NAGASAWA: Zatim to testujem a veci z toho pouzivame spise interne, v tendrech, prezentacich - tzn. mimo verejnost. A bude jeste imho trvat, kdy z toho polezou veci konzistentni pro kampan, kterou bys postavil ciste na vizualu. Jako nektery ty abstraknejsi elementy imho uz vypadaji dobre - napr. 'splashe' , 'koure'

uf, okej. #článek #kampaň

We are not anti-tech and we know this technology is here to stay one way or another but there are more ethical ways that these models can co-exist with visual artists. This is what we will be proposing these future models look like:

• Ensure that all AI/ML models that specializes in visual works, audio works, film works, likenesses, etc. utilizes public domain content or legally purchased photo stock sets. This could potentially mean current companies shift, even destroy their current models, to the public domain.
• Urgently remove all artist’s work from data sets and latent spaces, via algorithmic disgorgement. Immediately shift plans to public domain models, so Opt-in becomes the standard.
• Opt-in programs for artists to offer payment (upfront sums and royalties) every time an artist’s work is utilized for a generation, including training data, deep learning, final image, final product, etc. AI companies offer true removal of their data within AI/ML models just in case licensing contracts are breached.
• AI Companies pay all affected artists a sum per generation. This is to compensate/back pay artists for utilizing their works and names without permission, for as long as the company has been for profit.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/protecting-artists-from-ai-technologies