• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    GORGworld conspiracy // 911 // free world order! ... part 5 ::
    ARRAKIS
    ARRAKIS --- ---
    Austrian court overturns virus mask mandate in schools - Expat Guide to Austria | Expatica
    https://www.expatica.com/...management/austrian-court-overturns-virus-mask-mandate-in-schools-95250/

    Austria’s Constitutional Court ruled Wednesday that two government measures to fight the spread of coronavirus in schools, compulsory mask-wearing and splitting classes into two halves to be taught in alternate shifts, were illegal.

    The split classes system meant that some pupils had lessons on Mondays and Tuesdays and others on Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays.

    At all other times they were to stay at home.

    “In addition, it was decided that all persons present in school buildings, apart from during teaching time, had to wear a mask over their mouth and nose,” a statement from the court said.

    “In it’s decision published today, the Constitutional Court ruled that the measures in question were illegal,” the statement went on. It explained its decision by saying that the “ministry has not made clear why it considered these measures necessary”.


    Two children and their parents had brought the case before the court, saying the measures violated the principles of equality before the law, the right to a private life and the right to education.

    Since January Austria has been governed by a coalition of the Green party and the centre-right People’s Party (OeVP) of Chancellor Sebastian Kurz. The education ministry, which is held by the OeVP, said in a statement that it had taken note of the court’s judgement and would examine the judges’ reasoning.
    ARRAKIS
    ARRAKIS --- ---
    Spain Plans Registry For Those Who Refuse COVID Vaccine | ZeroHedge
    https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/spain-plans-registry-those-who-refuse-covid-vaccine

    As Europe begins vaccinating the first wave of high-priority patients, a "glitch" has already emerged: many health-care workers and others have refused to take the vaccine, as skepticism and suspicion remain elevated.

    A similar phenomenon has played out in the US, but to a less intense degree. But the situation, which we discussed last night, is now one of a variety of reasons, from a shortage of supplies and raw materials, to an uncooperative populace, that public-health officials are growing worried about hitting lofty vaccination targets.

    And so, in Spain at least, government bureaucrats are fighting back, as Health Minister Salvador Illa warned the country would set up a "registry" for everybody who refuses the vaccine.

    "What will be done is a registry, which will be shared with our European partners... of those people who have been offered it and have simply rejected it," he said.

    "It is not a document which will be made public and it will be done with the utmost respect for data protection."

    He added that the registry would not be made public, or delivered to employers, which begs the question: why else would the government keep a database of that information?

    An AFP report on the health minister's remarks wasn't exactly clear about the motive, which leads us to believe that it's just another tactic by the Spanish government, which has sworn up and down, like other European governments, that vaccinations wouldn't be mandatory,.

    Polls released over the last couple of months appear to reflect a steep and unexplained drop in the number of respondents who claim to be skeptical, or otherwise indicate that they would like to wait before getting the vaccine, has plunged as the first doses have been doled out and administered.

    Spain's government expects to have between 15MM and 20MM people out of its population of 47MM vaccinated against the virus by June in order to salvage next summer's tourism season.

    "The way to defeat the virus is to vaccinate all of us or the more the better," Illa said.

    Speculation has also been brewing about what might happen to those who refuse to inoculate themselves, and/or their children, even as public officials have talked up the importance of "transparency" and - of course - freedom of individual choice.

    To be sure, the Spanish aren't alone. Many other Europeans share their anxieties, which have been stoked by government table-pounding about vaccine safety (any skepticism is verboten), the rapid pace of development, and the use of the new mRNA technology. For example, independent pollster Alpha Research said its recent survey suggested that fewer than one in five Bulgarians from the first groups to be offered the vaccine - frontline medics, pharmacists, teachers and nursing home staff - planned to volunteer to get a shot. A recent IFOP poll found that roughly 41% of French would take the shot if available, which means nearly 60% would not.

    Which is why, looking ahead, we wouldn't be surprised to see more heavy handed measures employed (immunity passports?) as officials grow increasingly desperate to hit their (largely speculative) herd immunity targets.
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    COVID-19 will be around for next 10 years, says BioNTech CEO Ugur Sahin
    https://www.businesstoday.in/...und-for-next-10-years-says-biontech-ceo-ugur-sahin/story/425854.html

    Ugur Sahin, CEO of BioNTech that is collaborating with Pfizer for a coronavirus vaccine candidate, has said that he expects the virus to be around for the next 10 years. He, talking at a press conference, however, sounded hopeful that a 'new normal' would set in by the end of summer.

    When asked about when he believes the world will return to normal, Sahin said, "We need a new definition of 'normal'. The virus will stay with us for the next 10 years. We need to get used to the fact there'll be more outbreaks."

    The 'new normal', Sahin explained, would mean that countries do not have to go under lockdown. "This winter, we will not have an impact on the infection numbers. But we must have an impact so that next winter can be the new normal," he said.

    Talking about whether vaccinating 60-70 per cent of the world's population would prevent future outbreaks, Sahin said that if the virus mutates, a higher uptake of the vaccine would be required to return to normal.

    BioNTech is aiming to find if the vaccine is effective against the new strain of coronavirus discovered in the UK. Sahin said that the company would need another two weeks to see if the vaccine can stop the mutant coronavirus strain. He said that scientifically it is likely that the immune response generated by the vaccine can deal with the virus. Sahin said that the BioNTech vaccine contains over 1,270 amino acids and only nine of them are changed in the mutant virus. He said that 99 per cent of the protein is still the same.

    The new coronavirus strain has caused panic around the globe. More than 40 countries have suspended their flights to and from the UK. In India, separate SOPs have been issued for passengers who have arrived from the country. UK passengers are also rigorously tracked and tested to ensure there is no coronavirus symptom. Meanwhile, as per reports a separate mutant strain has emerged in South Africa.
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.

    https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
    RIVA
    RIVA --- ---
    Welcome | PCR Claims.co.uk
    https://pcrclaims.co.uk/videos
    RIVA
    RIVA --- ---
    Martin Armstrong: Elites Ushering in Communism 3.0 Kickstarted By Another World War
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K6RwoA3EDs
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Why The WHO Faked A Pandemic - Forbes.com
    https://web.archive.org/...rganization-swine-flu-pandemic-opinions-contributors-michael-fumento.html

    Michael Fumento, 02.05.10, 04:35 PM EST
    The agency needed to bounce back after the avian flu embarrassment.

    The World Health Organization has suddenly gone from crying "The sky is falling!" like a cackling Chicken Little to squealing like a stuck pig. The reason: charges that the agency deliberately fomented swine flu hysteria. "The world is going through a real pandemic. The description of it as a fake is wrong and irresponsible," the agency claims on its Web site. A WHO spokesman declined to specify who or what gave this "description," but the primary accuser is hard to ignore.

    The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), a human rights watchdog, is publicly investigating the WHO's motives in declaring a pandemic. Indeed, the chairman of its influential health committee, epidemiologist Wolfgang Wodarg, has declared that the "false pandemic" is "one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century."


    Even within the agency, the director of the WHO Collaborating Center for Epidemiology in Munster, Germany, Dr. Ulrich Kiel, has essentially labeled the pandemic a hoax. "We are witnessing a gigantic misallocation of resources [$18 billion so far] in terms of public health," he said.

    They're right. This wasn't merely overcautiousness or simple misjudgment. The pandemic declaration and all the Klaxon-ringing since reflect sheer dishonesty motivated not by medical concerns but political ones.

    Unquestionably, swine flu has proved to be vastly milder than ordinary seasonal flu. It kills at a third to a tenth the rate, according to U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates. Data from other countries like France and Japan indicate it's far tamer than that.

    Indeed, judging by what we've seen in New Zealand and Australia (where the epidemics have ended), and by what we're seeing elsewhere in the world, we'll have considerably fewer flu deaths this season than normal. That's because swine flu muscles aside seasonal flu, acting as a sort of inoculation against the far deadlier strain.

    Did the WHO have any indicators of this mildness when it declared the pandemic in June?

    Absolutely, as I wrote at the time. We were then fully 11 weeks into the outbreak and swine flu had only killed 144 people worldwide--the same number who die of seasonal flu worldwide every few hours. (An estimated 250,000 to 500,000 per year by the WHO's own numbers.) The mildest pandemics of the 20th century killed at least a million people.

    But how could the organization declare a pandemic when its own official definition required "simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness." Severity--that is, the number of deaths--is crucial, because every year flu causes "a global spread of disease."

    Easy. In May, in what it admitted was a direct response to the outbreak of swine flu the month before, WHO promulgated a new definition matched to swine flu that simply eliminated severity as a factor. You could now have a pandemic with zero deaths.

    Under fire, the organization is boldly lying about the change, to which anybody with an Internet connection can attest. In a mid-January virtual conference WHO swine flu chief Keiji Fukuda stated: "Did WHO change its definition of a pandemic? The answer is no: WHO did not change its definition." Two weeks later at a PACE conference he insisted: "Having severe deaths has never been part of the WHO definition."

    They did it; but why?

    In part, it was CYA for the WHO. The agency was losing credibility over the refusal of avian flu H5N1 to go pandemic and kill as many as 150 million people worldwide, as its "flu czar" had predicted in 2005.

    Around the world nations heeded the warnings and spent vast sums developing vaccines and making other preparations. So when swine flu conveniently trotted in, the WHO essentially crossed out "avian," inserted "swine," and WHO Director-General Margaret Chan arrogantly boasted, "The world can now reap the benefits of investments over the last five years in pandemic preparedness."

    But there's more than bureaucratic self-interest at work here. Bizarrely enough, the WHO has also exploited its phony pandemic to push a hard left political agenda.

    In a September speech WHO Director-General Chan said "ministers of health" should take advantage of the "devastating impact" swine flu will have on poorer nations to get out the message that "changes in the functioning of the global economy" are needed to "distribute wealth on the basis of" values "like community, solidarity, equity and social justice." She further declared it should be used as a weapon against "international policies and systems that govern financial markets, economies, commerce, trade and foreign affairs."


    Chan's dream now lies in tatters. All the WHO has done, says PACE's Wodart, is to destroy "much of the credibility that they should have, which is invaluable to us if there's a future scare that might turn out to be a killer on a large scale."

    // clanek byl smazany v rijnu 2020, kdyz ho zacali lidi odkazovat na socialnich sitich.
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Ta sama vakcína, o které pochybovali jenom mašíblové jako Klaus a konspirační teoretikové, nakonec skutečně řadě lidem život zničila.
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Narcolepsy fiasco spurs Covid vaccine fears in Sweden
    https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-11-narcolepsy-fiasco-spurs-covid-vaccine.html


    Take a vaccine developed in haste? Never again, says Meissa Chebbi, who, like hundreds of other young Swedes suffered debilitating narcolepsy after a mass vaccination campaign against the 2009-2010 swine flu pandemic.

    The experience has shaken Swedes' confidence in any future vaccine against the new coronavirus, compounding fears about unknown long-term side effects.

    "I will never recommend that," 21-year-old Chebbi told AFP when asked about taking a speedily developed vaccine. "Unless you really have to take it because of life-threatening circumstances."


    The Swedish case highlights the complex task governments face in rolling out vaccines against the coronavirus, especially at a time when rabid social media misinformation is feeding scepticism in state institutions and even about the disease itself.

    The trauma over vaccines is particularly notable in Sweden, which normally boasts participation of more than 90 percent in its voluntary children's vaccination programme.

    But a recent survey conducted by the Novus polling institute suggested that 26 percent of Swedes do not plan to take any of the COVID-19 vaccines being developed and 28 percent are undecided.

    Forty-six percent said they would get a jab.

    Of those opposed, 87 percent said it was due to fears over as-yet unknown side effects.

    Health authorities in the Scandinavian country in 2009 urged the public to voluntarily take the Pandemrix vaccine against swine flu, made by British drug company GlaxoSmithKline.

    More than 60 percent heeded the call—the highest level in the world.

    But Chebbi and hundreds of others, primarily children and young adults under 30, were later diagnosed with narcolepsy as a side effect of the vaccine.

    A link was eventually established to an adjuvant, or booster, in the Pandemrix vaccine which was intended to strengthen the immune response.


    Narcolepsy is a chronic disorder of the nervous system that causes excessive and often uncontrollable drowsiness.

    "I have sleep attacks all the time in all kinds of situations and at inappropriate times... In my food, at job interviews, at lectures, seminars, at university. I've fallen asleep at my workplace, I fall asleep on buses and everywhere," Chebbi says.

    "It has destroyed my life."

    The Swedish Pharmaceutical Insurance has so far approved 440 of 702 narcolepsy claims linked to Pandemrix, paying out a total of 100 million kronor (9.8 million euros, $11.6 million) in compensation.

    Side effects accompany all vaccines, but serious ones are proportionally very rare, as with the narcolepsy cases in Sweden.

    The effectiveness of vaccines are also widely agreed upon and they have led to the eradication of many diseases.

    'If only we had known'

    Anders Tegnell, Sweden's state epidemiologist and the face of the country's controversial 'softer' response to the new coronavirus, was among a group of experts at the Board of Health who called for the mass vaccination in 2009-2010.

    "Of course the decision would have been completely different if we had known about the side effects. But they were completely unknown, they were a surprise to everybody," Tegnell told AFP in an interview.


    "There has been an international consensus for many years that the best thing to do during a pandemic is to vaccinate, and that's really the only long-term solution we have."

    Babis Stefanides, a 36-year-old Stockholm resident, said he's too wary to take a COVID jab.

    "I'm not planning to take the vaccine," he told AFP. "There are just too many questions."

    Tegnell said he understood Swedes' concerns.

    "Of course when you have a new vaccine that we don't know very much about yet—against a disease that we don't know very much about—everybody ... wants to have more information before they make a decision on this," he said.

    "We are going to inform about these vaccines when we know a little bit more about them."

    Tegnell ruled out making any future vaccine mandatory.

    According to the director of the Swedish Public Health Agency, Johan Carlson, 60 to 70 percent of the population would have to be vaccinated in order to stop the spread of the virus.

    "Everyone needs to have a think and decide what to do. Usually in Sweden, most people end up getting vaccinated," Carlson told Swedish Television on Sunday.

    In a bid to assuage fears, Sweden plans to set up a register to quickly detect any side effects from a future COVID vaccine.

    Solidarity in question

    Hannah Laine, a 37-year-old social worker in Stockholm, said she, her husband and their three kids would definitely be getting the vaccine—despite her fears.

    "If it's approved for the market and we notice that the public health agency and society is saying that we should take the vaccine, we'll do it," she told AFP.

    "We have to take our moral responsibility for the elderly and the sick. We'll take it, maybe not for our sake but for society's."

    That kind of thinking worries Elisabeth Widell, chairperson of the Narcolepsy Association.

    She says health authorities were not wrong to call for a mass vaccination in 2009, but they appealed too heavily to Swedes' sense of solidarity and she hopes they won't do that again.

    "People who choose not to get vaccinated should not be blamed and shamed. Because it's not mandatory, which means it's a free choice."

    She urged Swedes to "do your own risk and benefit analysis".

    Narcolepsy sufferer Chebbi remains determined.

    "I'm not going to take the (COVID) vaccine until after about five years when we know what the risks are."



    // Hmm Svedi si vymysleli konspiracni teorii, ze jsou nemocni, po posledni masove vakcinaci.
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Potential for 'massive oversight' of women’s reproductive rights in Covid-19 vaccine rollout plans
    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40188369.html

    Pregnant healthcare, education, and frontline services workers may be excluded from Government Covid-19 vaccine rollout plans due to the lack of safety trials on the vaccines’ impacts on pregnancy, fertility, and lactation.

    Care-home staff and frontline healthcare workers are amongst the first due for the jab when it arrives on Irish shores, according to a provisional Vaccine Allocation Strategy approved by Nphet and signed off on by Cabinet on Tuesday.

    However, the plan lists “pregnant women” as a separate and final category, alongside children.

    Pregnant and lactating healthcare, frontline, and educational workers will likely be recommended not to take the vaccine.

    Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine, currently being rolled out in the UK, is untested for safety amongst pregnant and lactating women, no animal trials into reproductive toxicity have been completed, and no tests on the impacts of the vaccine on fertility have been conducted. The same goes for Moderna and AstraZeneca vaccines.

    Safety information released by the UK’s medicines regulator to medical staff administering the Pfizer vaccine states women should not be vaccinated if they are pregnant or lactating. It also says women should avoid pregnancy for three months during and after the two-shot vaccination process.

    “Pregnant women and children were not part of the cohorts tested during the current candidate Covid-19 vaccine trials, therefore there are no safety data for the administration of these vaccines in those cohorts at this time,” the Irish Department of Health confirmed in an emailed statement.

    Vaccines for Ireland are still awaiting authorisation from the European Medicines Agency, and the overall strategy and implementation plan is still being finalised, the email said.

    However, a maternity rights organisation has said that the provisional allocation plan represents a “lack of joined-up thinking” regarding women’s reproductive rights and workers’ rights.

    “We now have a large cohort of people who, for their own safety, the safety of their fertility, and the safety of their babies, are prevented from taking a vaccine,” said Association for Improvement in Maternity Services (Aims) chairperson Dr Krysia Lynch.

    “If you include all those breastfeeding, planning pregnancy, or who will become pregnant without planning a pregnancy, that’s a very sizable cohort with a huge overlap with those who provide our frontline services, who are top of the list to be vaccinated.”

    Dr Lynch said the absence of safety data amounted to a “massive oversight” when it came to women’s reproductive rights.

    “It’s incredible that during the fast-tracking of this vaccine, no-one raised this issue that this vaccine isn’t suitable for people planning a pregnancy, for people who might accidentally get pregnant, for people who want to conceive in coming years, for people who are breastfeeding, for people who are between pregnancies,” said Dr Lynch.

    As well as impacting the rights of pregnant workers across many sectors, Dr Lynch said the lack of research left knock-on impacts in other areas of women’s reproductive rights, such as planning for future families.

    “Having to decide to prioritise your immediate health by opting for a vaccine, or prioritise your fertility by planning a pregnancy: that’s a large decision to make and there isn’t enough information there for people to make that decision,” she said.

    Given the lack of safety studies on pregnancy, fertility, and lactation, Ms Lynch said the “rhetoric with respect to the vaccine needs to change to reflect risks it may present to a very large population in this country.”

    Any attempt to make Covid-19 vaccination mandatory, or to restrict access to services such as travel for people who opt out of taking the vaccine due to pregnancy, lactation, or fertility concerns would be discriminatory and could leave women “excluded from rights only afforded to those who can prove positive uptake of the vaccination, as well as from the positive effects of vaccination,” she said.

    A spokesperson for Pfizer’s corporate affairs department said recommendations as to which groups should be vaccinated were drawn up by the relevant jurisdiction’s health regulator on the basis of the company’s research, and that Pfizer did not itself make such recommendations.
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    The Future of Vaccines
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/UQvaQFdGLn8/

    Episode 392 – The Future of Vaccines : The Corbett Report
    https://www.corbettreport.com/futurevaccines/
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Z pametove diry :

    SARS-Like Virus Vaccine Unlikely, Experts Say
    https://abcnews.go.com/Health/sars-virus-vaccine-experts/story?id=19168004

    May 14, 2013— -- A virus similar to SARS has spread through hospitals in Europe and the Middle East, prompting fears of human-to-human transmission.

    But health officials said vaccines were unlikely to play a role in controlling the outbreak, which has sickened 34 people and killed 18.

    Instead, they've focused on detecting the novel coronavirus, dubbed nCoV, and have quickly isolated patients.

    "Because of the challenges with developing medicines for coronaviruses, those are the most effective measures we have at this point," Gregory Hartl at the World Health Organization told ABCNews.com.

    The tactic worked in the fight against SARS, or severe acute respiratory syndrome, a coronavirus that killed 775 people during a 19-month outbreak a decade ago. The virus, which spread through coughs and sneezes, vanished in May 2004.

    "Once we figured out that infection control worked to stop the transmission, people started to get serious about it," said Thomas Ksiazek, who served as chief of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Special Pathogens Branch during the SARS outbreak. "We were pretty lucky, but the key was infection control and mindfulness."

    Ksiazek, who is currently a professor in the department of pathology at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, said "mindfulness" is key once again, as a vaccine for nCoV could take years to develop and test.

    "The thing that really takes time is the regulation aspect of it," he said, describing the lengthy process of proving safety and efficacy in animal models before even thinking about testing in humans.

    It also takes money, and lots of it, according to Dr. Robert Atmar, who studied candidate vaccines for SARS.

    "To bring a vaccine all the way through clinical development and licensure, it's going to cost tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars," said Atmar, a professor in the departments of medicine and molecular virology and biology at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston. "So part of the decision to go down that pathway will be driven by how important the pathway is.

    "There was no vaccine for SARS," Atmar said. "But the public health system was able to control the infection and basically eradicate it. That might also work for this new coronavirus."

    But it's more than a matter of time and money. Coronaviruses, prickly pathogens that invade the body through the respiratory tract, are notoriously difficult when it comes to vaccine development, according to Atmar. Some of the candidate vaccines for SARS caused lung damage in mice exposed to the virus.

    "We don't know why. And that's the problem," said Atmar, co-author of a 2012 study published in the journal PLoS One. "The concern is that if these vaccines were to be used in people, they could end up causing harm."


    So for now, experts agree that early detection and patient isolation are the best way to curb the spread of the novel coronavirus. The good news, for lack of a better term, is the virus is nowhere nearly as infectious as SARS, according to WHO's Hartl.

    "One of the big differences between the novel coronavirus and SARS is the fact that SARS transmission was much better than this," Hartl said, adding that human-to-human transmission of nCoV appears to be limited to patients with prolonged contact in closed spaces, such as hospital rooms.

    "From that point of view, it's a lot easier to isolate cases and stop the transmission," Hartl said.

    At 1 p.m., ET today, ABC News' chief health and medical editor, Dr. Richard Besser, will moderate a tweet chat to explain which vaccinations adults should get, at what age and why. Guest tweeters include the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Medical Association, the Mayo Clinic and the Sabin Institute. Major hospitals and research centers from all over the country will also be tweeting need-to-know information.
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/.../file/948101/Temporary_Authorisation_HCP_Information.pdf

    4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
    Pregnancy
    There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2.
    Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed.
    COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine
    BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.
    For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women
    of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.
    Breast-feeding
    It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to
    the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used
    during breast-feeding.
    Fertility
    It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.
    LUKK
    LUKK --- ---
    LUKK: já vím není to zrovna relevantní přispění do auditka, ale chci tím říct že zdrogovaná mysl spojuje informace skoro až nahodile...Alex Jones je extrém...
    LUKK
    LUKK --- ---
    Alex Jones - Aliens Are Interdimensional | Joe Rogan
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5qbaxYhbL8
    LUKK
    LUKK --- ---
    RIVA: ovšem best one ze všech konspirátorů co vypadá že, buď :mozkové buňky ztrácí anebo je právě nabírá, je u mne ALEX JONES!!! Aneb všechny konspirační teorie v jedné větě za mohutného skřípání zubů....
    RIVA
    RIVA --- ---
    LUKK: To mi pripomelo komentar byvaleho kolegy na tema lidi od nas z firmy, kteri si stezovali jak moc velky strach maji z Covidu a pritom o vikendech sjizdeli levnej koks po dekach :D
    LUKK
    LUKK --- ---
    RIVA: velmi zajímavé...zároveň vidím člověka co futruje kokain(nebo jiný speed):(
    RIVA
    RIVA --- ---
    cryptogon.com » PCR: Positive Count Rising
    https://www.cryptogon.com/?p=60348
    RIVA
    RIVA --- ---
    Instagram‘s New Terms of Service - Not Sketchy at All!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhSX7IzHkrE


    Instagram protects you the way Bill Cosby protects women! :'D
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam