KEB: a těch původních necelých 10GW se nějak zázračně zvětšilo na 20 temelinu, to je víc než 4x tolik

Vychazi nejocekavanejsi zprava o stavu klimatu za poslednich 9 let. IPCC synthesis report AR6. Dalsi spickovy vyzkum (opet jake prekvapeni) potvrzuje, ze mame velmi vazne problemy a cas na klimatickou stabilizaci se prakticky vycerpal. Takze, sefredaktor Kretinskeho Info.cz se nas rozhodl informovat o mesic stare zprave CEPSu. Musime palit plyn jeho zamestnavatele. Neda se nic delat. Nic, pokrcme rameny.

Michal Půr
@michalpur
Mezi politiky zavládla skutečná panika poté, co ČEPS zveřejnil zprávu o skutečném stavu energetiky. Když to vezmu ve zkratce.
1) Vláda řekla, že do roku 2033 skončí Česko s uhlím.
2) V takovém případě musíme nahradit zhruba 9,5 GW výkonu uhelných bloků.
3) I kdybychom postavili náhradu 10 GW obnovitelných zdrojů, tak jelikož jsou jen občasné, musíme postavit 10 GW v plynu nebo v jádru.
4) Když to sečteme, tak je to velmi hrubě 20 GW výkonu do roku 2033, tedy do deseti let.
5) Je to 20 Temelínů do 10 let!
6) Skutečný stav je takový, že máme rozjetou stavbu 1 bloku o výkonu zhruba 1000 MW.
Vychází z toho jedna jediná věc. Nevychází to. A nerad to říkám, ale de facto jedinou alternativou je plyn, s jehož dodávkami víme všichni, jak to je.

At an industry conference, top executives lamented they had “lost the narrative” on natural gas, and outlined an effort to sell their product as the “cleanest energy in the world.”
Natural gas has long been subject to a war of words. Once it was a “bridge fuel” that would straddle the gap from fossil energy to renewable sources. More recently, climate activists have sought to highlight that gas pollutes, too, by stripping “natural” from its name and calling it fossil- or methane gas.
The industry is pushing back, and gas executives displayed their latest linguistic counteroffensive at an industry conference this month in Houston.

Fossil Fuel Executives See a ‘Golden Age’ for Gas, If They Can Brand It as ‘Clean’ - Inside Climate News
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/19032023/fossil-fuel-natural-gas-branding/

TUHO: + pro ty, kteri nechteji louskat dlouhy odborny text, kratsi vycuc zde

Petro-masculinity and the politics of climate refusal - Autonomy
https://autonomy.work/portfolio/petro-masculinity-climate-refusal/

Scientifically informed climate policymaking starts with the exchange of credible, salient, and legitimate scientific information between scientists and policy makers. It is therefore important to understand what explains the exchange of scientific information in national climate policymaking processes. This article applies exponential random graph models to network data from the Czech Republic, Finland, Ireland, and Portugal to investigate which types of organizations are favored sources of scientific information and whether actors obtain scientific information from those with similar beliefs as their own. Results show that scientific organizations are favored sources in all countries, while only in the Czech Republic do actors obtain scientific information from those with similar policy beliefs. These findings suggest that actors involved in climate policymaking mostly look to scientific organizations for information, but that in polarized contexts where there is a presence of influential denialists overcoming biased information exchange is a challenge.

Information exchange networks at the climate science-policy interface : Evidence from theCzech Republic, Finland, Ireland, and Portugal | Masarykova univerzita
https://www.muni.cz/vyzkum/publikace/1627737

Nasranej Topolanek, kdyz si nekdo opovazi upozornit na jeho vazby na fosilni prumysl

Miroslav Patrik
Krasna slovni prestrelka!
Europoslanec za Piraty Marcel Kolaja v dnesnich OVM prohlasil, ze Mirek Topolanek je lobbyista fosilního průmyslu. 😄 😄
Lobbyista se ihned behem 1 minuty zurive ohradil a citil se dlooouho urazene!!! 😄
Takze doporucuji pouzivat casteji tato souslovi:
- lobbyista fosilniho prumyslu
- lobbyista jaderneho prumyslu
- lobbyista automobiloveho prumyslu

Reakce muze byt mnohdy sice zuriva, ale bude i zabavna!
Zde je ta prestrelka urazaneho M. Topolanka, ktery podporuje cast fosilnich paliv, jadro a automobilismus = 8:15-7:15 minuta a 4:20-3:40 minuta (casomira dle webu). 😄

Proti změnám klimatu, za klimatickou spravedlnost!
https://www.facebook.com/groups/2023967384336650/posts/6064380416961973/

TUHO: [Za Paywallem? 🔐🗝️ Odemčeno. 🔑🔓]

neco starsiho - za pozary v kalifornii je zodpovednej zidovskej laser na obezny draze. v us byli vzdycky napred cyve

Just over two years ago, Greene suggested in a Facebook post that wildfires in California were not natural. Forests don’t just catch fire, you know. Rather, the blazes had been started by PG&E, in conjunction with the Rothschilds, using a space laser, in order to clear room for a high-speed rail project. Here is Greene’s entire post, via Media Matters:

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/marjorie-taylor-greene-qanon-wildfires-space-laser-rothschild-execute.html

Povinné soláry na střechách, rekonstrukce a zateplování, šílenství EU graduje - ČESKÉSTAVBY.cz
https://www.ceskestavby.cz/clanky/povinne-solary-na-strechach-rekonstrukce-a-zateplovani-silenstvi-eu-graduje-31820.html#dop_ab_variant=0&dop_source_zone_name=hpfeed.sznhp.box

Co je tohle za blbečka? Jakýsi Pojar a prý idnes

Analyza Global Climate Coalition - ranne dezinformacni asociace prumyslove lobby od sociologa Roberta Brulleho

Ever since climate change became a political issue in the late 1980s, a number of industry coalitions have formed to oppose mandatory carbon emissions reductions. One key coalition was the Global Climate Coalition (GCC). This paper conducts a historical and empirical review of the activities of this coalition. This review shows that the GCC engaged in four distinct activities to obstruct climate action: 1) monitoring and contesting climate science, 2) commissioning and utilizing economic studies to amplify and legitimate their arguments, 3) shifting the cultural understanding of climate change through public relations campaigns and 4) conducting aggressive lobbying of political elites. Through these activities, the GCC played an important role in obstructing climate action, both in the U.S. and internationally. Further analysis of similar coalitions can aid in our understanding of the organized opposition to climate action.

https://cssn.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/GCC-Paper.pdf