conspiracy theory” smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous - and more rational - than anti-conspiracy ones.

No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks.

http://therebel.org/...ment-dupes-crazy-hostile&catid=83:resistance&Itemid=1198#sthash.26cHo1vU.dpuf