Tak vzhledem k tomu, že už mám ban do všech diskuzí o COVIDu, tak nezbývá to dávat sem.
Tak se podívejme na tuhle "konspirační teorii" a "nebezpečnou dezinformaci", o které když píšu, tak jsem "nebezpečnej ksindl" (diskuzní úroveň covidářů je v skutku neskutečná)
Tahle konspirační teorie, že by se lidé neměli dotýkat roušky, je oficiální pohled, který je velice snadno doložitelný.
Namátkou lze nalézt například článek prestižního TheConversation, což jsou akademické noviny, kde se do redakce mohou zaregistrovat pouze vědci.
https://theconversation.com/...ntial-consequences-of-wearing-face-masks-we-need-to-be-wary-of-140273
Third, masks may act as an extra transmission route or prompt other behaviour that transmits the virus, such as regular face touching. To stop masks being turned into alternative transmission routes, they need to be safely put on and taken off.
People touch their faces 15-23 times per hour on average – an itchy or poorly fitted mask may mean that people touch their eyes, nose and mouth even more regularly. After touching your mask, there’s a risk that your hands become contaminated, with the risk that you will then spread the virus to other surfaces, such as door handles, railings or tables.
Podobně můžeme slyšet od WHO v jejich instruktážním videu pro veřejnost
https://www.idnes.cz/onadnes/zdravi/rouska-maska-ustenka-koronavirus.A200318_123402_zdravi_jup
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-020-0887-9
The fomite route to transmission of the virus could be particularly important because the virus can survive on some surfaces for several days20. Therefore, not touching the T-zone (Box 6 in Fig. 1) may be an important behaviour to target. Although the above personal protective behaviours are included in government advice in a number of countries21,22,23, little guidance, training or support is given to promote adherence, even though failure to do so is critical to the transmission of the virus.
https://blogs.bmj.com/...t-touch-the-t-zone-how-to-block-a-key-pathway-to-infection-with-sars-cov-2/
It is not known precisely how much transmission occurs by each route, but the latter can be expected to play a substantial role.3 This is because, while the virus is typically only airborne for a matter of minutes, it can contaminate surfaces and objects, known as ‘fomites’,3 for many hours and even days, and we are constantly touching these surfaces and objects.
https://www.qeios.com/read/1SC5L4
SARS-CoV-2 is spread through airborne droplets, and possibly in some cases aerosol, containing virions (8). Face masks of various types (e.g. surgical masks) filter droplets containing virus. However, they may not reduce transmission of the virus in community settings if they are not used correctly and may even increase transmission if they act as fomites or prompt other behaviours that transmit the virus such as face touching. For example, a face mask that has been worn for several hours becomes moist and acts as a potential source of contamination. Studies show that people touch their faces 15-23 times per hour on average (9,10), and this may mean that eyes and contaminated face masks are touched, spreading the virus. Several reviews have been undertaken on whether wearing face masks confers net benefit or harm (11–19). This rapid review aims to draw together the key evidence to date to try to establish the most comprehensive picture available. Given that policy has to be made on the basis of the likelihood of benefits versus harms rather than necessarily a high degree of confidence that a given policy will have the desired effect, it is important to focus on this likelihood. Therefore, this review includes the use of a Bayesian analysis to calculate cumulative posterior odds of the benefit of face mask wearing.