The Political Compass
https://www.politicalcompass.org/uselection2016

Five Differences Between the Alt-Right and Libertarianism
by Jeffrey Tucker

"Why the defections from libertarianism to alt-right? My theory is that this generation of libertarians were not prepared to deal with a hard challenge from the right (the socialists of the right). The wisdom that liberty rejects authoritarianism from the right and the left skipped a full generation. Hayek's Road to Serfdom, Mises's Omnipotent Government, and Flynn's As We Go Marching all came out in 1944, and all three issued dire warnings that the real danger comes not from Soviet-style socialism but from crank, populist, top-down planning ideas from different forms of socialism (many of which market themselves as anti-leftist). Mises, Hayek, and Flynn knew. They lived it. They warned us. But this knowledge dropped out as the decades went on. By the end of the 1980s, thanks mainly to the Reagan coalition, libertarians had come to believe that the left was all that stood between us and utopia. Lacking the intellectual equipment to recognize other dangers, naive young liberty enthusiasts were left vulnerable to being swept up by the latest, un-PC brands of collectivism. It is a real intellectual failing and we are seeing the results today. It's tragic in many ways, but there is something very good about the defections. I would rather see people admit that they no longer believe in liberty as the primary driving force of history than pretend to be something they are not. For my own part, I admit to finding all their arguments tedious simply because I've read ALL THIS SAME STUFF in writings from 100 years ago by Darwin-obsessed eugenicists and these were the very people who built the institutions that libertarians exist to oppose. It's painful to watch intellectual history repeat itself solely due to ignorance of the past."

Five Differences Between the Alt-Right and Libertarianism | Foundation for Economic Education
https://fee.org/articles/five-differences-between-the-alt-right-and-libertarians/

WANTON: Ekonomie jako celek k tomuto nikdy nedospela. Nic na tom nemeni tech par teoretiku, ktere ty sam v ramci tebou vybraneho smeru favoritujes.

Spousta teoretiku je... pro prakticky zivot nepouzitelna, kazda z teorii ma krome svych pozitiv i sva negativa, ale to uzkoprofikovy teoretik nikdy nepochopi.

WANTON: u místních ekonomickejch myslitelů bych očekával, že si jsou schopni uvědomit rozdíl mezi sacialismem, státem a centrálně plánovanou ekonomikou

WANTON: Je videt, jak fundovane dokazes debatovat :D

WANTON: Odpovez na otazku, srabe.

Ano, jsou veci co davaji smysl. Vozis si prdel po silnicich, doma ti tece voda a po baraku ti nikdo nestrili. To neni samo od sebe.

WANTON: Aaa, argument jako obvykle. Wanton je buh, co vi nejlip, co je pro ostatni dobre a ostatni jsou idioti. Ja zapomel :)

DANYSEK: Proč. Není to tvůj argument, že stát umí dělat věci dobře?

WANTON: Ale klidne teda napis, co je na statu podle tebe dobre :)

DANYSEK: Tohle je naprostý nesmysl, co jsi napsal. :-)

WANTON: Svet neni cernobily. A nefunguje plne podle socialistu... ale ani v duchu Misesovych teorii. To ze nejake teorie nebyly v teoreticke rovine vyvraceny neimplikuje, ze jsou prakticky skutecne funkcni. Furt je to jen o zvaneni "coby kdyby".