SPECZ: jo to pak jo... je to takove vylepseni obvazu...
jinak kouknul jsem se po nejakych studiich a neco najit jde, ale nemam uplne ted cas koukat podrobnej... mmchodem ted med je dost efektivnejsi...
obre je taky vsimnoiyt si, ze to zabira na male rany, a tak.... no proste furt si myslim, ze ten pan je DESNE NEBEZPECNEJ.... kdyz by tyhle veci byly uplne moc hitovka, asi by se to pouzivalo, coz je takove trosku pravidlo prave ruky... zas ono jako jo, Alexandra Makedonskeho nalozili do medu, aby se jim po smrti nekazil pri prevozu... to je jako fehr, zadny mouchy/cervi a tak, zadnej vzduch.... budiz, budiz. Ja mit betadinu a obvazy, pripadne jakejkoliv kus neceho neprodysneho [jestli prijde pruser, ktery znici vsechny plasty, tak to bude fakt velkej pruser ;].... no nic.
PMID: 17708384 DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2007.16.7.27053
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether there is a difference between the efficacy of honey and sugar as wound dressings.
Method: Patients with open or infected wounds were randomised to receive either honey or sugar dressings. Bacterial colonisation, wound size, wound ASEPSIS score and pain were assessed at the start of treatment and at weekly intervals until full healing occurred.
Results: Forty patients were enrolled; 18 received sugar dressings and 22 honey dressings. In the honey group, 55% of patients had positive wound cultures at the start of treatment and 23% at one week, compared with 52% and 39% respectively in the sugar group.The median rate of healing in the first two weeks of treatment was 3.8cm2/week for the honey group and 2.2cm2/week for the sugar group. After three weeks of treatment 86% of patients treated with honey had no pain during dressing changes, compared with 72% treated with sugar.
Conclusion: Honey appears to be more effective than sugar in reducing bacterial contamination and promoting wound healing, and slightly less painful than sugar during dressing changes and motion.