• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    GORGworld conspiracy // 911 // new world order ... part 3 :: Love your local Illuminati :)
    MARSHUS
    MARSHUS --- ---
    POTLAČENÁ PRAVDA?
    Otazníky kolem 11. září
    http://blisty.cz/2005/9/13/art24946.html
    PETVAL
    PETVAL --- ---
    Time For Ford Foundation & CFR To Divest?
    by bob feldman
    8 October 2002



    Like MIT and Harvard University, the Ford Foundation and the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR] also may invest in Big Oil stock, U.S. war machine stock, and in the stock of U.S. corporations that do business under the Sharon regime in Israel/Palestine. One way to more effectively resist the U.S. Establishment's militaristic foreign policy might be to seriously demand that MIT, Harvard, the Ford Foundation and the Council on Foreign Relations divest themselves of their Big Oil, war machine and Israeli-linked corporate stockholdings.

    Some of the investment income which the multi-billion dollar Ford Foundation may gain from its investment in Big Oil, war machine stock and Israeli-linked corporations is used to pay excessively high salaries to Ford Foundation executives. Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations member Susan Berresford, for instance, was paid an annual salary of $615,934 (plus an additional $114,095 in benefits) in 2001 by the "non-profit" Ford Foundation for serving as the Ford Foundation President. The chief investment officer of the Ford Foundation (who also moonlights as the Ms.Foundation for Women board member responsible for managing that "non-profit" group's investment portfolio), Linda Strump, was paid an even greater annual salary in 2001 of $890,217 by the "non-profit" Ford Foundation.

    Some of the Ford Foundation's investment income is also used to fund the alternative media work of groups that generally exclude 9/11 conspiracy journalists and researchers from their radio and tv shows, such as FAIR and DEMOCRACY NOW/Deep Dish TV/Pacifica. And an even greater portion of the Ford Foundation's investment income is used to help fund the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR] Inc. which has played an especially influential role in developing the U.S. Establishment's militaristic foreign policy
    --in addition to (like the Ford Foundation) receiving dividends from a stock portfolio which may contain Big Oil, war machine and Israeli-linked stock. As Thomas Dye noted in a book that was published during the Bush I Administration, entitled WHO'S RUNNING AMERICA? THE BUSH ERA:
    The most influential policy-planning group in foreign affairs is the Council on Foreign Relations [CFR]...The CFR by-laws limit membership to 1,900 individuals who are proposed by existing members...The CFR's list of former members includes every person of influence in foreign affairs...CFR meetings are secret...A discussion of the CFR would be incomplete without some reference to its multinational arm, the Trilateral Commission...The Trilateral Commission was established by CFR Board Chairman David Rockefeller in 1972, with the backing of the Council and the Rockefeller Foundation.

    THE CIA AND THE CULT OF INTELLIGENCE by Victor Marchetti and John Marks also made the following reference to the Council on Foreign Relations:
    It was no accident that former Clandestine Services Chief Richard Bissell...was talking to a Council on Foreign Relations discussion group in 1968 when he made his 'confidential' speech on covert action. For the influential but private Council, composed of several hundred of the country's top political, military, business and academic leaders, has long been the CIA's principal 'constituency' in the American public. When the agency has needed prominent citizens to front for its proprietary companies or for other special assistance, it has often turned to Council members.

    Former Ford Foundation executive and CIA official Bissell apparently told the Council on Foreign Relations discussion group the following in 1968:
    If the agency is to be effective, it will have to make use of private institutions on an expanding scale, though those relations which have been 'blown' cannot be resurrected. We need to operate under deeper cover, with increased attention to the use of 'cut-outs' (i.e., intermediaries). CIA's interface with the rest of the world needs to be better protected. If various groups hadn't been aware of the source of their funding, the damage subsequent to disclosure might have been far less than occurred. The CIA interface with various private groups, including business and student groups, must be remedied.
    (quote contained in THE PIED PIPER: ALLARD K. LOWENSTEIN AND THE LIBERAL DREAM by Richard Cummings)

    Seventeen years before he moved into the Ford Foundation presidential office, the now-deceased former Ford Foundation President, McGeorge Bundy, also worked with the Council on Foreign Relations. As NATION magazine contributing editor Kai Bird recalled in his MacArthur Foundation, LBJ Foundation and Rockefeller Foundation-subsidized book THE COLOR OF TRUTH: MC GEORGE BUNDY AND WILLIAM BUNDY: BROTHERS IN ARMS:

    [In 1949,] Mac took on a project with the Council on Foreign Relations in New York to study Marshall Plan aid to Europe...The council's study group on aid to Europe included some of the foreign policy establishment's leading figures. Working with young Bundy on the project were Allen Dulles, David Lilienthal, Dwight Eisenhower, Will Clayton, George Kennan, Richard M. Bissell and Franklin A. Lindsay. Dulles, Bissell and Lindsay...would shortly become high-ranking officials of the newly formed Central Intelligence Agency...Their meetings were considered so sensitive that the usual off-the-record transcript was not distributed to council members. There was good reason for the secrecy. These were probably the only private citizens privy to the highly classified fact that there was a covert side to the Marshall Plan. Specifically, the CIA was tapping into the $200 million a year in local currency counterpart funds contributed by the recipients of Marshall Plan aid. These unvouchered monies were being used by the CIA to finance anti-communist electoral activities in France and Italy and to support sympathetic journalists, labor union leaders and politicians.

    Both Bundy brothers were also good friends of Frank Wisner, the legendary intelligence officer who ran these covert programs in Western Europe. They socialized with Wisner and his...wife Polly, often at dinner parties hosted by Joe Alsop...Phil and Kay Graham of the WASHINGTON POST were also part of the same social scenery. In short, the council's study group placed Mac Bundy among a small group of like-minded men who fully understood and endorsed the necessity for waging psychological warfare against the Soviet Union.

    The policy paper Mac wrote that summer, "Working Paper on the Problem of Political Equilibrium," assumed that such covert activities in Western Europe were worthy endeavors.

    THE COLOR OF TRUTH book also contains the following additional reference to the ties between former Ford Foundation President Bundy, the CIA and the Council on Foreign Relations:
    Bundy...thought it only natural that the historian William L. Langer...had taken a leave from Harvard to organize the CIA's Office of National Estimates [ONE]...Langer had gone to Washington at the call of the CIA and promptly hired Mac's brother Bill as one of his top aides. They were old friends and political allies...Mac had published a review in THE REPORTER of a massive two volume study of America's entry into World War II written by Langer and S. Everett Gleason. Langer had finished the project while at the CIA and Gleason was a high-ranking official in the National Security Council. Bundy called it a "magnificent achievement...so thorough that it will never be done again"...Funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Council on Foreign Relations to the tune of $139,000--an extraordinary sum in those years--and written with privileged acces to classified documents, the Langer-Gleason volumes were official history parading as independent scholarship...

    According to a chapter entitled "How The Power Elite Make Foreign Policy" that appeared in the 1970 book THE HIGHER CIRCLES by G. William Domhoff, the Ford Foundation-subsidized Council on Foreign Relations has historically operated in the following way:

    ...Political scientist Lester Milbrath notes that "The council on Foreign Relations, while not financed by government, works so closely with it that it is difficult to distinguish Council actions stimulated by government from autonomous actions"...Aside from membership dues, dividends from invested gifts and bequests, and profits from the sale of FOREIGN AFFAIRS, the most important sources of income are leading corporations and major foundations. In 1957-58, for example, Chase Manhattan, Continental Can, Ford Motor, Bankers Trust, Cities Service, Gulf, Otis Elevator, General Motors Overseas Operations, Brown Brothers, Harriman, and International General Electric were paying from $1,000 to $10,000 per year for the corporation service, depending upon the size of the company and its interest in international affairs...More generally, in 1960-61, eighty-four large corporations and financial institutions contributed 12% ($112,200) of CFR's total income. As to the foundations, the major contributors over the years have been the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Corporation, with the Ford Foundation joining in with a large grant in the 1950's. According to [newspaper columnist Joseph] Kraft, a $2.5 million grant in the early 1950's from the Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie foundations made the Council "the most important single private agency conducting research in foreign affairs." In 1960-61, foundation money accounted for 25% of CFR income.

    All foundations which support the CFR are in turn directred by men from Bechtel Construction, Chase Manhattan, Cummins Engine, Corning Glass, Kimberly-Clark, Monsanto Chemical, and dozens of other corporations. Further, to complete the circle, most foundation directors are members of CFR. In the early 1960's, Dan Smoot found that twelve of twenty Rockefeller Foundation trustees, ten of fifteen Ford Foundation trustees, and ten of fourteen Carnegie Corporation trustees were members of CFR. Nor is this interlock of recent origin. In 1922, for example, former Secretary of State Elihu Root, a corporation lawyer, was honorary CFR president as well as president of the Carnegie Corporation, while John W. Davis, the corporation lawyer who ran for President on the Democratic ticket in 1924, was a trustee of both the Carnegie Corporation and CFR...


    Turning to the all-important question of government involvement, the presence of CFR members in government has been attested to by Kraft, Cater, Smoot, CFR histories and THE NEW YORK TIMES, but the point is made most authoritatively by John J. McCloy, Wall Street lawyer, former chairman of Chase Manhattan, trustee of the Ford Foundation, director of CFR and a government appointee in a variety of roles since the early 1940's: "Whenever we needed a man," said McCloy in explaining the presence of CFR members in the modern defense establishment that fought World War II, "we thumbed through the roll of council members and put through a call to New York."...

    Despite the importance of speeches and publications, I think the most important aspects of the CFR program are its special discussion groups and study groups. These small groups of about twenty-five bring together businessmen, government officials, military men and scholars for detailed discussions of specific topics in the area of foreign affairs. Discussion groups explore problems in a general way, trying to define issues and alternatives. Such groups often lead to a study group as the next stage. Study groups revolve around the work of a Council research fellow (financed by Carnegie, Ford and Rockefeller) or a staff member...In 1957-58...the Council published six books which grew out of study groups. Perhaps the most famous of these was written by Henry Kissinger, a bright young McGeorge Bundy protege at Harvard who was asked by the CFR to head a study group. His NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND FOREIGN POLICY was "a best seller which has been closely read in the highest Administration circles and foreign offices abroad"...

    It is within these discussion groups and study groups, where privacy is the rule to encourage members to speak freely, that members of the power elite study and plan as to how best to attain American objectives in world affairs...It was supposedly a special CFR briefing session in early 1947 that convinced Undersecretary of State Robert Lovett of Brown Brothers, Harriman that "it would be our principal task at State to awaken the nation to the dangers of Communist aggression."

    Despite the fact that the CFR is an organization most Americans have never heard of, I think we have clearly established by a variety of means that it is a key connection between the federal government and the owners and managers of the country's largest financial institutions and corporations. It is an organization of the power elite...In my view, what knowledge we have of CFR suggests that through it the power elite formulate general guidelines for American foreign policy and provide the personnel to carry out this policy...

    From a $135,057,600 stock portfolio which may be invested in Big Oil stock, U.S. war machine stock and Israeli-linked corporate stock, the Council on Foreign Relations, itself, earned an investment income of $2,905,350 between July 21, 2000 and June 30, 2001. Some of this investment income of the "non-profit" Council on Foreign Relations Inc. was then used to pay Council on Foreign Relations President Leslie Gelb an annual salary of $258,686.

    The Ford Foundation-subsidized Council on Foreign Relations is one of the U.S. governing elite institutions responsible for formulating the U.S. Establishment's militaristic foreign policy and an institution that may profit from investments in Big Oil, U.S. war machine and Israeli-linked corporate stock. So it might be politically productive for the U.S. anti-war movement to seriously start making stock divestment demands on both the Countil on Foreign Relations and the Ford Foundation, as well as on MIT and Harvard University.


    http://www.questionsquestions.net/feldman/ff_divest.html
    PETVAL
    PETVAL --- ---
    a samozrejme tady, ale to mame na home uz 4 roky :)

    Fractional Reserve Banking as Economic Parasitism - Scientific, Mathematical & Historical Expose, Critique and Manifesto - by Vladimir Z. Nuri, PDF, 62 stran
    ftp://wueconb.wustl.edu/econ-wp/mac/papers/0203/0203005.pdf
    PETVAL
    PETVAL --- ---
    JAXXE: hezka podrobnejsi analyza, jak to funguje, je napr. tady

    THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM:
    A FATAL PARASITE ON THE AMERICAN BODY POLITIC
    by
    Dr. Edwin Vieira, Jr.

    http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/VieiraMono4.htm
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Virtuální peníze = virtuální moc?

    Peníze hýbou světem. Ale co jsou to vlastně peníze? Jak se změnily v průběhu historie? Peníze umožnily a usnadňují směnu mezi lidmi. V dávné minulosti byly peníze z drahých kovů – ze zlata a ze stříbra. Revoluci do peněžnictví přinesly papírové peníze. Od té doby začaly všechny problémy v peněžnictví. Nastala éra inflace, krachu měn a dalších zlořádů. Nové peníze se staly předmětem podnikání. Přesto všechno byly stále tyto peníze kryty zlatem. Každý mohl přijít do banky a své peníze vyměnit za zlato. Dýku do zad peněžnictví vrazil prezident Nixon, když zrušil zlatý standard dolaru. Od té doby je možné všechno. Začala éra virtuálních peněz. Statistické údaje Bank of England z roku 1997 uvádí celkový stav peněz ve Velké Britanii celkem 680 miliard liber sterlingů (Lstg). Je to celkový obraz financí, pohybujících se v ekonomice. Jde o mince, bankovky, bankovní vklady, vklady stavebních spořitelen, všech lidí, veřejných i soukromých obchodních společností. Celkový obraz financí nám objasní, jak tento objem peněz rostl v čase. V roce 1963 to bylo jen 14 miliard, v roce 1975 to bylo už 53 miliard. Za 5 let toto množství stouplo v roce 1980 na 205 miliard Lstg. V roce 1997 dosáhlo množství peněz v ekonomice na celkem 680 miliard. Virtuálních peněz ! Většina lidí si myslí, že peníze může vydávat jen vláda a vláda si peníze ohlídá. Ze stejných statistických údajů Anglické banky vyplývá, že vláda Velké Britanie vydala celkem jenom asi 25 miliard Lstg. Kde se tedy vzalo zbývajících 655 miliard, které nevytvořila vláda? Celý ten zbytek 655 miliard liber – což dělá 97% všech peněz Velké Britanie – byl vytvořen bankami a stavebními společnostmi a byl vytvořen z ničeho. Každému, kdo by si chtěl přilepšit výrobou peněz, hrozí trest 20 let vězení. Nikoli lidem, kteří se pohybují v bankovním sektoru. Když by se někdo zeptal, jak můžou soukromé společnosti „vyrábět“ peníze, dostane se jim odpovědi, že jsou to hypotéky, soukromé půjčky a přečerpávání účtů, které vedou k vytvoření tohoto dluhu. Vlády se přímo spoléhají na to, že se lidé zadluží, aby tak byly vytvořeny peníze, které proudí do ekonomiky. K roztáčení kol ekonomiky je pak nutné, aby každá libra, koruna, dolar měly své ekvivalenty v nějakém dluhu. Ale Británie v tom není sama. Situace ve Spojených státech je stejná. Dluh USA dosahuje v současnosti 7 790 miliard dolarů.
    To znamená, že na každého Američana včetně starců a kojenců je tady státní dluh v částce 31 160 dolarů. Stejně jsou na tom všechny státy světa. Dluh Britanie jsme již vzpomínali, ale i Kanada má svůj dluh ve výšce 650 miliard dolarů, Japonsko dalších 2 000 miliard dolarů a Německo 300 miliard euro. Vypadá to, že čím bohatší země, tím je více zadlužená. Mohli bychom naopak říci, že čím je stát více zadlužený, tím je bohatší. Možná jen virtuálně. Ale nejen vlády jsou zadlužené. Rostou i dluhy osob a domácností. Američané jsou nejbohatším národem na světě hlavně díky tomu, že jsou také nejzadluženější. Celkový dluh lidí a firem v USA dosahuje dalších 4 200 miliard dolarů. V Británii je to 780 miliard liber, z toho domácnosti si půjčily přes 500 miliard. Ale dluhy se musí jednou splácet. Zatím to vypadá, že svět se řídí heslem Madame de Pompadour – „po nás potopa“. Většina lidí žije v bláhové představě, že když si půjčují peníze v bance, tak si půjčují peníze jiných lidí, kteří je do banky uložili. Jenže na výše uvedených číslech jsme si ukázali, že to není pravda. (když Bank of England vydala jen 25 miliard liber, není možné vytvořit dluhy ve výši 680 (stát) + 780 (lidé) miliard liber). Když banky půjčují lidem peníze, tak ve skutečnosti vytvoří nové peníze. Peníze půjčované bankou nejsou už existující peníze, ale jsou to nově vytvořené peníze jen k tomu účelu. Všichni se spoléhají na to, že tento proud peněz vytvořený dlužníky bude zásobovat ekonomiku jako celek a tím ji udržovat v chodu. Tato zadluženost žene státy k neustálému růstu ekonomiky. Ekonomika musí růst, státy musí exportovat, aby získaly peníze, aby mohly splácet dluhy. Jenže - to tak nefunguje. Ekonomika roste, ale ještě rychleji rostou dluhy. Rostou úroky a úroky z úroků. USA si musí každý den vypůjčit 2 miliardy dolarů, aby udržely ekonomiku v chodu. Vypůjčují si hlavně v Číně. Čína už má v USA aktiva za více než 400 miliard dolarů ve formě státních dluhopisů. Žijeme v éře stále rychlejšího ekonomického růstu. A dluhy dosahují astronomických výšek. Ve skutečnosti jediné co roste, jsou virtuální peníze na účtech několika jednotlivců, kterým poskytuje jen pocit moci. Virtuální moci. Neoliberální svět ekonomiky tak drží lidi pod krkem a nikdo neví, kam kráčí – přesto rychle kráčíme k zářným zítřkům. Zářným zítřkům pro koho??

    --------------------------------------------

    Demokracie je iluze, které vládnou banky

    Demokracie je pouhou iluzí ve světě řízeném bankéřskými kruhy, který směřuje ke globální centralistické vládě kapitálu. Skutečnými světovými vládci jsou nejvlivnější bankéřské kruhy, které se snaží nastolit globální policejní stát. Tato skupina má navíc spoustu následovníků, kteří si myslí, že chce budovat lepší svět. Jejich pravou tvář však ukazuje kromě jiného i dílo Nahý kapitalista (v originále The Naked Capitalist) od W. C. Skousena. Skousen, který 16 let působil jako agent FBI a čtyři roky jako šéf policie v Salt Lake City, ukázal ve svém díle jak funguje mezinárodní bankovní konspirace. Píše se tu například o síti bankovních dynastií, které začaly získávat moc od založení Bank of England v roce 1694. Jejich transformace do systému národních bank jim teď umožňuje disponovat s penězi celých států. Bankéřské kruhy pak řídí politiku většiny vlád. Bankéři, vytvářející peníze z ničeho, si nakradli většinu světového bohatství. V éře tzv. finančního kapitalismu (mezi lety 1884 až 1933) tyto kruhy rozšiřovaly klasickou bankovní sféru a pojišťovnictví na jedné straně a těžký průmysl a železnice na straně druhé: mobilizovaly tím obrovské bohatství a posílily ekonomicky, politicky i sociálně. Globálnímu kapitálu ale již nejde o nic jiného, než vytvořit světový systém finanční kontroly nad politickým systémem všech zemí a světovou ekonomikou jako celkem. Tento systém má být ovládán centrálními bankami. Bankéřské kruhy proto financují celé politické spektrum, včetně extrémistů, a získávají tak vliv nad státními rozpočty, zdroji, světovými trhy a pracovními silami. Například drobná pomoc partyzánům jim vzápětí poskytne obrovské zbrojní zakázky diktátorských vlád ohrožených sílícím lidovým povstáním. Propagandou demokracie si bankéři získali miliony idealistů, kteří vůbec netuší, že podpora tzv. demokratických vlád žene svět do totalitního područí. Zřejmě nepřekvapí odhalení společnosti Johna Birche, že útoky proti USA z 11. září 2001 byly součástí této velké hry a světová média kontrolovaná bankovními kruhy směřují po těchto aktech většinu lidstva žádoucím směrem, tedy ke globálnímu otroctví. Globalizace je proces vedoucí svět pod jednu vládu a potírající rasu, náboženství, národnost a rodinu. Cílem je homogenní svět kontrolovaný policejními silami bez možnosti odporu. Neschopnost globálně bojovat proti světovému kapitálu dokládá i mizivý prostor dávaný médii protiválečnému hnutí ve věci irácké války, v porovnání například s Vietnamem před asi 40 lety. Přestože tzv. válka proti terorismu je nejhorší koloniální expanzí za nejméně poslední dvě dekády, děti se v okleštěném vzdělávacím systému učí o ochraně demokratického světa a lidských hodnot. Stejně jako ztráta politické objektivity dotýká se nové konzumní generace odklon od kulturních hodnot. Demokracie je proto nutná součást tohoto globalizačního procesu, který jde proti člověku a jeho hodnotám.

    http://zpravy24.pantax.cz/
    PETVAL
    PETVAL --- ---
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    'EXPLOSIVE RESIDUE FOUND ON FAILED LEVEE DEBRIS'

    'Divers inspecting the ruptured levee walls surrounding New Orleans found something that piqued their interest: Burn marks on underwater debris chunks from the broken levee wall! One diver, a member of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, saw the burn marks and knew immediately what caused them. When he surfaced and showed the evidence to his superior, the on-site Coordinator for FEMA stepped-in and said "You are not here to conduct an investigation as to why this rupture occurred, but only to determine how best to close it."

    The FEMA coordinator then threw the evidence back into the water and said "You will tell no one about this."At that point, the diver went back down to do more inspection of the levee. On the second dive, he secreted a small chunk of the debris inside his wet suit and later arranged for it to be sent to trusted military friends at the U.S. Army Forensic Laboratory at Fort Gillem, Georgia for testing. According to well placed sources, a military forensic specialist determined the burn marks on the cement chunks did, in fact, come from high explosives. The source, speaking on condition of anonymity said "We found traces of boron-enhanced fluoronitramino explosives as well as PBXN-111 embedded in the debris. This would indicate at least two separate types of explosive devices."'

    http://www.halturnershow.com/DiversFindExplosiveResidueOnRupturedLevy.html
    ONDREX
    ONDREX --- ---
    JAXXE: metavylhedávače znám různý, Kartoo bylo první s kterým sem se seznámil, rozhodně mě ale nikdy nenapadlo na to aplikovat nwo apod. Každopádně díky za dobrej nápad :)
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    ONDREX: a tohle znas ? ;) tady si ty mapky muzes generovat sam a jsou interaktivni, staci tam zadat slova jako "new world order", illuminati, "911 truth" atd... doporucuju v options zvednout tu prvni hodnotu na 30
    SUPAFLY
    SUPAFLY --- ---
    na home pls:

    ONDREX
    ONDREX --- ---
    PETVAL
    PETVAL --- ---
    Fractional Reserve Banking Prevents Gold Standard

    August 30, 2004
    By Clinton P. Desveaux

    A bank requires one simple rule to ensure it's continued existence in times of financial and /or economic crisis:

    100 per cent reserves in safe storage to satisfy a call on all deposits when required

    Anyone with even a passing interest in economic issues should be aware of how monetary policy operates and in turn the banking industry; otherwise what is the point in discussing something if the issue debated is from the ignorance of utopia?

    Now most people who read my columns are, by now, aware of how monetary policy has been manipulated on the altar of statism at which many worship. For more information on monetary policy and the gold standard please look at the following link:

    Gold Standard

    Fractional Reserve Banking is nothing more than the ability to artificially inflate the money supply; commercial banks do so by printing and lending money, which a bank does not have in safe storage. No other business is allowed to print money, because it is viewed as being criminal. What special powers or veto does a bank hold over the masses, which allows it to flaunt the law? The issue of state banks which practice fractional reserve banking is an entirely other topic loaded with unintended humour.

    How does Fractional Reserve Banking operate? Well here is a simple explanation, which anyone will understand:

    Let us pretend that a new bank has been created and it’s called “HalifaxLive Bank”, this new bank operates just like any other bank in North America. Now I deposit $10.00 into this bank, which for the sake of this discussion is backed 100 per cent by a commodity. The commodity backing represents hard currency. The currency we use may be gold or platinum. Now most people think, hey it’s backed by a hard currency so this is a legitimate and trustworthy bank to deal with, right?

    I turn around as the head of this bank and “lend out” $100 to someone, either for personal spending or to invest in his/her business venture, it doesn’t really matter. How can I "lend out" 10 times more than I have? Is the type of bank you would want to deal with? This is the black magic voodoo art we call “fractional reserve banking”, only a fraction of what I’m lending out actually exists. I simply open up a chequing account of $100, which I am happy to lend to Mr. Kevin Smith. Why does Mr. Kevin Smith choose to borrow from me? I charge a lower rate of interest than what real legitimate banks with 100 per cent backed reserves or some larger percentage of backed reserves. Then what I would have in my bank if any such place really existed in the current market place? I don't have to save up the money myself, but simply can print it, and do so by claiming, “fractional reserve banking”, and the government gives it a thumbs up! Since demand deposits at the “HalifaxLive Bank” act as the equivalent to cash, the nation's money supply has grown by $90. This also causes inflation and it also causes the money supply to be further debased, and the entire deviant action is under way undermining capitalism and the money supply; all with the support and endorsement of the state. Banks create more than 90 per cent of all deposits, when a bank creates a loan it also at the very same time creates a deposit.

    Conservative/Liberal Keynesian economic theory and Friedmanite monetarism policy is where the current manipulation of the banking industry has found its unfortunate societal acceptance through the notion of Fractional Reserve Banking.

    An official storage or warehouse location of any product ensures that the goods and products entrusted to its care are there at all times. Commercial banks operate very differently. Banks create warehouse receipts (originally bank notes and now deposits) out of thin air. Essentially, they are counterfeiters of fake warehouse-receipts to cash, which circulate as if they were genuine, 100 per cent backed notes or checking accounts. Banks under the current system make money by literally creating money out of thin air through the magic of the printing press; currently deposits rather than bank notes are what is in vogue. This type of action is almost like a money laundering operation, counterfeiting is being accepted simply because the state backs the practice. This practice has been coined, "fractional-reserve banking", which means that bank deposits are backed by only a small fraction of the cash they promise to have at hand at any give time to satisfy a call on all deposits.

    Here in Canada for example the numbers from the Bank of Canada explain that by 1998 the ratio of all Canadian bank cash reserves ($3.893 billion) to their total assets ($1393 billion) have jumped to a level of 1:358, a number that is unheard of when considering that historically during the first 50 years of the 19th century the ratio never exceeded 1:15. That means for every dollar of cash in their vaults or deposited with the Bank of Canada, the banks have conjured up $357 from the gap that they've invested or lent out with interest. Now you understand why the record profits for all commercial banks is so silly most people are unable to even laugh.


    A long time ago in Canada commercial banks were required to have and hold “reserves” of 50 per cent. With reserves of 50 per cent, banks could “create” new loans (deposits) twice over the totals of their deposits. Through a series of legislative statist amendments to the bank act, the reserve requirement threshold was clawed back to 10% (allowing for new loans (deposits) of 10 times the amount of deposits on hand), then Pierre Trudeau’s socialist utopia pushed the number to 8 per cent (which allowed for new loans (deposits) of 12.5 times the amount of deposits on hand, then to 3 per cent (33.3 times) and then to zero. On Dec. 9,1991, the Parliamentary majority Progressive “Conservative” government of Brian Mulroney amended the Bank Act with Bill C-19, which provided for the reduction of any reserve requirement by commercial banks over the next 3 years to zero percent. This nonsense came into full effect January 1, 1994. Banks are no longer required to hold any reserves. This means the banks have unlimited power to create new loans (deposits) through deposit expansion. On page 257 of the Canadian Bank Act, Section 457 (4) states the following:

    "On the first day of the first month following the month this section comes into force, the primary reserve referred to in subsection (2) shall be reduced by 3 per cent, and thereafter on the first day of the first month of each of the next three succeeding six month periods, the primary reserve as modified by this subsection shall be reduced by 3 per cent, and on the first day of the twenty-fifth month following the month in which this section comes into force, the primary referred to in subsection (1) shall be NIL."

    Gary Huskins (ATLLITCON@AOL.com) a conservative Nova Scotia author with some libertarian leanings currently shopping his latest novel likes to point out that “fractional reserve banking is the equivalent to mass manipulation of the free-market. It is the sort of manipulation one would find with my fictitious characters I create with my novels.”

    What happens if everyone begins to feel nervous about the current system of Fractional Reserve Banking and nanny state, and growing numbers of people withdraw savings held in a bank? A bank run occurs, as witnessed by the tragic events of the Great Depression in the 1930’s. For more recent events consider 1985 when numerous regional banks in the northeastern United States faced bankruptcy due to a run on credit when individuals demanded a call on deposits. Just recently in Argentina, we witnessed a bank run in 2001. The police were called, and customers were refused entry into commercial banks to withdraw savings. This continued for extend amounts of time so as to allow a socialist demagogue maintain his grip on power. Elected officials and governments in various countries (tyranny of the majority as some may call it) have gone so far as to force the closure of banks, to prevent a bank run from happening and causing a chain of events which could become uncontrollable and essentially destroy the current banking system.

    The solution put in place once a bank has been closed is to use everyone 's tax dollars through central banking insurance to eliminate the problem until it occurs again.

    States not only condone (actually, forcing) the reserve limits, but also in allegedly "protecting" them from bank runs with deposit insurance, ultimately compounding the problem by fractionating the central bank reserves on which the banks draw from to begin with.

    The current banking industry in the Western World is regulated from competition in such a manner and a legitimate cartel has been created. This banking cartel has state authorization to protect it from the normal rational and logical thought processes and laws of the free market. Banking should be treated as any other segment of the economy in a capitalist system, and face competition.

    What is even more worrying with the current state - accepted banking industry practice of fractional reserve banking are the lower and middle-income earners who end up most likely to be harmed. With the current system, the most damage during a bank run happens to lower and middle income earners for 1 simple reason: high income earners tend to have the most diversification with their retirement portfolios, which almost always consist of some large percentage of a commodity like silver, gold, platinum and or oil/gas investments plus any additional private property one has at ones disposal which all represent hard currency to some extent. This hard currency is insulated from the debasing of the money supply and inflation unlike most other things in the free-market.


    Only one alternative exists to the current fractional reserve and printing press mess we find ourselves in today with so-called “commercial” banks. That alternative would be a decentralized private system of commodity money. The bank could not lend out any of its deposits, only the equity in the bank. The practice of issuing receipts, or bank notes, for exactly the amount of commodity on deposit would follow from here on out. For every bank note in circulation, the bank would always have in its possession the commodity to which the note entitles the holder.

    The commodity of Gold just happens to be what the market has chosen historically as money and it has certain valuable properties as money. Gold is divisible, interchangeable, etc. and when combined with 100 per cent back reserves, the banking industry then has honest money. A Gold Standard, that represents honest money, being protected by honest practices. Now that is a commercial bank, which everyone can feel secure in having! Is anyone else interested in a legitimate alternative to the mess we have today?

    The bank would still make money however by charging a storage fee of some sort. The fee collected from storage could be lent out for borrowing purposes by the bank if the management felt it was making a wise financial business choice for its shareholder interest; this eliminates fractional reserve banking. The reserves would be backed by a hard currency like gold for example, and paper money would continue to be used only it would be backed by something legitimate and honest.

    http://www.halifaxlive.com/fractional_reserve_08302004_0390.php
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Locals, Officials Suggest Levees were Intentionally Blown
    http://prisonplanet.com/Pages/090905levees.htm

    ...

    Some final intriguing footage reveals a journalist questioning former President Bill Clinton as to why many locals feel that the levees were purposefully broken.



    This was during the press conference with Clinton and George Bush Snr announcing their combined "relief effort" for New Orleans. Ignore the first 15 minutes of sickening joking and backslapping between the two and skip to the last minute of footage. Upon hearing the question Clinton appears to be surprised and then simply walks off.

    rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/hur/hur090505_clintonbush.rm

    http://prisonplanet.com/audio/090905clinton.mp3
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Total411.info has obtained video of an ABC News report featuring an earwitness to explosives used to destroy the Industrial Canal in New Orleans. Here's the video, and here's the transcript: http://www.total411.info/2005/09/video-earwitness-tells-abc-explosives.html
    PETVAL
    PETVAL --- ---
    Proces financování americké vlády charakterizují nejlépe následující
    údaje, které ukazují na nárůst množství dluhopisů vlády, které FED odkoupil:
    1913 – 0 USD,
    1921 – 400 000 000 USD,
    1934 – 2 400 000 000 USD,
    1981 – 140 000 000 000 USD,
    1992 – 280 000 000 000 USD.
    Více o politickém pozadí vzniku FEDu a jeho vlivu na americkou ekonomiku
    v Rothbard, Murray: The Case Against the Fed, Mises Institute, 1994.



    Mezi inflační faktory patřily mimo jiné levné úvěry financující
    export, operace na volném trhu, v rámci nichž byly nakupovány
    dluhopisy americké vlády, a úvěrové linky evropským zemím,
    především Velké Británii. Ty měly těmto zemím pomoci znovunastolit
    zlatý standard na starých paritách, jež byly zcela nerealistické
    v důsledku inflačních politik, které tyto státy v mezidobí provozovaly.
    Spojené státy dokonce záměrně způsobovaly vlastní inflaci
    (okrádaly vlastní obyvatelstvo), aby inflační politika evropských
    zemí nebyla tak viditelná (tj. aby např. kurs britské libry k americkému
    dolaru zůstal neměnný). Tuto „spolupráci“ centrálních bank,
    která není nepodobná snaze dnešních centrálních bank „koordinovat“,
    tj. zneviditelňovat inflaci, připravoval po dlouhá léta guvernér
    newyorské federální rezervní banky a pozdější prezident FEDu
    Benjamin Strong. Ten na tajných schůzkách (které nehlásil ani
    Federální rezervní radě ve Washingtonu) domlouval tuto společnou
    inflaci a záměrné snížení amerických úrokových měr vedoucích
    k úvěrové expanzi, aby „se pomohlo“ Velké Británii
    . Strong tvrdil, že
    „břímě tohoto přizpůsobení [zreálnění zlaté parity britské
    libry] musí dopadnout více na nás [USA] než na ně
    [Británii]. Bylo by pro britskou vládu a centrální banku
    politicky a sociálně obtížné vyrovnat se s poklesem
    cen.“93

    To se také stalo a americká inflace je toho dokladem. Zároveň je
    z této epizody zřejmé, jaké zájmy vedou centrální banky k vzájemné
    „spolupráci“.

    92 Hayek, F. A.: Prices and Production, str. 162.
    93 Dopis Stronga Mellonovi, americkému ministru financí z 27. května 1924.
    Podle Rothbard, Murray: America’s Great Depression, str. 134.

    z http://libinst.cz/etexts/sima_trhvcase.pdf
    PETVAL
    PETVAL --- ---
    az to stahnu, dam samozrejme i na FTP

    ed2k://|file|Alex.Jones-Martial.Law-911.Rise.Of.The.Police.State.(DVDRip-1.of.3).XviD.[www.lala.co.il].avi|733661184|3B2F42463973E63F7DE1E5BDFE1A0964|/
    ed2k://|file|Alex.Jones-Martial.Law-911.Rise.Of.The.Police.State.(DVDRip-2.of.3).XviD.[www.lala.co.il].avi|733253632|2711DCAB81CA58561D9A3B5D1BA4DBD4|/
    ed2k://|file|Alex.Jones-Martial.Law-911.Rise.Of.The.Police.State.(DVDRip-3.of.3).XviD.[www.lala.co.il].avi|262393856|3F8FEB5ECBF6FAC75E81669FA67B4551|/
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Pentagon chystá doktrínu preventivního atomového úderu

    USA mají mít možnost preventivním jaderným úderem odvrátit hrozící útok zbraněmi hromadného ničení proti sobě, spojencům nebo mezinárodním koalicím. Počítá s tím návrh nové doktríny, vypracovaný generálním štábem.
    12.9. 2005 10:10

    WASHINGTON - Podle dokumentu, o němž informoval deník The Washington Post, by velitelé v takových případech jednotlivě žádali o souhlas prezidenta k jadernému úderu proti jiném státu nebo skupině teroristů, případně ke zničení zjištěných skladů jaderných, biologických a chemických zbraní.

    Koncepce nazvaná Doktrína pro společné jaderné operace ještě čeká na schválení ministra obrany Donalda Rumsfelda, než bude poskytnuta dalším složkám vlády. Jde o rozpracovánou doktrínu preventivního úderu, kterou prezident George W. Bush představil v prosinci 2002.

    Doktrína také zdůrazňuje, že k odstrašení možného útoku zbraněmi hromadného ničení, musí Washington jednak činit přípravy k použití jaderné zbraně a dát najevo, že nebude váhat je nasadit. Odvolává se na to, že USA vždy odmítaly přijmout závazek nepoužít jaderné zbraně jako první.

    Obavy ze snížení prahu k použití atomových zbraní, jež by ve světě vyvolalo těžko odhadnutelnou reakci, vedly už Kongres USA k tomu, že odmítl financovat výzkum hlavic k ničení biologické a chemické munice bez zamoření ovzduší i studii o vývoji jaderné bomby k ničení skladů a velitelských štábů v bunkrech hluboko pod povrchem.

    http://www.novinky.cz/zahranicni/64854-pentagon-chysta-doktrinu-preventivniho-atomoveho-uderu.html
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    POTLAČENÁ PRAVDA? Otazníky kolem 11. září

    12.9.2005

    Čtyři roky po útocích z 11. září se začínají objevovat trhliny v "oficiální" verzi událostí, píše tento týden britský časopis, prodávaný bezdomovci The Big Issue (předloha českého časopisu Patron). Sílící hnutí, které podporují respektovaní myslitelé a politické osobnosti, požaduje nezávislé vyšetřování toho, co se ve skutečnosti událo.

    "Nejneuvěřitelnější ze všech možných konspiračních teorií je teorie o tom, že dne 11. září se prostě Usáma bin Ladin a 19 fanatických muslimů rozhodli zaútočit na USA a podařilo se jim to." Robert M. Bowman to říká naprosto narovinu. Nevěří, že by bylo možno provést útoky z 11. září. Přitom Bowman není tak leckdo. Je to bývalý plukovník amerického letectva a šéf programu Hvězdných válek, které měly ochránit USA během studené války.

    Bowman není jedinou osobností, která zpochybňuje oficiální verzi toho, k čemu snad došlo dne 11. září 2001. Debaty se účastní čelní univerzitní odborníci, politikové a analytici. Většinou na internetu. Vyšla však už také celá řada knih a další se připravují.

    Bushova vláda tvrdí, že ji útoky z 11. září 2001 absolutně překvapily.

    Její hlavní odpůrci v této debatě argumentují, že to je "nemožné". Někteří z nich dokonce tvrdí, že útoky z 11. září uskutečnila sama americká vláda.

    Kolektivně všichni tito lidé požadují nezávislé vyšetřování toho, co se vlastně 11. září 2001 stalo.

    Dr. David Ray Griffin je čelný americký teolog, který vydal 25 knih na nejrůznější témata. Ve svých analýzách 11. září The New Pearl Harbor a The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions (Zpráva komise o 11. září: Chyby a zkreslení) vypočítává nedůslednosti a "otevřené lži", které obsahuje ofiicální zpráva. Griffin je přesvědčen, že Bushova vláda připravila tyto útoky, aby jí to umožnilo realizovat své globální ambice, což by prý jinak bylo nemožné.

    V úvodu ke Griffinově knize píše bývalý britský ministr životního prostředí Michael Meacher: "Nikdy v moderní historii dosud nebyla událost takového významu obklopena takovým tajemstvím."

    Nikdo, kdo zastává oficiální výkonnou funkci v americké vládě, se však těmito otázkami nechce zabývat.

    Nafez Moxadeqq Ahmed, ředitel britského vědeckého ústavu Institute for Policy Reseaarch and Development, zuřivě protestuje ve svých textech proti "absolutně nesprávné" oficiální interpretaci události. Vydal knihu The War on Truth (Válka proti pravdě). V ní uvádí důkazy, že západní vlády v současnosti ze strategických důvodů v různých částech světa manipulují "Al Kajdu", čímž kompromitují celou "válku proti teerorismu. To podle něho zpochybňuje celé oficiální vysvětlení událostí z 11. září.

    David Shayler, známý bývalý britský špion, který odhalil britské spiknutí zavraždit plukovníka Gaddáfího financováním organizace blízké al Kajdě a byl za to britskou vládou vězněn, sdílí Ahmedovy pochybnosti o událostech z 11. září.

    Ian Henshall poukazuje na informace amerického týdeníku Newsweek, podle nichž vysocí činitelé amerického Pentagonu zrušili lety, které měly plánovány na 11. září 2001.

    Griffin vyjadřuje nedůvěru, jak je možné, že - v přímém protikladu proti normálním procedurám - letectvo a protivzdušná obrana nedaly příkaz stihačkám, aby zasáhly proti uneseným letadlům, přestože bylo zjevné, že se odchýlila stovky kilometrů od svých leteckých tras.

    Jsou to všechno ovšem jen nepřímé důkazy. David Shayler však zdůrazňuje, že rychlost, s níž sdělovací prostředky přijaly oficiální verzi událostí z 11. září 2001, v něm vyvolala podezření. Americké úřady, přestože nenašly černé skříňky z letadel, která narazila do WTC, tvrdí, že v troskách věžáků nalezly pas jednoho z únosců.

    "Do 24 hodin byla FBI schopna říct, že únos letadel provedlo 19 únosců. Nevíme, jak se jim to podařilo," zdůrazňuje David Shayler. "Zdá se mi neuvěřitelné, že by to bylo možné. Vím podle vlastních zkušeností, že prvních 24 hodin po teroristickém útoku vládne chaos. Není čas na vyšetřování, k tomu dochází daleko později."

    Ti, kdo zpochybňují oficiální verzi událostí z 11. září, tvrdí, že bez útoků na WTC by Amerika nemohla zaútočit na Afghánistán a na Irák. Neprosadila by Vlastenecký zákon, který omezil americké ústavní svobody. Nekonečná americká "válka proti terorismu" by bez 11. září byla nemožná.

    11. září bylo usmrceno téměř 3000 osob a zdá se neuvěřitelné, že by nějaká západní vládan obětovala život tolika lidí pro prosazení své politiky. Kritikové však poukazují na to, že 56 000 Američanů zemřelo ve Vietnamu a v Iráku už zahynulo téměř 2000 Američanů a konflikt tam jen tak neskončí. Shayler, se svými zkušenostmi z práce v západních výzvědných službách, svědčí, že západní vlády absolutně nemají skrupule a klidně obětují životy svých občanů.

    Teorie o tom, co se údajně stalo dne 11. září 2001, však nepřesvědčují všechny lidi. Robin Ramsay, editor časopisu Lobster, který píše o konspiračních teoriích a parapolitice, poukazují: "Nemyslím, že by Američané nebyli natolik zlovolní, že by to celé nechtěli zorganizovat sami. Jenže si nemyslím, že takto složitá akce se vůbec dá aktivně zorganizovat. Je známé o amerických výzvědných službách, že spolu navzájem nekomunikují, že se navzájem nenávidí. Kdyby měli Američané unést čtyři letadla a narazit s nimi do WTC a do Pentagonu, vyžadovalo by to spolupráci výzvědných služeb a to je prostě nemožné."

    Dr. Jerry Goodenough, odborník na konspirační teorie na University of East Anglia, si myslí, že snaha obviňovat Bushe z toho, co se stalo 11. září, je příznakem politické nespokojenosti.

    Faktem však je, že existuje množství nepřímých důkazů, shromážděných lidmi, jako je Ahmed, Henshall a Griffin, a ty zpochybňují oficiální verzi událostí. Bylo by skutečně zapotřebí řádného a autoritativního nezávislého vyšetřování. K němu však nedošlo.

    http://www.blisty.cz/2005/9/12/art24946.html
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Still Don't Believe In
    The New World Order?


    "We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money." Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)

    THAT quotation and the following - and many others like them - clearly demonstrate that the words "new world order" are deadly serious and furthermore, have been in use for decades. They did not originate with President George Bush in 1990. The "old world order" is one based on independent nation-states. The "new world order" involves the elimination of the sovereignty and independence of nation-states and some form of world government. This means the end of the United States of America, the U.S. Constitution, and the Bill of Rights as we now know them. Most of the new world order proposals involve the conversion of the United Nations and its agencies to a world government, complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, global taxation, and numerous other agencies to control every aspect of human life (education, nutrition, healthcare, population, immigration, communications, transportation, commerce, agriculture, finance, the environment, etc.). The various notions of the "new world order" differ as to details and scale, but agree on the basic principle and substance.

    "Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond , whether real or promulgated , that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government." Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

    "The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent." Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets

    "We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.

    "The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies (marxism /fascism /socialism v. democracy/capital- ism) to enable them (the Illuminati) to divide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other." Myron Fagan

    "No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation." David Spangler, Director of Planetary Initiative, United Nations

    "In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and power interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press....They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers.

    "An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers." U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917

    "The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind." George Herbert Walker Bush

    "In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all." Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992.
    "We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent." Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, l950

    "The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation

    "The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments' plans. " British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, 1876

    "Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913)
    "What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil." Christian Science Monitor editorial, June 19th, l920
    "The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen....At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties." New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922
    "From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire." Winston Churchill, stated to the London Press, in l922.
    "We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world." Professor Arnold Toynbee, in a June l931 speech before the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen.
    "The government of the Western nations, whether monarchical or republican, had passed into the invisible hands of a plutocracy, international in power and grasp. It was, I venture to suggest, this semi-occult power which....pushed the mass of the American people into the cauldron of World War I." British military historian Major General J.F.C. Fuller, l941

    "For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn't. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared "ammunition" in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support.
    "The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power.

    "The depression was the calculated 'shearing' of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market....The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank." Curtis Dall, FDR's son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law

    "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson." A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, l933

    "The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes." Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952

    "Fifty men have run America, and that's a high figure." Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK, in the July 26th, l936 issue of The New York Times.

    "Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government - a bureaucratic elite." Senator William Jenner, 1954

    "The case for government by elites is irrefutable" Senator William Fulbright, Former chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, stated at a 1963 symposium entitled: The Elite and the Electorate - Is Government by the People Possible?

    "The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system ,they will rule the future." U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater in his l964 book: With No Apologies.

    "The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds' central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups." Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University, highly esteemed by his former student, William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

    "The Council on Foreign Relations is "the establishment." Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member state of a one-world dictatorship." Former Congressman John Rarick 1971

    "The directors of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) make up a sort of Presidium for that part of the Establishment that guides our destiny as a nation." The Christian Science Monitor, September 1, l961

    "The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down...but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault." CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR's journal, Foreign Affairs.

    "The planning of UN can be traced to the 'secret steering committee' established by Secretary [of State Cordell] Hull in January 1943. All of the members of this secret committee, with the exception of Hull, a Tennessee politician, were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. They saw Hull regularly to plan, select, and guide the labors of the [State] Department's Advisory Committee. It was, in effect, the coordinating agency for all the State Department's postwar planning." Professors Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter, writing in their study of the CFR, "Imperial Brain Trust: The CFR and United States Foreign Policy." (Monthly Review Press, 1977).

    "The most powerful clique in these (CFR) groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the U.S.

    They want to end national boundaries and racial and ethnic loyalties supposedly to increase business and ensure world peace. What they strive for would inevitably lead to dictatorship and loss of freedoms by the people. The CFR was founded for "the purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government." Harpers, July l958

    "The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day's sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow." Nicholas Murray Butler, in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia, Nov. 27, 1915

    "The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world." M. C. Alexander, Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation, in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)

    "If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands." Dr. Augustus O. Thomas, president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927), quoted in the book International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World (1931)

    "... when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people ... will hate the new world order ... and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people." H. G. Wells, in his book entitled The New World Order (1939)

    "The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a 'League of Nations' or a 'Federated Union' to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the 'New International Order,' 'The New World Order,' 'World Union Now,' 'World Commonwealth of Nations,' 'World Community,' etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual." Excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)

    "In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of 'justice and peace." Excerpt from article entitled "New World Order Pledged to Jews," in The New York Times (October 1940)

    "If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order." The Declaration of the Federation of the World, produced by the Congress on World Federation, adopted by the Legislatures of North Carolina (1941), New Jersey (1942), Pennsylvania (1943), and possibly other states.

    "New World Order Needed for Peace: State Sovereignty Must Go, Declares Notre Dame Professor" Title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)

    "Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis." Text of article in The Philadelphia Inquirer (June 1942)

    "The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God." American Institute of Judaism, excerpt from article in The New York Times (December 1942)

    "There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper." Norman Thomas, in his book What Is Our Destiny? (1944)

    "He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order." Excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page in The Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944)

    "Alchemy for a New World Order" Article by Stephen John Stedman in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)

    "The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, 'has not been able--nor can it be able--to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.' ... The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, 'urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach." Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled

    "Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order" -- The New York Times (February 1962)

    "The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order." Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)

    "He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building 'a new world order." Excerpt from an article in The New York Times (February 1972)

    "If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis ... In short, the 'house of world order' will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great 'booming, buzzing confusion,' to use William James' famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault." Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)

    "The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species." Richard A. Falk, in an article entitled "Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions," in the book On the Creation of a Just World Order (1975)

    "My country's history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order." Henry Kissinger, in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)

    "At the old Inter-American Office in the Commerce Building here in Roosevelt's time, as Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American Affairs under President Truman, as chief whip with Adlai Stevenson and Tom Finletter at the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American system of political and economic security but a new world order." Part of article in The New York Times (November 1975)

    "A New World Order" Title of article on commencement address at the University of Pennsylvania by Hubert H. Humphrey, printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette (June 1977)

    "Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order." Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)

    "We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms." Brent Scowcroft (August 1990), quoted in The Washington Post (May 1991)

    "We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt's and Winston Churchill's vision for peace for the post-war period." Richard Gephardt, in The Wall Street Journal (September 1990)

    "If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we've all worked toward for so long." President George Bush (January 1991)

    "But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush's mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council." Excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal, in The New York Times (January 1991)

    "I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: ... At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a 'new world order' based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court." George McGovern, in The New York Times (February 1991)

    "... it's Bush's baby, even if he shares its popularization with Gorbachev. Forget the Hitler 'new order' root; F.D.R. used the phrase earlier." William Safire, in The New York Times (February 1991)

    "How I Learned to Love the New World Order" Article by Sen. Joseph R. Biden, Jr. in The Wall Street Journal (April 1992)

    "How to Achieve The New World Order" Title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger, in Time magazine (March 1994)

    "The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth - in Morocco - to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund." Part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in The New York Times (April 1994)

    "New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State" Title of article by Kenichi Ohmae, political reform leader in Japan, in The Wall Street Journal (August 1994)

    "The new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all." Nelson Mandela, in The Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)

    "The renewal of the nonproliferation treaty was described as important "for the welfare of the whole world and the new world order." President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt, in The New York Times (April 1995)

    "The American people must be willing to give up a degree of personal privacy in exchange for safety and security." Louis Freeh Director of the FBI, 1993

    "We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans." William Jefferson Clinton, USA Today, March 11, 1993.

    "I can't be responsible for every undercapitalized small business in America. It's time to put the common good, the national interest, ahead of individuals." Hillary Clinton, when told her socialized health care plan would bankrupt small businesses.

    "Decisions about motherhood and abortion, schooling, cosmetic surgery, treatment of venereal disease or employment ... should not be made unilaterally by the parents." Hillary Clinton on "children’s rights"

    "Fundamental, Bible-believing people do not have the right to indoctrinate their children in their religious beliefs because we, the state, are preparing them for the year 2000, when America will be part of a one-world global society and their children will not fit in." Nebraska State Senator, Peter Hoagland on radio in 1983

    “I don’t care if you want to hunt. I don’t care if you think it’s your right. I say, ‘Sorry.’ It is 1999. We have had enough as a nation. You are not allowed to own a gun, and if you do own a gun I think you should go to prison.” Rosie O’Donnell, April 21, 1999

    http://www.inlibertyandfreedom.com/nwo.htm
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam