The London Attacks - Latest
Prisonplanet | July 19 2005
BRITISH police are considering the possibility that the four key suspects in the recent London attacks may have been tricked into setting off their bombs.
"We do not have hard evidence that the men were suicide bombers. It is possible that they
did not intend to die,” a Scotland Yard spokesman said.
According to one police
hypothesis, the bombers were tricked by a "master” who told
them they would have time to escape — when, in fact, the devices
were set to go off immediately.
"The bombers’ master
might have thought that he couldn’t risk the four men being caught
and spilling everything to British interrogators,” an unnamed security
official has said.
Lending weight to the theory
is the fact that all four men had paid up their parking tickets before
boarding a train at Luton for King’s Cross and that they all bought
return tickets to the Capital.
Moreover, the paper said,
the men were carrying their explosives inside rucksacks, as opposed
to strapped to their bodies, as is common practice among suicide bombers.
None were reported to have
cried "Allah-o-Akbar” before setting off their charge —
something which most suicide bombers do.
So
the official line is now leaning towards the theory that an "Al
Qaeda" Mastermind duped the "pawn" bombers into their
actions, covering for all the inconsistencies we have thrown up so far.
This
comes as no surprise, after the mainstream media have been questioning
the official line all weekend. Both the London
Mirror and the Independent
published articles directly challenging the suicide bomber theory.
The bombers were certainly duped, yet there is absolutely no evidence
to suggest there was an Al Qaeda guiding hand. The fact that these men
had
been to Pakistan in 2004 seems to be, for some outlets, stone cold
proof that they were Al Qaeda terrorists.
One of the suspected "masterminds"
behind the attacks, Egyptian Magdy el Nashar, challenged
officials to find any credible evidence to implicate him. It seems
they have failed as he has been cleared
of involvement by Egyptian authorities.
Meanwhile
bigger stories have gone unnoticed. Firstly, on Saturday we published
an article highlighting the various instances of elite connections
to the bombings and the drill that was taking place on the same morning.
Secondly
the fact that the British Government had tracked
and possibly arrested
and then released their so called suspects has not hit the front
pages. Could it be that the plot was discovered and then allowed to
happen or aided in some way. The media should be jumping all over the
fact that the terror alert level was DOWNGRADED
for the first time in four years one month prior to the attacks.
Thirdly,
it has gone virtually unreported that the Pound
fell 6% in 10 days before London terror attacks, a clear indication
of prior knowledge on the part of London's financial establishment.
And
we now also have an admission by Israeli authorities that they did
indeed receive prior warning of the attacks and warned Benjamin
Netanyahu to stay inside his London Hotel.
This
clearly indicates first that the story of power surges on the underground
was prepared beforehand and used as a cover for over an hour to confuse
the media and keep away those who seek the real stories. If Israel knew
it was bombs before they went off then why wouldn't British police?
It's a tried and tested method and serves the purpose of keeping the
public and the media in line at the scene of such events.
Also the scramble to alter
the initial AP reports of this story indicates that someone was attempting
to cover up this smoking gun.
We've been told that there
will be 'No
internal inquiry' into the blasts so we might as well shut up and
just believe whatever they tell us no matter how many times they change
the story.
....
http://propagandamatrix.com/Pages/Jul05/190705attacks.html