OXIS: vzdycky slo o PENIZE a tohle je uplne stejny, jsem o tom presvedcen. Hodne lidi, kteri se primotali do zivota MJ vycitili sanci z nej neco vytahnout, samozrejme, ze penize. Cim vetsi senzace, tim vic vydela. Tentokrat je to jeste nechutnejsi v tom, jak je to jednostranny a MJ tu neni aby se mohl branit. Ani 10 let po smrti ho nenachaj odpocivat. Nerozumim tomu jak muzou soudny radia a tv stanice prestat hrat jeho hudbu na zaklade vyfabulovanyho dokumentu a neptaji se dal, ze nepochybuji, vzdyt vymyslet si muze kdokoliv a komkoliv cokoliv.
V roce 2005 .. 10 let byl pod dohledem FBI, nenasli jedinou vec a u soudu zprosten od vseho a to si pis, ze kdyby meli aspon neco malinkatyho tak mu natrou nehorazne. Wade Robson co ted prisel s dokumentem byl hlavni svedek,.. predstav si, ze jsi MJ, 10 let nekoho zneuzivas a pak ho postavis jako prvniho a hlavniho svedka pri svoji obhajobe. Dava to smysl? Nebyl vhodnejsi moment, kdy mohl Robson udelat coming out nez u toho soudu, kde byl pod ochranou atd.
ten dokument je tocenej tak manipulativne, jak z ucebnice, znamy techniky kdy "obet" rekne "MJ byl skvelej, blabla,... " tim si pripravi pudu a za tim ihned lez a ta ma pak vetsi dopad na divaka. Zabery, ktery miri na "obet" shora pusobi, ze clovek vypada zranitelny, naladovy nasviceni, hudba, detaily na chvejici se ruce. Ta stopaz 4h, absolutne zadny vyjadreni kohokoliv jinyho, jen oni dva a jejich nejuzsi rodina. napriklad ten prsten co tam ukazuje v tom dokumentu, ..Brett Barnes (ten kluk o kterem mluvi, ze je "nahradil") rika, ze Safechuck mel rad prsteny, si bral MJ kreditku a kupoval si veci... Wade Robson tam je jasny timeline... Ti kluci chtej prachy, casem se to ukaze.
timeline
--------
In 2011, Robson approached John Branca, co-executor of the Michael Jackson Estate, about directing the new Michael Jackson/Cirque du Soleil production, ONE. Robson admitted he wanted the job “badly,” but the Estate ultimately chose someone else for the position.
In 2012, Robson had a nervous breakdown, triggered, he said, by an obsessive quest for success. His career, in his own words, began to “crumble.”
That same year, with Robson’s career, finances, and marriage in peril, he began shopping a book that claimed he was sexually abused by Michael Jackson. No publisher picked it up.
In 2013, Robson filed a $1.5 billion dollar civil lawsuit/creditor’s claim, along with James Safechuck, who also spent time with Jackson in the late ‘80s. Safechuck claimed he only realized he may have been abused when Robson filed his lawsuit. That lawsuit was dismissed by a probate court in 2017.
In 2019, the Sundance Film Festival premiered a documentary based entirely on Robson and Safechuck's allegations. While the documentary is obviously emotionally disturbing given the content, it presents no new evidence or witnesses. The film's director, Dan Reed, acknowledged not wanting to interview other key figures because it might complicate or compromise the story he wanted to tell.
je to z Forbesu
What You Should Know About the New Michael Jackson Documentary
https://www.forbes.com/...at-you-should-know-about-the-new-michael-jackson-documentary/#37a30f6640fa
doporucuju zde kdo je Wade Robson
Michael Jackson And Wade Robson: The Real Story
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgSbSotJgUY
jsem moc zvedavej jestli Taj Jackson dokaze vybrat ty penize a natoci neco, co da vsechno kolem MJ do kontextu, pevne v tom doufam. (viz odkaz na sbirku co jsem sem hazel)
ja uz se v zivote presvedcil, ze jestli je nekdo intelektual jak pises atd. nehraje vubec roli, jen proste nezna vsechny souvislosti a tudiz to vidi zkreslene. Lidi chteji rychly jednoduchy reseni, ono to vyzaduje vuli a cas hledat. Kdyz je ti to tak nejak jedno a nejsi fanda, tak to neresis a akceptujes to, co plni headlines. Negativita se skvele prodava :) Kdyz se lze dostatecne opakovane, lidi tomu zacnou verit, to uz tady bylo prece stokrat.
uvidime casem...