Explosives Were Placed In The 7 World Trade Center Building Before September 11, 2001!

Free Press International

11.26.2004

Most of America is not aware that three buildings fell on September 11, 2001. The 47 story 7 World Trade Center building also fell. In fact, there is absolutely nothing about 7WTC on CNN's 9/11 archive web site.

In a PBS interview, Larry Siverstein, the leaseholder for the World Trade Center, told PBS that the fire department commander made a decision to detonate the building because of fire in the building. The building was detonated at 5:20pm on September 11, 2001.

There is no way to 'precisely' detonate a building in less than one day! It takes weeks and sometimes over a month to prepare a building for demolition.

This can only lead to one conclusion. Explosives were placed in the 7 World Trade Center Building before September 11, 2001!

............

video, kde sam majitel WTC Silverstein priznava, ze 11.9. dal prikaz "to pull down" budovu 7...

http://www.freepressinternational.com/7wtc.826541.detonate.9034129387450.html

Russian Political Scientist Blames Brzezinski Conspiracy To Bring US And Russia Into Conflict For Ukraine Crisis

http://www.mosnews.com/news/2004/11/25/markov.shtml

....

Cold War crisis in Ukraine . Control of oil, key Grand Chessboard 'pivot' at stake

...

Ukraine: Key Square on the "Grand Chessboard"

Zbigniew Brzezinski's 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives has served as a blueprint for world dictatorship, and an incriminating predictor of post-9/11 world conflict. Against today's explosive headlines, Brzezinski's words are, once again, nightmarishly relevant:

"Geopolitical pivots are the states whose importance is derived not from their power and motivation but rather from their sensitive location and from the consequences of their potentially vulnerable condition for the behavior of geostrategic players. Most often, geopolitical pivots are determined by their geography, which in some cases gives them a special role in either defining access to important areas or in denying resources to a significant player [my emphasis-LC]."

"Ukraine, Azerbaijan, South Korea, Turkey and Iran play the role of critically important geopolitical pivots . . .

"Ukraine, a new and important space on the Eurasian chessboard is a geopolitical pivot because its very existence as an independent country helps to transform Russia. Without Ukraine, Russia ceases to be a Eurasian empire. Russia without Ukraine can still strive for imperial status, but it would then become a predominantly Asian imperial state, more likely to be drawn into debilitating conflicts with aroused Central Asians, who would then be supported by their fellow Islamic states to the south.

"However, if Moscow regains control over Ukraine, with its 52 million people and major resources as well as access to the Black Sea, Russia automatically again regains the wherewithal to become a powerful imperial state, spanning Europe and Asia.

"Ukraine's determination to preserve its independence was encouraged by external support. In July 1996, the US secretary of defense declared, "I cannot overestimate the importance of Ukraine as an independent country to the security and stability of all of Europe," while in September, the German chancellor . . . went further in declaring that "Ukraine's firm place in Europe can no longer be challenged by anyone . . ."

...

Then Brzezinski goes directly at Ukraine's importance to world energy:

"For Ukraine, the central issues are the future character of the CIS and freer access to energy sources, which would lessen Ukraine's dependence on Russia.

"Accordingly, Ukraine has supported Georgia's efforts to become the westward route for Azeri oil exports. Ukraine has also collaborated with Turkey in order to weaken Russian influence in the Black Sea and has supported Turkish efforts to direct oil flows from Central Asia to Turkish terminals.

"Neither the West nor Russia can afford to lose Ukraine to its geostrategic and geoeconomic adversary."

http://mparent7777.blog-city.com/read/928880.htm

...

Ukraine crisis: A Western circus with Yushchenko, the clown

http://english.pravda.ru/mailbox/22/101/399/14639_yushchenko.html

Iraq Pipeline Watch

Attacks on Iraqi pipelines, oil installations, and oil personnel:

http://www.iags.org/iraqpipelinewatch.htm

But the supposedly empty pipeline to Haifa/Israel, protected by three US military bases, is never touched.

Arnie's 'eye in the sky' fuel tax

Robert Lusetich, Los Angeles correspondent
November 26, 2004

NO one is quite sure whether to laugh or cry over the proposal from Arnold Schwarzenegger's administration to do away with traditional petrol tax in favour of taxing cars on the number of kilometres they are driven.

The problem is California's answer to how the distance would be tracked: by installing detection devices in every car in the state that would be constantly monitored by satellite.

Drivers would have their taxes automatically added to the cost of petrol when they filled their tanks.

...

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,11501895%255E2703,00.html

Congress Funds Psychological Tests for Kids

http://newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/11/22/215244.shtml

No child left unmedicated
Phyllis Schlafly (archive)

November 23, 2004 | Print | Send

Big Brother is on the march. A plan to subject all children to mental health screening is under way, and pharmaceutical companies are gearing up for bigger sales of psychotropic drugs.

Like most liberal big-spending ideas, this one was slipped into the law under cover of soft semantics. Its genesis was the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health created by President George W. Bush in 2002

...

Mental health diagnoses are inherently subjective and social constructions, as even the diagnostic manuals admit. Many thousands, if not millions, of children would receive stigmatizing diagnoses that would follow them for the rest of their lives.

"State-of-the-art treatments" will result in many thousands of children being medicated by expensive, ineffective, and dangerous drugs. The long-term safety and effectiveness of psychiatric medications on children have never been proven.

The side effects of suggested medications in children are severe. They include suicide, violence, psychosis, cardiac toxicity, and growth suppression. Several school shooters, such as Eric Harris (Columbine) and Kip Kinkel (Oregon) had been on antidepressants or stimulants when they committed their crimes.
...

Will they face coercion and threats of removal from school, or child neglect charges, if they refuse privacy-invading interrogations or unproved medications? How will a child remove a stigmatizing label from his records?

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/phyllisschlafly/ps20041123.shtml

KERRAY: no je to mozny, pac tohle je fakt silenost...

BULHI: Navrhy jsou realne, pochybuju ale, ze v tehle podobe projdou... bohuzel to asi ani neni zamer, vzhledem k osvedcene taktice "navrhnout neco sileneho, co smetou ze stolu, a pak navrhnout neco podobneho, co neni tak moc, a to vsichni s ulevou schvali"...

autor dopisu zpochybnujiciho oficialni priciny padu vezi wtc vyhozen.... /viz jeho jeho dopis --- JAXXE 12:49:37 15.11.2004 /

South Bend firm's lab director fired after questioning federal probe

By JOHN DOBBERSTEIN
Tribune Staff Writer

SOUTH BEND -- The laboratory director from a South Bend firm has been fired for attempting to cast doubt on the federal investigation into what caused the World Trade Center's twin towers to collapse on Sept. 11, 2001.

Kevin R. Ryan was terminated Tuesday from his job at Environmental Health Laboratories Inc., a subsidiary of Underwriters Laboratories Inc., the consumer-product safety testing giant.

On Nov. 11, Ryan wrote a letter to the National Institute of Standards and Technology -- the agency probing the collapse -- challenging the common theory that burning jet fuel weakened the steel supports holding up the 110-story skyscrapers.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc., according to Ryan, "was the company that certified the steel components used in the construction of the WTC buildings."

Ryan wrote that last year, while "requesting information," UL's chief executive officer and fire protection business manager disagreed about key issues surrounding the collapse, "except for one thing -- that the samples we certified met all requirements."

...

http://www.southbendtribune.com/stories/2004/11/22/local.20041122-sbt-FULL-A1-Area_man_stirs.sto

Bulhi: jo, to uz si rikam par let :)

ty jo porad nad tim premejslim, to si snad nekdo vymyslewl, to neni mozny...

JAXXE: ohooo, tak to je husty... povinny psichiatricky prohlidky, tomu se fakt clovek muze jenom smat, ale obavam se, aby nas smich nepresel... az do ted jsem ty zvesti o fasisticky americky vlade bral celkem s rezervou, ale tohle je fakt kotel.. a ten dotaznik, to je taky hodne drsny... je to vlastne hodne chytry, lidi na sebe vsechno napraskaj a pokud je nekdo normalni a nema zajem vsechno vykecat, tak na nej vlastne uz vzdycky budou neco mit... pokud vzbudi pozdeji nejaky podezreni, tak se jen nejakej urednik koukne na jeho formular, oznaci 30 otazek za umyslne spatny a nazdar...

Stále více Orwelovská Amerika

Žurnalisté rádi přirovnávají současnou společnost k totalitnímu režimu z knihy George Orwella 1984. V této knize je zobrazen totalitní stát kontrolující každý aspekt života svých občanů. Když v roce 1949 byla kniha poprvé představena veřejnosti, jen málo lidí si takovou společnost dokázalo představit. Většina se domnívala, že to není možné, že občané by prostě nic takového nepřipustili.

Kdyby se některý stát pokusil zavést podobný systém ze dne na den, samozřejmě by narazil na odpor svých občanů. Ovšem stát to ví a zavádí jednotlivá opatření postupně a opatrně, aby nevzbudil příliš pozornost veřejnosti. A rovněž se mu daří zdůvodňovat, že se tak děje pro vlastní dobro občanů a pro dobro společnosti. Výsledkem je skutečnost, že odpor veřejnosti je minimální.

Vy samozřejmě víte, jak pracuje stát, ale přesto bych vám rád znovu připomněl a předložil k diskuzi tři návrhy naší vlády, které hluboce zasahují do našeho soukromí a které značně okleští naše svobody. Říci pravdu, tyhle tři návrhy - budou-li přijaty - by nás měly přinutit vstát od od televize, odložit dálkový ovládač a vyrazit do ulic.

Na první návrh upozornili LRC senátoři Ron Paul a Wendy McElroy. "New Freedom Commission on Mental Health" (Nová svobodná komise pro mentální zdraví) navrhuje státem nařízené povinné psychiatrické prohlídky pro všechny občany Ameriky, včetně školních dětí a dokonce i těch předškolních, bez ohledu na případný nesouhlas rodičů. Ron Paul o tomto návrhu soudí, že (cituji): "... popírá rodičovská práva a může vést k nadměrnému předepisování léků pro děti." Jistě by tento návrh znamenal zlatý důl pro farmaceutické firmy těsně spojené s byrokraty ve Washnigtonu, ale pro obyčejné Američany, především rodiny s dětmi, by znamenal katastrofu.

Nadměrné předepisování antidepresiv dětem bylo nedávno tématem diskuze v The Beaufort Gazette, odkud uvádím: "Vzrůstající počet studií, z nichž některé byly prováděny přímo odborníky z FDA, ale jejichž závěry nebyly zveřejněny, uvádějí, že děti a mládež, kterým byla antidepresiva ordinována, mají náběh na vyšší počet sebevražd. Jde o antidepresiva určena původně dospělým." Jeden ze základních léků, často předepisovaný dětem, je Ritalin (methylphenidate). Tento lék je návykový a má další vážné vedlejší účinky. Ostatně methylphenidate a heroin jsou základní složky drogy "speedball" prodávané na ulici a oblíbené především mezi mládeži.

O druhém návrhu se zatím ještě diskutuje. Týká se zavedení agresivnějšího monitorování domácích učitelů. Ale domácí učitelství už je na tapetě nějakou dobu, včetně např. požadavků vynuceného testování. Upřímně řečeno slovo "monitorování" by mělo u nás způsobit rozsvícení varovných kontrolek v mozku. Vládou organizované monitorování většinou vede k vládou prováděné kontrole. Veřejné školy, nebo lépe řečeno "vládou kontrolované školství", míchá vzdělání a ideologii a nestydatě staví na módních a neověřených učitelských metodách.

Toto jsou některé důvody, pro které se mnoho rodičů rozhodlo neposílat děti do veřejných škol, a učit je raději doma. Ale washingtonští byrokraté nebudou mít klid, dokud nebudou moci kontrolovat osnovy, ideologii a učitelské techniky domácích učitelů.

A konečně třetí návrh. Máme tady nové každoroční sčítání lidu nazvané American Community Survey. Mnozí jej označili za (cituji) "pokus proniknout do všech aspektů našich životů". Dotazník má neuvěřitelných čtyřiadvacet stran a obsahuje vše zahrnující otázky týkající se takových věcí, jako příjmu dotazovaného, jeho fyzického a mentálního zdraví, rodinného zázemí a postavení, a dalších intimních a zcela soukromých záležitostí. Dotazník chce vědět, kolik dnů v uplynulém roce jste prostonali, zda máte zdravotní těžkosti vylézt do schodů, a (kupodivu i) v kolik hodin ráno jdete do práce. Musíte uvést jména a adresy vašich přátel a příbuzných a odpovědět i otázky soukromé povahy, které se týkají přímo jich. Máte povinnost uvést, jak dlouho chodili do školy lidé žijící s vámi ve společné domácnosti, kdy naposledy pracovali, jakým jazykem hovoří a rovněž musíte popsat jejich zdravotní a emocionální problémy.

A chcete vědět, co se stane, pokud se domníváte (jako já), že po takových věcech vládě nic není, a že nebudete dělat informátory a donašeče na vlastní rodinu a přátele? Vaše neochota vás bude stát pěkně kulaté penízky. Za každou přeskočenou otázku sto dolarů pokuty. Za každou úmyslně špatnou odpověď pět set. Přičemž byrokraté ve Washingtonu se sami rozhodnou, zda šlo o úmysl nebo ne.

Tyto tři návrhy se rovnají byrokratické inkvizici. A domnívám se, že nepřeháním, nazývám-li je "orwellovskými". Naše děti se v podstatě stanou chovanci státu - všechny, včetně těch předškolních. Stát bude rozhodovat o tom, zda chování, myšlení a názory našich dětí jsou v pořádku. Bude-li se domnívat, že nikoliv, budou jim předepisovány medikamenty, nebo budou muset podstupovat korektivní výuku. Domácí školství bude nuceno sjednotit své osnovy a filozofii se státními školami tak, aby vše, v co děti věří, bylo uniformní. Rozšířené sledování občanů bude sloužit Washingtonu k identifikaci jedinců podezřelých z nedostatečného nadšení pro snahy vlády o "ochranu" našich svobod a "zlepšení" naší společnosti. Jakmile budou tito jedinci známí, může se vláda rozhodnout, jaké další kroky by přicházely v úvahu k nápravě jejich myšlení.

Naši apatičtí zástupci ve Washingtonu, ať republikáni nebo demokraté, nebudou váhat podpořit tyto a podobné návrhy. A očekávají, že v úřadech, do kterých byli zvoleni, setrvají.

Článek The Orwellian US vyšel 27. září na serveru lewrockwell.com

http://www.osud.cz/cs/clanek.php?id=3154&PHPSESSID=c3841fe19f386f568923a82923ba1bd1

prituhuje :(

USA Patriot Act II would make news gathering a crime

Think the first Patriot Act was a civil rights and personal privacy tragedy? Just wait until you see Patriot Act II. Section 102 of the police state bill would make it a crime to engage in any information gathering, meaning that people who gather news headlines on the Internet would suddenly be deemed criminals and terrorists.

Essentially, the law would destroy any last illusions of freedom in the United States. It would turn the USA into a communist-style police state, where no person is truly free.

http://www.newstarget.com/002477.html

video ukazky z filmu "911 in plain site":

zablesk pred narazem a podivny tvar na trupu:

http://911inplanesite.com/media/flight175anomalies.wmv

reporter fox news rika tesne po narazu, ze to byl "cargo plane" bez oken

http://911inplanesite.com/media/nowindows.wmv

"dira" v pentagonu, pred zhroucenim steny

http://911inplanesite.com/media/pentagon.wmv

NEW YORK MAGAZINE
Photo by Rob Howard


FLIGHT 175: Abnormal protrusion captured on film
WAS FLIGHT 175 A UNITED AIRLINES JETLINER?



Let’s begin by examining the original source footage from CNN. Everyone has seen this same footage over and over again. The Boeing 767 enters from the left side of the frame and plows full speed into the corner of the South tower. Still frames from this shot appear on dozens of national magazine covers from all over the country and it is also the trademark video that used by most filmmakers for their documentaries on 9/11. What most people have failed to recognize, until recently, is that on the underside of the plane, just to the right of the fuselage, there appears to be a peculiar three-dimensional anomaly. By comparison, this “protrusion” looks as if it is slightly smaller than one of the engines mounted to the plane. Keep in mind that the engines on a 767 are approximately 9 feet in diameter and 12 feet in length.



The first impression is that it might be a trick of light and shadow, so it was important to turn to experts in this field. La Vanguardia, a publication in Barcelona, Spain, published an investigative report from a Spanish University, back in June of 2003. What was their professional opinion? After a thorough digital image analysis, the university experts came to the conclusion that the object mounted to the bottom of this plane was three-dimensional in nature and could not have been caused by shadows or reflections. This brings us to a very interesting point in our investigation and begs us to ask some very serious questions. What is mounted to the underbelly of Flight 175? What purpose did it serve in the attacks? How could this plane have departed from a commercial airport without such a large attachment being noticed by maintenance and refueling personnel? Wouldn’t the baggage handlers have noticed it? Surely we can all agree that they would have noticed it - that is, if it had taken off from a commercial airport.



¨

Let’s stop for a moment and ask the question, “Did this plane take off from a commercial airport?” We already have one Fox News employee making the statement that the plane had no passenger windows. What commercial airliner has no passenger windows? The answer, I’m sure we all can agree, is none. We have a Fox News anchor asking the question, “Is it possible that was some sort of cargo plane?”

After a few weeks of searching, we were able to obtain photographs of a military Boeing 767. This plane is being marketed to the U.S. Air Force by Boeing to replace their KC-130 series. The most perplexing aspect of this military craft is that it has no passenger windows and is in fact a refueling tanker aircraft. Is it possible that the plane we all saw crashing into the South tower was a Boeing 767 refueling tanker aircraft? Wouldn’t such a plane take off from a military base?

-------------

nevim jestli vidite obrazky, takze jsou kdyz tak tady:

http://www.911inplanesite.com/new_york_magazine.htm

News Executive Calls Anti-Arnold Movement 'Klan-Like,' Promises to Alert FBI

Prison Planet | November 22 2004

We received the following E mail from a reader who had forwarded the 'American Against Arnold' press release to mainstream news executives and journalists.

This response came from the Vice-President of a Tennessee based CBS affiliate.

In the E mail, he likens Alex Jones and the Americans Against Arnold movement to the Klu Klux Klan, saying they are "probable threat to our freedom and safety and are not fit to carry Governor Schwarzenegger’s luggage."

It is completely baffling to try to understand the logic in play here. We are opposing someone who said publicly that they admired Hitler and campaigned in Austria for admitted Nazi Kurt Waldheim.

Schwarzenegger’s Nazi ties are detailed in the links at the end of the article.

We're opposing a man who called black people subhuman ni**ers and once stated, "If you gave these blacks a country to run, they would run it down the tubes."

We fight the racist and so that makes us racist!

The E mail is reprinted below and gives us another insight into the warped minds of the people who are behind The Gropenfuhrer becoming president.

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/november2004/221104newsexecutive.htm

The enforcer

Michael Koubi worked for Shin Bet, Israel's security service, for 21 years and was its chief interrogator from 1987 to 1993. He interrogated hundreds of Palestinian prisoners, including renowned militants such as Sheikh Yassin, the former leader of the Palestinian group Hamas, who was killed in an Israeli attack this year. He claims that intelligence gained in interrogation has been crucial to protecting Israel from terrorism. He tells Michael Bond that, given enough time, he could make almost anyone talk


http://www.newscientist.com/opinion/opinterview.jsp;jsessionid=EEFCIFMECEPN?id=ns24741

'We could monitor you anywhere on Earth'

http://newpaper.asia1.com.sg/top/story/0,4136,77782,00.html

Special Report

On executions, beheadings, and other propaganda operations

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/112004Chin/112004chin.html