TADEAS: s tímhle si dovolím nesouhlasit. Po mnoha a mnoha zkušenostech jsem naprosto přesvědčen že i kdyby zasáhl střední Evropu pětka tropický hurikán tak třetina lidí bude řvát že se nic takového vlastně nestalo protože u nich to zrovna jen sundali pár střech jako normální vichřice, třetina že je to přirozený jev který tady vždycky byl a třetina začne opatrně připouštět že možná by na tom mohlo něco být.

TADEAS: staircase to hell

As a Climate Scientist, I Knew It Was Time to Leave Los Angeles
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/10/opinion/la-fires-los-angeles-wildfires.html


Climate Scientist Peter Kalmus Fled L.A. Fearing Wildfires. His Old Neighborhood Is Now a Hellscape
https://youtu.be/mMYvuY_MLMQ?si=0HnVb1GwLOr5hY2f


Multiple neighborhoods have been completely burned down, including in the town of Altadena, where our guest, climate scientist and activist Peter Kalmus, lived until two years ago, when increasing heat and dryness pushed Kalmus to leave the Los Angeles area in fear of his safety. "I couldn't stay there," he says. "It's not a new normal. … It's a staircase to a hotter, more hellish Earth." Kalmus discusses an op-ed he recently published in The New York Times about the decision, which he says was toned down by the paper's editors when he attempted to explain that fossil fuel companies' investment in climate change denial and normalization has only accelerated the pace of unprecedented large-scale climate disasters. "This is going to get worse," he warns, "Everything has changed."

z obecnejsi duskuze o politice asset managementu


There was a phenomenon where in the five or six years after the Paris climate agreement, which was in 2015-2016, there was significant hope amongst large parts of the population and the professional classes that governments were getting serious about climate. The belief was that they were going to take measures, whether that's significant carbon taxes or whatever else it might be, that would really entail a shift away from fossil fuel capitalism.

I think that what's happened over the last three or four years in particular is that the realization has kind of dawned—and people don't want to say it explicitly, but I think people are sort of implicitly seeing it—that it's not happening and that the governments are actually not serious about taking the types of actions that are necessary to keep temperatures at two degrees, two and a half degrees. You know, forget 1.5 degrees—governments aren't serious about keeping temperatures to two and a half degrees. I mean, of course they're not going to say that, but no, I don't think they're remotely serious about it.

I was in Norway recently, and in May 2021, the International Energy Agency came out with this really, I think, incredibly significant report which they called "Net Zero by 2050." They basically said, look, for the energy sector, which is obviously the very heart of the climate problem, to be able to be net zero—not actual zero, net zero—by 2050, this is the kind of path it has to take over the next 29 years, whatever it was (it was 2021, so the next 21 years). And basically, for that to be possible, there can be no new approvals of oil and gas field developments and no new approvals of coal mines anywhere in the world from this day forward—none, zero—to have any chance of hitting net zero by 2050.

And so, as I said, I was in Norway a few weeks ago. Over 160 approvals of new oil and gas field development licenses have been approved just in Norway since May 2021. So no, the governments aren't remotely serious. Oil and gas field development licenses have been showered like confetti around the world since then, and so I think the investment world looks at what governments are doing and they say, "Governments, which have to be the ones that take the lead, are not serious about this, so why should we be serious about this? If governments are not taking the types of actions that will make fossil fuel investments less profitable and green capitalism much more profitable, why would we bother with ESG?"

Woke Capitalism Just COLLAPSED. Here’s Why. | Aaron Bastani Meets Brett Christophers
https://youtu.be/W98jFzvl7q4?si=z-IvmiNHhTV3cSML

SCHWEPZ: tady je paradoxní, že tenhle požár byl nejspíš (opět) způsobený vedením vysokého napětí nad uschlou vegetací. U nás se pod stožáry pracně udržují vykácené průseky. Ale samotné VVN nikomu nevaděj, protože pocházejí z éry, kdy prostě ještě nebylo v módě protestovat a všichni si zvykli (proti jakýmkoliv zdrojům energie, ať už jaderným, uhelným nebo nově větrným, se začalo protestovat až v pozdější éře...)

SCHWEPZ: vetrny turbiny prece zpusobily ten pozar v LA. predpovedeli to uz simpsonovi



Thousands protest at far-right AfD rally as German election campaign begins | The Independent
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/afd-germany-election-alice-weidel-elon-musk-wind-turbines-b2677965.html

AfD would tear down all wind turbines – which she described as “windmills of shame” – if it came to power

SCHWEPZ: doufam ze mu to pujde stejne dobre jsko mir na Ukrajine do 24hod od zvoleni

Nově zvolený americký prezident Donald Trump nemá rád větrné zdroje energie. Podle něj hyzdí krajinu a na mořích zabíjejí velryby. Slíbil, že se po nástupu do Bílého domu nepostaví ve Spojených státech ani jedna větrná turbína.

„Pustoší krajinu a způsobují rakovinu.“ Trump slíbil, že se v USA nepostaví už ani jedna větrná turbína | Hrot24.cz
https://www.hrot24.cz/clanek/donald-trump-zakaz-vystavby-vetrnych-elektraren-usa-energetika-HrHMK

Ohroženy jsou totiž projekty ve Spojených státech za miliardy dolarů.
Trump v minulosti protestoval také proti větrnému projektu ve Skotsku, který je na dohled od jeho golfového resortu u Aberdeenu. Připomínají se i jeho vědecky nepodložené výroky, že větrné turbíny způsobují rakovinu a zabíjejí velryby.