KUKIDE: Jo, věštění z horoskopu je dobré přirovnání.
:::WiFi a stromy - holandani kteri prisli s tou studiji nebyli schopni zopakovat experiment e stejnym vysledkem: The Antenna Agency statement suggests that the researcher involved has backed away from the reported findings and has not succeeded in repeating them (pardon the translation): "The researcher from Wageningen University indicates that these are initial results and that has not been confirmed in a repeat survey. He warns strongly that there are no far-reaching conclusions from its results."
More than 60 studies have looked into the impact that electromagnetic mobile communications signals might have on plants, according to an initial review by the Antenna Agency. Some studies did find detrimental effects, though likely as a result of signal intensities being high (and close) enough to cause heat damage – not the situation in real life with disparate sources of Wi-Fi signals.
Coz neznamena, ze na zivocisnou tkan to nebude mit vliv. Maso neni celuloza. Ale jako argument je ta studie se stromy invalidni. Zatim se mi nepodarilo dohledat, jaka je realne vyuzivana sila signalu 5G BTSek, abych dohledal nejake studie o prostupnosti tech frekvenci 30-60GHz tkanemi a vlivem na ne.
:::Data: ano, sice te od malicka ovlivnuje kde co, nicmene plosne ovlivnovani nalad a postoju obyvatel je uplne jiny level. Jeden z faktoru ktery je nebezpecny je, ze to neni videt. Nelze to vystopovat ke zdroji, nejde se tomu postavit jinak nez podobnou taktikou, coz uz samo o sobe je pruser. Predstava, ze se lidi nauci pracovat s informacemi tak, aby vetsina nebyla manipulovatelne nastroji, jake pouzila Cambridge Analytica je sci-fi.
Cim kompletnejsi data o nasich zivotech budou dostupna, tim komplexnejsi blackbox machine learning zasahy, ktere vubec nikdo nepochopi ba mozna ani nepostrehne budou k dispozici.
Do Wi-Fi signals kill trees? - CSMonitor.com
https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2010/1122/Do-Wi-Fi-signals-kill-trees