DRAGON: BINGO :-)

FLU:
BULHI:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848

"nezavisle" .)

na vsechny asi ne .. ale jde mi spis o nezavisle zdroje .)

KULHY: no správně by v oficiální verzi měla být odpověď na tyhle otázky, ne?

tohle vypada zajimave...

http://www.ceskatelevize.cz/program/10076331799-24.05.2006-21:40-2.html

nerozjizdejte tady flejmy ;) zdalo se mi, ze prispevek je on topic, tot vse...

autor je bezpochyby na vyplatni listine Judicial Watch a na provoz stranek mu ze svych tajnych fondu prispiva Bilderberg ;)

MARSHUS: velice dukladna, nebo jo?

KULHY: oficiální verzi třeba?

rozhodne ocenuju videt neco dukladnejsiho z druhe strany .. vic takovych

MARNEYY: presne jak rika flu, aspon to ma hlavu a patu, na rozdil od vetsiny "zarucenejch dukazu", co se tady objevujou... nerikam ze verim jednomu nebo druhymu, prijimam informace z obou stran, ale zatim jsou tady standardem akorat ucelove manipulovany udaje a zavery vyvozovany z fotek, na kterejch nelze rozpoznat vubec nic...

MARNEYY: ja nerikam, ze to je pravda. ale chlapik si s tim evidentne dal spoustu prace a jeho dukazy jsou imho stejne presvedcive jako spousta "konspiracnich"

...As to why that 757 hit the Pentagon, or what were the driving forces behind it hitting the Pentagon that is entirely another matter for an entirely different discussion.

FLU: No jo v poradku, ale proc teda je kolem toho tolik tajnosti? Proc tam nesedi tolik veci? Ja jsem si prohlidnul tu stranku a nenasel jsem tam ani jedinej dukaz, kterej by mne alespon nahlodal. Vsechno to vypada jako fake.

FLU: pekny, konecne taky nejakej odlisnej pohled

FLU: jeste slovo autora:

All I can say to add to this is I spent a few weeks trying to see if a 757 hit the Pentagon. What I arrived at, from all the facts, from all the photos, and from all the witnesses is - a missile did not, a Global Hawk did not, a 757 definitely did. As to why that 757 hit the Pentagon, or what were the driving forces behind it hitting the Pentagon that is entirely another matter for an entirely different discussion.

ad Flight 77... pohled z druhe strany (dukazy o tom, ze to skutecne byl boeing?)

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

How Flight 77 Hitting The Pentagon Would Really Look?



Prison Planet.com | May 17 2006

Is this what Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon would really look like from nearby security cameras instead of the nondescript blur footage we have been subject to?

This is obviously a crude collection of doctored frames but if the government had released something similar yesterday would you have believed it? Many would.

Wary therefore we are of the potential for the government to eventually release clear footage of the impact from the 84 other cameras that were dotted around the Pentagon and would have easily documented the event to debunk 9/11 skeptics.

The government claims all 84 cameras either didn't capture the impact or that tape in the cameras was mysteriously empty and yet returned as normal to film the cleanup operations.

Judicial Watch has said it will continue to pursue footage from the other 84 cameras. If the government is telling the truth in saying that the tapes show nothing of interest then what are they trying to hide by not releasing them?

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/170506reallylook.htm

New Video Clip Surfaces: Firefighters Say Bombs in WTC.

Fireman: "bomb in the building, start clearing out..."

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=9%2F11%20bomb

Soldiers to get life in jail for refusing to act as occupiers

GERRI PEEV // POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT

SOLDIERS who object to taking part in a military occupation of a foreign country will face life in prison under measures due to be rubber-stamped in the House of Commons on Monday.

The little-noticed Armed Forces Bill will have its third reading in the Commons on Monday and left-leaning MPs are alarmed that it will legitimise pre-emptive military strikes.

...

http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=742682006

Hijacked truth?
http://www.timesherald.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=16670601&BRD=1672&PAG=461&dept_id=33380&rfi=6

"The Internet just feeds (conspiracy claims)," he said. "In a world of information overload, it's getting harder and harder to separate the wheat from the chaff."
Farley predicted the explosion of misinformation would only get worse over time. Spencer Meredith, a political science professor at New York's Rochester Institute of Technology, was more optimistic.
"The impact of this is negligible, and long-term it's marginal," Meredith said.
People who believe the government is malicious and highly capable of wrongdoing are more inclined to buy into Sept. 11 conspiracy theories, Meredith said.
"It starts with a mistrust of government," he said. "They don't like Bush."