BULHI: Loose Change - 2nd Edition

DRAGON: nejak ve zkratce o cem to je? prece jen to ma hodinu a pul, tak je nechci ztratit zbytecne :-)

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/22/world/middleeast/22missiles.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

WASHINGTON, May 21 — The Bush administration is moving to establish a new antimissile site in Europe that would be designed to stop attacks by Iran against the United States and its European allies.

The administration's proposal, which comes amid rising concerns about Iran's suspected program to develop nuclear weapons, calls for installing 10 antimissile interceptors at a European site by 2011. Poland and the Czech Republic are among the nations under consideration.

DRAGON: BINGO :-)

FLU:
BULHI:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848

"nezavisle" .)

na vsechny asi ne .. ale jde mi spis o nezavisle zdroje .)

KULHY: no správně by v oficiální verzi měla být odpověď na tyhle otázky, ne?

tohle vypada zajimave...

http://www.ceskatelevize.cz/program/10076331799-24.05.2006-21:40-2.html

nerozjizdejte tady flejmy ;) zdalo se mi, ze prispevek je on topic, tot vse...

autor je bezpochyby na vyplatni listine Judicial Watch a na provoz stranek mu ze svych tajnych fondu prispiva Bilderberg ;)

MARSHUS: velice dukladna, nebo jo?

KULHY: oficiální verzi třeba?

rozhodne ocenuju videt neco dukladnejsiho z druhe strany .. vic takovych

MARNEYY: presne jak rika flu, aspon to ma hlavu a patu, na rozdil od vetsiny "zarucenejch dukazu", co se tady objevujou... nerikam ze verim jednomu nebo druhymu, prijimam informace z obou stran, ale zatim jsou tady standardem akorat ucelove manipulovany udaje a zavery vyvozovany z fotek, na kterejch nelze rozpoznat vubec nic...

MARNEYY: ja nerikam, ze to je pravda. ale chlapik si s tim evidentne dal spoustu prace a jeho dukazy jsou imho stejne presvedcive jako spousta "konspiracnich"

...As to why that 757 hit the Pentagon, or what were the driving forces behind it hitting the Pentagon that is entirely another matter for an entirely different discussion.

FLU: No jo v poradku, ale proc teda je kolem toho tolik tajnosti? Proc tam nesedi tolik veci? Ja jsem si prohlidnul tu stranku a nenasel jsem tam ani jedinej dukaz, kterej by mne alespon nahlodal. Vsechno to vypada jako fake.

FLU: pekny, konecne taky nejakej odlisnej pohled

FLU: jeste slovo autora:

All I can say to add to this is I spent a few weeks trying to see if a 757 hit the Pentagon. What I arrived at, from all the facts, from all the photos, and from all the witnesses is - a missile did not, a Global Hawk did not, a 757 definitely did. As to why that 757 hit the Pentagon, or what were the driving forces behind it hitting the Pentagon that is entirely another matter for an entirely different discussion.

ad Flight 77... pohled z druhe strany (dukazy o tom, ze to skutecne byl boeing?)

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

How Flight 77 Hitting The Pentagon Would Really Look?



Prison Planet.com | May 17 2006

Is this what Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon would really look like from nearby security cameras instead of the nondescript blur footage we have been subject to?

This is obviously a crude collection of doctored frames but if the government had released something similar yesterday would you have believed it? Many would.

Wary therefore we are of the potential for the government to eventually release clear footage of the impact from the 84 other cameras that were dotted around the Pentagon and would have easily documented the event to debunk 9/11 skeptics.

The government claims all 84 cameras either didn't capture the impact or that tape in the cameras was mysteriously empty and yet returned as normal to film the cleanup operations.

Judicial Watch has said it will continue to pursue footage from the other 84 cameras. If the government is telling the truth in saying that the tapes show nothing of interest then what are they trying to hide by not releasing them?

http://prisonplanet.com/articles/may2006/170506reallylook.htm