A proč je matematicky neplatná?- Už to tu bylo... tak jen pro zopakovani:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/rpkp/autopsy.html
The Conclusion
So we see that the value of w(k) cannot be determined from the local geometry of the six-levelled object in a neighbourhood of k. The "collapse mechanism" built into the formula is clearly k-dependent. Therefore we see that not only is the inclusion of the "half twist" failing to guarantee the "preservation" of some geometric property to which McKenna has referred, but the failure is precisely because of its inclusion. McKenna's stated reason for this (crucial) step of the construction is unacceptable. As a mathematician who has met and talked with him, who is sympathetic with the majority of his other work, and who is only interested in spreading clarity, I must conclude that the "timewave" cannot be taken to be what McKenna claims it is.
On a more positive note, I should add that I don't find McKenna's timewave exploit to be completely without value. Certain observations (such as the absence of 5's in the set {h(1),...,h(64)} and the correspondence of the Chinese 13-lunation ritual calendar with six 64-day cycles) are certainly worthy of further consideration. It wouldn't surprise me if a fractal map of temporal resonance was encoded into the King Wen sequence, just as it wouldn't surprise me if something quite remarkable does occur on December 21, 2012. The world can be a very strange place, and we all have much to learn. McKenna's hyper-imaginative speculation has fired the imagination of many. With this particular "theory" he has spread awareness of the I Ching and the Mayan calendar, both fascinating and poorly understood systems of ancient human thought. I should therefore end by suggesting that the remainder of his published thought should not be dismissed as a result of my findings which are discussed here.