• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHOKlimaticka zmena / If the fracturing of our once stable climate doesn’t terrify you, then you don’t fully understand it
    THE_DARKNESS
    THE_DARKNESS --- ---
    TADEAS: zdroj? díky, ať mohu případně sdílet
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    TADEAS: driv sem ten scenar Fortress Europe nemel moc za realnej, ale tyhle staty, zvlast s Talibanem v cele nemaj podle me vubec tuseni, ze se neco s klimatem deje a nakonec tem lidem fakt nezbyde nic jinyho nez masivni migrace...

    Nakonec nejde ani tak o klima, jako o politiku a focus na priority, misto boje o moc...
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Climate Change driven severe drought affects most of Afghanistan. Nearly 23 million people in Afghanistan, about half the country's population, face acute food shortages, according to the World Food Program.

    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Climate change: Cost of weather disasters surged in 2021 | News | DW | 27.12.2021
    https://www.dw.com/en/climate-change-cost-of-weather-disasters-surged-in-2021/a-60263393
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    jason hickel

    Plunder in the Post-Colonial Era: Quantifying Drain from the Global South Through Unequal Exchange, 1960–2018
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13563467.2021.1899153

    This paper quantifies drain from the global South through unequal exchange since 1960. According to our primary method, which relies on exchange-rate differentials, we find that in the most recent year of data the global North (‘advanced economies’) appropriated from the South commodities worth $2.2 trillion in Northern prices — enough to end extreme poverty 15 times over.

    Over the whole period, drain from the South totalled $62 trillion (constant 2011 dollars), or $152 trillion when accounting for lost growth. Appropriation through unequal exchange represents up to 7% of Northern GDP and 9% of Southern GDP. We also test several alternative methods, for comparison: we quantify unequal exchange in terms of wage differentials instead of exchange-rate differentials, and report drain in global average prices as well as Northern prices.

    Regardless of the method, we find that the intensity of exploitation and the scale of unequal exchange increased significantly during the structural adjustment period of the 1980s and 1990s. This study affirms that drain from the South remains a significant feature of the world economy in the post-colonial era; rich countries continue to rely on imperial forms of appropriation to sustain their high levels of income and consumption.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Chile po tlaku studentskyho hnuti prepisuje autoritarskou Pinochetovskou ustavu. A chysta se do ni vnest problematiku klimaticke krize...

    Rarely does a country get a chance to lay out its ideals as a nation and write a new constitution for itself. Almost never does the climate and ecological crisis play a central role.
    That is, until now, in Chile, where a national reinvention is underway. After months of protests over social and environmental grievances, 155 Chileans have been elected to write a new constitution amid what they have declared a “climate and ecological emergency.”
    ...
    Dr. Dorador is vying to be the convention’s president. She wants the constitution to recognize that “humans are part of nature.” She bristles when asked if lithium extraction is necessary to pivot away from fossil fuel extraction. Of course the world should stop burning oil and gas, she says, but not by ignoring yet unknown ecological costs. “Someone buys an electric car and feels very good because they’re saving the planet,” she says. “At the same time an entire ecosystem is damaged. It’s a big paradox.”
    Indeed the questions facing this Convention aren’t Chile’s alone. The world faces the same reckoning as it confronts climate change and biodiversity loss, amid widening social inequities: Does the search for climate fixes require re-examining humanity’s relationship to nature itself?
    “We have to face some very complex 21st century problems,” said Maisa Rojas, a climate scientist at the University of Chile. “Our institutions are, in many respects, not ready.”

    Chile Writes Its Constitution, Confronting Climate Change Head On - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/28/climate/chile-constitution-climate-change.html
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    ke hvezdam

    FB-IMG-1641374391655
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Pavel Fischer
    https://www.facebook.com/1934837773438430/posts/3043002212621975/

    Miloš Zeman se nedávno velmi zjednodušeně opřel do Green Dealu. Jenže tak triviální to není. Faktem je, že Green Deal zastihl naši společnost nepřipravenou. Čeští politici i podnikatelé jsou razancí Zelené dohody zaskočeni, ačkoli Andrej Babiš v pozici premiéra její podmínky odkýval už před dvěma lety. Dnes za to samozřejmě nepřijímá žádnou odpovědnost. “Premiér Fiala ani Miloš Zeman tomu nerozumí,” je Babišova reakce na kritiku, že Zelenou dohodu odsouhlasil.

    Z Green Dealu se už ČR nemůže vymanit, je to hotová věc, ke které se nyní budou přijímat dílčí rozhodnutí. Příslušná evropská komise je ochotna dočasně uznat za “zelené” také jádro a plyn, což je pro nás ještě dobré, protože v ostatních ekologických zdrojích významně zaostáváme. Pro vyjednávání konkrétních podmínek jsme ale už na startu zatíženi několika handicapy.

    — Nejsilnějším ekonomickým aktérem Evropy je Německo. Pokud se Německo rozhodlo v energetice otočit kormidlem, politicky vzato máme jen málo možností jeho rozhodnutí zvrátit. Domluva s Německem stojí na dlouhodobě budovaných kontaktech. Jak si stojíme v dialogu s Německem dnes? Kolik tam máme spojenců? Málo.

    — V tuto zásadní chvíli může být naším spojencem také Francie, která prosazuje jadernou energetiku. Jak si na tom stojíme s Francií? Kolik ministrů se domluví francouzsky? Ani jeden. A to máme před sebou společné předsedání Radě EU.

    — Od souhlasu Andreje Babiše se Zelenou dohodou uplynuly dva roky. Dělo se během nich něco? Vypracovala Babišova vláda nějaký, jakýkoli návrh či strategii přechodu k zelené energii? Ne. Vůbec nic.

    — EU loni poskytla historicky největší balík financí, takzvaný program obnovy, určený na povzbuzení covidem oslabené ekonomiky. ČR navrhla projekty v řádech desítek miliard, v nichž byly jen minimálně zastoupeny investice do dlouhodobě udržitelných modelů dopravy nebo výroby energie. V rámci Green Dealu nám teď bude citelně chybět nejen čas, ale i finance.

    — V uplynulých dvou letech tým Miloš Zeman, Andrej Babiš a Karel Havlíček svedl dlouhý a lítý boj o to, aby ruský Rosatom mohl dostavět elektrárnu Dukovany. Rosatom nakonec ze seznamu potenciálních dodavatelů zmizel, a jsem tomu rád. Ale ztratilo se kvůli tomu obrovské množství času. V konfrontaci s Green Dealem už víme, že dostavbou jediného reaktoru se mnoho nezmění, ČR by jich potřebovala hned několik.

    — Green Deal de facto smetl se stolu naši letitou energetickou koncepci, která se naposledy upravovala snad roku 2015. Babišova vláda ji samozřejmě ostentativně ignorovala. Má teď ČR nějaký strategický energetický dokument, který by odpovídal realitě? Ne.

    Nechci být pesimista, ale Green Deal je skutečnost, před kterou nemůžeme zavírat oči. Záleží teď na vládě, našich evropských vyjednavačích, a potažmo i na nás všech, jak se k realitě postavíme. Cílené úspory energií jsou to nejmenší, co můžeme začít dělat už dnes.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Watching Don’t Look Up made me see my whole life of campaigning flash before me | George Monbiot | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jan/04/dont-look-up-life-of-campaigning

    It’s not just its individual stupidities that have become inexcusable, such as the platforms repeatedly given to climate deniers. It is the structural stupidity to which the media are committed. It’s the anti-intellectualism, the hostility to new ideas and aversion to complexity. It’s the absence of moral seriousness. It’s the vacuous gossip about celebrities and consumables that takes precedence over the survival of life on Earth. It’s the obsession with generating noise, regardless of signal. It’s the reflexive alignment with the status quo, whatever it may be. It’s the endless promotion of the views of the most selfish and antisocial people, and the exclusion of those who are trying to defend us from catastrophe, on the grounds that they are “worthy”, “extreme” or “mad” (I hear from friends in the BBC that these terms are still used there to describe environmental activists).

    Even when these merchants of distraction do address the issue, they tend to shut out the experts and interview actors, singers and other celebs instead. The media’s obsession with actors vindicates Guy Debord’s predictions in his book The Society of the Spectacle, published in 1967. Substance is replaced by semblance, as even the most serious issues must now be articulated by people whose work involves adopting someone else’s persona and speaking someone else’s words. Then the same media, having turned them into spokespeople, attack these actors as hypocrites for leading a profligate lifestyle.

    Similarly, it’s not just the individual failures by governments at Glasgow and elsewhere that have become inexcusable, but the entire framework of negotiations. As crucial Earth systems might be approaching their tipping point, governments still propose to address the issue with tiny increments of action, across decades. It’s as if, in 2008, when Lehman Brothers collapsed and the global financial system began to sway, governments had announced that they would bail out the banks at the rate of a few million pounds a day between then and 2050. The system would have collapsed 40 years before their programme was complete. Our central, civilisational question, I believe, is this: why do nations scramble to rescue the banks but not the planet?
    INK_FLO
    INK_FLO --- ---
    Požáry v Coloradu díky hustému sněžení téměř ustaly — ČT24 — Česká televize
    https://ct24.ceskatelevize.cz/svet/3422026-pozary-v-coloradu-diky-hustemu-snezeni-temer-ustaly
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Ours is the Waste Age: that’s the key to tranforming the future | Aeon Essays
    https://aeon.co/essays/ours-is-the-waste-age-thats-the-key-to-tranforming-the-future

    Waste is precisely what dissolves the distinction between nature and culture. Today, when the very weather is warped by the climate crisis, and plankton thousands of metres deep have intestinal tracts full of microplastics, the idea of a nature that is pristine or untouched is delusional. Nature and waste have fused at both planetary and microbiological scales. Similarly, waste is not merely a byproduct of culture: it is culture. We have produced a culture of waste. To focus our gaze on waste is not an act of morbid negativity; it is an act of cultural realism. If waste is the mesh that entangles nature and culture, it’s necessarily the defining material of our time. We live in the Waste Age.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    JINDRICH: first world problems
    JINDRICH
    JINDRICH --- ---
    Asociace soukromého zemědělství ČR :

    O veledůležitém dokumentu, který ovlivní zemědělství v České republice až do roku 2027 se rozhoduje právě v těchto dnech. Je to strategický plán pro společnou zemědělskou politiku a vypracovalo jej ministerstvo zemědělství ještě pod vedením bývalého ministra Miroslava Tomana.
    Napětí a tlaky kolem strategického plánu rostou, protože již nezbývá mnoho času na jeho odeslání Evropské komisi.

    My jako Asociace soukromého zemědělství ČR žádáme přepracování jeho některých částí, máme sedm zásadních výhrad a jsme přesvědčeni, že znění strategického plánu z dílny ministra Tomana by prohloubilo problémy v našem zemědělství.

    Vedení Agrární komora České republiky a Zemědělský svaz ČR podporuje původní verzi ministra Tomana a vyhrožuje nové vládě Petra Fialy nátlakovými akcemi svých členů před budovou ministerstva zemědělství.

    Zajímavé na celé situaci je, že vedení Agrární komory a Zemědělského svazu postupuje proti ekonomickým zájmům většiny členů svých organizací, protože v Tomanově strategickém plánu je ponížení přímé platby dotací na plochu obhospodařované půdy ve výši 1000 Kč/ha pro všech více jak třicet tisíc zemědělských subjektů v ČR.

    Tyto peníze se použijí na dotační podporu chovu prasat a drůbeže v ČR. U prasat je to dle dat z Ústavu zemědělské ekonomiky a informací (ÚZEI) maximálně 150 firem, které jsou povětšinou součástí větších agroholdingů a chov prasat se jim v současné době nevyplácí, kvůli nízké ceně zaviněné více jak dvacetiprocentním přebytkem vepřového masa v EU způsobeného zastavením vývozů do Číny, která se bojí prasečího moru vyskytujícího se v Evropě. V chovu drůbeže je podpora pro podobný počet firem, jako je to u již zmíněných prasat.

    Část peněz, které se ministr Toman rozhodl sebrat všem zemědělcům z přímých plateb, má být také použito na tzv. společnou organizaci trhů, což má být propagace českých zemědělských výrobků. Přeloženo do češtiny peníze pravděpodobně zmizí v reklamních akcích nějaké najmuté agentury.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS:

    Groundswell Part 2 : Acting on Internal Climate Migration
    https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/36248

    This new report builds on the scenario-based modeling approach of the previous Groundswell report from 2018, which covered Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and Latin America. The two reports’ combined findings provide, for the first time, a global picture of the potential scale of internal climate migration across the six regions, allowing for a better understanding of how slow-onset climate change impacts, population dynamics, and development contexts shape mobility trends. They also highlight the far-sighted planning needed to meet this challenge and ensure positive and sustainable development outcomes. The combined results across the six regions show that without early and concerted climate and development action, as many as 216 million people could move within their own countries due to slow-onset climate change impacts by 2050. They will migrate from areas with lower water availability and crop productivity and from areas affected by sea-level rise and storm surges. Hotspots of internal climate migration could emerge as early as 2030 and continue to spread and intensify by 2050.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Zimbabwe's climate migration is a sign of what's to come | MIT Technology Review
    https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/12/17/1041315/climate-migration-africa-zimbabwe/

    Mutero is just one of the 86 million people in sub-Saharan Africa who the World Bank estimates will migrate domestically by 2050 because of climate change—the largest number predicted in any of six major regions the organization studied for a new report.

    At the height of the most recent drought, which lasted from 2018 to 2020, only about half as much rain fell in Zimbabwe as usual. Crops were scorched and pastures dried up. People and livestock crowded around hand-pumped boreholes to find water, but the wells soon went dry. Some people in the driest areas had so little to eat they survived on the leaves and white, powdery fruit of baobab trees.

    More rain fell during the last growing season, but many farmers still feel uneasy about the future. Maize—Zimbabwe’s staple crop, which was aggressively promoted by the former colonial government beginning in the 1940s—is becoming impossible to grow.

    ...

    Over 5 million Zimbabweans—a third of the population—don’t have enough to eat, according to the World Food Program. A study in 2019 of how vulnerable countries were to agricultural disruption due to drought ranked Zimbabwe third, behind only Botswana and Namibia.

    ...

    As Mutero and other climate migrants know, conditions are somewhat better in the Eastern Highlands. This mountainous region stretches for around 300 kilometers along Zimbabwe’s border with Mozambique. Many of the region’s major rivers, including the Pungwe and Odzi, begin there as streams. The area’s climate and fertile soils are perfect for growing crops such as tea, coffee, plums, avocados, and a sweet pinkish-red fruit called lychee.

    When climate migrants started showing up in the Eastern Highlands a decade ago, they settled without permission on state land, and the government was swift to evict them. But they returned in even larger numbers, and officials have more or less given up trying to stop them.

    By 2015, the government estimated that more than 20,000 migrants had settled in the Eastern Highlands. Though no more recent official estimates exist, anecdotal evidence suggests the number has continued to climb.

    Today in some parts of the highlands, migrants occupy any vacant land they can find. In others, traditional or community leaders like the one helping Mutero, who are known in local dialect as sabhuku, have taken up the task of allocating land to migrants. The leaders—whose roles are largely ceremonial—are doing this in defiance of government orders. They’ve earned praise from migrants but disdain from local farmers who were there first.

    ...

    Leonard Madanhire, a farmer who lives in what’s known as the Mpudzi area in the Eastern Highlands, is worried. He grows mostly maize on his five hectares of land. His herd of cattle has dwindled from more than 20 a decade ago to five. Most nearby grazing lands, which he has long shared with other farmers, are now occupied by climate migrants.

    In September, Madanhire took me on a long hike along the banks of the Chitora River. Freshly built dwellings stood on land that was once pasture; other structures dotted the river’s banks. A couple of seemingly frustrated herdsmen were trying to steer cattle and goats through the narrow patches of pasture that remained.

    A few kilometers upriver, migrants had planted vegetable gardens on the river’s edges. Madanhire says farming along the banks that way causes erosion and puts more silt and debris in the water for everyone downstream.

    ...

    “As climate change intensifies, it is going to make some of these areas uninhabitable,” she says. “Rather than having to deal with a rushed mass migration, which will put severe pressure on the areas that people migrate to, we should be planning for a gradual evacuation of the most vulnerable areas now.”

    She says the government should do a nationwide land audit to figure out where space is available for migrants and create a process by which people can legally resettle there—perhaps with a bit of money or other support to get them started. While the government is doing a lot to properly relocate people from flood-prone areas, it’s doing little to relocate farmers from places prone to drought
    AIM_FREEMAN
    AIM_FREEMAN --- ---
    TADEAS: pokrok nezastavis
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam