• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
    • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHODezinformace o klimatu // Dont confuse me with the facts!
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    https://twitter.com/curious_founder/status/1616179132554952707?s=19
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    +1
    Velmi poucny vlakno k soucasnemu deni na dezinformacni scene a soc. mediich

    https://twitter.com/isdglobal/status/1616107589833474051?s=46
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    +3
    https://twitter.com/VojtechPecka/status/1615991222010519552
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS:

    Climate Change Debate: Bjørn Lomborg and Andrew Revkin | Lex Fridman Podcast #339
    https://youtu.be/5Gk9gIpGvSE
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    +1
    nevim vlastne kam to patri, mozna jen kritika, nevim

    "Something HUGE is Happening in Germany!!!" | Jordan Peterson 2023
    https://youtu.be/zllDpFKc2Jw
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TUHO: everybody knows and now...

    R.E.M. - Everybody Hurts (Official Music Video)
    https://youtu.be/5rOiW_xY-kc
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Starsi

    Toxická desiatka zarába na šírení dezinformácií - INFOSECURITY.SK
    https://infosecurity.sk/dezinfo/toxicka-desiatka-media-profitujuce-zo-sirenia-klimatickych-dezinformacii/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    1 odpověď+2
    Exxon knew, coal knew, utility knew, automobile industry knew... Everybody knew. .))

    Building upon recent work on other major fossil fuel companies, we report new archival research and primary source interviews describing how Total responded to evolving climate science and policy in the last 50 years. We show that Total personnel received warnings of the potential for catastrophic global warming from its products by 1971, became more fully informed of the issue in the 1980s, began promoting doubt regarding the scientific basis for global warming by the late 1980s, and ultimately settled on a position in the late 1990s of publicly accepting climate science while promoting policy delay or policies peripheral to fossil fuel control. Additionally, we find that Exxon, through the International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association (IPIECA), coordinated an international campaign to dispute climate science and weaken international climate policy, beginning in the 1980s. This represents one of the first longitudinal studies of a major fossil fuel company’s responses to global warming to the present, describing historical stages of awareness, preparation, denial, and delay.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378021001655
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    +1
    Scientists at two of America's biggest automakers knew as early as the 1960s that car emissions caused climate change, a monthslong investigation by E&E News has found.

    The discoveries by General Motors and Ford Motor Co. preceded decades of political lobbying by the two car giants that undermined global attempts to reduce emissions while stalling U.S. efforts to make vehicles cleaner.

    POLITICO Pro
    https://subscriber.politicopro.com/article/eenews/1063717035
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    +1
    Utilities Knew: Documenting Electric Utilities’ Early Knowledge and Ongoing Deception on Climate Change From 1968-2017

    Dr. Donald F. Hornig, a science advisor to President Lyndon B. Johnson, warned the 1968 Annual Convention of the Edison Electric Institute about the threat that allowing CO2 emissions from burning fossil fuels to build up in the atmosphere could one day pose to the climate.
    “Such a change in the carbon dioxide level might, therefore, produce major consequences on the climate – possibly even triggering catastrophic effects such as have occurred from time to time in the past,” Hornig said.

    Utilities Knew: Documenting Electric Utilities’ Early Knowledge and Ongoing Deception on Climate Change
    https://www.energyandpolicy.org/utilities-knew-about-climate-change/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    A newly unearthed journal from 1966 shows the coal industry, like the oil industry, was long aware of the threat of climate change.

    “There is evidence that the amount of carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere is increasing rapidly as a result of the combustion of fossil fuels,” wrote Garvey. “If the future rate of increase continues as it is at the present, it has been predicted that, because the CO2 envelope reduces radiation, the temperature of the earth’s atmosphere will increase and that vast changes in the climates of the earth will result.”

    Coal Knew, Too | HuffPost Impact
    https://www.huffpost.com/entry/coal-industry-climate-change_n_5dd6bbebe4b0e29d7280984f
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    +1
    věda a výzlum mimo veřejný instituce je zajímavé téma :)
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    +2
    TUHO:
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    +1
    TUHO: In 2015, investigative journalists discovered internal company memos indicating that Exxon oil company has known since the late 1970s that its fossil fuel products could lead to global warming with “dramatic environmental effects before the year 2050.” Additional documents then emerged showing that the US oil and gas industry’s largest trade association had likewise known since at least the 1950s, as had the coal industry since at least the 1960s, and electric utilities, Total oil company, and GM and Ford motor companies since at least the 1970s. Scholars and journalists have analyzed the texts contained in these documents, providing qualitative accounts of fossil fuel interests’ knowledge of climate science and its implications. In 2017, for instance, we demonstrated that Exxon’s internal documents, as well as peer-reviewed studies published by Exxon and ExxonMobil Corp scientists, overwhelmingly acknowledged that climate change is real and human-caused. By contrast, the majority of Mobil and ExxonMobil Corp’s public communications promoted doubt on the matter.
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    2 odpovědi+1
    TUHO: TUHO: A samotny paper v Science tu

    Climate projections by the fossil fuel industry have never been assessed. On the basis of company records, we quantitatively evaluated all available global warming projections documented by—and in many cases modeled by—Exxon and ExxonMobil Corp scientists between 1977 and 2003. We find that most of their projections accurately forecast warming that is consistent with subsequent observations. Their projections were also consistent with, and at least as skillful as, those of independent academic and government models. Exxon and ExxonMobil Corp also correctly rejected the prospect of a coming ice age, accurately predicted when human-caused global warming would first be detected, and reasonably estimated the “carbon budget” for holding warming below 2°C. On each of these points, however, the company’s public statements about climate science contradicted its own scientific data.

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0063

    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    1 odpověď
    Projections created internally by ExxonMobil starting in the late 1970s on the impact of fossil fuels on climate change were very accurate, even surpassing those of some academic and governmental scientists, according to an analysis published Thursday in Science by a team of Harvard-led researchers. Despite those forecasts, team leaders say, the multinational energy giant continued to sow doubt about the gathering crisis.

    Exxon scientists predicted global warming with ‘shocking skill and accuracy,’ Harvard researchers say – Harvard Gazette
    https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/01/harvard-led-analysis-finds-exxonmobil-internal-research-accurately-predicted-climate-change/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    1 odpověď+1
    TUHO:
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    1 odpověď+1
    "Our analysis allows us for the first time to actually put a number on what Exxon knew, which is that the burning of their fossil fuel products was going to heat the planet by about 0.2C of warming every decade," he said.
    Researchers have never before quantified the scientific evidence in ExxonMobil's documents, he says.
    ...
    "Their excellent climate modelling was at least comparable in performance to one of the most influential and well-regarded climate scientists of modern history," Prof Supran said, comparing ExxonMobil's work to Nasa's James Hansen who sounded the alarm on climate in 1988.
    Prof Oreskes said the findings show that ExxonMobil "knowingly misled" the public and governments. "They had all this information at their disposal but they said very, very different things in public," she explained.

    ExxonMobil: Oil giant predicted climate change in 1970s - scientists - BBC News
    https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-64241994
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TUHO: Second, the IGU's approach to cultivating relationships with influencers in the media, environmental NGOs, and think tanks reveals that the same tactics we laid out in S3 of the podcast (and online here) are still being deployed, and to great effect. Every time I talk about how much money and effort the fossil fuel industry expends to court influencers who will carry water for it, I hear a similar response.
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    1 odpověď
    O tom, jak plynovej prumysl makal na tom, aby nacpal spalovani plynu do klimatickych politik

    In the same week, Influence Map put out a fascinating report on the International Gas Union, which describes itself as a "spokesperson for the gas industry worldwide." It has more than 150 members including all the household names—Shell, ExxonMobil, Sempra, and Total—representing about 90 percent of the global gas industry. The report analyzes strategy documents that, incredibly, were available on IGU's website from 2017 to 2021. Taken together they reveal a global playbook that includes the "greening" of gas in regions that are more environmentally conscious and the emphasizing of "energy poverty" in the Global South. The group's advocacy strategy includes a focus on the World Bank and International Monetary Fund in an effort to tie economic development goals to the buildout of gas infrastructure, as well as partnerships with media outlets, environmental organizations, and think tanks.

    These documents are fascinating and I encourage folks to read the whole report, but a couple of things really jumped out to me in particular. First, there really seems to be confirmation here that the industry's only real interest in "renewable biogas" and hydrogen are their usefulness in perpetuating the conventional gas industry and infrastructure. In a document focused on the strategy of "greening" gas, the IGU spells this out explicitly, highlighting the way that hydrogen and biogas could help save the market and the industry's assets.

    InfluenceMap The International Gas Union’s Climate Strategy
    https://influencemap.org/landing/-a794566767a94a5d71052b63a05e825f-20189?ref=drilled
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam