Dmitry Orlov's latest:

The Great Reset as a Suicide Pact

The recent virtual meeting of the world's richest at Davos made quite a bit of noise. In the run-up to it the perennial fluffer of plutocratic egos Klaus Schwab published a very short book about what he's been calling The Great Reset. It has given rise to catchy slogans such as "You’ll own nothing... and you’ll be happy about it." One of the people invited to speak at this meeting was Vladimir Putin. What he said put people in a state of shock. "But what about Europe?!" Schwab cried out plaintively as soon as Putin finished speaking. "Mr. Putin, will Russia save Europe?!" "Possibly," said Putin. Of the assembled worthies, 80 immediately signed up for a closed conference with Putin to find out how to get in on that. After taking all of this in and letting it simmer in my brain-pan for a couple of weeks, I believe I now understand what the Great Reset is: it is an oligarchic suicide pact. Please allow me to explain...

In his talk, Putin set out some bold new ideas. I don't know if Schwab understood that Putin ever so politely told him to go stand in a corner and suck his thumb, but as an idea man Schwab is a disaster. His thinking is a muddle of pompous platitudes, wishful thinking and relentless self-contradiction served up with a senile revolutionary fervor worthy of Leon Trotsky who, at 141 years of age, would indeed be quite senile by now. Western leaders seem to have accepted Schwab's grand concept of the Great Reset and have been running around abusing another catchy slogan: "Build back better!"

Schwab thinks that the coronavirus provides a great opportunity for his Great Reset. Indeed, this horrible plague has already killed over a third of the world's population and the world will never be the same again. Oh, wait, that's the Great Plague I was thinking of. Great Plague, Great Reset—I keep getting the two confused...

Looking up the latest official numbers, the coronavirus has only killed 0.02821% of the world's population, 73.6% of them retirees, most of the rest gravely ill with something else already. A lot of them actually died of the common cold or the flu or some bacterial or fungal infection and tested positive for coronavirus on the ever-so-unreliable PCR test, but we'll never know how many. The coronavirus has killed a *RoundingError* of children and less than 0.001% of healthy people in their productive years (18 to 45). That's less than one person in a million.

Significantly fewer people have died as a result of shoving dangerous foreign objects, such as light bulbs, up their anuses, though one may wonder just how significantly. Taken in this light (pun intended) New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's stance that "no measure, no matter how draconian, could be deemed unwise if it saves but a single life" would lean one to ban all light bulbs and safely sit around in the dark. Perfect safety is impossible and if it were it would be a bad idea: we'd be up to our necks in Darwin award winners. Perfect safety shouldn't exist. Idiots occur naturally and do us all a great service by dying as soon as possible.

Something else that shouldn't exist is SARS-COV-19. As you may have surmised by now, it is a coronavirus. Coronaviruses are very common in all sorts of species; there is at least a dozen common human ones that don't cause any particularly severe illness. A commonly understood fact about coronaviruses (and most other viruses, with the specific exception of lyssavirus which causes rabies) is that they are species-specific. There is a dog coronavirus that gives them diarrhea; there is a cat coronavirus that kills them; no amount of mingling of cats, dogs and humans over thousands of years has caused any of these coronaviruses to jump species.

And then we are expected to believe that a bat virus jumped to humans. Analysis of the virus genome showed that it simultaneously borrowed a spike protein from a human coronavirus allowing it to penetrate human cells and the replication mechanism from HIV (which causes AIDS) that allowed it to replicate itself within human cells. Sure, anything is possible, but what's more likely is that somebody went ahead and made this virus.

Does this sort of thing happen? You'd think that a person who wants to make viruses more lethal belongs in a straitjacket in a padded cell, but apparently some of them have escaped and went to work for the US government. "Researchers studying viruses in the lab sometimes deliberately make them more dangerous to help prepare better responses to outbreaks that might occur naturally." And sometimes what happens in the lab doesn't stay in the lab.

Not only is this virus likely to have been concocted in the lab, but it appears that it has been concocted incompetently. It is a crap virus that doesn't replicate well: instead of making well-formed, functional virus particles it makes all kinds of molecular garbage that then causes severe allergic reactions. You have probably heard of cytokine storms? The release of cytokines is central to almost every stage of the immune response to allergens. Children are immune because of an organ called the thymus which is "largest and most active during the neonatal and preadolescent periods."

Again, anything is possible, but some things are more probable than others. A coronavirus spontaneously jumping from bats to humans is extremely improbable. A super-creepy and evil US government-funded research project going horribly wrong seems not only much more probable but has a certain whiff of inevitability about it. Given the ongoing degradation of the US, at this point just about anything the US does tends to boomerang on itself. So far there have been 2.31 million coronavirus deaths worldwide and 463 thousand in the US, which is eight times worse per capita than the average for the rest of the world. Nice going, intrepid American government-funded gain-of-function boomerang makers!

What is a disaster for most is an opportunity for a few, and Klaus Schwab, for one, seems to think that if life gives you a box of boomerangs then you should hurry up and use them to knock yourselves out. Schwab's point is that we won't have the coronavirus to kick around forever, so we should really hurry up with the Great Reset or we'll miss the chance to all hold hands and jump out of what he calls "the window of opportunity" and the world will never be the same again because you can't step into the same river twice or make up your own stupid platitude because I don't much care for any such nonsense. Schwab really seems like a poster by for Western cognitive dysfunction, so let's leave him standing in his corner eating glue and get back to Putin.

Putin said that the Western liberal system is dead and that Russia won't have any of this "Great Reset" nonsense. Instead he laid out his own principles for what in Russia is called "the social state": one that works well serving the interests of its citizens. The West can either come along with this program or not. But if it doesn't then a humanitarian disaster on the scale of World War II appears quite likely. You can read his entire speech here. You may also wish to compare his speech to what China's Xi said. Xi didn't suffer any of this Great Reset nonsense either, and his grand plan seems suspiciously well harmonized with Putin's.

The right way to move the world forward is a huge topic that I will save for another day. Here, I just want to answer the question, What is the Great Reset, really. To reset something is to set it to its original state. What was the original state of your bank account when you first opened it? Exactly! And what does a conclave of the world's super-rich people control? Why, finance, of course! I think that calling it the Great Nullification would be more accurate. But how will the super-greedy determine who gets nullified and who doesn't?

Since the poor by definition have nothing to nullify and the middle class no longer exists except as a repository of debt that is gradually nullifying itself, super-rich only have each other to nullify. And how, pray tell, will they decide who gets nullified and who doesn't? Will they cast dice? Will they fight duels? Will they let an AI robot decide? All such proposals seem outlandish; after all, we are talking about the world's greediest bastards who are about to lose it all. How would you like to have all of your bank accounts nullified while your neighbor is spared? See what I mean? No, there is only one way they will all agree to go: jump off the cliff all together, holding hands. In this context "Build back better!" is a dream of an afterlife: the rescue spaceship from a future that will never come.

What they are calling the Great Reset is a suicide pact. The reason for the rush to get it over with while the oh-so-fatal coronavirus pandemic is still presumably raging is to make their mass suicide seem less ridiculous. After all, if the faux-pandemic passes and only then does the Western financial system implode, then it will be as if all of the grand oligarchs simultaneously walked out on their balconies, slipped on carefully prepositioned banana peels and synchronously stove in their temples on the finials decorating the corners of the parapets. Half the planet would see that and also die—laughing. The worst kind of death is a ridiculous death, and so Western financial collapse has to happen while "The coronavirus did it!" still remains plausible as an excuse; hence the rush.

Now this could stir up things a bit...
‘Everybody dies’: Musk says neither he nor his family will take Covid-19 vaccine, blasts Bill Gates as ‘knucklehead’ — RT World News
https://www.rt.com/...-vaccine/?fbclid=IwAR3vViVvaiKbz9FdmM1-mfesUPg6IeXhHbTeTQO0MQeshkW2QuKdP6_sWeY

Mimo jiné se v tomto videu probírají právní důsledky vynucování vakcinace zaměstnavatelem:
UK Column News - 3rd February 2021
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnJ_sguaGp4

Why Is There A Correlation Between The Vaccine Rollout And Increased COVID–19 Mortality? | UK Column
https://www.ukcolumn.org/...elation-between-vaccine-rollout-and-increased-covid%E2%80%9319-mortality

Podle Českého statistického úřadu (ČSÚ) byl nárůst počtu zemřelých za loňský rok v Česku zhruba patnáctiprocentní. Tak výrazná meziroční změna je v historii po roce 1950 zcela výjimečná, řekl předseda ČSÚ Marek Rojíček.
Že by tu ta epidemie fakt byla a že by fakt zabíjela? Nebo staťák taky ovládaj reptiliáni?

GORG: To ze tu neni misto pro polemiku sem si nikdy nevsiml, v zahlavi ani na nastence to nevidim tak mozna by stalo za to to tam dopsat, sledoval jsem to jeste kdyz to tu mel jaxxe(jestli se dobre pamatuju) ale je pravda ze sem mozna driv nemel potrebu neco rozporovat, protoze sem asi nemel pocit ze cast mistniho osazenstva neumi do peti pocitat. Dozvidal sem se tu driv spoustu zajimavyho infa, oproti soucasnosti kdy sem lidi postujou veci nad kterejma se ani na vterinu nezamysleli.

Fakt ale je ze kdyz uz se tu obcas nekdo snazil neco rozporovat dostal nalepku ovce co sleduje zpravy v televizi a je vyreseno, takze je to asi mlaceni prazdny slamy, me kvalitni diskuze prijde jako neco co pomuze oddelit zrno od plev a zrevidovat svoje nazory, proto mnohem radsi diskutuju s lidma s opacnejma nazorama nez s lidma co se mnou budou ve vsem souhlasit, zacinam ale chapat ze to tady mezi free thinkers moc nefrci, jedinej kdo mi sem poslal neco zajimavyho nad cim se da zamyslet byl RIVA. Zbytek mlceni nebo nalepky.

K tvymu grafu - promin ale kdyz jsi si s tim dal tu praci tak to trochu vypada jako kdyby sis chtel overit co se deje nezavysle na mediich jakyhokoliv nazoru, v momente ze tam vidim nekolik zasadnich chyb tak mam potrebu ti je zdelit, analitik ocividne uplne nejsi.
S lagem je to uplne jednoduchy pokud tvrdis ze to pro tebe neni novinka. Bud uznavas jeho existenci, pak nevidim duvod proc by si ho nezohlednil, nebo o nem pochybujes a pak staci se trochu zamyslet co se deje mezi nakazenim a prvni testem, a jak dlouho trva nez se nekdo kdo je nemocnej uzdravi v horsim pripade zemre, nemusis kvuli tomu zapinat TV. Tohle neni vec nazoru, to je holej fakt muzem se bavit maximalne o tom jak dlouhej ten lag je. Tvrdis ze si koukal v horizontu nasledujicih 14 dni, ale do grafu napises takovej nesmysl jako "vysledek opatreni = strmejsi narust na den presne od jejich zavedeni". Podivej se do grafu znovu a uvidis ze 6.ho zavedeni opatreni, mezitim jeste zavreny skoly a cca 20 se ta exponenciala zmirnuje a za par dni se otoci a jde dolu(coz je zaroven ta sama skutecnost ktery si se hrozne divil jestli se nepletu), tak nevim kde teda nevidis ten nasledek. Nic dalsiho co jsi do toho grafu zadal neni na celostatnim meritku a neni imho dost velky na to aby se to prejvilo v celkovejch cislech do kterejch si spatne zanes a tim to cely absolutne zamlzil.

"Možná je to celý blbost, ale zajímavý, jak se to jakoby stále naplňuje" tak pokud ignorujes realitu zpusobem kterej si tu predvedl tak se nedivim ze ti prijde ze se to cely naplnuje

Jeste bych chtel osvetlit posledni vec, co je presne ten "řekněme normie pohled" kterej podle tebe zastavam a z kteryho myho tvrzeni usuzujes ze to tak je? To ze verim ze existuje lag mezi nakazou a pozitivnium testem a ze ti pisu ze neumis pracovat s datama je normie pohled? Mozna by ses divili s cim z druhy pulky tvyho postu bych souhlasil, ale oproti tvymu predpokladu TV nemam asi 15 let, mainstream media sleduju pro zabavu a obrazek o realite si delam sam, ze nekolika ruznejch zdroju. Sem sem dycky chodil sledovat co jsou ty potencionalni grand schemes, ale jelikoz je to nekonecny mnozstvi cest kteryma se vydat tak sem vdecnej kdyz muzu odstrihnout ty ktery jsou fundamentalne spatne na urovni logiky, presentujou je absolutni demagogogove nebo je jejich vysvetleni slepenec argumentacnich faulu a manipulce. Pak mi zustanou veci nad kterejma se ma smysl zamejslet. Nesouhlasim s kazdou picovinou jenom proto ze to je z alternativniho zdroje, ale chapu ze s predstavou ze sem k smrti vydesenej normie sledovac tv hovna je jednoudssi se vyrovnat.

Jinak neboj, na dalsi temata uz reagovat nebudu a vyprovodim se sam.

MONKEYFIGHTER: Jak už jsem psal. Tohle není místo na nějakou polemiku. Chci to tu držet ve formátu původního majitele, tak to tu záhy promažu. Příležitost k debatě byla jinde. Nechápu snahu ji rozpoutat tady. Nakonec tu stejně píšeš obecně známé věci. To si fakt můžu zapnout televizi. :) O lagu slyšíme už od jara. Mluvilo se o dvou týdnech. Teď jsou zjevně tři. Budiž.

Ale k tomu grafu. Já ten graf graboval do obrázku, abych to tu mohl hodit s poukázáním, že nechápu, co je tohle za exponenciálu. Napadlo mě pak se pozastavit nad určitými eventy ve vztahu k "číslům", ať už znamenají cokoliv. Dal jsem je tam v reálné datumy sic jsem tušil, že někdo naběhne možná s tím, že zas nechápu velkou vědu lagu v reakci. Já u každého toho bodu koukal na horizont následujících 14 dní. V průběhu toho okna a ani později jsem neviděl žádnou reakci.

Tohle si může posoudit každý sám, jestli mu taková exponenciála dává smysl... Nebo jestli i s uvážením "uzdravených" a spol. bychom neměli vidět nějaké změny v trendu.
To samé platí pro poměrné zastoupení pozitivity na počet testů.

Ad děti.. zvláštní, že když jsem na tohle upozorňoval, aby se bralo na vědomí, čelil jsem pouze hate. Tady na nyxu. Onehdá jsem třeba linkoval, jak mládež randí na vzdálenost 2 metrů, protože mají vrtulníkový rodiče, co je chtěj mít safe.
Když už se to nesmí řešit nikde jinde na nyxu než tady, tak aspoň dopřej tady tinfoil expertům si tu malovat různá potenciální larger schemes. Možná je to celý blbost, ale zajímavý, jak se to jakoby stále naplňuje. A má mě překvapovat, že Great Reset zvládá do covidu zamotat LGBT, klimatické změny, white guilt a všechny ostatní topicy, které jsou v tomhle konspiračním revíru jako doma. Ne.

Jinak představa, že to tu řídí nějaká jedna skupina mi přijde podobně naivní jako ten řekněme normie pohled, který si tu nastínil. Tohle je imho jeden z klíčových rozdílů právě, proč se to některým jeví neproveditelné je nepřipustit si unknown unknowns. I že se třeba strůjci spiknutí realizace napříč stovkami let osobně nedožijí. Oportunisti sledující krátkodobé cíle jsou pro ně užitečné vydíratelné loutky.
Asi nepřekvapí, že jim je přikládáno vytvoření konceptu pravice a levice už za Velké francouzské revoluce. A finanční a jiná podpora kapitalismu i komunismu, ať se lidi hádaj, aby mohli nakonec nabídnout syntézu (stakeholder capitalism?)

Ale jestli na tom covidu naumotaj nějakou formu transhumanistický totality, budu jen rád překvapen. Co bychom ale zprvu ale nejspíš viděli je kolaps ekonomiky a hospodářství. A z popela se pak může zrodit pták Phoenix, nový typ společnosti, až budou lidi úplně na dně. Dotace o covidové dotace jsou toho názorná ukázka. Lidi natahující ruku prosící stát o pomoc, a poslušní ji dostanou. Počátky toho konceptu tu evidentně z médií popisují na březen, ale i teď zamítnutím dávek těm, kdo porušili "opatření". Po pár letech už si nikdo ani nebude pořádně pamatovat, jak to vlastně začalo. Budou řešit akutnější problémy. Takhle to fungovalo vždy předtím alespoň.
Na druhou stranu sebevětší znalci lidské psychologie nemusí být schopni řídit chaos a plán selže, nebo je tohle celý jedná velká blbost, a vůdci jsou prostě jen nekompetentní. je pravda, že ty konspirace asi působí líp. než že to tu řídí nekompetentní lidi s atomovými kufříky, nebo kteří neuváží důsledky dlouhodobého lockdownu. Imho jestli krachne dolar, tak to bude na slušnej chaos bohatě stačit.