Tak ona treba prave ta vytka, ze v te studii jsou pochyby, jak konzistentne nosili ty rousky - jestli si ji v prubehu ruzne sundavaji nandavaji, jestli se dotykaji, meni ji dostatecne za novou.. jak jsem psal uz nekdy vv 2020.. to neni v moznostech normalnich lidi, kteri v tom maji zit mesice sve zivoty.

neustale jsem videl mezi lidma i v mediich televiznich debata ruznych i samotnych covidistu, jak si furt na ty rousky a respiratory sahaj, aby si ji nejak posunuli.. takze pokud neco zachytily , budou to mit na rukou. nebo si ji zejo naopak z ruky neco na rousku prenese atd. atd. noseni promocene rousky..

to dava smysl leda u nekoho, kdo je nemocnej, a jede k doktorovi. kratkodobe si muze dat pozor. 12 hodin za kasou v Kauflandu je to demence.

na co my si tu hrali spis vstoupi do ucebnic historie... o ztrate rozumu

i kdyz uz ubehl n ejaky patek od te spanelske chripky v 1918.. a kupodivu, ze i tehdy se v nekterych mestech USA nosily rousky bylo davano za priklad ormalnosti jejich povinnosti dneska.

kdyz jsem se onehda zacetl do textu historiku nebo dobovych zprav,, tak ten obrazek byl uplne jiny, nez byl predkladan, a zrovna ucinnost tohodle masoveho noseni rousek byla tehdy pak zpetne zpochybnovana.
celkkove byla ta situace v reakci lidi dost podobna covidismu.. rada lidi to odmitala nosit, popotahovani policajtama a vsudypritomna masirka

najdu vam k tomu neco

https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2020/04/02/everyone-wore-masks-during-1918-flu-pandemic-they-were-useless/

Did Masks Work? — The 1918 Flu Pandemic and the Meaning of Layered Interventions - UC Berkeley Library Update
https://update.lib.berkeley.edu/2020/05/23/did-masks-work-the-1918-flu-pandemic-and-the-meaning-of-layered-interventions/

...


This is from a study published in 1919 by the California State Department of Health. The above graph showed very little difference in death rates between Stockton, which mandated the wearing of masks in public, and Boston, which did not. So, early on, authorities were skeptical of the effectiveness of masks, but they also felt that masks were not used properly.

...


“One difficulty in the use of the face mask is the failure of cooperation on the part of the public. When, in pneumonia and influence wards, it has been nearly impossible to force the orderlies or even some of the physicians and nurses to wear their masks as prescribed, it is difficult to see how a general measure of this nature could be enforced in the community at large.”

William T. Vaughan, Influenza: An Epidemiologic Study, (Baltimore, MD: American Journal of Hygiene Monographic Series, No.1, 1921) 241.

Mask skepticism was officially sanctioned by the Surgeon General of the US Navy in a 1919 report:

“No evidence was presented which would justify compelling persons at large to wear masks during an epidemic. The mask is designed only to afford protection against a direct spray from the mouth of the carrier of pathogenic microorganisms … Masks of improper design, made of wide-mesh gauze, which rest against the mouth and nose, become wet with saliva, soiled with the fingers, and are changed infrequently, may lead to infection rather than prevent it, especially when worn by persons who have not even a rudimentary knowledge of the modes of transmission of the causative agents of communicable diseases.”

“Epidemiological and Statistical Data, US Navy, 1918,” Reprinted from the Annual Report of the Surgeon General, US Navy, (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1919) 434.

fascinujici je ,ze kdyz jsem ja na tohle (nespravne noseni rousek) upozornoval, dostal jsem na nnyxu ban

PALEONTOLOG: kdyz nekdo prokazuje, ze opatreni byla uplne na hovno.. neucinna, vytahovat slagr, ze fugovala, je trochu zvlastni

jestli sis tam nasel nejakou peknou korelaci, prokazuje to hned kauzalitu?

Also this week, researchers examined the efficacy of local COVID-19 vaccine mandates implemented across the United States in 2021 and found they didn’t work.

“These mandates imposed severe restrictions on the lives of many citizens and business owners,” the researchers said in a study conducted by George Mason University’s Mercatus Center. “Yet, we find no evidence that the mandates were effective in their intended goals of reducing COVID-19 cases and deaths.”

The researchers evaluated the District of Columbia, New York, Los Angeles, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Seattle.

“We find no evidence that the announcement or implementation of indoor vaccine mandates in the cities listed had any significant effect on vaccine uptake, COVID-19 cases, or COVID-19 deaths, and this is largely consistent for all US cities that implemented the mandate,” the researchers wrote.

rozhodne jsou na to jiny pohledy. mne by byly vakciny u prdele, kdybyste to neudelali v podstate povinny. to samy ty nahubky

postupne se vic a vic aj v samotnym mainstreamu prokazuje, co jsme tvrdili nebo pochybovali uz relativne na zacatku... ze to vlastne vvsechno bylo zbytecny a postaveny na lzich ci nepravdach a nekvalitni vede

vcetne tech pitomejch nahubku

minimalne je potreba se poucit z krizoveho vyvoje.. takhle pakarna se nesmi uz nikdy opakovat. je tedy potreba vecne zhodnotit, co se stalo, a co vime

OMNIHASH: zase lzes.. proc lzes.. drzis se desatera? z prirucky pro extremisty :)

to nebylo ve skutecnosti jen o rouskach a dobre to vis

GORG: to knučení, co poslední pětiletku předvádíš, kvůli tomu, že tě zlej stát v době světový pandemie nutil rok nosit roušku, je naprosto fascinující

PALEONTOLOG: hele typek z myho okoli spachal kkvuli oopatrenim sebevrazdu, frajere

ok vypada byly oboustranny ale to ani tak neresim . ja mluvim o lidech na nyxu, co delali hlavne

tady je bez paywallu

Vaccines don't work, masks don't work: Everything government told us about COVID-19 was wrong - Washington Times
https://web.archive.org/web/20230320150507/https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/mar/1/vaccines-dont-work-masks-dont-work-everything-gove/

Remember when the government told you vaccines will keep you from getting the virus?

Yeah, they don’t.

And remember when the federal government told you COVID didn’t come from a lab in Wuhan, China? Well, it did. Who says? The federal government.

The narrative laid out by the administrations of both former President Donald Trump and President Biden has rapidly fallen apart in the past couple of weeks.

The New York Times published a piece last week headlined “The Mask Mandates Did Nothing. Will Any Lessons Be Learned?” It was penned by Bret Stephens, an opinion columnist with the Times who won a Pulitzer Prize for commentary in 2013.

“The most rigorous and comprehensive analysis of scientific studies conducted on the efficacy of masks for reducing the spread of respiratory illnesses — including Covid-19 — was published late last month. Its conclusions, said Tom Jefferson, the Oxford epidemiologist who is its lead author, were unambiguous.”

“‘There is just no evidence that they’ — masks — ‘make any difference,’ he told the journalist Maryanne Demasi. ‘Full stop.’”

“But, wait, hold on. What about N-95 masks, as opposed to lower-quality surgical or cloth masks? ‘Makes no difference — none of it,’ said Jefferson.”

Hang on. Study after study in the early days of the pandemic asserted that masks worked, which prompted lawmakers at every level of government to enact mask mandates. But Mr. Jefferson says those studies were “non-randomized” and “flawed.”

So that raises the question: What about Mr. Jefferson’s study? Yeah, no. He and 11 colleagues conducted 78 randomized controlled trials with a total of 610,872 participants in numerous countries.

“Mask mandates were a fool’s errand from the start,” Mr. Stephens wrote. “They may have created a false sense of safety — and thus permission to resume semi-normal life. They did almost nothing to advance safety itself. The Cochrane report ought to be the final nail in this particular coffin.”

Also this week, researchers examined the efficacy of local COVID-19 vaccine mandates implemented across the United States in 2021 and found they didn’t work.

“These mandates imposed severe restrictions on the lives of many citizens and business owners,” the researchers said in a study conducted by George Mason University’s Mercatus Center. “Yet, we find no evidence that the mandates were effective in their intended goals of reducing COVID-19 cases and deaths.”

The researchers evaluated the District of Columbia, New York, Los Angeles, Boston, Chicago, New Orleans, Philadelphia, San Francisco and Seattle.

“We find no evidence that the announcement or implementation of indoor vaccine mandates in the cities listed had any significant effect on vaccine uptake, COVID-19 cases, or COVID-19 deaths, and this is largely consistent for all US cities that implemented the mandate,” the researchers wrote.

When COVID-19 arrived on our shores in early 2020, leaders of big cities — almost invariably Democrats — enacted major lockdowns, forcing businesses to close and shutting down entertainment and sports venues. They also ordered everyone to wear masks. When vaccines were created, those leaders issued mandates requiring millions to take them.

For instance, Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney, a Democrat, said in August 2021 that science shows mask and vaccine mandates would slow the spread.

But researchers found no evidence to back that up.

“Our findings put into question the efficacy of city-level vaccine mandates,” the researchers found. “Indoor vaccine mandates caused large disruptions for many individuals and businesses. New York City, for example, fired 1,430 city workers for failing to comply with its vaccine mandate. A survey found that over 90% of NYC restaurants reported having customer-related challenges, such as losing customers who objected to the mandate, and 75% having staff-related challenges. Those are just a small fraction of the disruptions caused by the mandates.”

“Most supporters of the mandates claim that the associated increase in vaccination rates, and its implied reduction in the spread of COVID-19, outweigh the cost of the disruptions. However, we find that the effects of the mandates on their intended outcomes are not statistically noticeable in any of the cities they were implemented in all empirical strategies used,” the report said.

Then last week we found out the global COVID-19 pandemic originated from a virology lab in run by the communist regime in China, according to a new U.S. Department of Energy document that was recently provided to key members of Congress and the White House.

Remember when social media squelched any mention of that? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

So now we know that the government didn’t know a thing about COVID-19. They told us things to make us do what they wanted us to do, but none of it was based in science.

And that should scare the hell out of you.