• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    GORGworld conspiracy // 911 // free world order! ... part 5 ::
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Uncensored: Smart City Locations & Agenda EXPOSED!!! - Zeee Media
    https://zeeemedia.com/interview/uncensored-smart-city-locations-agenda-exposed/
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    What's human composting? Eco-friendly alternative to burial, cremation
    https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/16/what-is-human-composting-eco-friendly-alternative-to-burial-cremation.html

    When Michelle Skaff dies, she’s going to turn into dirt.

    The 31-year-old is a client of Return Home, a Seattle-area human composting facility. Its futuristic-looking vessels full of organic material like straw, alfalfa and sawdust can turn human bodies back into soil by mimicking natural decomposition processes, the company says.

    Skaff is very much alive, and plans to be for a long time. She signed up for the company’s “pre-planning” services, starting a payment plan that’ll enable her to eventually become compost.

    The reason: Burials and cremations carry heavy environmental tolls. Burials require embalming bodies in toxic solutions, plus an indefinite use of land, and cremations result in millions of tons of carbon dioxide emissions annually.

    Over the last 15 years, the rate of cremation in the U.S. almost doubled, to 57%.

    Many of human composting’s advocates are relatively young. The first five people to sign up for Return Home’s pre-planning services were under age 35, according to CEO Micah Truman.

    At Recompose, another Seattle-based facility, 25% of pre-planning clients are between 20 to 49 years old, says founder Katrina Spade. That’s a lot for a service primarily devoted to the recently deceased.

    For some clients, these companies present unparalleled opportunity. Experts who study decomposition and the environmental impact of dead bodies agree.

    “My first reaction was: Why haven’t we done this before?” says Jennifer DeBruyn, an environmental microbiology professor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. “It’s not really a new idea. It’s just new-ish that we’re applying it to humans.”

    Human composting is legal in six states and counting
    On a rapidly warming planet, the somewhat fringe concept is inching toward the mainstream. Human composting, also called “natural organic reduction,” is now legal in six states and counting.

    Washington was first, in 2019. Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, California and New York soon followed. You don’t need to live where it’s legal to take advantage: Some of Return Home’s clients will have their bodies flown to Washington after they die.

    “We’ve got 29-year-olds in Miami signing up,” Truman says. “Young people are going to teach us how to die better.”

    But legalization is only the first step, proponents say. The next big hurdle is getting more people on board with the concept.

    That’s where TikTok comes in.

    Return Home, for example, has a robust presence on the platform, with more than 570,000 followers watching videos about what happens to the soil, where the bones go and other common questions.


    It’s an accessible way to learn the basics, clear up misconceptions and identify benefits beyond the environmental, says Tabitha Ogren, a 39-year-old TikTok user-turned-Return Home client.

    Ogren was drawn to the idea of alleviating future burdens on her family, noting the expenses and stress of funerals she’d previously planned. “Not having to decide what to do after I pass away is ... that last gift I can give to them,” she says.

    The sign-up process was easy: Ogren called the company, discussed options for the final location of her soil and determined a payment plan. “They pretty much did 98% of it over the phone,” she says.

    Skaff, who used the same process, asked the company to call her again a few months later to make sure her decision wasn’t rash. By then, she knew it felt right.

    “No matter what happens the rest of my life — if I do have kids, if I don’t have kids, no matter what my family looks like in the future — it’s on no one else to [plan for my death],” she says.

    Detractors are increasingly voicing their concerns
    Nina Schoen first learned about Recompose in 2017, two years before human composting was even legal in Washington. Attracted by the sustainability factor, she became one of Recompose’s first-ever clients after the facility opened to the public in 2020.

    “Anything I can do today to have an impact [down the road] is meaningful,” Schoen, 52, says.

    But she knows it’s a potentially controversial choice. Burials have helped humans process death for millennia, a process codified in multiple major religions. Cremation, popularized in America as recently as the Civil War, is notably common in modern-day Catholicism.

    Schoen says she’s openly discussed her decision with family and friends, including her 10-year-old daughter. She’s also careful not to force her views on others. “There’s so much tradition, and everyone’s perspective here is different,” she says.

    Recompose's futuristic-looking composting vessels.
    Recompose’s futuristic-looking composting vessels.Recompose
    That cultural headwind is intensifying. Despite what Truman calls the “remarkable” speed of legislation thus far, detractors are making their voices heard.

    “It is inappropriate to suddenly introduce a completely different method, with no input from the public, religious communities, or anyone else outside of the state Capitol,” the New York State Catholic Conference wrote in a letter to Gov. Kathy Hochul, three weeks before she legalized human composting in the state.

    The New York State Funeral Directors Association, which represents more than 950 funeral homes across the state, also opposed the legislation — seemingly for a more practical reason.

    “As written, it excludes funeral homes from having the option of owning [or] operating a facility necessary to provide this service to families,” the organization tells CNBC Make It via email, adding: “We simply deserve the opportunity to provide the service to those families seeking natural organic reduction.”

    It’s not really a new idea. It’s just new-ish that we’re applying it to humans.
    Jennifer DeBruyn
    PROFESSOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE
    Truman cautiously likens the human composting industry’s roadmap to the legal cannabis industry’s ongoing expansion. Companies in both fields lack access to bank loans and other traditional methods of financing without federal legalization — but recreational cannabis, now legal in 21 states, has momentum.

    Others aren’t quite as optimistic. DeBruyn, for example, predicts that human composting won’t become commonplace anytime soon.

    That still won’t stop a subset of people who want to “do better after death,” she says. “The end product is some soil. We could always use more soil. At the end of the day, it’s always going to be a better option than a graveyard.”
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Pokles porodnosti po očkování | Zuzana Krátká
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGHiiNcYHQ8
    XMEDA
    XMEDA --- ---
    RAGAMUFF: Co je na tom vytahu konspiracniho?
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/04/ukraine-war-live-updates-latest-news-on-russia-and-the-war-in-ukraine.html

    Russia has been accused of staging an alleged drone attack on the Kremlin that it blamed on Ukraine, with Ukraine with analysts saying it’s likely Moscow carried out the “attack” itself.
    RIVA
    RIVA --- ---
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    How is This a Thing? 17th of April 2023
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/7l53CqTSBwQQ

    ECB’s Lagarde gets pranked, reveals digital euro will have ‘limited’ control
    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ecb-lagarde-gets-pranked-reveals-135218145.html
    Fast facts
    “We are considering whether for very small amounts, anything that is around €300 [or] €400, we could have a mechanism where there is zero control, but that could be dangerous,” said Lagarde, recalling a previous terrorist attack in France that was believed to be financed by rechargeable and anonymous credit cards.

    Late last month, the European Union introduced new cash payment limits of €7,000 (US$7,645). The cap is lower in some member states of the EU, such as €1,000 in France and Italy. The region also imposes restrictions on anonymous crypto asset transfers over €1,000.

    Lagarde also said in the video that the decision on the digital euro is expected to be made this coming October.

    The prank call and its resulting revelations come amid a larger discussion about CBDCs and the role they may play in the future of global finance. While some see CBDCs as a way to modernize and streamline financial systems, others have expressed concern about the potential for government overreach and loss of privacy.

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who recently filed to run for U.S. president in 2024 as a Democrat, shared his concerns on CBDCs via Twitter on Wednesday.

    “A CBDC tied to digital ID and social credit score will allow the government to freeze your assets or limit your spending to approved vendors if you fail to comply with arbitrary diktats, i.e. vaccine mandates.” Kennedy’s verified account tweeted.

    “The Fed will initially limit its CBDC to interbank transactions but we should not be blind to the obvious danger that this is the first step in banning and seizing Bitcoin as the Treasury did with gold 90 years ago today in 1933.”

    At least 114 countries are currently exploring CBDC developments, according to the Atlantic Council.

    Prank with the President of the European Central Bank Christine Lagarde (Vovan and Lexus) full
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtrNk2jHyVM
    VOYAGER
    VOYAGER --- ---
    Celým světem Mamon vládne, jemu náš se klaní věk, celou zeměkoulí točí průmysl a výdělek.
    LOOKASH_II
    LOOKASH_II --- ---
    https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/30/meditations-on-moloch/

    ....
    5. Capitalism. Imagine a capitalist in a cutthroat industry. He employs workers in a sweatshop to sew garments, which he sells at minimal profit. Maybe he would like to pay his workers more, or give them nicer working conditions. But he can’t, because that would raise the price of his products and he would be outcompeted by his cheaper rivals and go bankrupt. Maybe many of his rivals are nice people who would like to pay their workers more, but unless they have some kind of ironclad guarantee that none of them are going to defect by undercutting their prices they can’t do it.

    Like the rats, who gradually lose all values except sheer competition, so companies in an economic environment of sufficiently intense competition are forced to abandon all values except optimizing-for-profit or else be outcompeted by companies that optimized for profit better and so can sell the same service at a lower price.

    (I’m not really sure how widely people appreciate the value of analogizing capitalism to evolution. Fit companies – defined as those that make the customer want to buy from them – survive, expand, and inspire future efforts, and unfit companies – defined as those no one wants to buy from – go bankrupt and die out along with their company DNA. The reasons Nature is red and tooth and claw are the same reasons the market is ruthless and exploitative)

    From a god’s-eye-view, we can contrive a friendly industry where every company pays its workers a living wage. From within the system, there’s no way to enact it.

    (Moloch whose love is endless oil and stone! Moloch whose blood is running money!)
    .....
    RIVA
    RIVA --- ---
    RIVA
    RIVA --- ---
    Neodpustím si trochu zatrollit... ;)

    RIVA
    RIVA --- ---
    ALWA: jako vážně
    HNILOB: lidí, ještírci, psi, hlasovat může kdokoliv...

    Vy za tím hledáte hlubší význam, nebo politiku, nebo co. Mě to zajímá jen z hlediska statistiky. Na odpovědi samotné mi nezáleží.
    HNILOB
    HNILOB --- ---
    ALWA: Lidi s alikvotním tónem se samozrejme učastnit nemohou ;)
    ALWA
    ALWA --- ---
    RIVA: Jako vážně?
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    BEYOND THE RESET - Animated Short Film
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWkepoLUZfs
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    “Right To Housing”…The Loss of Private Property Rights
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/vrRI3H1cNlIy/
    RIVA
    RIVA --- ---
    Zacinam pres kourove signaly slychat o celosevetove se plnicich skladech noveho antivirotika Peramivir. Zazracneho leciva proti nove, mega destruktivni vlne ptaci chripky, ktera je pry naspadnuti...?
    ARRAKIS
    ARRAKIS --- ---
    29.03.2023
    Cyber Storm Predicted at the 2023 World Economic Forum
    https://securityintelligence.com/articles/cyber-storm-predicted-at-the-2023-world-economic-forum/?web_view=true

    According to the Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2023, 93% of cybersecurity leaders and 86% of business leaders think a far-reaching, catastrophic cyber event is at least somewhat likely in the next two years. Additionally, 43% of organizational leaders think it is likely that a cyberattack will affect their organization severely in the next two years.

    With cybersecurity concerns on everyone’s mind, the topic received top billing at the recent World Economic Forum’s Annual Meeting 2023 in Davos, Switzerland. At the meeting, Matthew Prince, the CEO of Cloudflare, emphasized the enormous amount of cyber insecurity around the world. He also predicted that 2023 will be a busy year in terms of cyberattacks. Other leaders echoed his sentiments and concerns throughout the meeting.

    “There’s a gathering cyber storm,” Sadie Creese, a professor of cybersecurity at the University of Oxford, said during an interview at the meeting. “This storm is brewing, and it’s really hard to anticipate just how bad that will be.”

    Leaders’ Response to Increasing Threats
    In addition to the increase in attacks, leaders are concerned that world conditions make a serious cyber event more likely. Not surprisingly, world unrest is a top reason for the increased focus on cybersecurity. The majority of organizations (74%) reported that global geopolitical instability has influenced their cyber strategy “moderately” or “substantially”. Additionally, their biggest concerns regarding cyberattacks are business continuity (67%) and reputational damage (65%).

    The report found that leaders plan to take quick action in response to the predicted increase in threats. The top response is to strengthen controls on third parties with access to their environments (73%), with controlling access to data coming in second at 66%. Half of the leaders also plan to re-evaluate the countries that they do business with. When you do business with an organization or government with lacking policies and security, you inherit their risk into your organization.

    Fighting the Cyber Storm
    Reducing the risk of a debilitating and global attack requires working together and creating a targeted plan. Jürgen Stock, the secretary-general of the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), said in Davos that there needs to be extensive collaboration across countries and corporations.

    “This is a global threat, and it calls for a global response and enhanced and coordinated action,” Stock said. “The key to winning the battle against cyber crime is, of course, to work together to make it a priority across the geopolitical fault lines.”

    Additionally, organizations, jurisdictions and governments must proactively take precautions to reduce their own risk. According to the report, the threat is not just to governments or enterprises. Any company — even a small business — that handles consumer data is at risk. Larger organizations that do business with smaller companies should evaluate their partners’ cyber risk. If a vendor experiences business disruption, that affects partners’ ability to serve their customers as well.

    Collaboration within organizations, especially structured interactions, is also crucial. The report found that 56% of security leaders meet with their board at least monthly. However, respondents felt that more needs to be done to close the gap between business and security teams.

    Resilience, Not Just Security
    Many leaders focus on security, meaning keeping their organization from becoming a victim of a cyberattack. However, cyberattacks are now a “when not if” event. In addition to reducing vulnerabilities, organizations and governments should ensure that they can quickly recover from an attack to get back to serving their customers or citizens.

    “We need to accept that this is really about cyber resilience,” Creese shared at the meeting. “There is no such thing as a hundred percent security. It’s about resilience in the face of insecurity.”
    RIVA
    RIVA --- ---
    GORG: Jasny, presne tak jsem to myslel. Jen trocha statistiky
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam