• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    KAILASHWikileaks - Assange - Revolution now! + Anonymous + Bradley Manning a Snowden
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Julian Assange's lawyer Jennifer Robinson on rumours the Wikileaks founder will be expelled from Ecuador's Embassy and extradited to the United States. https://t.co/qSn0PgzazK

    https://twitter.com/sunriseon7/status/1114672579590017024?s=19
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    SCHWEPZ: "President Moreno, desperate to divert public attention away from the scandal, is using the claims as a pretext to oust Julian Assange, whom he erroneously blames for the publication, from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. On 2 April, the President stated that Assange has “violated the ‘conditions’ of his asylum” and that he will “take a decision” “in the short term.”" https://defend.wikileaks.org/...blog-julian-assange-in-jeopardy/?mc_cid=34cd97b2c3&mc_eid=8188ea33de
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    SCHWEPZ: cz tisk opet fascinujici:

    "Podle serveru Wikileaks by měl být Assange vyhozen kvůli skandálu, k němuž nedávno zveřejnil dokumenty." -- tak nevim jestli tohle je zamerna idiocie novinare co to pise nebo je nekompetentnost v zakladni anglictine? wikileaks zminily tenhle leak na svym twitteru, to je asi tak vsechno co s tim maj spolecnyho. zbytek ohledne toho kdo to heknul atd. je ekvadorska fabulace (alespon z dostupnejch informaci).

    a opet v clanku chybne uvedeno "obvineni ze znasilneni" ("Assange se uchýlil na ekvádorské velvyslanectví v roce 2012, aby se vyhnul vydání do Švédska, které ho chtělo vyslechnout kvůli obvinění ze znásilnění z roku 2010.") kdyz slo o podani vysvetleni. nekolikrat jsem jim kvuli tomu psal do lidovek, ale ignorujou me.

    a lezerne zmineno, ze muze byt vydan to usa, coz je obrovskej problem pro celou zurnalistickou profesi, bez jakyhokoliv dalsiho komentare.

    asi nelze cekat nic vic. halo noviny at its best.
    SCHWEPZ
    SCHWEPZ --- ---
    Zakladatel serveru WikiLeaks Julian Assange bude vyhnán z azylu na ekvádorském velvyslanectví v Londýně během několika dnů či hodin,
    uvedl na Twitteru WikiLeaks s odvoláním na nejmenovaný vysoce postavený ekvádorský zdroj. Ekvádor se na tom podle něj už dohodl s Británií.

    Zakladatel WikiLeaks Assange prý může přijít o azyl, během pár dnů - iDNES.cz
    https://www.idnes.cz/...l.A190405_160512_zahranicni_dtt?utm_source=www.seznam.cz&utm_medium=z-boxiku
    Assange expulsion from Ecuador embassy would be 'illegal,' his legal team says - CNN
    https://edition.cnn.com/2019/04/05/uk/ecuador-assange-embassy-expulsion-gbr-intl/index.html

    Podle serveru Wikileaks by měl být Assange vyhozen kvůli skandálu, k němuž nedávno zveřejnil dokumenty. Kauza se týká rodiny ekvádorského prezidenta Lenína Morena a převádění peněz do daňových rájů.

    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Laibach - The Whistleblowers 2.0 - Assange+Snowden+Manning +...version
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5GaqdVtNag
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    U.N. torture expert urges Ecuador not to expel Assange from embassy - Reuters
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ecuador-assange-un-idUSKCN1RH22V
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Chelsea Manning pushes for release from jail, with support of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/...-cortez/2019/04/02/6687625c-557c-11e9-8ef3-fbd41a2ce4d5_story.html
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Chelsea Manning's lawyers file an appeal against her detention | The Canary
    https://www.thecanary.co/...019/03/30/chelsea-mannings-lawyers-file-an-appeal-against-her-detention/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Silencing the Whistle: The Intercept Shutters Snowden Archive, Citing Cost
    https://www.mintpressnews.com/intercept-snowden-archive/256772/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Courage nominates Julian Assange for the 2019 Galizia Prize - Defend WikiLeaks Defend WikiLeaks
    https://defend.wikileaks.org/...9/03/08/courage-nominates-julian-assange-for-the-2019-galizia-prize/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    2. note: after a MASSIVE media campaign hinting at the fact that #Mueller was ready to indict Julian #Assange and #WikiLeaks for colluding with the #Trump campaign,no media has published a single line on the fact that there was no indictment at all against #Assange and #WikiLeaks
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    1. I vividly remember: 1 year ago, the very same day we published this interview with @DefendAssange https://t.co/oOcrh5MkVW, #Ecuador cut him off from the outside world. He is still there and his health is seriously deteriorating while he still arbitrarily detained since 2010
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    EXCLUSIVE: Ecuador Imprisons US Journalist In Room As Ambassador Tells Assange to 'Shut up' and Accept Spying
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/...shed-with-julian-assange-as-he-attempted-to-surveil-our-meeting/

    When I arrived, embassy staff checked my passport and letter of approval and pointed at the time on the letter. I was six minutes early. Instead of allowing me to wait inside, they told me to come back at the appropriate time — despite knowing that I did not have a phone or watch on me.

    ...

    After being searched, the staff directed me into the conference room, where two large visible cameras were pointed at the table. Those were there last time too. I knew the drill — or so I thought. They reminded me multiple times that my visit was only approved until 5 p.m. and that I would need to leave on the dot.

    ...

    A few moments later Assange walked by the door, but could not enter. Embassy staff demanded that he submit to a full-body scan with a metal detector before allowing him in the room. They have not done this with any other visitor in the nearly seven years that he has lived there, including during my previous visits.

    “I don’t want to do the body scan. It is undignified and not appropriate,” I heard Assange say. “I am just trying to have a private meeting with a journalist.”

    The door was slammed shut by someone from the embassy. I decided to sit and wait.

    Not only would they not let Assange in to see me without a body-scan, they also forced his lawyer to be scanned before he could come in to update me on the situation.

    After roughly 20 minutes, the lawyer came in and informed me that they were demanding to search Assange. Moreover, we would not be permitted to talk anywhere outside the highly-surveilled room where the Ecuadorians had confined me. Agreeing to these draconian terms would set a bad precedent — so he was unsure if the meeting would go ahead. After appraising me of the situation, he left the room.

    A bit later, I decided to leave the room myself for an update from embassy staff. I quickly discovered that the door was locked from the outside. So I went to the second door — that was locked too. That was when I realized that Ecuadorian officials had deliberately imprisoned me in a room.

    As this ominous realization dawned on me, I heard a dramatic confrontation unfolding outside.

    “What are you frightened of in relation to me meeting with a journalist? What is the embassy afraid of?” Assange asks. I can’t hear the response.

    Assange is arguing that as a political refugee the embassy has a duty to protect him — not to treat him as a prisoner.

    “Is this a prison?” Assange asks.

    “It’s not,” they reply. “You know it’s not.”

    The visit to the publisher had, in fact, become eerily similar to visits I have made to inmates at federal penitentiaries in the US. It seemed our government was getting what they wanted from Ecuador, as a former senior State Department official told Buzzfeed in January, “as far as we’re concerned, he’s in jail.”

    Assange, clearly agitated, demands to know “why are you surveilling me speaking to a US journalist? Do you think it’s unreasonable for me to expect privacy when I meet with a journalist? Why are you silent?”

    The embassy staff member responded that he “can’t say anything.”

    “Why can’t you say anything? Don’t you have an excuse? What is the basis? Why are you surveilling an American journalist? What reason should we tell her?” Assange asks.

    The conversation becomes hard to hear, as I am still locked in the room.

    Assange’s lawyer is also being searched again outside the room, though I can only hear bits and pieces of that conversation. He comes back in with a glass of water and tells me to hang tight. I feel like a prisoner receiving a visit. Finally, someone from the embassy comes in and tells me that I need to go to the lobby so that the ambassador could meet with Assange in the room. The room with the cameras and the bugs.

    I see Assange in passing in the lobby and say hi, but it’s cut short as he is directed to the conference room.

    Still phoneless, I glance at a clock and notice that it’s 4:19pm. I was locked in the room for over an hour.

    Sitting in the lobby I hear much of the conversation, so I begin to take notes.

    “Is this a prison? This is how you treat a prisoner, not a political refugee!” Assange demands.

    Ambassador Jaime Alberto Marchán retorts, saying it’s “for our protection, and to protect you!”

    At this point, clearly frustrated, Assange asserts: “I am trying to have a private conversation with a journalist. I am also a journalist — and you’re stopping me from doing my work. How can I safely relay my mistreatment and the illegality going on here to this journalist while under surveillance?”

    One of the issues, it seemed, is that Assange wanted to bring a small radio into the conference room to muffle our voices, so the microphones surveilling the room wouldn’t pick up what we were saying as easily. There also appears to be concern that he will share stories with other journalists now that they have him muzzled and gagged.

    “You are preventing this journalist from meeting with me in any other room,” Assange says, but only part of the conversation is audible at this point as someone cleaning decided they needed to jingle keys and make a ton of noise for several minutes.

    “You have been illegally surveilling me,” Assange sternly insists.

    “I want you to shut up,” the ambassador says.

    “I know you want me to shut up — the Ecuadorian president has already gagged me,” Assange fired back. “I am banned from producing journalism.”



    Wikileaks founder Julian Assange given 'less rights than a prisoner'
    https://pressgazette.co.uk/julian-assange-fewer-rights-than-prisoner-embassy-us-journalist-meeting/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    A Year of Silencing Julian Assange – Consortiumnews
    https://consortiumnews.com/2019/03/28/a-year-of-silencing-julian-assange/

    Assange and his lawyers are now subjected to body scans in addition to conditions that, in the opinion of Ecuador’s former President Rafael Correa, already amounted to torture. In his argument with the ambassador, Assange protested that he was being treated like “a prisoner” and not a political asylee.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Woman who sheltered Edward Snowden is granted asylum in Canada | World news | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/25/vanessa-rodel-helped-edward-snowden-asylum-canada
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    So #Mueller hasn’t indicted @DefendAssange and @wikileaks, will Journalists and media who have conducted a vitriolic campaign against them apologise?

    The vitriolic campaign has had an obvious agenda: to make acceptable to the public opinion that for 1st time in the history of the United States journalists who have revealed the true face of wars in Afghanistan+Iraq+warOnTerror end up in jail for their journalism

    https://twitter.com/SMaurizi/status/1109741341620273152?s=19
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Chelsea Manning: supporters demand release from solitary confinement | Chelsea Manning | The Guardian
    https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/mar/23/chelsea-manning-jail-solitary-confinement-wikileaks
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    WikiLeaks probe: supporters say Chelsea Manning in 'solitary confinement' - The National
    https://amp.thenational.ae/...-probe-supporters-say-chelsea-manning-in-solitary-confinement-1.840652
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    A build up of plain clothes ear-piece wearing operatives around the Ecuador embassy in London in the last two days has been sighted by Julian Assange's lawyers. There are normally 2-4 plainclothes British operatives present. The reason for the increase is not publicly known.

    ...

    someone flew the DOJ G5 from DC to London Tuesday. https://t.co/mDXupZvBX6

    ...

    What is US Department of Justice jet "N996GA" doing in London? The jet arrived on Tuesday from DC and was last noted rendering alleged Russian hacker Yevgeniy Nikulin to the US last year from the Czech republic, causing a diplomatic incident with Russia https://t.co/p6QL3r9BJD https://t.co/pr91LZl4rl

    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    The "Assange Precedent": The threat to the media posed by Trump's prosecution of Julian Assange - Defend WikiLeaks Defend WikiLeaks
    https://defend.wikileaks.org/...e-threat-to-the-media-posed-by-trumps-prosecution-of-julian-assange/

    The US seeks to apply its laws to European journalists and publishers and at the same time strip them of constitutional rights, effectively turning Europe into a legal Guantanamo Bay, where US criminal laws are asserted, but US rights are withheld. In April 2017, CIA director Mike Pompeo said that “Julian Assange has no First Amendment privileges. He is not a U.S. citizen.” He stated:

    “We have to recognize that we can no longer allow Assange and his colleagues the latitude to use free speech values against us. To give them the space to crush us with misappropriated secrets is a perversion of what our great Constitution stands for. It ends now.”[10]

    But while rejecting any rights under the first amendment, which guarantees free speech and freedom of the media under the US Constitution, the US believes it still has a right to prosecute a non-US publisher in Europe.
    Alan Rusbridger, former editor of The Guardian:

    “Journalists – whatever they think of Julian Assange – should defend his First Amendment rights”.[11]

    James Goodale, the lawyer representing the New York Times in the Pentagon Papers case, put it succinctly:

    “… the prosecution of Assange goes a step further. He’s not a source, he is a publisher who received information from sources. The danger to journalists can’t be overstated… As a matter of fact, a charge against Assange for ‘conspiring’ with a source is the most dangerous charge that I can think of with respect to the First Amendment in almost all my years representing media organizations. The reason is that one who is gathering/writing/distributing the news, as the law stands now, is free and clear under the First Amendment. If the government is able to say a person who is exempt under the First Amendment then loses that exemption because that person has “conspired” with a source who is subject to the Espionage Act or other law, then the government has succeeded in applying the standard to all news-gathering. That will mean that the press’ ability to get newsworthy classified information from government sources will be severely curtailed, because every story that is based on leaked info will theoretically be subject to legal action by the government. It will be up to the person with the information to prove that they got it without violating the Espionage Act. This would be, in my view, the worst thing to happen to the First Amendment — almost ever.” [12]
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam