KOUDY: Jako taky mi to neni jasne, jak je mozne, ze novinari pisuou bombasticke senzacechtive nadpisy clanku, misto toho, aby objektivne zhodnotili, co se deje. To se jeste nikdy prece nestalo :-O
BTW, nedelaji to uplne vsichni:
Will AI take my job? A new Anthropic study suggests the answer is more complicated than you think | Fortunehttps://fortune.com/2026/03/10/will-ai-take-your-job-this-chart-in-an-economic-study-by-anthropic-may-give-you-a-hint-but-the-answer-is-complicated/https://www.forbes.com/sites/hamiltonmann/2026/03/08/anthropics-study-does-not-measure-ais-labor-market-impacts/Anthropic's new study shows AI is nowhere near its theoretical job disruption potentialhttps://the-decoder.com/anthropics-new-study-shows-ai-is-nowhere-near-its-theoretical-job-disruption-potential/Job losses study by Anthropic reveals 0 evidence of AI driven unemployment | Digital Watch Observatoryhttps://dig.watch/updates/job-losses-ai-report-anthropicCo zda se hodne lidi ma problem pochopit je, ze ta "exposure", kterou se ohani jako ukazkou, ze se vsichni maji jit ucit na instalatera, je vstup do toho, co ve vysledku delaji. Zkusili spocitat, jak moc jsou ruzne profese potencialne otevrene pouziti AI. To se ma pak zkombinovat s daty z trhu prace a vystupem bude to, jak moc se meni zamesnanost v profesich, ktere jsou vice nebo mene "exposed". Zatim tam meritelny rozdil neni (s tou poznamkou o lidech pod 25, co minule).