• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    GORGworld conspiracy // 911 // free world order! ... part 5 ::
    PLAYER
    PLAYER --- ---
    RAGAMUFF: je smutné, že si neuvědomuješ, že tyhke sarkastické úšklebky tě ve skutečnosti více ponižující než to, že si se předtím dopustil demagogie. Opět se ukazuje, jak strašně moc lidem záleží na jejich neleštěném egu a i to je lresne důvodem, byť né v tvém případě, proč se naše úžasná civilizace řítí do zadele. Díky tomuto zjevnému egoismu se daří psychopatům směšně snadno kontrolovat masy tím, že je rozdělí.
    Obdobná situace je teď mezi SMIS a spolkem Resetheus. Vědci ze SMIS jsou tak moc přesvědčení o jejich nedotknutelném vzdělání a neomylnosti, že ani nemají zapotřebí věcně reagovat na "nepohodlné" dotazy z Resethea (ohledně prokázání existence viru) a ze strany Fürsta padají jen dětinské úšklebky. Koho mi jen připomíná...?^^
    PETER_PAN
    PETER_PAN --- ---
    RAGAMUFF: Pred lety si PLAYER koupil knihu s kvalitnimi fakty (chlubil se tady na nyxu) a z ni cerpal vedomosti. I ty si muzes koupit knihu treba o dutem mesici a bude plna kvalitnich a do sebe zapadajicich "faktu".
    RAGAMUFF
    RAGAMUFF --- ---
    PLAYER: Vyhrál jsi, máš pravdu, byly to termonukleární nálože pod těma třema budovama, nebo jaká je tvoje stručně řečená hypotéza.

    Vysvětluje to nalezené kuličky železa a i nalezený termit, dává to smysl.

    Konec diskuze, kterou jsem ani nechtěl začínat, prohrál jsem, moje tvrzení nejsou pravdivá a umřu hloupý.
    PLAYER
    PLAYER --- ---
    RAGAMUFF: pokud tvrdíš, že konvenční trhavina či termit běžné vytváří pyroklastický mrak naprosto schodný s erupcí sopky, dodej pro takové tvrzení důkaz. Zajisté dokážeš najít nějaký test, experiment, kontrolovaný, kde to bude demonstrováno, replikováno. Pokud nic takového nejsi schopný doložit, pak předkládáš ničím nepodloženou hypotézu. V tuto chvíli si tedy pyroklastický mrak nevysvětlil.

    Nikde jsem nenapsal ani slovo o rozmetaných lidech. Přečti si prosím znovu, co jsem skutečně napsal. Zde tedy "vysvětluješ" něco, co ale nemá se skutečnými forenzními nálezy téměř nic společného. Doporučuji opět doplnit základní informace, co se z lidí vlastně našlo, potažmo například z vybavení kanceláří. To obsahují i oficiální vyjádření.

    Nikde jsem nenapsal ani slovo o vodíkové bombě. Opět tedy reaguješ na něco, co sis vymyslel a následně se to snažíš jakoby obhájit. Doporučuji nastudovat pečlivě co je to vodíková bomba a co je to termonukleární bomba. Do začátku ;)

    Zdá se, že o mnou nadhozené hypotéze vůbec nic nevíš, podle té závěrečné otázky, bez urážky. Doporučuji tedy nejprve studovat a až poté případně zavrhnout. Tedy za předpokladu, že ti je konfirmační zkreslení cizí.

    Buď si můžeš přečíst knížku:

    https://www.amazon.de/dp/B08B384LQS/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=1O94W8GKEP029

    A nebo se jednoduše podívat na web:
    911media.de
    http://www.911media.de/#autoid1009793/

    Odkazuji záměrně na podrobný fyzikální model, protože se stručnou odpovědi by ses s největší pravděpodobností nespokojil a následovala by nekonečná série doplňujících otázek.
    RAGAMUFF
    RAGAMUFF --- ---
    PLAYER: Nemyslím si že cenzurují, jen GORG tu nechce kecy okolo. Tebou níže popsané jevy jsou podle mě snadno vysvětlitelné.

    Při reakci termitu se uvolňuje bílý kouř, a to spolu prachem ze sutin vytvořilo tenhle mrak. Nikdo neříká že použili termit tvořený směsí prášků. Každý větší či menší výbuch vytvoří "mushroom cloud".


    Nechápu proč si myslíš že by běžná trhavina nedokázala ty lidi rozmetat. Podle mě bez problému.

    Prostě koukám na kolaps wtc7 a 1a2 a žádnou vodíkovku nebo něco podobnýho v tom nevidím.

    https://preview.redd.it/snck2c5wlk491.gif?format=mp4&v=enabled&s=cb058ce823df0c6228b607f3a209137f7388c606

    Naopak, vydím tam přesne to co bych čekal, sekvenci menších výbuchů které odklánějí nařezané svislé podpěry, tak jak je potřeba aby jsi složil budovu. Přesně tak jak to dělají demoliční čety, akorát asi s jinýma prostředkama.


    9 11 3rd Tower Collapse WTC7 Compilation Raw Footage
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WNk674LZrI



    Téhle teorii nepřikládám žádnou váhu, naopak, ale zeptám se na jednu věc:

    Takže to provedli třema nezávisle odpálenýma vodíkovejma pumama? WTC1 pak 2 a pak WTC7?
    PLAYER
    PLAYER --- ---
    RAGAMUFF: napamatuji se. Stacili by napsat, co podle tebe zpusobilo mnou nize popsane jevy, klidne mi to muzes napsat do SZ, pokud se tu cenzuruji prispevky. Ale ty vlastne nechces.
    RAGAMUFF
    RAGAMUFF --- ---
    PLAYER: Mohl bych, ale nechci, už jsme se o tom bavili, ale asi to bude mázlý.
    PLAYER
    PLAYER --- ---
    RAGAMUFF: muzes byt konkretni? Jsem otevreny diskusi a zatim jediny, kdo zohlednil veskere dostupne dukazy a ne pouze ty, ktere by vyhovovaly jeho teorii (Richard Gage a spol.) a nasledns predlozil velmi oresvedcivou hypotezu, je nemecky fyzik Heinz Pommer, pripadne pred nim Dimitri Khalezov.
    RAGAMUFF
    RAGAMUFF --- ---
    PLAYER: V tomhle se bohužel neshodneme, ale alespoň oba nesouhlasíme s oficiální verzí. Respektuju tvůj názor ale nemohu se sním ztotožnit.
    PLAYER
    PLAYER --- ---
    RAGAMUFF: tam šlo o něco efektivnějšího, než pouhé řezací nástroje, ať už tomu budeme říkat nanotermit nebo jinak. Ten pyroklastický mrak co se během destrukce tvořil (podoba s erupcí sopky či nukleární nálože čistě náhodná), ty masivní bloky co to vymrštilo, ta doslova "vypařená" lidská těla, to běžné trhaviny neumí. Navíc je termit relativně pomalý, září a je hlučný.

    WTC1&2 on 9/11 - obvious nuclear explosions
    https://youtu.be/ruM8ejV-Jzo
    RAGAMUFF
    RAGAMUFF --- ---
    World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) University of Alaska Fairbanks
    https://ine.uaf.edu/wtc7

    Jen pro připomenutí, oficiální story o wtc7 říká že vodorovný nosník A2001 vyklouznul z lůžka na svislém nosníku 79, jenže vypustili "side plate" na nosníku 79.

    Zpráva UAF ukazuje že nemohl vyklouznout a i kdyby vyklouznul, rozhodně by to nesložilo celou budovu tak jak složilo.

    Data můžete stáhnout a udělat vlastní analýzu, já zatím jen kouknul na to patro 13. Jestli k tomu někdo máte něco technickýho, rád odpovím.
    RAGAMUFF
    RAGAMUFF --- ---
    Poslal jsem to sem protože ACE elevator wtc renovation nelze nic najít.
    RAGAMUFF
    RAGAMUFF --- ---
    XMEDA: Nic moc, ale dobrá příležitost tam nacpat řezací nálože
    RIVA
    RIVA --- ---
    The Coronation (featuring Mi7’s Winnie the Pooh), and British Israelism (the bane of the world) and Victorian Medievalism (that still ruins our lives) - From Behind Enemy Lines
    http://www.frombehindenemylines.org.uk/2023/05/the-coronation-featuring-mi7s-winnie-the-pooh-and-british-israelism-the-bane-of-the-world-and-victorian-medievalism-that-still-ruins-our-lives/
    OMNIHASH
    OMNIHASH --- ---
    To už u nás funguje 10+ let

    V Lese vzpomínek v Ďáblicích se pohřbívá ke stromům a ekologicky | iROZHLAS - spolehlivé zprávy
    https://www.irozhlas.cz/clovek/v-lese-vzpominek-v-dablicich-se-pohrbiva-ke-stromum-a-ekologicky_201506022031_sbartosova
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Maker of suicide pod plans to launch in Switzerland - BBC News
    https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-59577162



    The pod can be 3D printed and placed anywhere
    By Jane Wakefield
    Technology reporter
    The company behind a 3D-printed pod which can help carry out assisted suicide has said it is confident it could be used in Switzerland as early as next year.

    Sarco commissioned a Swiss legal expert, who found that the machine did not break any laws in the country.

    But other lawyers questioned his findings.

    And assisted-suicide organisation Dignitas said it would be unlikely to meet "much acceptance".

    Assisted suicide, in which somebody is given the means to end their own life, is legal in Switzerland. About 1,300 people died there in this way in 2020.

    Both assisted suicide and euthanasia, in which a doctor ends the life of somebody who wants to die, are illegal in the UK.

    Legal debate
    The current method used in Switzerland is to provide the person with a series of liquids that, if ingested, will end the person's life.

    By contrast, the pod - which can be placed anywhere - is flooded with nitrogen, reducing the oxygen levels rapidly.

    The process would make the person inside lose consciousness and die in approximately 10 minutes.

    The suicide pod is activated from the inside and also has an emergency button to exit.

    Daniel Huerlimann, a legal expert and assistant professor at the University of St Gallen, was asked by Sarco to explore whether the use of the suicide pod would break any Swiss laws.

    He told the BBC that his findings suggested the pod "did not constitute a medical device", so would not be covered by the Swiss Therapeutic Products Act.

    He also believed it would not fall foul of laws governing the use of nitrogen, weapons or product safety.

    "This means that the pod is not covered by Swiss law," he said.

    But Kerstin Noelle Vkinger, a doctor, lawyer and professor at the University of Zurich, told Swiss newspaper Neue Zurcher Zeitung: "Medical devices are regulated because they are supposed to be safer than other products. Just because a product is not beneficial to health does not mean that it is not also affected by these additional safety requirements."

    And Dignitas told the BBC: "For 35 years now, through the two Swiss Exit groups and for 23 years also with Dignitas, Switzerland has the practice of professional accompanied suicide with trained staff, in co-operation with physicians.

    "In the light of this established, safe and professionally conducted/supported practice, we would not imagine that a technologised capsule for a self-determined end of life will meet much acceptance or interest in Switzerland."

    Dr Death
    If the machine gets the go-ahead for use in Switzerland, the pod will not be offered for sale in the conventional way.

    Instead, the capsule's creator Dr Philip Nitschke, said he planned to make the blueprints available so anyone could download the design. This will be made available for free.

    His aim is to "de-medicalise the dying process", he said in an interview published on the Exit International website, a voluntary assisted dying charity which he founded.

    "We want to remove any kind of psychiatric review from the process and allow the individual to control the method themselves."

    He has long campaigned for the right to die, earning him the nickname "Dr Death".

    Currently there are two prototypes of the Sarco pod, with a third being printed in the Netherlands.

    Dr Nitschke has previously faced criticism for the pod, with some saying that its futuristic design glamourises suicide.
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    New York approves composting of human bodies - BBC News
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64140571

    US composting firms such as Recompose - in Seattle - say the process is an environmentally friendly option after death
    By James FitzGerald
    BBC News
    New York has become the latest US state to allow so-called human composting.

    A person can now have their body turned into soil after their death - which is seen as an environmentally friendly alternative to a burial or cremation.

    Also known as "natural organic reduction", the practice sees a body decompose over several weeks after being shut in a container.

    In 2019, Washington was the first US state to legalise it. Colorado, Oregon, Vermont and California followed suit.

    New York is therefore the sixth American jurisdiction to allow human composting, following Saturday's stamp of approval from Kathy Hochul, the state's Democratic governor.

    The process happens in special above-ground facilities.

    A body is put in a closed vessel along with selected materials such as woodchips, alfalfa and straw grass, and gradually breaks down under the action of microbes.

    After a period of around a month - and a heating process to kill off any contagion - loved ones are given the resulting soil. This can be used in planting flowers, vegetables or trees.

    One US firm, Recompose, has said its service can save a tonne of carbon compared with a cremation or a traditional burial.

    Emissions of carbon dioxide are a major contributor to climate change, because they act to trap the Earth's heat in a phenomenon known as the greenhouse effect.

    Traditional burials involving a coffin also consume wood, land and other natural resources.

    Proponents of human composting say it is not only a more environmental option, but also a more practical one in cities where land for cemeteries is limited.

    New York's approval of the process was "a huge step for accessible green death care nationwide", one Washington-based provider, Return Home, told the New York Post.


    But, for some, there are ethical questions about what happens to the soil which results from the composting.

    Catholic bishops in New York state reportedly opposed the legislation, arguing that human bodies should not be treated like "household waste".

    Concerns have also been raised about the cost of composting. But the firm Recompose - whose facility in Seattle is one of the world's first - says its $7,000 (£5,786) fee is "comparable" with rival options.

    The median sum in the US for a funeral with a burial was $7,848 in 2021, or $6,971 for a funeral with a cremation, according to the National Funeral Directors Association (NFDA).

    Human composting is already legal throughout Sweden. And natural burials - in which a body is buried without a coffin or with a biodegradable coffin - are permitted in the UK.
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Uncensored: Smart City Locations & Agenda EXPOSED!!! - Zeee Media
    https://zeeemedia.com/interview/uncensored-smart-city-locations-agenda-exposed/
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    What's human composting? Eco-friendly alternative to burial, cremation
    https://www.cnbc.com/2023/02/16/what-is-human-composting-eco-friendly-alternative-to-burial-cremation.html

    When Michelle Skaff dies, she’s going to turn into dirt.

    The 31-year-old is a client of Return Home, a Seattle-area human composting facility. Its futuristic-looking vessels full of organic material like straw, alfalfa and sawdust can turn human bodies back into soil by mimicking natural decomposition processes, the company says.

    Skaff is very much alive, and plans to be for a long time. She signed up for the company’s “pre-planning” services, starting a payment plan that’ll enable her to eventually become compost.

    The reason: Burials and cremations carry heavy environmental tolls. Burials require embalming bodies in toxic solutions, plus an indefinite use of land, and cremations result in millions of tons of carbon dioxide emissions annually.

    Over the last 15 years, the rate of cremation in the U.S. almost doubled, to 57%.

    Many of human composting’s advocates are relatively young. The first five people to sign up for Return Home’s pre-planning services were under age 35, according to CEO Micah Truman.

    At Recompose, another Seattle-based facility, 25% of pre-planning clients are between 20 to 49 years old, says founder Katrina Spade. That’s a lot for a service primarily devoted to the recently deceased.

    For some clients, these companies present unparalleled opportunity. Experts who study decomposition and the environmental impact of dead bodies agree.

    “My first reaction was: Why haven’t we done this before?” says Jennifer DeBruyn, an environmental microbiology professor at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. “It’s not really a new idea. It’s just new-ish that we’re applying it to humans.”

    Human composting is legal in six states and counting
    On a rapidly warming planet, the somewhat fringe concept is inching toward the mainstream. Human composting, also called “natural organic reduction,” is now legal in six states and counting.

    Washington was first, in 2019. Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, California and New York soon followed. You don’t need to live where it’s legal to take advantage: Some of Return Home’s clients will have their bodies flown to Washington after they die.

    “We’ve got 29-year-olds in Miami signing up,” Truman says. “Young people are going to teach us how to die better.”

    But legalization is only the first step, proponents say. The next big hurdle is getting more people on board with the concept.

    That’s where TikTok comes in.

    Return Home, for example, has a robust presence on the platform, with more than 570,000 followers watching videos about what happens to the soil, where the bones go and other common questions.


    It’s an accessible way to learn the basics, clear up misconceptions and identify benefits beyond the environmental, says Tabitha Ogren, a 39-year-old TikTok user-turned-Return Home client.

    Ogren was drawn to the idea of alleviating future burdens on her family, noting the expenses and stress of funerals she’d previously planned. “Not having to decide what to do after I pass away is ... that last gift I can give to them,” she says.

    The sign-up process was easy: Ogren called the company, discussed options for the final location of her soil and determined a payment plan. “They pretty much did 98% of it over the phone,” she says.

    Skaff, who used the same process, asked the company to call her again a few months later to make sure her decision wasn’t rash. By then, she knew it felt right.

    “No matter what happens the rest of my life — if I do have kids, if I don’t have kids, no matter what my family looks like in the future — it’s on no one else to [plan for my death],” she says.

    Detractors are increasingly voicing their concerns
    Nina Schoen first learned about Recompose in 2017, two years before human composting was even legal in Washington. Attracted by the sustainability factor, she became one of Recompose’s first-ever clients after the facility opened to the public in 2020.

    “Anything I can do today to have an impact [down the road] is meaningful,” Schoen, 52, says.

    But she knows it’s a potentially controversial choice. Burials have helped humans process death for millennia, a process codified in multiple major religions. Cremation, popularized in America as recently as the Civil War, is notably common in modern-day Catholicism.

    Schoen says she’s openly discussed her decision with family and friends, including her 10-year-old daughter. She’s also careful not to force her views on others. “There’s so much tradition, and everyone’s perspective here is different,” she says.

    Recompose's futuristic-looking composting vessels.
    Recompose’s futuristic-looking composting vessels.Recompose
    That cultural headwind is intensifying. Despite what Truman calls the “remarkable” speed of legislation thus far, detractors are making their voices heard.

    “It is inappropriate to suddenly introduce a completely different method, with no input from the public, religious communities, or anyone else outside of the state Capitol,” the New York State Catholic Conference wrote in a letter to Gov. Kathy Hochul, three weeks before she legalized human composting in the state.

    The New York State Funeral Directors Association, which represents more than 950 funeral homes across the state, also opposed the legislation — seemingly for a more practical reason.

    “As written, it excludes funeral homes from having the option of owning [or] operating a facility necessary to provide this service to families,” the organization tells CNBC Make It via email, adding: “We simply deserve the opportunity to provide the service to those families seeking natural organic reduction.”

    It’s not really a new idea. It’s just new-ish that we’re applying it to humans.
    Jennifer DeBruyn
    PROFESSOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE, KNOXVILLE
    Truman cautiously likens the human composting industry’s roadmap to the legal cannabis industry’s ongoing expansion. Companies in both fields lack access to bank loans and other traditional methods of financing without federal legalization — but recreational cannabis, now legal in 21 states, has momentum.

    Others aren’t quite as optimistic. DeBruyn, for example, predicts that human composting won’t become commonplace anytime soon.

    That still won’t stop a subset of people who want to “do better after death,” she says. “The end product is some soil. We could always use more soil. At the end of the day, it’s always going to be a better option than a graveyard.”
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Pokles porodnosti po očkování | Zuzana Krátká
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGHiiNcYHQ8
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam