United States celebrate Human Rights Day with double execution
12/10/2003 13:51

December the 10th is International Human Rights Day. Everywhere in the world attention is drawn to issues concerning Human Rights. On this day two people will be executed in the United States.

http://english.pravda.ru/world/20/91/368/11498_Texecutioner.html

Our World Leaders In Satanic Rituals



http://www.freepressinternational.com/satanic.html

World War III Has Already Started

Free Press International





This Is What The Reality Of War Looks Like

All President Bush has to do is declare Martial Law or a National Emergency and we as Americans have lost all our rights.We will be living in a military police state. America and the rest of the world are in grave danger of being completely enslaved. For the first time in history due to technology our world leaders have the power to enslave the entire globe. They can destroy this planet with nuclear bombs. They probably already have the power to bomb us from space with satellites.

Our world leaders will enslave us with four words. TERRORISM, HEALTH AND NATIONAL SECURITY. Once they CREATE the next crisis such as a nuclear attack on a major city, people will be quarantined for HEALTH reasons. This is how it begins. Our world leaders will enslave us by throwing us into chaos.

Our world leaders have already started attacking the masses with biological warfare. It's called AIDS! They are burning down the planet by allowing wildfires to burn on purpose! They are starving 19 million people to death on purpose in Africa as we speak! Do we know anyone who DOESN'T want these people fed? Then who do we think is doing it? They are killing untold millions of innocent people with their war machines! World War III has already started.

http://www.freepressinternational.com/ww3.html

General Tommy Franks Says That If The United States Is Hit With A Weapon Of Mass Destruction
That Inflicts Large Casualties, The Constitution Will Likely Be Discarded In Favor Of A Military
Form Of Government. We Lose All Our Rights!



Revealing Picture Of George Bush And Tommy Franks

EXPLOSIVES POWERED THE 9-11 WORLD TRADE CENTER DUST CLOUDS.

by XXXX • Tuesday December 09, 2003 at 02:46 PM

This paper uses photographic evidence -- primarily a reference photograph taken from FEMA report -- to estimate the volume of the dust cloud that grew from the collapse of the North Tower at about 30 seconds after the commencement of the collapse. The paper estimates the quantity of explosive necessary to produce the observed expansion in the volume of the dust cloud.

The North Tower's Dust Cloud
Analysis of Energy Requirements for the Expansion of the
Dust Cloud following the Collapse of 1 World Trade Center
by Jim Hoffman, October 16th, 2003
[Version 3.0]



analyza: http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2003/12/91767.php

Texas Congressman Ron Paul Says There Is A International Conspiracy To Overthrow The American Republic And Create A One World Government Which Some Call "The United Nations/NATO/FEMA","A New World Order","Globalization" Or "The Military Industrial Complex"

http://free911dvd.netfirms.com/RonPaul-NewWorldOrder.wmv

"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism
because it is a merger of State and corporate power."

Benito Mussolini

...


"It's a virtual certainty that sometime in the near future we will see a SARS-like event in the United States, a highly communicable infectious disease that will require mass quarantine or isolation," Dr. Iton said.

Since last spring's outbreak of SARS, or severe acute respiratory syndrome, public health officials across the country have been spending extraordinary amounts of time and energy preparing for the prospect that the disease - or pandemic flu, smallpox or something as yet unknown - could require them to order a quarantine, a once common public health measure virtually abandoned for most of the past century.

In a draft SARS preparedness plan released this fall, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention advises states and communities to impose restrictions on people's movements based on the severity of an outbreak. In the event of a quarantine, the plan envisions extensive tracing of contacts of SARS patients, combined with a largely home-based, voluntary regime.

...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/120903sarsquarantine.html

Al-Qaida does not exist

http://www.shwa.org/bbs/index.php?act=ST&f=2&t=169&s=339771f6a72b39485c4734a5aafb6532

Remarks prepared for delivery by Robert S. Mueller III, Director,
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Commonwealth Club of California
San Francisco, CA
April 19, 2002

...

The hijackers also left no paper trail. In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper – either here in the U.S. or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere – that mentioned any aspect of the September 11th plot. The hijackers had no computers, no laptops, no storage media of any kind.

...

http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/speeches/speech041902.htm

--------------------------------------

Tracking the 19 Hijackers
What are they up to now?
At least 9 of them survived 9/11

A former high-level intelligence official told me, "Whatever trail was left was left deliberately--for the F.B.I. to chase."

New Yorker 10/1/01 by Seymour Hersh

...

The FBI still says these are the terrorists.14 But when they are found alive,
the FBI says their identity was stolen, and its not the terrorist.15

Remember that suspicious bin Laden "confession" video?
# How could he praise uninvolved living people12 for the 9/11 hijackings?
# If they stole identities, how did the FBI identify those passengers as terrorists?
Not by flight calls, which contradict the FBI13 information!

# These aren't the first mistakes. FBI quickly had amended the original list8,
as the original "suicide hijackers" came forward!

...



http://www.welfarestate.com/911/

US Made Arms Deals With Balkan Jihad Forces

US accused of weapons deals with jihad forces

By Richard Norton-Taylor in London
April 23 2002

United States intelligence agencies secretly broke a United Nations arms embargo during the 1991-95 war in Croatia by channelling arms through Islamic jihad groups that Washington is now hunting across Europe and Asia, according to evidence from The Netherlands.

The evidence surfaced in the official Dutch report into the 1995 Srebrenica massacre that led to the fall of the Dutch Government and the resignation last week of its army chief.

According to the report, the Pentagon formed a secret alliance with Islamic groups in an Iran-Contra-style operation. US, Turkish and Iranian intelligence groups worked with the Islamists in what the report calls the "Croatian pipeline". Arms bought by Iran and Turkey and financed by Saudi Arabia were flown into Croatia first by Iran Air, and later in a fleet of C-130 Hercules aircraft.

The report says mujahideen fighters were also flown in, and that the US was "very closely involved" in the operation, which was designed to help Bosnian Muslims. British secret services obtained documents proving that Iran also arranged deliveries of arms directly to Bosnia, it says.

...

http://www.realitymacedonia.org.mk/web/news_page.asp?nid=1808

CIA admits employing Nazis

Files released by the Central Intelligence Agency in the United States have confirmed that World War II Nazi war criminals were employed by Western intelligence agencies.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1301306.stm

Pentagon says 911 Interceptors flew: Too Far, too slow, too late

by William Thomas

www.globalresearch.ca 19 November 2003

The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/THO311B.html

It happens all the time. When a small private plane recently entered the 23-mile restricted ring around the U.S. Capitol, two F-16 interceptors were immediately launched from Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles away. In a similar episode, a pair of F-16 "Fighting Falcons" on 15-minute strip alert was airborne from Andrews just 11 minutes after being notified by the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) of a Cessna straying towards the White House. [AP Nov11/03; CNN June20/02]

These were well-practiced routines. With more than 4,500 aircraft continuously sharing U.S. airspace, between September 2000 and June 2001 the Pentagon launched fighters on 67 occasions to escort wayward aircraft. [FAA news release Aug/9/02; AP Aug13/02]

But on Sept 11, 2001, NORAD and the FAA ignored routine procedures and strict regulations. In response to a national emergency involving hijacked airliners as dangerous as cruise missiles, interceptors launched late from distant bases flew to defend their nation at a fraction of their top speeds. [NORAD news release Sept. 18/01]

WHAT NORAD KNEW A recently resurfaced NORAD news bulletin released seven days after Sept. 11 explains that America's aerial defenders were slow to counter rapidly developing air attacks because they didn't hear from the FAA that American Airlines Flight 11 had been hijacked until 8:40 that fateful morning. [NORAD news release Sept. 18/01]

But at the National Military Command Center (NMCC) in the basement of the Pentagon, Air Force staff officers monitoring every inch of airspace over the northeastern seaboard would have caught that first hijacking when Flight 11's identification transponder stopped transmitting at 8:20 - automatically triggering a radar alarm.

With their capability to monitor developing "situations" by tapping into military and civilian radars, U.S. military commanders would have also seen Flight 175 turn abruptly south 25 minutes later - just as they had watched on radar in October 1999 when pro golfer Payne Stewart's Learjet abruptly departed its flight path while enroute o Dallas. [CNN Oct26/1999]

In that legendary intercept, a fighter jet out of Tyndall, Florida was diverted from a training flight to escort the Lear, whose pilot had become incapacitated, trapping Stewart in the stratosphere. An F-16 was reportedly sitting off the left wingtip of Payne's pilotless business jet within 19 minutes of the FAA alert. [ABC News Oct25/99]

...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/THO311B.html

Lidská práva nelze vyměnit za bezpečnost

tisková zpráva Amnesty International

AI je znepokojena tím, že v rámci boje proti terorismu podporují demokratické země vojensky a politicky často také státy, ve kterých dochází k hrubému porušování lidských práv.

10. prosinec se tradičně slaví jako Den lidských práv. Organizace Amnesty International se od svého vzniku v roce 1961 věnuje prosazování lidských práv na základě přesvědčení, že tato práva jsou univerzální a nedělitelná a že jejich porušování kdekoliv na světě představuje současně ohrožení pro celý svět.

V souvislosti s událostmi, které se odehrály po 11. září 2001, je však Amnesty International znepokojena tím, že lidská práva jsou odsouvána na vedlejší kolej. Boj proti globální a zároveň špatně uchopitelné hrozbě terorismu postupně vytvořil podmínky pro to, aby se v centru zájmu politiků namísto lidských práv ocitla problematika zajištění bezpečnosti. Jakkoliv je tento posun pochopitelný, nelze přehlížet, že ve jménu boje proti terorismu dochází i ke mnoha negativním jevům.

Rozhodnutí porazit terorismus především silou armád a bezpečnostních služeb, stejně jako zahrnutí řady represivních režimů do mezinárodní protiteroristické koalice, vede v řadě případů k nárůstu porušování lidských práv. Práva občanů demokratických zemí jsou nyní často omezována, aniž by bylo zřejmé, kdy a za jakých podmínek budou tato omezení zrušena. Mezinárodní kritika represivních režimů participujících na válce proti terorismu utichá a namísto ní je nabízena vojenská pomoc, která vede k posilování těchto režimů. V současnosti dochází k dodávkám zbraní a poskytování vojenského výcviku vládám Ázerbajdžánu, Egypta, Filipín, Jemenu, Kolumbie, Nigérie, Pákistánu, Saúdské Arábie, Tádžikistánu, Uzbekistánu a dalších problematických zemí. Bezpečnostní síly těchto států se přitom často dopouštějí závažného porušování lidských práv v podobě mučení, poprav zadržených nebo mimosoudních poprav. Pomoc, která je poskytována vládami demokratických zemí těmto státům přitom není doprovázena požadavky na zlepšení lidskoprávní situace. Amnesty International je přesvědčena, že taková podpora režimů, jejichž silové složky ve velkém rozsahu porušují lidská práva, znamená velmi problematický příspěvek ke zlepšení bezpečnostní situace na celém světě.

V řadě dalších případů jsou pak zbraně na komerčním základě prodávány zemím, které se na válce proti terorismu nijak nepodílejí, v nichž však hrozí zneužití výzbroje k vnitřní represi, ohrožování regionální bezpečnosti nebo intenzifikaci probíhajících občanských válek. Rostoucí výdaje na zbrojení také podvazují ekonomické možnosti řady cílových zemí.

Na této znepokojivé praxi nezodpovědného obchodování se zbraněmi se bohužel v nemalé míře podílí i Česká republika. Mezi lety 1992 – 2003 prodávala zbraně, jejich součásti nebo munici mimo jiné do Alžírska, Angoly, Etiopie, Jemenu, Kamerunu, Kolumbie, Nigérie, Pobřeží Slonoviny, na Srí Lanku nebo do Zimbabwe. Ve všech zmíněných zemích dochází k rozsáhlému porušování lidských práv, ať už v rámci probíhajících ozbrojených konfliktů, při pronásledování politické opozice, nebo při rutinní činnosti bezpečnostních složek.

Amnesty International vyzývá vládu České republiky, aby se vážně zabývala doporučením Evropské komise a v rámci licenčního řízení pro obchod se zbraněmi zlepšila aplikaci Kodexu EU.

http://blisty.cz/article.rb?id=16215&iid=1442

From Tommy Franks, a doomsday scenario

St. Petersburg Times

The doomsday scenario was laid out by Gen. Tommy Franks, the recently retired head of CentCom, in of all places the December edition of Cigar Aficionado magazine.

"What is the worst thing that can happen in our country?" Franks asked rhetorically. "Two steps. The first step would be a nexus between weapons of mass destruction . . . and terrorism." The second step would be "the western world, the free world, loses what it cherishes most, and that is freedom and liberty we've seen for a couple of hundred years in this grand experiment that we call democracy."

Franks suggested that a "massive casualty-producing event" might cause "our population to question our own Constitution and begin to militarize our country."

For those tapped into the alternative media world of the Internet, the quotes bounced around faster than a Paris Hilton sex video. Franks, a four-star general, was warning of a future he sees as possible if not likely. Our economy might survive another terrorist assault, so might our mass culture - it'll take more than a nuclear device to shut up Jessica Simpson - but the prognosis for the Constitution is bleak.

New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman repeated the alarm in a recent column when he said that virulent terrorism "is the most serious threat to open societies, because one more 9/11 and we'll really see an erosion of our civil liberties."

We ain't seen nothing yet, according to the experts. If terrorism's sting is felt again, fascism may be its aftermath.

These pundits and prognosticators are saying out loud what anyone who has been following the government's actions since 9/11 already senses.

Consider how far down this road we've already moved: The passage of the USA Patriot Act has given the government extraordinary powers to spy on Americans without cause. The FBI has been unleashed to surveil Americans engaged in antiwar protests. Immigrants have been secretly detained and deported by the hundreds. And two Americans have been imprisoned indefinitely and without charge as "enemy combatants." (Only last week did the Defense Department agree to grant one of those, Yaser Esam Hamdi, access to a lawyer.) To all this, the courts and Congress have barely blinked.

In Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, we are holding more than 600 prisoners from 42 countries who are being refused prisoner of war status or any other formal legal designation. The Bush administration believes these prisoners should have no access to American courts to challenge the legitimacy of their detention and the president alone, as commander in chief, has the power to decide each man's fate. The Justice Department will argue this in two cases before the U.S. Supreme Court this term.

In essence, the administration is asserting something unprecedented - that the kinds of emergency powers that might flow to the military on the battlefield should be available in the "war on terrorism."

But combating terrorism is not the same as prosecuting a traditional war. As the administration itself has explained, with terrorism there is no discrete enemy, place of battle or anticipated end to hostilities. Emergency powers take on a very different sheen when the emergency is permanent and everywhere.

Egypt has slouched toward totalitarianism in this way. Since 1981, the country has used fighting terrorism as a justification to repeatedly renew emergency laws that allow the government to hold suspects without charge and try civilians in military courts - with the U.S. State Department objecting the whole way. Conveniently, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak has also used the laws to thwart prodemocracy efforts and dispatch political enemies.

It was the Nine Years' War in Aldous Huxley's Brave New World that facilitated the seizure of power by the world reformers who then took control of nearly all human and social development. In 1984, George Orwell described Oceania as in a constant state of war with a changeable enemy who "always represented absolute evil." These inventors of the great dystopias understood the way governments use war and its associative fear and instability to consolidate power. Despotism thrives on insecurity. Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs puts safety right behind food, water and sleep. Humans naturally crave stability and are willing to sacrifice values such as liberty in its pursuit.

Within the current government there are those who would exploit this weakness. Before it was leaked to the Center for Public Integrity, a bill dubbed the Patriot Act II was in development at the Justice Department. The draft would have allowed for the stripping of American citizenship and the secret detention of citizens; and popular conjecture had it that Attorney General John Ashcroft was just waiting for another terror attack to roll the bill out. In that moment of national panic, a malleable Congress wouldn't resist.

So, will another major terrorist attack on American soil lead, as Franks warns, to the end of freedom and democracy? There aren't many hopeful signs to the contrary.

USDA creating national livestock ID system

By Teresa Bjork

The U.S. livestock industry is moving forward with plans to create a national animal identification system (ID) that can track livestock movements from birth to slaughter, a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) official said last week.

The USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) will publish within the next few months a proposed rule to establish a national livestock ID system, said Dr. John Wiemers, national ID coordinator for USDA-APHIS, at the Iowa Farm Bureau’s annual meeting Dec. 3.

“We’ve been talking about animal ID and tracking animals for 20 years,” Wiemers told Farm Bureau members. “Just recently, in the last two to three years, it (animal ID) has become more of a ‘have-to’ kind of thing as we’re faced with foreign animal diseases, such as foot-and-mouth and mad cow disease, that are knocking at our doorstep.”

...

http://www.ifbf.org/publication/spokesman/story.asp?number=21999&type=News

Joint Task Force Told Face to Face, Blackout was a Military Test

Oliver J. Midelson

At an under publicized public comment meeting, which was publicly 'announced' by a Department of Energy news release, Michael Kane outlined his report, published at Global Free Press, stating that the August 14th blackout was part and parcel to a multi-faceted military test. The Task Force was very attentive, attempting to take notes as fast as Michael spoke.

...

The first point Michael made was that the Task Force Interim Report failed to address the possibility of Electro Magnetic Pulses causing the blackout. He noted that it is known HAARP was turned on at 4pm on August 14th, just 11 minutes before the blackout occurred. He stated the Air Force should be contacted and required to turn over all documentation pertaining to what HAARP was used for on that day.

Michael detailed the aerial aerosol spray operation he witnessed the night of the blackout, as well as referencing the proximity of the Determined Promise '03 national military drills announced just one day after the blackout. He also mentioned he received a report that the Canadian border was militarized at 1pm on August 14th, just three hours before the blackout, in the Mohawk River Valley region. Why?

...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/120803blackout.html

SHOCK VIDEO: WHO SHOT NEW 9/11 TAPES?

Did Al Qaeda shoot recently released footage of 9/11 WTC attack – or was it someone else?
by Justin Raimondo

I shivered, a little, as I watched Lisa Meyers' report on NBC the other night:

"New and threatening messages have been received from Al Qaeda. There's a videotape aimed at American and Saudi Arabian rulers and another that includes what appears to be well-produced footage of the 9/11 attacks – raising still other questions."

This new 9/11 footage sure does raise a lot of other questions, first and foremost: who shot the video? It was posted on what is described as "a known Al-Qaeda website" last Wednesday, although it was taken down after a few days. Aside from the usual militaristic gymnastics by jihadi commandos, Meyers reports:

"The tape also contains what U.S. counterterror experts say may be never-before-broadcast video of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on New York's World Trade Center shot from across the East River in Brooklyn. The FBI says it is familiar with the video, which was provided by a friendly bystander. But that raises the question – how did a tape that was not widely circulated end up on a known Al Qaeda site?"

It's sinister to contemplate. Video believed to have been in U.S. government hands somehow pops up on a website alleged to be an Al Qaeda mouthpiece, and U.S. government officials hold it up as a reason to cower in fear before the threat of another major terrorist attack on American soil. Meanwhile, the President avers that Iraq is the central arena in his "war on terrorism," and his supporters claim that we're battling them in the streets of Baghdad so we don't have to fight them in the streets of Boise – or whatever alliterative cliche first comes to mind.

The idea that Al Qaeda had additional agents in the area, who knew the attack was coming, would certainly explain the unflinching steadiness of the camera's eye as it recorded the terror of that moment. But instead of inventing additional elements and players, it's always best to stick with what we already know. So who else just happened to be videotaping the World Trade Center attack that day?

Hours after the terrorists struck, five people were arrested in New Jersey as they taped the WTC from their vantage point across the Hudson River in New Jersey. A witness identified only as "Maria" by ABC News said she saw:

"Three young men kneeling on the roof of a white van in the parking lot of her apartment building. 'They seemed to be taking a movie,' Maria said. The men were taking video or photos of themselves with the World Trade Center burning in the background, she said.

"What struck Maria were the expressions on the men's faces. 'They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me. I thought it was very strange,' she said."

Even stranger – it turned out the five were Israelis. When law enforcement swooped down on this crew, they found them in possession of $4,700 in cash, box cutters, and multiple foreign passports. Police dogs reacted as if the presence of explosives was indicated, and, as the Bergen County Record reported:

"Sources close to the investigation said they found other evidence linking the men to the bombing plot. 'There are maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted,' the source said. 'It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park.'"

These guys were held for three months, much of the time in solitary confinement, and extensively interrogated. One refused to take a lie detector test for weeks, and then failed it. All five had been in the employ of Urban Moving Systems, of Weehawken, New Jersey, the company name on their van's registration.

Police raided the Urban Moving Systems warehouse 48 hours later, and carted away a lot of computer hard drives and other materials. The owner, one Dominik Suter, fled to Israel the next day. A few months later, Suter's name turned up on a list of terrorist suspects circulated by the FBI to European financial institutions.

The apprehended Israelis claimed that they were merely "documenting" the day's events: police confiscated their photographic equipment, and whatever film they had taken. The new film shows the World Trade Center burning from the Brooklyn side of the East River, while the Urban Movers were filming from the vantage point of Liberty State Park, across the Hudson River in New Jersey. But whomever had foreknowledge of the attack on the World Trade Center could have taken that film – and Al Qaeda operatives are not the only possible suspects.

I have written at length about the five arrested Israelis in my new book, The Terror Enigma: 9/11 and the Israeli Connection, and I commend the attention of my readers to this modest little volume if they want to know more. I bring this up, not merely to plug my book, but to point out that we can't begin to understand the strange expropriation of this previously unknown footage outside the context provided by The Terror Enigma.

As I prove in my book, Al Qaeda did not carry out its plans for a major terrorist attack entirely undetected. The Israelis were hot on the trail of the 9/11 hijackers, and must have had some foreknowledge of what happened that fateful day.

Did they shoot the footage we are just now seeing, or was an Al Qaeda film team at the ready the moment the twin towers were hit? Readers of The Terror Enigma will understand how and why the former scenario is just as likely the latter.

As to how, in that case, the video passed into the hands of Al Qaeda's propagandists – it wouldn't be the first time the fruits of Israeli spying operations in the U.S. fell into the hands of America's enemies.

In any case, how this new 9/11 footage, previously known only to the FBI and a "friendly bystander," wound up in Al Qaeda's possession – or in the hands of a website claiming to represent them – is a mystery that the U.S. government seems quite uninterested in unraveling.

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j120803.html