Kdyz se clovek mrkne na stranku CDC na lek hydroxychloroquine na malarii, zadne straseni jeho nebezpecnosti tam nenajdete.

https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/resources/pdf/fsp/drugs/hydroxychloroquine.pdf

Who can take hydroxychloroquine?
Hydroxychloroquine can be prescribed to adults
and children of all ages. It can also be safely taken by
pregnant women and nursing mothers.

Who should not take
hydroxychloroquine?
People with psoriasis should not take
hydroxychloroquine.

How should I take
hydroxychloroquine?
Both adults and children should take one dose of
hydroxychloroquine per week starting at least 1 week
before traveling to the area where malaria transmission
occurs. They should take one dose per week while
there, and for 4 consecutive weeks after leaving.

What are the potential side
effects of hydroxychloroquine?
Hydroxychloroquine is a relatively well tolerated
medicine. The most common adverse reactions
reported are stomach pain, nausea, vomiting,
and headache. These side effects can often be
lessened by taking hydroxychloroquine with
food. Hydroxychloroquine may also cause
itching in some people.
All medicines may have some side effects.
Minor side effects such as nausea, occasional
vomiting, or diarrhea usually do not require
stopping the antimalarial drug. If you cannot
tolerate your antimalarial drug, see your
health care provider; other antimalarial drugs
are available.

How long is it safe to use
hydroxychloroquine?
CDC has no limits on the use of
hydroxychloroquine for the prevention of
malaria. When hydroxychloroquine is used
at higher doses for many years, a rare eye
condition called retinopathy has occurred.
People who take hydroxychloroquine for
more than five years should get regular
eye exams.


Ale pdfko vzniklo zrejme jeste v dobe, kdy se kolem tohodle leku nerozpoutala hysterie, jak je to strasne mega nebezpecny lek, ktery navic zarucene nijak nepomaha s covidem, ale pouze a jen skodi, a veskere jine zminky o nem by mely byt cenzurovany

Zaklinaji se radou studii, zejmena studii publikovanou na prestiznim Lancet

Could taking hydroxychloroquine for coronavirus be more harmful than helpful?
https://theconversation.com/...ydroxychloroquine-for-coronavirus-be-more-harmful-than-helpful-139309

It does have a range of serious possible side-effects, including eye damage and altered heart rhythm, which require monitoring.

The new Lancet study, published last week, has found it could increase the risk of death among COVID-19 patients in hospital. But there’s more to the story.

What did the new study do?
The Lancet study collected real-world data on more than 96,000 hospitalised patients with COVID-19 from more than 600 hospitals across six continents.

tenhle lek, ktery CDC aktivne doporucovalo lidem brat PREVENTIVNE jako ochranu pred malarii, tehotnym zenam, detem a dokonce i lidem, kteri maji vedlejsi ucinky doporucovali, ze to neni duvod ho prestat brat.

Najednou je to "serious possible side-effects including eye damage..." No.. PDF ze CDC zminuje rizika poskozeni oka taky. Uvadeji tam, ze pokud to bude clovek brat vic nez 5 let, tak ze je tam tohle riziko, a ze je takove dlouhodobe uzivani vhodne monitorovat doktorem. Rizika tam zlehcujou, ze kazdej lek ma vedlejsi ucinky. Jo, kdyz se podivate na jakykoliv lek z lekarny, budete tam mit radu tehle vedlejsich ucinku.

Jasneze pokud je clovek nemocnej zahadnou nemoci, mozna to nemusi byt vhodna kombinace, ale hysterie jak je to nebezpecny? Doktor ma prece posoudit vhodnost. Rizika jsou tu zjevne relativne mala. Rozhodne mensi nez na nekoho nasadit ventilator.

kdyz si kliknete na tu Lancet studii, je tam velkymi pismeny RETRACTED. Ta studie byla stazena jako neduveryhodna.

https://www.cnbc.com/.../lancet-retracts-covid-19-paper-that-raised-safety-concerns-about-drugs.html


“We can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources,” Mandeep Mehra of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Frank Ruschitzka of University Hospital Zurich, and Amit Patel of University of Utah said in a statement. “Due to this unfortunate development, the authors request that the paper be retracted.”


Sranda jak se to s tichosti preslo.

ADRENOCHROME REPORTED LIVE ON TURKISH & BULGARIAN TELEVISION
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zchCPc0a4iM

Pod svícnem tma. Vláda schválila zákon o Vojenském zpravodajství – A2larm
https://a2larm.cz/2020/03/pod-svicnem-tma-do-vlady-jde-zakon-o-vojenskem-zpravodajstvi/

pro pripomenuti asi jedine medium v cele CR, ktere vubec o tomto hlasovani informovalo.
jak nejsem pravidelnym ctenarem a mam sve vyhradz, tak to je jedine medium, ktere o celem rozhodnuti vlady vubec informovalo.
nejsem si jistej, jestli to dava dobry zaklad pro duveru, kdzy je rec o skrince nainstalovane u kazdeho poskytovatele internetu. v mem pohledu to dkaze kolektivne vyradit i bug. vedomy i nezamerny.
cilem integrace novych technologii nebo smirovani internetu je at to aspon nezbori funkcnost.


vetsina mediii volila straktegii o tematu neinformovat vuibec. krome a2larmu.

zakon sel do schvalovani v dobe, kdy, jedine co zajimalo novinare, byl dostatek rousek. pres vsechny kontroverze medialni a z rad vladni opozice, je tohle facka vsemu o tom ani neinformovat.

tady ani neslo o to vypnout internet.. tady slo ciste o znepokojeni o bezpecnost dat.najednou se to schvali.. presne v dobe kdy doslova zadny novinar nema jedinou otazku, ktera by se netykala rousky.

Jeden fakt zůstává neohrožený ničím.. vůdci zvazovali internet zakázat. Sice v rámci virtuální simulace epidemie koronaviru, což se nápadně podobá současně situaci.. ale myšlenkou tam bylo vypnout plosne internet.

Jako je stejně minimálně zajímavý že během akce korona schválili zákon o vojenském zpravodajství, který narážel na tvrdý odpor kolem omezování svobody.. a pak ho schválili někdy v březnu 2020 po letech kontroverzi.. a nebylo jediného novináře, kdo by se zeptal k tomu sebemenší věc.. k něčemu co bylo mega kontroverzní celé roky předtím. Ne. Žádný novinář se nezeptal nic. Ani málo. Všichni novináři se k tématu zeptali kolektivní nic, protože na to jak to byl zákon kontroverzní,brojila proti němu opozice , najednou to bylo bez jakéhokoliv diskuze.
Žádná diskuze. Nic . Většina lidí ani neví, že taková krabička existuje. Dokonalé.

XMEDA: záleží na tom?

Od rozhodnutí to prostě přikazující všem ISP po že během, co probíhala Corona party, třeba u nás imho schválili potencionální kill switch internetu... Každý ISP musí nainstalovat mysteriózní černou krabičku ministerstva obrany na monitorování kyberterorismu.. nejsem si jistej, že by to umělo kill switch ale ..záleží na tom ? Jestli zákonem to pikauoz vypnout nebo technicky jestli jde o one switch co to vypne synchronne(ideální) . K čemu potřebuješ internet?

GORG: a víš že ti ho vypnout nemůžou??? ;)

Fauci: Mask advice was because of doctors' shortages from the start - Business Insider
https://www.businessinsider.com/...i-mask-advice-was-because-doctors-shortages-from-the-start-2020-6

Dr. Anthony Fauci said Friday the reason the public was advised not to wear masks at the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic was that there were too few to go around.

Tohle je presne to, co diskredituje ruzne samozvane odborniky. Doporucovat lidem nenosit rousky, protoze jich je nedostatek, je ukazkova manipulace. Je to pragmaticke, ale odbornici tu nejsou od toho, aby delali nejaka pragmaticka vyjadreni. Od toho jsou politici.

Jindy jsme zas slyseli vyjadreni odborniku, kde se priznali, ze se snazi lidi desit (zvelicovat), aby si uvedomili zavaznost situace, a dodrzovali narizeni. Opet. Odbornici a autority ztraci duveryhodnost, pokud co rikaji, je vlastne nekdy lez, ale jakoby ctnostna lez, aby se vytvorilo nejake PR/propaganda.

Takze mame rousek malo, tak lidem reknem, ze je nosit nemaji, aby je nevykoupili zdravotnikum, kteri je budou potrebovat primarne.

V normalni svete by prece mohli lidem doporucit nosit nejake zakryti obliceje, coz se ostatne dnes za rousku povazuje taky. Kus latky. Pritom Fauci je svetoznama autorita pres vsechny Korona veci, ale pritom jak ho muzu vrat vazne, kdyz takhle uvazuje? Mohli rict lidem, at pouzijou cokoliv k zakryti obliceje.

Misto toho lidem tvrdi, ze nemaji nosit rousky. Neni takove jednani az primo obecne ohrozeni? Vzdyt on doporucil lidem nenosit rousky "v pocatku pandemie" a doznava, ze zamerne uvedl lidi v omyl, aby je nevykoupili zdravotnikum (pricemz mohli klidne pouzit aspon jakoukoliv latku). A nebzl jedinej odbornik, co lidi od rousek odrazoval. Tenhle flip/flop kolem rousek byl i od predstavitelu WHO.

Za me jsou rousky nesmysl, ale ukazuje to za jaky idioty lidi maj. Delejte, co se vam rekne, i pokud jsou ta narizeni v rozporu. Mam silny podezreni, ze to je zamer psychogickyho muceni - chaos v informacich, kdy jedinym skutecnym cilem je naucit lidi delat, co se jim rekne. A aby akceptovali, ze to klidne muze byt pravy opak toho, co bylo predtydnem posvatnou pravdou.

Do toho tu jeste pobihaji spolumucitele, kteri se z toho teroru jeste nevzpamatovali, a sami terorizujou ostatni, pokud do toho nekdo jakkoliv rejpe.

Jinak predikovano v publikaci Rockefeller Foundation v roce 2010:

http://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf

Scenarios for the Future of Technology
and International Development

Scenario Narratives

LOCK STEP

A world of tighter top-down government control and more
authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing
citizen pushback

The pandemic also
had a deadly effect on economies: international
mobility of both people and goods screeched to
a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and
breaking global supply chains. Even locally,
normally bustling shops and office buildings sat
empty for months, devoid of both employees
and customers.

...

But even
in developed countries, containment was a
challenge. The United States’s initial policy of
“strongly discouraging” citizens from flying
proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the
spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but
across borders. However, a few countries did
fare better—China in particular. The Chinese
government’s quick imposition and enforcement
of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well
as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of
all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping
the spread of the virus far earlier than in other
countries and enabling a swifter postpandemic recovery


atd.atd. popisujou tam dnesek vcetne zejmena tech opatreni, ktery jsou dnes normalni realitou. novym normalem.

China’s government was not the only one that
took extreme measures to protect its citizens
from risk and exposure. During the pandemic,
national leaders around the world flexed their
authority and imposed airtight rules and
restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face
masks to body-temperature checks at the entries
to communal spaces like train stations and
supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded,
this more authoritarian control and oversight
of citizens and their activities stuck and even
intensified. In order to protect themselves from
the spread of increasingly global problems—from
pandemics and transnational terrorism to
environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders
around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world
gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens
willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and
their privacy—to more paternalistic states
in exchange for greater safety and stability.
Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for
top-down direction and oversight, and national
leaders had more latitude to impose order in the
ways they saw fit.

Asi nutno dodat, ze ten text pojednava o fiktivnim scenari noveho viru jakesi husi chripky (geese flu) v roce 2012.

TECHNOLOGY IN LOCK STEP

Technological innovation in “Lock Step” is largely driven by government and is
focused on issues of national security and health and safety.

Technology trends and applications we might see:
• Scanners using advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
technology become the norm at airports and other public areas to detect
abnormal behavior that may indicate “antisocial intent.”
• In the aftermath of pandemic scares, smarter packaging for food and beverages
is applied first by big companies and producers in a business-to-business
environment, and then adopted for individual products and consumers.
• New diagnostics are developed to detect communicable diseases. The
application of health screening also changes; screening becomes a prerequisite
for release from a hospital or prison, successfully slowing the spread of many
diseases.
• Tele-presence technologies respond to the demand for less expensive, lowerbandwidth, sophisticated communications systems for populations whose travel
is restricted.
• Driven by protectionism and national security concerns, nations create their
own independent, regionally defined IT networks, mimicking China’s firewalls.
Governments have varying degrees of success in policing internet traffic, but
these efforts nevertheless fracture the “World Wide” Web.



zpocatku to vsechno zacalo "flattening the curve".. na par tydnu naridit domaci vezeni cele populaci.. pritom ted 4 mesice pozdeji to preslo v otevrene deklarovany new normal a opatreni naopak pritvrzuji (sic u nas to ted vypada, ze skoro vse skoncilo) a leckteri vudci jasne rikaji, ze se to do normalu uz nevrati nikdy, nicmene pobizi verejnost, aby sekala dobrotu, a delala, co se jim rekne, a ze mozna jim pak budou navraceny svobody. jo tohle asi fakt splnuje skutecny psychologicky muceni. a z obeti se stavaji mucitele druhych.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/3yk3xezML8Q/

Tohle je trefný poznatek, že řešení koronaviru zjevně splňuje definici mučení. A z dostupných informací se to jeví, že ne nahodilé, ale záměrné - ke zlomení jakékoliv lidské vůle k získání kompletní poslušnosti, protože by lidi nový světový řád dobrovolně nepřijali.
A NWO teď prosazuje World economic forum, OSN a spol.

https://www.un.org/en/coronavirus/global-wake-call
From COVID-19 to climate disruption, from racial injustice to rising inequalities, we are a world in turmoil.
...

The pandemic, as horrible as it is, must be a wake-up call that prompts all political leaders to understand that our assumptions and approaches have to change, and that division is a danger to everyone.

This understanding could lead people to recognize that the only way to address global fragilities is through much more robust mechanisms of global governance with international cooperation.

After all, we cannot simply return to the systems that gave rise to the current crisis. We need to build back better with more sustainable, inclusive, gender-equal societies and economies.

..

Political leaders around the world need to heed this wake-up call and come together to address the world’s fragilities, strengthen our capacity for global governance, give teeth to multilateral institutions, and draw from the power of unity and solidarity to overcome the biggest test of our times.


Je to vsude

https://www.spectator.co.uk/...e/Britain-should-brace-itself-for-a-new-world-order-after-coronavirus

https://www.theguardian.com/.../apr/11/coronavirus-who-will-be-winners-and-losers-in-new-world-order

https://www.msn.com/...style/style/what-the-new-world-order-will-look-like-post-covid-19/ar-BB12VHhB

The NWO Agenda Revealed (With Rosa Koire)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf5hVCidA4s

I Hate to Say I Told You So…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSiA2Rm-s9U&feature=em-lsp



ROADMAP ON VACCINATION
Last update: Q3 2019
https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/vaccination/docs/2019-2022_roadmap_en.pdf

zajimavy... naplanovany jeste pred tim, nez se objevil ten koronavirus. to je dobra nahoda, ze se vzapeti objevilo neco, co to pomuze politicky protlacit.

Pro perspektivu, co se dnes povazuje za vedecke - covid nineteen je prej trest prirody. Na me tohle vsechno spis pusobi jako pseudovedecke nabozenstvi. Ani neni zadna peer reviewed studie , ze je covid19 reakci prirody na jeji devastaci clovekem. Sic je to samozrejme mozny.

[ VOYTEX @ viry | epidemie | pandemie (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19) ]

faktem je, ze dosud nebyla ani epidemie a mluvi se o pandemii. pritom snad v zadnem state sveta nebyla epidemie. ta je vyhlasovana od urciteho poctu nakazenych na 100 000 obyvatel. pro CR to znamena cca 170 000-200 000 nakazenych. dohromady jich zatim bylo pritom za celou dobu 11 000.. to je tak 17x min, nez je minimalni mnozstvi, aby se vubec dalo hovorit o epidemii. ktery teda byvaji bezny u chripky kazdy rok.

ale rade lidem uplne jeblo, ze nejsou schopni uvazovat racionalne a opakujou talking points, co jim nacpali v mediich.

[ VACA @ viry | epidemie | pandemie (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19) ]

tohle je fakt zajimavy.. tady pise o jakychsi mraky fotografii preplnenych nemocnic. kolonach mrazicich vozu. ja nikdy zadnou takovou fotku nevidel a to jsem je aktivne hledal.
ci-li nekteri si dokonce vsugerovali, ze videli fotky preplnenych nemocnic, ackoliv tp bylo napsany jen v tech clancich. nikdy to nebylo dolozeny zadnou fotku. pokud uz jsme videli nejaky zabery nemocnic, tak byly naopak uplne prazdne.. vic nez normalne. ale ten clovek ma dojem, ze si pamatuje primo fotky. coz je fakt mazec, jak se mediim podarilo vytvorit naprostou iluzi.