• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    KAILASHWikileaks - Assange - Revolution now! + Anonymous + Bradley Manning a Snowden
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Your Man in the Public Gallery - Assange Hearing Day 1 - Craig Murray
    https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/...ives/2020/02/your-man-in-the-public-gallery-assange-hearing-day-1/

    in the courtroom itself, Julian Assange is confined at the back of the court behind a bulletproof glass screen. He made the point several times during proceedings that this makes it very difficult for him to see and hear the proceedings. The magistrate, Vanessa Baraitser, chose to interpret this with studied dishonesty as a problem caused by the very faint noise of demonstrators outside, as opposed to a problem caused by Assange being locked away from the court in a massive bulletproof glass box.

    Now there is no reason at all for Assange to be in that box, designed to restrain extremely physically violent terrorists. He could sit, as a defendant at a hearing normally would, in the body of the court with his lawyers. But the cowardly and vicious Baraitser has refused repeated and persistent requests from the defence for Assange to be allowed to sit with his lawyers. Baraitser of course is but a puppet, being supervised by Chief Magistrate Lady Arbuthnot, a woman so enmeshed in the defence and security service establishment I can conceive of no way in which her involvement in this case could be more corrupt.

    ...

    Baraitser’s intention is to humiliate Assange, and to instill in the rest of us horror at the vast crushing power of the state. The inexorable strength of the sentencing wing of the nightmarish Belmarsh Prison must be maintained. If you are here, you are guilty.

    It’s the Lubyanka. You may only be a remand prisoner. This may only be a hearing not a trial. You may have no history of violence and not be accused of any violence. You may have three of the country’s most eminent psychiatrists submitting reports of your history of severe clinical depression and warning of suicide. But I, Vanessa Baraitser, am still going to lock you up in a box designed for the most violent of terrorists. To show what we can do to dissidents. And if you can’t then follow court proceedings, all the better.

    ...


    I followed the arguments very clearly every minute of the day, and not a single one of the most important facts and arguments today has been reported anywhere in the mainstream media. That is a bold claim, but I fear it is perfectly true. So I have much work to do to let the world know what actually happened. The mere act of being an honest witness is suddenly extremely important, when the entire media has abandoned that role.

    ...

    Baraitser questioned the prosecution on the veracity of some of these claims. In particular, the claim that newspapers were not in the same position because Assange was charged not with publication, but with “aiding and abetting” Chelsea Manning in getting the material, did not seem consistent with Lewis’ reading of the 1989 Official Secrets Act, which said that merely obtaining and publishing any government secret was an offence. Surely, Baraitser suggested, that meant that newspapers just publishing the Manning leaks would be guilty of an offence?

    This appeared to catch Lewis entirely off guard. The last thing he had expected was any perspicacity from Baraitser, whose job was just to do what he said. Lewis hummed and hawed, put his glasses on and off several times, adjusted his microphone repeatedly and picked up a succession of pieces of paper from his brief, each of which appeared to surprise him by its contents, as he waved them haplessly in the air and said he really should have cited the Shayler case but couldn’t find it. It was liking watching Columbo with none of the charm and without the killer question at the end of the process.

    Suddenly Lewis appeared to come to a decision. Yes, he said much more firmly. The 1989 Official Secrets Act had been introduced by the Thatcher Government after the Ponting Case, specifically to remove the public interest defence and to make unauthorised possession of an official secret a crime of strict liability – meaning no matter how you got it, publishing and even possessing made you guilty. Therefore, under the principle of dual criminality, Assange was liable for extradition whether or not he had aided and abetted Manning. Lewis then went on to add that any journalist and any publication that printed the official secret would therefore also be committing an offence, no matter how they had obtained it, and no matter if it did or did not name informants.

    Lewis had thus just flat out contradicted his entire opening statement to the media stating that they need not worry as the Assange charges could never be applied to them.
    And he did so straight after the adjournment, immediately after his team had handed out copies of the argument he had now just completely contradicted. I cannot think it has often happened in court that a senior lawyer has proven himself so absolutely and so immediately to be an unmitigated and ill-motivated liar. This was undoubtedly the most breathtaking moment in today’s court hearing

    ...

    I cannot find any mention anywhere in the mainstream media that this happened at all. What I can find, everywhere, is the mainstream media reporting, via cut and paste, Lewis’s first part of his statement on why the prosecution of Assange is not a threat to press freedom; but nobody seems to have reported that he totally abandoned his own argument five minutes later. Were the journalists too stupid to understand the exchanges?

    ...

    while the US allegation of harm to informants is widely reported, the defence’s total refutation on the facts and claim that the fabrication of facts amounts to abuse of process is not much reported at all. Fitzgerald finally referred to US prison conditions, the impossibility of a fair trial in the US, and the fact the Trump Administration has stated foreign nationals will not receive First Amendment protections, as reasons that extradition must be barred

    ...

    For the purposes of section 81(a), I next have to deal with the question of how
    this politically motivated prosecution satisfies the test of being directed against
    Julian Assange because of his political opinions. The essence of his political
    opinions which have provoked this prosecution are summarised in the reports
    of Professor Feldstein [tab 18], Professor Rogers [tab 40], Professor Noam
    Chomsky [tab 39] and Professor Kopelman:-
    i. He is a leading proponent of an open society and of freedom of expression.
    ii. He is anti-war and anti-imperialism.
    iii. He is a world-renowned champion of political transparency and of the
    public’s right to access information on issues of importance – issues such
    as political corruption, war crimes, torture and the mistreatment of
    Guantanamo detainees.
    5.4.Those beliefs and those actions inevitably bring him into conflict with powerful
    states including the current US administration, for political reasons. Which
    explains why he has been denounced as a terrorist and why President Trump
    has in the past called for the death penalty.
    5.5.But I should add his revelations are far from confined to the wrongdoings of
    the US. He has exposed surveillance by Russia; and published exposes of Mr
    Assad in Syria; and it is said that WikiLeaks revelations about corruption in
    Tunisia and torture in Egypt were the catalyst for the Arab Spring itself.
    5.6.The US say he is no journalist. But you will see a full record of his work in
    Bundle M. He has been a member of the Australian journalists union since
    2009, he is a member of the NUJ and the European Federation of Journalists.
    He has won numerous media awards including being honoured with the
    highest award for Australian journalists. His work has been recognised by the
    Economist, Amnesty International and the Council of Europe. He is the winner
    of the Martha Gelhorn prize and has been repeatedly nominated for the Nobel
    Peace Prize, including both last year and this year. You can see from the
    materials that he has written books, articles and documentaries. He has had
    articles published in the Guardian, the New York Times, the Washington Post
    and the New Statesman, just to name a few. Some of the very publications for
    which his extradition is being sought have been refereed to and relied upon in
    Courts throughout the world, including the UK Supreme Court and the
    European Court of Human Rights. In short, he has championed the cause of
    transparency and freedom of information throughout the world.
    5.7.Professor Noam Chomsky puts it like this: – ‘in courageously upholding
    political beliefs that most of profess to share he has performed an
    enormous service to all those in the world who treasure the values of
    freedom and democracy and who therefore demand the right to know
    what their elected representatives are doing’ [see tab 39, paragraph 14].
    So Julian Assange’s positive impact on the world is undeniable. The hostility
    it has provoked from the Trump administration is equally undeniable.
    The legal test for ‘political opinions’
    5.8.I am sure you are aware of the legal authorities on this issue: namely whether
    a request is made because of the defendant’s political opinions. A broad
    approach has to be adopted when applying the test. In support of this we rely
    on the case of Re Asliturk [2002] EWHC 2326 (abuse authorities, tab 11, at
    paras 25 – 26) which clearly establishes that such a wide approach should be
    adopted to the concept of political opinions. And that will clearly cover Julian
    Assange’s ideological positions. Moreover, we also rely on cases such as
    Emilia Gomez v SSHD [2000] INLR 549 at tab 43 of the political offence
    authorities bundle. These show that the concept of “political opinions” extends
    to the political opinions imputed to the individual citizen by the state which
    prosecutes him. For that reason the characterisation of Julian Assange and
    WikiLeaks as a “non-state hostile intelligence agency” by Mr Pompeo makes
    clear that he has been targeted for his imputed political opinions. All the
    experts whose reports you have show that Julian Assange has been targeted
    because of the political position imputed to him by the Trump administration –
    as an enemy of America who must be brought down.
    MTO
    MTO --- ---
    Trump aurait proposé un marché à Assange afin de le gracier
    https://www.lefigaro.fr/...disculpait-la-russie-dans-les-fuites-democrates-selon-sa-defense-20200219

    První zprávy - Domácí - Trump udělí milost Assangemu, ale nebude to zadarmo!
    https://www.prvnizpravy.cz/zpravy/zpravy/trump-udeli-milost-assangemu-ale-nebude-to-zadarmo/

    - nevim jestli to je k placi nebo ke smichu...
    MTO
    MTO --- ---
    TADEAS: njn. svoboda slova uz se nekona. musime si zvykat a zaridt se...
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    MTO: hnus co
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Australian MPs lobby Britain to release Wikileaks founder Julian Assange | ABC News
    https://youtube.com/watch?v=IwzUIc63dIY
    MTO
    MTO --- ---
    Why Did Twitter Just "Lockdown" WikiLeaks Account? | Zero Hedge
    https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/why-did-twitter-just-lockdown-wikileaks-account

    Just hours after a secret meeting with Silicon Valley tech giants to discuss censorship of "misinformation" surrounding coronavirus, and just days before Julian Assange's extradition hearings are set to continue, Kristin Hrafnsson - a WikiLeaks' journalist - reports that the WikiLeaks' Twitter account has been locked-down...
    SCHWEPZ
    SCHWEPZ --- ---
    Assange ve vězení umučíte k smrti, varuje Brity 120 lékařů a psychologů - Novinky.cz
    https://www.novinky.cz/...gu-40313834?utm_source=www.seznam.cz&utm_medium=z-boxiku&utm_campaign=null

    Doctors call for end to ‘torture and medical neglect of Julian Assange’ | Bournemouth Echo
    https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/...242187.doctors-call-end-torture-medical-neglect-julian-assange/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Wikileaks founder Julian Assange is being subjected to torture, UN Special Rapporteur on Torture told DW.

    His claim has fueled calls for the UK to release Assange from custody. https://t.co/wHSHGof5UO
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    RAY McGOVERN: German TV Exposes the Lies That Entrapped Julian Assange – Consortiumnews
    https://consortiumnews.com/...ray-mcgovern-german-tv-exposes-the-lies-that-entrapped-julian-assange/

    One of the main German TV channels (ZDF) ran two prime-time segments on Wednesday night exposing authorities in Sweden for having “made up” the story about Julian Assange being a rapist.

    Until last night most Germans, as well as other consumers of “major media” in Europe, had no idea of the trickery that enmeshed Assange in a spider-web almost certainly designed by the U.S. and woven by accomplices in vassal states like Sweden, Britain and, eventually, Ecuador.

    ZDF punctured that web by interviewing UN Rapporteur on Torture Nils Melzer. One ZDF “Heute Sendung” segment (in German) is especially telling from minute 13:00 to 15:30 . The second is ZDF “Heute Journal” (minute 25:49 to 30:19.)

    Both ZDF programs show Melzer being interviewed, with minimal interruption or commentary, letting his findings speak for themselves about how allegations against Assange were “made up” and manipulated to hold him captive.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    More than 100 prominent Germans appeal for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's release from prison | London Evening Standard
    https://www.standard.co.uk/...world/german-politicians-julian-assange-free-from-prison-a4355801.html

    Signatories to the appeal include former vice-chancellor Sigmar Gabriel, former vice president of the European Commission Gunter Verheugen and a number of former federal ministers.

    The German appeal, which is supported by Reporters Without Borders Germany, as well as members of Amnesty International, Transparency International, the German Journalists’ Union (dju), the Whistleblower Network and the writers’ association PEN-Germany, calls on the British Government to “release Julian Assange from prison immediately so that he can recover under specialist medical supervision and exercise his basic rights without hindrance”.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Press freedom is at risk if we allow Julian Assange's extradition | Roy Greenslade | Media | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/...b/02/press-freedom-is-at-risk-if-we-allow-julian-assanges-extradition
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    A murderous system is being created before our very eyes
    «A murderous system is being created before our very eyes» – Republik
    https://www.republik.ch/2020/01/31/nils-melzer-about-wikileaks-founder-julian-assange

    A made-up rape allegation and fabricated evidence in Sweden, pressure from the UK not to drop the case, a biased judge, detention in a maximum security prison, psychological torture – and soon extradition to the U.S., where he could face up to 175 years in prison for exposing war crimes. For the first time, the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, Nils Melzer, speaks in detail about the explosive findings of his investigation into the case of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    JUAN BRANCO, JULIAN ASSANGE ESPIONNES par la CIA #4
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9M9dQUxxD0
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    https://medium.com/athenslivegr/juan-branco-we-are-lucky-that-julian-is-still-alive-7ceb79d36c52

    Despina Papageorgiou interviews Assange lawyer Juan Branco:
    “So, in a sense, we are lucky that Julian has survived all these, but it’s a price he should have never paid”.

    “He reveals the nature of our regimes, Julian Assange’s case — and I think that’s why it is so important”,
    ...
    Branco refers to risks:
    “Do you receive direct threats in the legal team?” I ask.

    “Yes, of course”.

    Life threats?

    “Yeah”.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Assanges Lawyers Pin High Hopes On Spain Wiretapping Case Due To Ample Evidence - UrduPoint
    https://www.urdupoint.com/en/world/assanges-lawyers-pin-high-hopes-on-spain-wir-821362.html

    "In Spain, I have high hopes. We have tons of documents evidencing this, and I hope that the Spanish system will ... be up to the task and independent on assessing this case," Avila said.
    ...
    "The case in Spain is a very important case because it is the case where we saw the evidence of gross violations of human rights consented by the UK and also it proves a serial, even systematic surveillance of doctors and lawyers of Julian," Avila stressed.
    ...
    "There was a monetary deal between the Spanish company and a US company, and then the US company was somehow connected to the US intelligence. So you will have involvement of the US government in the surveillance," she explained....
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Edward Snowden: Trump has created a global playbook to attack those revealing uncomfortable truths
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/...eated-global-playbook-attack-those-revealing-uncomfortable-truths/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Spain: Assange wins "Dignity Award" from Catalan commission
    https://youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=t9BeUenyHN0
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam