From an address to a joint session of the US Congress: President George W. Bush.

"Americans are asking ``Why do they hate us?'' They hate what they see right here in this chamber: a democratically elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms: our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other. " George W. Bush, 20 September, 2001

http://www.indystar.com/library/factfiles/crime/national/2001/sept11/transcripts/0921bush.html

From Goebbels' New Year address to Germany

They hate our people because it is decent, brave, industrious, hardworking and intelligent. They hate our views, our social policies, and our accomplishments. They hate us as a Reich and as a community. They have forced us into a struggle for life and death. We will defend ourselves accordingly. All is clear between us and our enemies. Goebbels 31 December 1939

http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/goeb21.htm

Richard Perle, policy advisor to G.W. Bush, 2001

"No stages. This is total war. We are fighting a variety of enemies. There are lots of them out there. All this talk about first we are going to do Afghanistan, then we will do Iraq, then we take a look around and see how things stand. That is entirely the wrong way to go about it ... If we just let our vision of the world go forth, and we embrace it entirely, and we don't try to ... piece together clever diplomatic solutions ... but just wage a total war against these tyrants, I think we will do very well. Our children will sing great songs about us years from now." ---

- Richard Perle, policy advisor to G.W. Bush, 2001

http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=11938


Joseph Goebbels, 1943

So total war is the demand of the hour. We must put an end to the bourgeois attitude which we have also seen in this war: Wash my back, but don't get me wet! The danger facing us is enormous. The efforts we take to meet it must be just as enormous. The time has come to remove the gloves! We must use our fists now! There is no excuse for only superficially and carelessly making use of the war potential at home and throughout Europe. We must use the full resources, as quickly and thoroughly as it is organizationally and practically possible. Unnecessary concern is wholly out of place. The future of Europe hangs on our success in the East! We are ready to defend it! The German people are shedding their most valuable blood in this battle. The rest of Europe should at least work to support us. Those who do not understand this fight today will thank us on bended knee tomorrow that we took it!

- Joseph Goebbels, 1943

http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/goeb36.htm

America, the Fourth Reich

By Ian Gurney
Online Journal Contributing Writer

"Dictatorships start wars because they need external enemies to exert internal control over their own people." —Richard Perle

August 13, 2003

Americans are the new Nazis. There, that's earned me a lot of enemies very quickly hasn't it?

"How dare you," comes the riposte from the neo-cons in the administration and the right-wing think tanks like JINSA and the PNAC, as well as the "Fox news compliant" brigade whose heads are still stuck up their backsides enjoying the televised view. "America is a democracy, a free country run by a democratically elected government. It is the land of the free, the home of the brave and the protector of the free world," I hear them chorus.

To that I say, bullshit.

To say America is a democracy these days is just stretching things too far. Consider: Bush was not elected by the majority of people in the USA. Admittedly the turnout was low (you do, after all, get the government you deserve if you don't exercise your franchise) but George W didn't get a mandate. To do that more than 50 percent of the voters have to vote for you, and that didn't happen. In fact, Georgie boy lost. However, good old George made sure that, mandate or not, win or not, with a little help from friends and family in Florida he could win it by cheating. Let's not mince words, George W Bush stole the presidency of the United States. He is not the democratically elected leader of America.

It also appears that some unelected officials in the Bush administration may have acquired more power than the president himself. Perle, Wolfowitz, Feith, Bolton, Abrams, Rumsfeld all share the same right-wing neo-conservative views held by organisations such as the Project for a New American Century, the Zionist Organisation of America and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs. As members of these organisations, it could be said that this unelected cabal of neo-cons in the White House and the Pentagon have interests other than America at heart. This is not only undemocratic, it is treason.

So, we now see that America is governed by a president who was not democratically elected, supported by an unelected cabal of people with very extreme and in some cases, very un-American views. This cannot, therefore, classify America as a democratic country. A country that is governed by a non-elected power is, as we have seen and heard these last few months concerning Iraq, Iran and North Korea, classed as a "dictatorship". Dictatorships are fascist by nature. Fascism is described as "right-wing dictatorship". Look up the word fascism. See what I mean?

Now let's take a quick look at Germany in the 1930s and '40s as the Nazis reared their ugly heads. Here was a country that was financially crippled with a massive budget deficit owing billions of dollars to the rest of the world. Just like the USA.

In the 1930s Germany was a country where the burning of the Reichstag, Germany's 9/11, engineered by Hitler and his henchmen, was used to create external enemies and to exert internal control over the German people. Hitler then used the media to lie, frighten and deceive the population, allowing a bunch of vicious, extreme, right-wing megalomaniacs to gain power. Just like the USA.

In the 1930s Hitler was surrounded by a group of unelected officials whose sole objective was to take control of Germany for their own ends and with the use of their military might, take control of the assets and prosperity of other, weaker countries. Just like the USA.

In 1939 Hitler embarked on a series of pre-emptive attacks on sovereign nations in the name of "freeing the people" of that country. Just like the USA.

In 1940 the German hierarchy started building special "camps" or detention centres in which to incarcerate and eventually execute those people considered to be "against" their regime. Just like the USA.

As Germany invaded the countries surrounding them during World War II, they found that far from having conquered the country and "liberated" the people, the people of that country formed nationalist "resistance" groups and used guerilla warfare to kill, harass and slowly demoralise the occupying army. Just like the USA.

"History is little more than the register of crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind" wrote Edward Gibbon, the British historian in The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. History should teach us a great many things, but unfortunately the majority of Americans know very little about history, or for that matter, the rest of the world. Don't believe me? Ask an American where Admiral Lord Nelson, one of the worlds greatest naval commanders, died or what nationality Alexander the Great was? Better still, ask an American to point to pretty much any foreign country on a map. Try North Korea.

If you know nothing of history, you cannot learn the lessons history teaches. You continue to make the same mistakes. Hitler's mistake was to wage war on too many fronts at once and underestimate the ferocity of the guerilla wars being fought against him by resistance groups all over Europe. Eventually it was Russia, or to be more precise, the Russian winter and Hitler's hubris, that proved to much for the disillusioned German troops, sick and tired of fighting and dying for a regime that they belatedly realised was illegitimate.

Hitler, in the last desperate act of a cowardly tyrant, committed suicide. Germany, defeated and destroyed, had lost everything. Those who had been instrumental in Germany's war and propaganda machine were tried and executed. Eventually Germany once again became a democracy, but it had taken the deaths of many millions of people to restore that democracy.

Despite Germany's huge arsenal of weapons, it had lost the war because those running Germany were not the democratic leaders of a democratic country, but were fascist, right-wing neo-conservatives: Nazis, who propagated an illegal war through lies and deception and stirred up the anger of all decent thinking people on the planet with their evil deeds.

Just like the USA.

Copyright © 2003 Ian Gurney

Ian Gurney is a broadcaster, journalist and the author of the bestseller, "The Cassandra Prophecy-Armageddon Approaches," published by International Global Press. ISBN: 0953581314. Ian welcomes your comments at info@caspro.com

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Commentary/081303Gurney/081303gurney.html

A proč jsme napadli Irák, tatínku?

1: Tatinku, proc jsme napadli Irak?
2: Protoze meli zbrane hromadneho niceni, broucku.
1: Ale inspektori nenasli zadne zbrane hromadneho niceni.
2: To proto, ze je Iracani schovali.
1: A proto jsme napadli Irak?
2: Ano. Invaze vzdycky funguji lepe, nez inspekce.
1: Ale potom, co jsme je napadli, jsme stejne nenasli zadne zbrane hromadneho niceni, ne?
2: No, protoze jsou dobre schovane. Nedelej si starosti, urcite neco najdeme, pravdepodobne tesne pred volbami 2004.
1: Na co Irak vsechny ty zbrane hromadneho niceni potreboval?
2: Aby je pouzil ve valce, hlupacku!
1: Tak to jsem zmateny... Kdyz meli vsechny ty zbrane, ktere chteli pouzit ve valce, proc zadne nepouzili, kdyz jsme s nimi valcili my?
2: No, samozrejme nechteli, aby nekdo vedel, ze ty zbrane maji, takze radsi po tisicovkach umirali, nez by se branili.
1: To nedava smysl, tatinku. Proc by radsi umreli, kdyz meli vsechny ty velike zbrane proti nam.
2: Je to odlisna kultura. To nemusi davat smysl.
1: Ja nevim, jak ty, ale ja si myslim, ze nemeli zadne z tech zbrani, ktere vlada rika, ze meli.
2: No, vis, na tom tak nezalezi. Meli jsme dalsi dobry duvod, abychom je napadli.
1: A jaky?
2: I kdyby Irak nemel zbrane hromadneho niceni, Sadam Husajn byl kruty diktator, coz je dalsi dobry duvod, abychom je napadli.
1: Proc? Co dela takovy kruty diktator, aby bylo v poradku napadnout jeho zem?
2: No, treba tryznil svuj vlastni lid.
1: Neco jako v Cine?
2: Nesrovnavej Cinu s Irakem. Cina je dobra ekonomicka konkurence, miliony lidi pracuji za otrocke mzdy v manufakturach, a vydelavaji americkym korporacim.
1: Takze kdyz zeme zneuziva sve lidi pro zisk americkych korporaci, je to dobra zeme, i kdyz trapi lidi?
2: Spravne.
1: A proc trapili lidi v Iraku?
2: Hlavne za politicke zlociny, treba kritizovani vlady. Lide, kteri kritizovali vladu v Iraku byly zavirani do vezeni a muceni.
1: Neni to presne tak, jako v Cine?
2: Rikal jsem ti, ze Cina je jina!
1: A jaky je rozdil mezi Cinou a Irakem?
2: No, za prve, Irak vedla strana Ba'ath, zatimco Cina je komunisticka.
1: Nerikal jsi mi jednou, ze komunisti jsou spatni?
2: Nene, jenom kubansti komunisti jsou spatni.
1: A jak jsou kubansti komunisti spatni?
2: No, za prve, lide, kteri kritizuji vladu na Kube, jdou do vezeni a muci je.
1: Jako v Iraku?
2: Presne.
1: A jako v Cine?
2: Rikal jsem ti, ze Cina je dobra ekonomicka konkurence. Na druhe strane Kuba neni.
1: A proc Kuba neni?
2: No, vis, nekdy v sedesatych letech nase vlada schvalila nektere zakony, ktere zpusobily, ze obchodovat s Kubou je nelegalni. Dokud neprestanou byt komunisty a nestanou se kapitalisty, jako jsme my.
1: A kdybychom se zbavili tech zakonu, otevreli s Kubou hranice a zacali s nimi obchodovat, nepomohlo by to, aby se z nich stali kapitalisti?
2: Nedelej chytryho!
1: Nechtel jsem delat chytryho...
2: V kazdem pripade, taky na Kube nemaji svobodu nabozenstvi!
1: Neco jako Cina a hnuti Falun Gong?
2: Rikal jsem, abys o Cine osklive nemluvil! A Sadam Husajn ziskal moc vojenskym prevratem, takze stejne neni legitimni vudce.
1: Co je to vojensky prevrat?
2: To je kdyz vojensky general ziska vladu v zemi nasilim, namisto svobodnych voleb, jako mame tady ve Spojenych Statech.
1: A neziskal pakistansky vudce vladu taky prevratem?
2: Myslis generala Perveze Musharrafa? Ehm, jo, ziskal, ale Pakistan jsou nasi pratele.
1: A proc jsou Pakistan nasi pratele, kdyz nemaji legitimniho vudce?
2: Nerikal jsem, ze Pervez Musharraf neni legitimni.
1: Ale vzdyt jsi rikal, ze vojensky general, ktery ziska moc tim, ze premuze silou legitimni vladu v zemi, neni legitimni vudce?
2: Jenom Sadam Husajn. Pervez Musharraf je nas pritel, protoze nam pomahal v invazi do Afghanistanu.
1: A proc jsme napadli Afghanistan?
2: Kvuli tomu, co nam udelali 11. zari.
1: A co nam Afghanistan udelal 11. zari?
2: No, 11. zari devatenact muzu (patnact z nich bylo ze Saudske Arabie) uneslo nase letadla a tri z nich nasmerovali do budov, a zabili pres 3000 Americanu.
1: A jak do toho zapada Afghanistan?
2: V Afghanistanu vsechny ty muze vycvicili, pod krutou vladou Talibanu.
1: Nejsou Taliban ti radikalni islamci, co sekaji lidem hlavy a ruce?
2: Ano, to byli presne oni. Sekali lidem hlavy a ruce, a taky utlacovali zeny.
1: A nedala Bushova administrativa Talibanu v kvetnu 2001 43 milionu?
2: Ano, to byla odmena, za jejich uspesny boj proti drogam.
1: Boj proti drogam?
2: Ano, Taliban byl velmi uspesny v zabranovani lidem pestovat opium.
1: A jak se jim to tak dobre povedlo?
2: Jednoduse. Koho chytili, ze pestoval opium, tomu sekali ruce a hlavy.
1: Takze kdyz Taliban sekal lidem hlavy a ruce kvuli pestovani kytek, bylo to v poradku, ale uz nebylo v poradku kdyz sekal hlavy a ruce z jinych duvodu?
2: Ano. To je v poradku, kdyz radikalni islamci sekaji lidem hlavy a ruce za pestovani kytek, ale je krute, kdyz jim sekaji ruce a hlavy za kradeni chleba.
1: A nesekaji lidem ruce a hlavy i v Saudske Arabii?
2: To je rozdil. Afghanistan byl tyransky patriarchat, ktery utlacoval zeny a chtel po nich, aby na verejnosti oblekaly burku, pod pohruzkou smrti ukamenovanim pro ty, ktere to nedodrzely.
1: A Saudske zeny nemusi na verejnosti chodit v burce?
2: Ne, Saudske zeny nosi jenom tradicni Islamsky odev.
1: A jaky je v tom rozdil?
2: Tradicni islamsky odev, ktery nosi saudske zeny, je prosty, lec elegantni sat, ktery zakryva cele zenske telo, krome oci a prstu. Naproti tomu burka je odporny nastroj patriarchalniho utlaku, ktery zakryva cele zenske telo, krome oci a prstu.
1: Zni to jako stejna vec pod jinym jmenem.
2: Nesrovnavej tady Afghanistan a Saudskou Arabii. Arabove jsou nasi pratele!
1: Ale ja myslel, ze jsi rikal, ze 15 z 19 unoscu z 11. zari bylo ze Saudske Arabie?
2: Ano, ale vycvicil je Afghanistan.
1: A kdo je vycvicil?
2: Velmi spatny muz, Osama bin Ladin.
1: Z Afghanistanu?
2: Eh, ne, byl take ze Saudske Arabie. Ale byl to spatny clovek, velmi spatny clovek.
1: Vzpominam si, ze kdysi byl taky nas pritel...
2: Jenom kdyz jsme pomahali jemu a mudzahedinskemu odporu Sovetske invazi v 80tych letech.
1: Kdo jsou Soveti? To je to Zle Komunisticke Imperium, o kterem mluvil Ronald Reagan?
2: Soveti uz nejsou. Sovetsky svaz se rozpadl nekdy kolem 1990 a ted maji volby a kapitalismus jako my. Ted jim rikame Rusove.
1: Aha, a tak teda Soveti... chci rict Rusove? Jsou ted nasi pratele?
2: No, ne uplne. Vis, byly nasimi prateli dlouha leta potom, co prestali byt Sovety, ale pak se rozhodli nepodporit nasi invazi do Iraku, takze jsme na ne ted nastvani. Taky jsme nastvani na Francouze a Nemce, protoze nam taky nepomohli napadnout Irak.
1: Takze Francouzi a Nemci jsou taky zli?
2: Ne uplne zli, ale dost zli na to, abychom prejmenovali hranolky French fries a tousty French toast na Freedom fries a Freedom toast.
1: To vzdycky prejmenovavame jidlo kdyz nejaka zeme nedela to, co chceme my?
2: Jenom kdyz to jsou nasi pratele. Nepratele napadame.
1: Ale nebyl Irak taky jednim z pratel, tehdy v 80tych letech?
2: No, ano. Chvili.
1: A byl tehdy vudce Iraku Sadam Husajn?
2: Ano, ale tehdy bojoval proti Iranu, coz z nej na chvili udelalo naseho pritele.
1: Proc to z nej udelalo naseho pritele?
2: Protoze tehdy byl Iran nas nepritel.
1: Nebylo to tehdy, jak posilali Kurdy do plynu?
2: Jo, ale protoze zrovna bojoval proti Iranu, tak jsme privreli oci, abychom mu ukazali, ze jsme pratele.
1: Takze ten, kdo bojuje proti nekomu z nasich nepratel, se automaticky stane nasim pritelem?
2: Ano, vetsinou.
1: A ten, kdo bojuje proti nekomu z nasich pratel je automaticky nepritel?
2: To je taky nekdy pravda. Nicmene kdyz americke korporace muzou vydelavat na prodeji zbrani obema stranam, tim lepe.
1: Proc?
2: Protoze valka je dobra pro ekonomiku, coz znamena, ze valka je dobra pro Ameriku. A take, protoze Buh je na strane Ameriky, kazdy kdo odporuje valce je bezbozny neamericky komunista. Uz rozumis, proc jsme napadli Irak?
1: Myslim, ze jo. Napadli jsme ho, protoze to po nas Buh chtel, je to tak?
2: Ano.
1: Ale jak jsme vedeli, ze Buh po nas chce, abychom napadli Irak?
2: No, vis, Buh osobne mluvi s Georgem W. Bushem a rika mu, co ma delat.
1: Takze v podstate, podle toho, co rikas, jsme napadli Irak, protoze George W. Bush slysi hlasy?
2: Ano! Konecne rozumis tomu, jak funguje svet.
1: A ted zavri oci, pohodlne si lehni a uz spi. Dobrou noc.
2: Dobrou noc, tatinku.

http://www.osud.cz/cs/clanek.php?id=1897

...

A man faces being sent to jail if he uses a specific term of racial abuse in public.

Michael Guilfoyle, 31, is believed to be the first person in the UK to be banned from using a particular word - "Paki" - under the terms of an anti-social behaviour order. He could also be prosecuted for behaving anti-socially or using insulting or abusive, including homophobic, language.

...

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/story.jsp?story=433113

Condoleeza Rice Warned Willie Brown Not To Fly On 9-11

Bush administration foreknowledge of 9-11 hijackings confirmed by condoleezza Rice herself.

http://www.sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/08/1634286.php

Human shields face 12 years' jail for visiting Iraq

http://www.guardian.co.uk/antiwar/story/0,12809,1017347,00.html

US tried to plant WMDs, failed: whistleblower

Daily Times Monitor

According to a stunning report posted by a retired Navy Lt Commander and 28-year veteran of the Defense Department (DoD), the Bush administration’s assurance about finding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq was based on a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) plan to “plant” WMDs inside the country. Nelda Rogers, the Pentagon whistleblower, claims the plan failed when the secret mission was mistakenly taken out by “friendly fire”, the Environmentalists Against War report.

Nelda Rogers is a 28-year veteran debriefer for the DoD. She has become so concerned for her safety that she decided to tell the story about this latest CIA-military fiasco in Iraq. According to Al Martin Raw.com, “Ms Rogers is number two in the chain of command within this DoD special intelligence office. This is a ten-person debriefing unit within the central debriefing office for the Department of Defense.”

The information that is being leaked out is information “obtained while she was in Germany heading up the debriefing of returning service personnel, involved in intelligence work in Iraq for the DoD and/or the CIA. “According to Ms Rogers, there was a covert military operation that took place both preceding and during the hostilities in Iraq,” reports Al Martin Raw.com, an online subscriber-based news/analysis service which provides “Political, Economic and Financial Intelligence”.

Al Martin is a retired Lt Commander (US Navy), the author of a memoir called “The Conspirators: Secrets of an Iran-Contra Insider,” and is considered one of America’s foremost experts on corporate and government fraud. Ms Rogers reports that this particular covert operation team was manned by former military personnel and “the unit was paid through the Department of Agriculture in order to hide it, which is also very commonplace”.

According to Al Martin Raw.com, “the Agriculture Department has often been used as a paymaster on behalf of the CIA, DIA, NSA and others”. According to the Al Martin Raw.com story, another aspect of Ms Rogers’ report concerns a covert operation which was to locate the assets of Saddam Hussein and his family, including cash, gold bullion, jewelry and assorted valuable antiquities. The problem became evident when “the operation in Iraq involved 100 people, all of whom apparently are now dead, having succumbed to so-called ‘friendly fire’. The scope of this operation included the penetration of the Central Bank of Iraq, other large commercial banks in Baghdad, the Iraqi National Museum and certain presidential palaces where monies and bullion were secreted.”

“They identified about $2 billion in cash, another $150 million in Euros, in physical banknotes, and about another $100 million in sundry foreign currencies ranging from Yen to British Pounds,” reports Al Martin.

“These people died, mostly in the same place in Baghdad, supposedly from a stray cruise missile or a combination of missiles and bombs that went astray,” Martin continues. “There were supposedly 76 who died there and the other 24 died through a variety of ‘friendly fire’, ‘mistaken identity’ and some of them—their whereabouts are simply unknown.” Ms Rogers’ story sounds like an updated 21st-century version of Treasure Island meets Ali Baba and the Bush Cabal Thieves, writes Martin.

“This was a contingent of CIA/ DoD operatives, but it was really the CIA that bungled it,” Ms Rogers said. “They were relying on the CIA’s ability to organise an effort to seize these assets and to be able to extract these assets because the CIA claimed it had resources on the ground within the Iraqi army and the Iraqi government who had been paid. That turned out to be completely bogus. As usual.”

“CIA people were supposed to be handling it,” Martin continues. “They had a special ‘black’ aircraft to fly it out. But none of that happened because the regular US Army showed up, stumbled onto it and everyone involved had to scramble. These new Iraqi “asset seizures” go directly to the New US Ruling Junta. The US Viceroy in Iraq Paul Bremer is reportedly drinking Saddam’s $2000 a bottle Napoleon-era brandy, smoking his expensive Davidoff cigars and he has even furnished his office with Saddam’s Napoleon-era furniture.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_12-8-2003_pg1_9

Mississippi school district installs Web cams in every hallway and classroom

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2003/08/12/national1827EDT0680.DTL

NWO Conditioning Discovered in NBC's 'Frasier' Sitcom

Paul Joseph Watson August 13 2003

The nexus between societal engineering and popular television has always existed but the brainwashing is no more evident than today. We have a whole raft of recent movies and television shows that portray anyone who thinks there is a New World Order agenda to be a raving lunatic. We also have so-called fictional TV programs that predict future events to an astounding degree of accuracy.

Films like Spy Kids 2, Men in Black 2, XXX and SWAT - almost every other movie at the cinema, has a consistent and sinister message. The heroes work for the government and anyone who disagrees with the government is mentally unstable or worse, a terrorist.

This sea change is not by accident. Just as Nokia or Budweiser would pay film companies to have their products featured, (such as in the recent Terminator 3) so too the government pay to have a particular brand of 'acceptable' thinking ingrained into the masses via their favourite movie and TV characters. Just after September 11th, Hollywood agreed to a Pentagon demand that government must be involved in all movies that even lightly touch upon national security issues - despite the fact that the plots are obviously fictional.

Stunningly Accurate Forecasts

The Lone Gunmen is a Fox spin-off of the X-files and in July 2001 aired an episode where a plane is electronically hijacked by a secret government cabal who try to crash it into the World Trade Center to get martial law, start wars and increase weapons sales.

Perhaps then we should be anxious about the plot of another Fox propaganda crusade, 24, where an element within the government tied to the multinational oil industry is the hidden hand behind a nuclear explosion over Los Angeles. A war is then initiated based on forged evidence tying three middle eastern countries to the attack (Niger uranium anyone?).

Frasier's New World Order Pitch

Another example of social steering occured in a recent episode of Frasier, I will quote the relevent script segments, just read along and you will soon realize the trick. Anyone who believes in a 'New World Order' is a dangerous mentally ill terrorist who wants to overthrow the government. This, despite the fact that world leaders call for a New World Order in public speeches every week.

Frasier Season 10 - Episode 23: Analyzed Kiss

vice:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_watson.html

US ADMIT USING 'SON OF NAPALM' ON IRAQIS Aug 10 2003


The generals love it, says Colonel

From Bob Graham In Baghdad


AMERICAN jets killed Iraqi troops with a controversial napalm-type weapon during the war in Iraq, the Pentagon has admitted.

Mark 77 firebombs were dropped on Iraq on at least two occasions during the recent conflict.

A senior Pentagon colonel confirmed the bombs have "similar destructive characteristics" to napalm - the use of which sparked world outrage in the Vietnam war. The photograph of nine-year-old Kim Phuc, screaming in pain from napalm burns, turned public opinion in America against the war. In 1980 napalm was banned by the United Nations, but the US did not sign the agreement.

Three months ago, after Gulf War II, the Pentagon denied using napalm against Iraqi troops. However, it has now admitted using "Mark 77 firebombs", which are produced using a similar fuel-gel mixture.

Colonel Mike Daily of the US Marines confirmed Mark 77 bombs were dropped around the Kuwait-Iraq border at the start of the war.

He said they had "similar destructive characteristics" to the Vietnam-era napalm.

...

http://www.sundaymirror.co.uk/news/content_objectid=13274923_method=full_siteid=106694_headline=-U-S--ADMIT-USING--SON-OF-NAPALM--ON-IRAQIS-name_page.html

Order Out Of Chaos: Elite Sponsored Terrorism and the New World Order

Order Out Of Chaos blows wide open the official story behind a multitude of both historical and modern day events. Paul Joseph Watson uses mainstream media reports to exhaustively document how governments are exploiting and even carrying out terrorist attacks to further their unified political agenda. Every referenced article is available online so you can cross-check the facts for yourself! In this shocking expose you will discover how;

. Both the Clinton and Bush administrations protected Osama bin Laden and the Al-Qaeda network before September 11;

. The highest levels of the US government were complicit in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon;

. Many of the named 9/11 'suicide hijackers' are still alive and the real culprits have never been officially identified;

. British MI5 have infiltrated the IRA and are carrying out terrorist attacks to maintain a divided Ireland;

. Chaos mongers are arming tyrants worldwide as a pretext for endless war and empire building;

. A despotic New World Order is being constructed, how it threatens us all and what we can do to stop it.

Watson goes back in history to show how the same tactics used to centralize power and coerce societies are still being used today. A high-tech prison grid police state is being erected that will envelop everyone on planet earth in a spider web of brutal tyranny.

No longer is the New World Order a shadowy enemy lurking on the horizon, it is in our faces and the proof is everywhere. The dark empire of world government is in the final stages of its construction. This book is one of many keys you will need to unlock the door and shine the burning light of freedom upon the twisted souls of the Globalists.

http://www.store.yahoo.com/infowars-shop/pauljoswator.html

The Future: Voting In The New World Order

http://www.govsux.com/voting.htm

BIG BROTHER GETS BIGGER

domestic Spying & the Global Intelligence Working Group

http://www.infoshop.org/inews/stories.php?story=03/08/05/1568190

Storage devices from the WORLD TRADE CENTER, destroyed on 11 SEPTEMBER 2001, have arrived in germany for data recovery

Pirmasens, 12 November 2001 - At the weekend, the first storage devices from the offices of a US company, located in a building neighbouring the World Trade Center in New York, destroyed on 11 September 2001, arrived in Germany for data recovery.

The storage devices are 18 hard disks from the computing centre of an electronic payment systems company. The hard disks were removed from the computer installations, which had been completely destroyed, and sent to CONVAR's experts in Germany for data recovery.

An employee of the US customer came directly from New York via Frankfurt to Pirmasens on Sunday to deliver the hard disks to the high-security area of the German data recovery experts.

Damaged hard disk from the World Trade Center

There the data are to be recovered from the storage devices. The customer hopes that rapid recovery of the data will enable uncleared cash movements to be quickly settled.

On Wednesday this week, further hard disks from a major US telephone company should arrive in Germany for data recovery by CONVAR.

...

http://www.convar.de/en/presse/presse_12_11_2001.htm

****************

These are the disks which contain the evidence of a massive credit card swindle that occurred in conjunction with 9-11. The scam was simple. Moments before the planes impacted the WTC, millions of dollars in credit card transactions surged into companies which had their computer systems in the WTC. With the collapse of the towers, all trace of these transactions would be expected to vanish, since there would not be time for backups to be made and sent to storage. No record of the transactions, no demand for repayment. The credit card companies knew money had vanished, but not where. Now this German company has announced that they have succeeded in recovering some of the data showing just who was behind the swindle. Will this trail lead back to CIA, as some of the stock short selling, or will it lead to the same people who sent an early warning of the attacks to Odigo? Or will the trail simply be ordered to vanish or point in another direction, as happened with the Anthrax letters?

Iran and North Korea To Unite

08/07/2003 18:56

Iran is reportedly purchasing ballistic missiles from North Korea

It has recently become known that Iran was planning to purchase Taepodong 2 long-range ballistic missiles from North Korea. There are a lot of variants to predict the further development of the situation: either the two countries of the so-called "axis of evil" decided to join their efforts in the face of an unknown danger, or it is the beginning of a new propaganda campaign in the spirit of "Saddam Hussein buys uranium from Africa."

...

http://english.pravda.ru/world/20/91/366/10680_missiles.html

Wolfowitz: Iraq Not Involved in 9-11, No Ties to al-Qaeda

by Jason Leopold
August 7, 2003


Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, one of the main architects for the war in Iraq, admitted for the first time that Iraq had nothing to do with the September 11 terrorist attacks, contradicting public statements made by senior White House and Pentagon officials whose attempt to link Saddam Hussein and the terrorist organization al-Qaeda was cited by the Bush administration as one of the main reasons for launching a preemptive strike in March against Iraq.

In an interview with conservative radio personality Laura Ingraham, Wolfowitz was asked when he first came to believe that Iraq was behind the 9-11 terrorist attacks.

"I'm not sure even now that I would say Iraq had something to do with it," Wolfowitz said in the interview, aired Friday.

Wolfowitz's answer confirms doubts long held by critics of the Iraq war that the Bush administration had no evidence linking Iraq to 9-11 or al-Qaeda, but simply used the horrific terrorist attacks as a reason to overthrow Saddam Hussein and his Baathist regime.

"I think what the realization to me is – the fundamental point was that terrorism had reached the scale completely different from what we had thought of it up until then. And that it would only get worse when these people got access to weapons of mass destruction which would be only a matter of time," Wolfowitz said in the interview. "…What you really got to do is, eliminate terrorist networks and eliminate terrorism as a problem. And clearly Iraq was one of the country – you know top of the list of countries actively using terrorism as an instrument of national policy."

Since the United States invaded Iraq 111 days ago, no chemical or biological weapons have been found in the country.

A spokesman for Wolfowitz would not return repeated calls for comment.

...

http://www.antiwar.com/orig/leopold13.html

'Secret' nuclear meeting revealed

Arms control groups say the development of mini nuclear weapons will be discussed tomorrow at a top level meeting in the United States.

The conference is taking place at the Strategic Air Command Headquarters at an air base near the city of Omaha in Nebraska.

The BBC reports the meeting was supposed to take place in secret.

The US Defence Department has now acknowledged that the meeting in Nebraska involves 150 people, including officials, technicians and scientists.

Arms control groups are convinced they will discuss the new generation of nuclear weapons.

It is already clear, through testimonies to Congress and elsewhere, what direction many experts want the defence establishment to take.

They want to move towards the development of small, low-yield weapons, or 'mini nukes'.

They would be designed to burrow themselves deep underground before exploding.

That is in tune with President Bush's doctrine that the US should be capable of carrying out controlled pre-emptive strikes on hidden weapons of mass destruction.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s919524.htm

Key Bali suspect Mukhlas says he was stripped, tortured

http://in.news.yahoo.com/030623/137/25dqr.html

Bali bomber sentenced to death

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/3130929.stm

Elite Force Aviator: George W. Bush - U.S. President and Naval Aviator - 12" Action Figure
Pre-order: Available 09/15/03



Blue-Box
Price: $39.99

http://www.kbtoys.com/genProduct.html/PID/2431939/ctid/17/place/aguc?_ts=y&ls=collect&_e=3f337&_v=3F33781DQ5AQaCF4F28C4EE8&_ts=y

`War Of Civilizations' Lobby Targets Egypt, Saudi Arabia for Overthrow

http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2001/2846skunks_rpt1.html