CYNIK: ale prostě o tom to je :-) neexistence základního příjmu povede k tomu, že věci které máme rádi, prostě zmizí z trhu. Zavře se Overtonovo okno, ve kterém ta zmrzlina je dostupná.

Situace, kdy všichni jen investují, ale nikdo reálně už nemá peníze něco poptávat, může vést k tomu, že trh, jako správný runtime ekonomiky, prostě vyhodnotí, že reference counter nějakého objektu je nula a objekt úplně dealokuje. To, aby poptávka nikdy neklesla úplně k nule, dává smysl.

XCHAOS:
"Now, according to what we know about markets, customers are essentially not voting for your ice cream. Why aren't they voting for your ice cream? Is it because your ice cream sucks? It's entirely possible. However, there's another possibility. It's also possible that your customers lack the money to pay for your ice cream."

No to si děláš srandu, to je odstavec pod tvou citací.

To bolí oči tohle číst.

Unconditional Basic Income Would Fix a Major Flaw in Markets
https://www.scottsantens.com/unconditional-basic-income-would-fix-a-major-flaw-in-markets/
How prices are determined is actually kind of amazing too in that it's a decentralized process. No one person is figuring out how much everything should cost everywhere. It's more like an iterative process of trial and error. Prices go up. Prices go down. High demand for something can increase its price, which results in greater supply to meet the demand, which can result in a lower price. This process is happening continually and is called the price mechanism.
...
Here's the great flaw: markets can't tell the difference between zero and null. The invisible hand of the market, no matter how strongly you believe in it, is simply incapable of determining the difference between the two. In fact, you may not even know the difference either, so let me explain.

Zero is a quantity less than one. It's a number that is known. If you have one apple and eat the apple, you now have zero apples.

Null is a lack of value. It's like a blank cell in a spreadsheet. There's just nothing there.