• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    GORGworld conspiracy // 911 // new world order ... part 3 :: Love your local Illuminati :)
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Ucpali jste záchod? V USA vás za to zavřou

    Devatenáctiletý Jesse Huffman byl obviněn z uličnictví a čelí kriminální sazbě, protože na přechodu v Montaně použil WC a ucpal jej. S kamarády se vracel ze čtyřdenní cesty z kanadské Alberty. Na hraničním přechodu si odskočil, zatímco čekal na odbavení. Krátce na to navštívil toaletu hraniční inspektor a zjistil, že je ucpaná.

    "Neudělal jsem to schválně," brání se Jesse, ale nikdo ho neposlouchá. Zločin je zločin. Huffman si si tedy musel zaplatit právníka a teď čeká, jak se věci vyvinou.

    Každou chvíli se vynoří další perlička ze země nekonečných svobod. Už jsme tady měli zadržení ženy v metru, protože jedla cestou na eskalátoru čokoládovou tyčinku, psali jsme o dívce, kterou navštívilo FBI, protože měla protibushovský plakát, o muži, kterého někdo udal, že si na veřejnosti četl podezřelou věc, a o jiném, kterého málem zavřeli, protože se ptal, kolik mají skluzavek v zábavním parku. Dalšího zavřeli za protibushovské tričko. Ale kriminál za ucpaný záchod jsme ještě neměli.

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2004/260804cloggingtoilet.htm

    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    projev johna kerryho o blizkem vychode... stoji za precteni. vpodstate rika to same, co sharon nebo bush, takze je fuk kdo vyhraje.... war on terror bude smele pokracovat

    An Unwavering Commitment To Reforming the Middle East

    By John Kerry
    August 27, 2004

    Across the Middle East, the United States and Israel are facing a range of crucial security challenges. We are not secure while Saudi donors fund terror, while Iran pursues a nuclear weapons programs and while Syria sponsors terrorist operations. We are not secure while Iraq is at risk of becoming a haven for terrorists. And we are not secure while Israel, the one true democracy in the region, remains the victim of an unrelenting campaign of terror. If we continue without a more effective strategy, we are not supporting our ally as best we can.

    For too long, America has not led, and Iran's program has advanced. Let me say it plainly: a nuclear-armed Iran is unacceptable.
    I believe we must work with our allies to end Iran's nuclear weapons program and be ready to work with them to implement a range of tougher measures, if needed. Developing an international coalition enhances our influence by ensuring that all nations are united in the effort, leaving no room for Iran to play allies against one another.

    The Syria Accountability Act, which I co-sponsored in the Senate, gave the president authority to sanction Syria, a concrete step against Syria's support for terror and its occupation of Lebanon. As president, I will never delay implementing sanctions as the Bush administration did for many months.

    The greatest long-term strategic threat to U.S.-Israeli relations is U.S. dependence on Mideast oil. A new national security policy demands an end to that dependence. For too long, America has lost its voice when talking about the policies and practices of some governments in the Persian Gulf.
    If we are serious about energy independence, then we can finally be serious about confronting the role of Saudi Arabia in financing and providing ideological backing for Islamic fundamentalist jihadists. This is a problem that this administration has ignored — and one that must be addressed.

    I have a plan for energy independence from Mideast oil in the next 10 years. I will invest in the research and exploration needed to develop renewable energy sources. I will take the lead in developing the new technology and production methods needed to ensure that resources such as coal and natural gas are used more efficiently and cleanly, and fully integrated into the new energy economy. I want an America that relies on its own ingenuity and innovation and not the Saudi royal family.

    As president, I will use bold diplomacy to get governments to recognize the growing crisis of resurgent anti-Semitism, and take action to deal with it — not hide it. Silence will never prevail — either abroad or at home. As president, I will support the creation of an office within the State Department dedicated to combating anti-Semitism, as well as adding reporting on acts of anti-Semitism around the world to the State Department's annual human rights reporting.

    I will work with the United Nations and our allies to bolster security in Iraq so that we can meet our goals for elections and speed up reconstruction. I will launch a massive effort to train and equip Iraqi security forces, so that they can take over the security of their nation, allowing us to draw down our troops in an orderly manner.

    These steps will be vastly more effective when backed by a long-term strategy to change the political equation in the Middle East, to empower reformers and foster democracy.

    I will launch an aggressive public diplomacy campaign in Arab and Muslim countries to tackle head-on the anti-Semitic and anti-Israel propaganda that fuels ignorance and hatred. This will be a part of an expansive American-led, international effort to promote democratic reforms throughout the Middle East by supporting secular education, business development and educational initiatives. By carefully targeting aid and development programs we can most effectively bolster civil society groups to take action to advance reform.

    American leadership is needed to bolster Israel's security at home as well as in the region. I believe that we must stand with Israel, supporting our ally's right to build a security fence
    and to allow its own Supreme Court — not the International Court of Justice — to address the issue of the route of the fence. The fence has proven its value as an anti-terror measure.

    I believe, in addition, that the withdrawal from Gaza, which Prime Minister Sharon announced in April, holds great promise. Indeed, this step enjoys overwhelming support among Israelis. It must receive our support and backing as well.

    The success of the withdrawal also requires a real Palestinian effort to establish security — to ensure Gaza does not remain a haven for terrorists to launch attacks on Israel. Experience has made very clear that for the Palestinians to meet this key test, new Palestinian leadership is required, as Yasser Arafat has proven himself not to be a partner for peace.

    As president, I will work with the Palestinian community to empower new, responsible Palestinian leadership committed to a permanent end to terror and the promotion of democracy. I will ensure that allies are united in this effort, not working at cross-purposes by propping up a failed Palestinian power structure. This kind of tough and frank diplomacy will be a hallmark of my administration. We will magnify our power and restore American influence to enhance our own security and that of our allies. We will restore our alliances and we will lead. But we will never compromise America's special relationship with our ally Israel. As president, I will never pressure Israel to make concessions that will compromise its security.

    My commitment to a safe and secure Jewish state is unwavering. For 19 years, this is a pledge I have kept in the United States Senate — whether through my votes on economic aid, military security or the location of the U.S. Embassy. And it is one I will continue to keep as I lead a bold new effort to enhance regional security throughout the Middle East.

    John Kerry is the Democratic nominee for president of the United States.

    http://www.forward.com/main/article.php?ref=kerry200408251051
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---


    WASHINGTON -- Image released by the FBI of the the letter containing ricin sent last year to the White House that threatened to turn Washington into a "ghost town" if new trucking safety regulations went into effect.
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    FBI Suspects Israel Has Spy in Pentagon -- CBS News

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The FBI believes there is an Israeli spy at the very highest level of the Pentagon, CBS News reported on Friday. The Israeli embassy immediately denied the report.

    The network said federal agents believed the spy may have been in a position to influence Bush administration policy on Iran and Iraq.

    "The FBI has a full-fledged espionage investigation under way and is about to ... roll up someone agents believe has been spying not for an enemy but for Israel, from within the office of the secretary of defense," the network reported.

    CBS News said the FBI believed it had solid evidence the suspected mole supplied Israel with classified material that included secret White House deliberations on Iran.

    The network described the spy as "a trusted analyst" assigned to a unit within the defense department tasked with helping develop the Pentagon's Iraq policy.

    Asked about the CBS report, a spokesman for the Israeli embassy said: "We categorically deny these allegations. They are completely false and outrageous."

    © Reuters 2004. All Rights Reserved.

    ....

    http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=6093000

    ---------------------

    "I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted not just in financing -- although that was part of it -- by a sovereign foreign government... It will become public at some point when it's turned over to the archives, but that's 20 or 30 years from now."

    -- Senator Graham as quoted in Senator: At Least One Foreign Country Assisted the 9/11 Terrorists

    http://www.thememoryhole.org/911/911-graham-admits.htm

    -----------------------------------------------------

    "Investigators within the DEA, INS and FBI have all told Fox News that to pursue or even suggest Israeli spying ... is considered career suicide."

    -- Carl Cameron, as quoted in The Spies Who Came In From The Art Sale


    ---------------------------------------------------------

    "While I agree with you, if I say anything about US geopolitical interests with Israel, I might as well clean off my desk."

    http://www.ccmep.org/ccmep/american031902.html

    -- Unnamed reporter as quoted in American Media Censorship and Israel

    --------------------------------------------------------

    "Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

    -- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring and its connections to 9-11.

    http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/spyring.html

    ------------------------------------

    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The FBI has evidence that a person who has been working at high levels in the Pentagon may be a spy for Israel, senior U.S. officials confirmed to CNN on Friday.

    The suspect could have been in a position to influence Bush administration policy toward Iran and Iraq, the senior official said.

    http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/08/27/fbi.spy/index.html
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Explosives Found; Russia Says Terrorism Responsible; Group Claims Responsibility

    Associated Press | August 27 2004

    MOSCOW -- One of two Russian airliners that crashed nearly simultaneously was brought down by a terrorist act, officials said Friday, after finding traces of explosives in the plane's wreckage. An Islamic militant group claimed responsibility for the attack in a Web statement.

    The planes, with 90 people aboard, went down within 20 minutes of each other Tuesday night. In Washington, a Bush administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said there is mounting evidence that both crashes were acts of terrorism.

    Traces of the explosive hexogen were found in the remains of one of the planes, a Tu-154, security service spokesman Nikolai Zakharov said. No results from the investigation of the other crashed plane, a Tu-134, have been announced

    ....


    http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-russia-plane-crash,0,3238208.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines

    Comment: Hexogen explosives? The last time they were used it turned out the government itself was behind the attacks. http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html#fsb
    PETVAL
    PETVAL --- ---
    All That Secrecy Is Expensive
    02:00 AM Aug. 27, 2004 PT
    The 9/11 Commission, leaders in Congress -- even the government's top secret-keeper -- all agree that Washington's penchant for keeping information under wraps has grown out of control. Now, a coalition of watchdog groups has documented just how much it's costing to keep all those records away from the public eye.

    During the 2003 fiscal year, the federal government spent more than $6.5 billion securing classified information
    , according to a new "Secrecy Report Card" from OpenTheGovernment.org, a coalition of government watchdog and civil liberties groups. That's an increase of more than $800 million from the previous year, according to the group, and a nearly $2 billion jump since 2001. But it's only a best guess, really; the report card's accounting doesn't include a penny from the Central Intelligence Agency, which keeps even its overall budget classified.
    ...
    http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,64731,00.html
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    VOXFUX SITE BEING SYSTEMATICALLY REMOVED FROM GOOGLE

    THE FASCISTS NOW CONTROL GOOGLE

    voxfux

    It was inevitable, it was bound to happen. The voxfux site had over the years steadily increased the number of hits when the name voxfux was typed into Google. Last month it had reached 8000 hits on a Google search. Then suddenly something strange started happening. Just after the public offering and purchase of Google, the numbers of hits in a Google query of the word voxfux started to decline - For the first time in 3 years. This is occuring at the same time as my logs reflect a steady increase in traffic. There is nothing to explain to explain this anomaly, beside the possibility that what I had predicted a long time has come to fruition a lot sooner than I expected. It appears that as they have taken over all other media measurement tools such as the Neilson rating system and the Gallup and other major polling systems, that the illuminati simply could no longer allow the Google juggernaut remain outside their grip of control. And so it appears that Google may no longer be a trustworthy source of information search and that it may have fallen into the hands of the fascists ahead of schedule. Google has replaced all other means of information exchange, it has replaced the dictionary and the encyclopedia and the library and books as the primary tool for the searching of Information on the planet earth.

    vox

    http://www.voxfux.com/archives/00000118.htm
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    The "New European Soviet"

    by Vilius Brazenas

    The European Union is rapidly descending into totalitarianism. Under NAFTA and the proposed FTAA, U.S. policymakers have adopted the same socialist EU program.

    ...

    http://www.thenewamerican.com/tna/2004/09-06-2004/eu.htm
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com//paperboy.cfm?id=786212003
    Kelly warned of 'dark actors playing games'
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Takové docela normální zatčení

    Vladimír Stwora 26.8.2004

    Ten článek na titulní stránce celoplošného deníku Toronto Star z 23. srpna hovořil o něčem úplně jiném, než o čem hovořit měl. Pěl chválu na pohotovost nejvyššího šéfa městských strážníků v Torontě, Juliana Fantina.

    Pan Fantino se zúčastnil jakési akce na CNE, kde měl projev. V projevu si stěžoval na vzrůstající kriminalitu města a vzpomínal na časy, kdy Toronto bývalo relativně klidným místem k životu. Když projev dokončil a vracel se s kolegou k vozu, někdo na ně zavolal. Upozornil policisty (zřejmě aniž si uvědomil, že hovoří s nejvyšším šéfem policie) na nevhodné chování nějakého muže.

    Další popis události je poněkud skeči. Praví se (v článku), že Fantino muže konfrontoval a po krátkém boji jej pacifikoval a zatkl. Co přesně se míní slovem "konfrontoval", nebylo sděleno. Rovněž jsem nepochopil, jak se taková konfrontace změnila v potyčku. Faktem je, že na fotografii leží muž v prachu na zemi a šéf policie mu nasazuje pouta. Možná byl ten člověk drzý, to nevím. Muži byly zabaveny dva fotoaparáty a stanou se zřejmě součástí průkazního řízení.

    "Myslím, že osobně provedl zatčení, protože zná své povinnosti policisty," řekl o svém šéfovi seržant Roy Sorgo.

    Zločinec byl tedy zadržen, spravedlnosti byla učiněna zadost. Nejvyšší šéf prokázal, že pobyt za psacím stolem mu neubral na fyzičce a že - když je třeba - neostýchá se přiložit ruku k dílu. Dvaačtyřicetiletý muž stane před soudcem, kde se bude zodpovídat z (cituji v originále) mischief, interfering with property and assaulting police. Tedy z rošťáctví, zasahování do vlastnictví a útoku na policistu. Takový byl zhruba rámec článku, který dále pokračoval už úplně nezajímavým blábolem.

    A vy se asi teď ptáte, proč se o tak o banální příhodě rozepisuji a zda jsem se nezbláznil a nepřevzal styl časopisu Blesk. Nepřevzal. Mně totiž z té události mrazí. A jsem zřejmě sám jediný, který z toho má mizerný pocit. Ten zadržený spáchal zločin opravdu děsivý.

    Fotografoval děti.


    Nikoliv svlečené, nikoliv za účelem porno. Prostě jen fotografoval děti. Zřejmě nikoliv své vlastní a aniž se ptal na povolení rodičů. Ono to někdy ani nejde. Zkuste na pískovišti v chumlu dětí identifikovat rodiče ke každému z nich.

    A proč to dělal? Tipuji to na fotografa-amatéra. Asi věděl, stejně jako každý, kdo se někdy pokoušel o malinko hlubší fotografické vyjádření, že děti jsou nejlepšími modely - bezprostředními, přirozenými, hravými. Záběry dětské tváře, rozzářených dětských očí, nebo naopak uplakaných dětských očí v minulosti vyhrály ceny nejednomu fotografovi. V době, kdy jsem se pokoušel o uměleckou fotografii, jsem se i já vydával do ulic s fotoaparátem a lovil snímky docela neznámých dětí. Tenkrát to ještě zločin nebyl, to bylo za totality. Dnes máme svobodu a demokracii a všechno je úplně jinak.

    Otázka, která se mi v poslední době vrací stále častěji (a nejen nad touto příhodou): Proč jsme, krucipísek, vlastně utíkali a kam?

    http://www.zvedavec.org/zvedavec_957.htm
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    US warplanes violate Iran's air space

    Aug 24, 2004, 19:11
    IRNA

    Five US warplanes entered Iran's air space last Thursday night from the southwestern Shalamcheh border and flew over the city of Khorramshahr for a while, press reports said Tuesday.

    According the Persian daily Seday-e Edalat, 'the jet fighters which flew at high speed and altitude, then headed to the Arvand River'.


    "They flew at a height of 10 kilometers and maneuvered over Khorramshahr for a while," the paper said.

    "While the objective behind the fighters' violation of the Iranian air space is not known yet, some military specialists believe such moves are aimed at assessing the sensitivity of the Islamic Republic's anti-aircraft defense system," it added.

    It said military and air force officials had refrained from commenting on the incident when contacted.

    Iran has been wary of the occupation forces' presence on its doorsteps in Iraq and carefully watched their movements.

    Tehran, while opposing Iraq's invasion, took a position of `active neutrality' at the time of the attack.

    In June, Iranian naval guards seized three British boats with eight crew in the country's territorial waters in Arvand river, which borders Iraq.

    The servicemen, two Royal Navy sailors and six Royal Marine commandos, were later released.

    Their equipment reportedly consisted of personal weapons, radios and navigation equipment, including echo sounders to measure the depth of the water, global positioning systems to identify the exact position and up-to-date maritime charts.

    © Iranian.ws

    http://www.iranian.ws/iran_news/publish/article_3464.shtml
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Fahrenheit 9/11: Neobyčejně významný historický počin

    Propaganda - podle zkušenosti z minulého století - vyžaduje permanentní síť komunikací, aby mohla systematicky potlačovat reflexi prostřednictvím emotivních či utopických hesel. Propaganda většinou slouží dlouhodobým zájmům nějaké elity.

    Moorův film Fahrenheit 9/11 oslovil po celém světě miliony diváků. Mohl by změnit vývoj civilizace? ptá se známý britský autor a kritik John Berger.

    Fahrenheit 9/11 má neuvěřitelně velký význam. Není to ani tak film jako událost. Většina komentátorů se ho snaží shodit, přestože promluvil výmluvně k milionům lidí na celém světě. Za prvních šest týdnů promítání vydělal jen v USA více než 100 milionů dolarů. Tento film jako politický čin se zřejmě stal historickým mezníkem. Máme-li to pochopit, musíme mít určitou perspektivu budoucnosti. Pokud žijeme jen z nejnovějších zpráv, což dělá většina komentátorů, omezuje to naši perspektivu.

    Fahrenheit 9/11 je historickou událostí, protože je to efektivní a nezávislý zásah do bezprostřední světové politiky. V současnosti se děje velmi zřídka, že by se umělci podařilo úspěšně realizovat takový zásah, totiž že by se mu podařilo podvrátit předem připravené, pravdu obcházející výroky politiků.

    Očerňovat tento film jako propagandu je buď naivní anebo zvrácené. Propaganda - podle zkušenosti z minulého století - vyžaduje permanentní síť komunikací, aby mohla systematicky potlačovat reflexi prostřednictvím emotivních či utopických hesel. Propaganda většinou slouží dlouhodobým zájmům nějaké elity.

    Tento samostatný, jediný film je v mnoha částech reflexivně pomalý a nebojí se využívat mlčení. Apeluje na lidi, aby mysleli samostatně a pospojovali si věci. A identifikuje se s těmi, které normálně nikdo neposlouchá. Argumentuje v jejich zájmu. Argumentovat energicky pro nějakou věc není totéž jako šířit propagandu.

    Už od starořeckých tragédií se občas umělci ptali sami sebe, jak by mohli ovlivnit aktuální politické události. Je to složitá otázka, protože jde o dva úplně rozdílné druhy moci. Této otázky se týká mnoho estetických a etických teorií. Pro lidi, kteří žijí v politických tyraniích, je kultura a umění často formou skrytého odporu a tyrani se snaží obyčejně kulturu potlačovat.

    Avšak Fahrenheit 9/11 je něčím jiným. Tomuto filmu se podařilo úspěšně zasáhnout do politického programu na vlastním teritoriu tohoto programu.

    Přispělo k tomu několik faktorů, zejména hlavní cena z Cannes a pošetilé pokusy v Americe zabránit tomu, aby se film dostal do kin.

    V říši masových sdělovacích prostředků je úspěšný průlom (rozbití každodenní zdi lží a polopravd) velmi vzácný. A právě v důsledku toho, že se to filmu Fahrenheit 9/11 podařilo, je tento film mimořádnou událostí. Je příkladem pro miliony lidí, kteří na něco takového čekali.

    Film argumentuje, že v prvním roce nového milénia převzala Bílý dům a Pentagon banda gangsterů, jejichž cílem je zajistit, aby americká moc od nynějška sloužila globálním zájmům korporací. Avšak důležitější než tato argumentace je způsob, jímž film k divákům promlouvá. Tento film dokazuje, že navzdory veškeré manipulativní moci odborníků na média, navzdory lživým prezidentským projevům a mlhavým tiskovým konferencím, je schopen jediný nezávislý hlas poukázat na určité zjevné pravdy, které už si množství Američanů začalo odhalovat samo pro sebe, že tento hlas dokáže rozbít spiknutí mlčení, atmosféru strachu a samotu politické bezmocnosti.

    Cílem filmu Fahrenheit 9/11 je zabránit Bushovi, aby zfalšoval i příští americké prezidentské volby tak, jak zfalšoval ty poslední. Film se zaměřuje na zcela neospravedlnitelnou válku proti Iráku. Ale jeho závěr je daleko významnější než tyto dílčí otázky. Z tohoto filmu vyplývá, že politická ekonomika, která vytváří obrovské bohatství, obklopené katastrofální chudobou, potřebuje k svému přežití neustálou válku k tomu, aby dokázala udržovat vlastní interní pořádek a bezpečnost.

    Tak patnáct let po pádu komunismu a deset let po vyhlášeném "konci historie" se znovu stává předmětem debaty jedna z hlavních tezí Marxovy interpretace historie jako možné vysvětlení katastrof, v nichž žijeme.

    Vždycky přinášejí největší oběti chudí, oznamuje tiše film Fahrenheit 9/11 ve svých posledních minutách. Jak ještě dlouho?

    Žádná civilizace nebude mít nikde v dnešním světě zajištěnu budoucnost, pokud bude tuto otázku ignorovat. A proto byl tento film vytvořen a proto se stal tím, čím se stal. Je to film, který si nesmírně silně přeje, aby Amerika přežila.

    Kompletní článek v angličtině ZDE

    John Berger (1926) je spisovatel, malíř a historik umění. Od r. 1952 psal recenze pro londýnský časopis New Statesman a rychle se stal vlivným marxistickým kritikem. Vydal celou řadu knih o výtvarném umění, včetně proslavené Ways of Seeing (Způsoby vidění), podle níž televize BBC vytvořila klasický dokumentární seriál. Posledních dvacet let žije Berger ve francouzských Alpách

    http://www.blisty.cz/2004/8/25/art19474.html
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Dvě letadla dole, bomba v Moskvě

    (25.8.04)

    V Rusku možná spadla v rozmezí několika minut dvě letadla. Hovoří se přibližně o stovce mrtvých.

    První letadlo bylo typu TU-134 s třiceti čtyřmi pasažéry a osmi členy posádky a směřovalo do Soči, druhé TU-154 se čtyřiceti čtyřmi pasažéry a rovněž osmi členy posádky mířilo do Volgogradu. Nikdo údajně nehody nepřežil. Obě letadla startovala z Moskvy.

    Některé zdroje, např. Reuters, později zprávu pozměnily a uvádějí pád pouze jednoho letadla, druhé se snad ztratilo. Jiné uvádějí, že svědkové viděli nejméně jedno letadlo explodovat. Zatím se neví nic jistého, Putin nařídil vyšetřování.

    Ve stejný den vybuchla malá bomba na autobusové zastávce v Moskvě, zranila čtyři lidi.

    O víkendu má dojít v Čečensku k volbám. Žádná skupina se nepřihlásila k odpovědnosti za útoky.


    Chystají se Američané napadnout koncem října Severní Koreu?

    (25.8.04)

    Nenápadná zpráva v International Herald Tribune hovoří o připravovaném cvičení americké armády v blízkosti hranic Severní Koreje. Cvičení má proběhnout koncem října - měsíc před volbami.

    Možná jde jen o cvičení. Možná se chystá něco většího. Vzpomeňme, jak začala vietnamská válka. Tehdy nařídil prezident Johnson bombardování suverénního státu a jako záminku použil údajný útok severovietnamských sil na mírumilovně se plavící americký torpédoborec USS Maddox.

    Zdroj: http://www.rense.com/general56/october.htm
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    The US Invasion of Iraq was perhaps the most cowardly War ever fought in History

    by Arundhati Roy

    Transcript of talk by Arundhati Roy, United For Peace and Justice teach-in, Washington, DC, 31 May 2003.

    www.globalresearch.ca 3 June 2003

    The URL of this article is: http://globalresearch.ca/articles/ROY306A.html

    Mesopotamia. Babylon. The Tigris and Euphrates. How many children, in how many classrooms, over how many centuries, have hang-glided through the past, transported on the wings of these words?

    And now the bombs have fallen, incinerating and humiliating that ancient civilization. On the steel torsos of their missiles, adolescent American soldiers scrawled colorful messages in childish handwriting: For Saddam, from the Fat Boy Posse.

    A building went down. A marketplace. A home. A girl who loved a boy. A child who only ever wanted to play with his older brother's marbles.

    On March 21 – the day after American and British troops began their illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq – an "embedded" CNN correspondent interviewed an American soldier. "I wanna get in there and get my nose dirty," Private A.J. said. "I wanna take revenge for 9/11."

    To be fair to the correspondent, even though he was "embedded" he did sort of weakly suggest that so far there was no real evidence that linked the Iraqi government to the September 11, 2001, attacks. Private A.J. stuck his teenage tongue out all the way down to the end of his chin. "Yeah, well that stuff's way over my head," he said.

    Lies Instead of Evidence

    When the United States invaded Iraq, a New York Times/CBS News survey estimated that 42 percent of the American public believed that Saddam Hussein was directly responsible for the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. And an ABC news poll said that 55 percent of Americans believed that Saddam Hussein directly supported Al-Qaeda. None of this opinion is based on evidence (because there isn't any). All of it is based on insinuation, auto-suggestion and outright lies circulated by the US corporate media.

    Public support in the US for the war against Iraq was founded on a multi-tiered edifice of falsehood and deceit coordinated by the US government and faithfully amplified by the press. We had the invented links between Iraq and Al Qaeda. We had the manufactured frenzy about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. No weapons of mass destruction have been found. Not even a little one.

    Now, after the war has been fought and won, and the contracts for reconstruction have been signed and sealed, the New York Times reports that, "The Central Intelligence Agency has begun a review to try to determine whether the American intelligence community erred in its prewar assessments of Saddam Hussein's government and Iraq's weapons programs."

    Meanwhile, in passing, an ancient civilization has been casually decimated by a very recent, casually brutal nation.

    Throughout more than a decade of war and sanctions, American and British forces fired thousands of missiles and bombs on Iraq. Iraq's fields and farmlands were shelled with 300 tons of depleted uranium.

    In their bombing sorties, the Allies targeted and destroyed water treatment plants, aware of the fact that they could not be repaired without foreign assistance. In southern Iraq there was a fourfold increase in cancer among children. In the decade of economic sanctions that followed the war, Iraqi civilians were denied medicine, hospital equipment, ambulances, clean water – the basic essentials.

    About half a million Iraqi children died as a result of the sanctions. The corporate media played a sterling role in keeping news of the devastation of Iraq and its people away from the American public. It has now begun preparing the ground with the same routine of lies and hysteria for a war against Syria and Iran – and, who knows, perhaps even Saudi Arabia. Perhaps the next war will be the jewel in the crown of George Bush's 2004 election campaign. Though he may not need to go to such great lengths, since the Democrats have announced that their strategy for the 2004 election is to charge that the Republicans are weak on national security. It's like a small-town teenage bully telling the Mafia it has too many scruples.


    America's presidential elections sound as though they will be a complete waste of everybody's time. Although that's not exactly breaking news.

    Most Cowardly War Ever Fought

    The US invasion of Iraq was perhaps the most cowardly war ever fought in history.

    After using the "good offices" of UN diplomacy (economic sanctions and weapons inspections) to ensure that Iraq was brought to its knees, after making sure that most of its weapons had been destroyed, the "Coalition of the Willing" – better known as the Coalition of the Bullied and Bought – sent in an invading army.

    Then the corporate media gloated that the United States had won a just and astonishing victory!

    TV watchers witnessed the joy that the US army brought to ordinary Iraqis. All those newly liberated people waving American flags, which they must have somehow hoarded during the years of sanctions.

    Never mind that the toppling of the statue of Saddam Hussein in Firdos Square (shown over and over on TV) turned out to be a carefully choreographed charade played out by a handful of hired extras coordinated by the US marines. Robert Fisk called it the "most staged photo-op since Iwo Jima."


    Never mind that in the days that followed American soldiers fired into a crowd of peaceful, unarmed Iraqi demonstrators who were demanding that US troops leave their country. Fifteen people were shot dead.

    Never mind that a few days later US soldiers killed two more and injured several people who were protesting the fact that peaceful demonstrators were being killed. Never mind that they murdered 17 more people in Mosul. Never mind that in the days to come the killing will continue. (But it won't be on TV.)

    Never mind that a secular country is being driven to religious sectarianism. Never mind that the US government helped Saddam Hussein's rise to power and supported him through his worst excesses, including the eight-year war against Iran and the 1988 gassing of Kurdish people in Halabja, crimes which 14 years later were re-heated and served up as reasons to justify going to war against Iraq.

    Never mind that, after the first Gulf War, the Allies fomented an uprising of Shias in Basra and then looked away while Saddam Hussein crushed the revolt and slaughtered thousands in an act of vengeful reprisal.

    After the invasion of Iraq, Western TV channels' ghoulish interest in the mass graves they discovered evaporated quickly when they realized that the bodies were of Iraqis who had been killed in the war against Iran and the Shia uprising. The search for an appropriate mass grave continues.

    Never mind that US and British troops had orders to kill people, but not to protect them. Their priorities were clear. The safety and security of Iraqi people was not their business.

    The security of whatever little remained of Iraq's infrastructure was not their business. But the security and safety of Iraq's oil fields was. The oil fields were "secured" almost before the invasion began.

    It's worth noting that the reconstruction of Afghanistan, which is in far worse condition than Iraq, hasn't merited the same evangelical enthusiasm in reconstruction that Iraq has. Even the money that was so publicly promised to Afghanistan has not for the most part been handed over. Could it be because Afghanistan has no oil? It has a route for a pipeline, true, but no oil. So there isn't much money to be extracted from that vanquished country.

    On the other hand, we were told that contracts for the reconstruction of Iraq could jump-start the world economy. It's funny how the interests of American corporations are so often, so successfully, and so deliberately confused with the interests of the world economy.

    Occupation Government

    The talk about Iraq's oil for Iraqis and a war of liberation and democracy and representative government had its time and place. It had its uses. But things have changed now....

    Having escorted a 7,000-year-old civilization into anarchy, George Bush has announced that the US is in Iraq to stay "indefinitely." The US, in effect, has said that Iraq can only have a representative government if it represents the interests of Anglo-American oil companies. In other words, you can have free speech as long as you say what I want you to say.


    On May 17, the New York Times said, "In an abrupt reversal, the United States and Britain have indefinitely put off their plan to allow Iraqi opposition forces to form a national assembly and an interim government by the end of the month. Instead, top American and British diplomats leading reconstruction efforts here told exile leaders in a meeting tonight that allied officials would remain in charge of Iraq for an indefinite period."

    Jackals Feeding Frenzy

    Long before the invasion began, the world's business community was tingling with excitement about the scale of money that the reconstruction of Iraq would involve. It has been billed as "the biggest reconstruction effort since the Marshall Plan rebuilt Europe after World War Two."

    Bechtel Corporation, based in San Francisco, is leading the pack of jackals moving into Iraq.

    Coincidentally, former Secretary of State George Schultz is on the Board of Directors of the Bechtel Group, and happens also to have served as the chairman of the advisory board of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq. When asked by the New York Times whether he was concerned about the appearance of a conflict of interest, Shultz said, "I don't know that Bechtel would particularly benefit from it. But if there's work to be done, Bechtel is the type of company that could do it. But nobody looks at it as something you benefit from."

    Bechtel already has a contract for $680 million dollars, but, according to the New York Times, "Independent estimates are that the final cost for the reconstruction effort of the extent outlined in Bechtel's contract with USAID would be $20 billion."


    In an article appropriately headlined "Feeding Frenzy Under Way, as Companies From All Over Seek a Piece of the Action," the Times notes (without irony) that "governments around the world and the companies whose causes they support have besieged Washington in a campaign to win a piece of the reconstruction action in Iraq."

    "The British," the article notes, "though their appeals are understated, offer what some Bush administration officials argue is the most convincing case: that they shed blood in Iraq."

    Whose blood was shed has not been clarified. Surely they didn't mean British blood, or American blood. They must have meant the British helped the Americans to shed Iraqi blood.

    So "the most convincing case" for reconstruction contracts is when a country can argue that it is a co-murderer of Iraqis.

    Lady Simmons, the deputy leader of the UK House of Lords, recently traveled to America with four leaders of British industry. Apart from staking their claim to contracts based on their status as co-murderers, the British delegation also invoked the their colonial past, again without irony, making the case that British companies "had a long and close relationship with Iraq and Iraqi business from the imperial days in the early 20th century until international sanctions were imposed in the 1990s." Glossing over, of course, that this meant Britain had supported Saddam Hussein through the 1970s and 1980s.
    "Relax and Enjoy It"

    Those of us who belong to former colonies think of imperialism as rape. So you rape. Then you kill. Then you demand the right to rape the corpse. That's usually known as necrophilia.

    Extending this horrible analogy, Richard Perle said recently, "Iraqis are freer today and we are safer. Relax and enjoy it."

    A few days into the war, the news anchor Tom Brokaw said: "One of the things we don't want to do ... is to destroy the infrastructure of Iraq because in a few days we're going to own that country."

    Now the ownership deeds are being signed. Iraq is no longer a country. It's an asset.


    It's no longer ruled. It's owned.

    And it is owned for the most part by Bechtel. Maybe Halliburton and a British company or two will get a few bones.

    Our battle has to be against both the occupiers and the new owners of Iraq.

    Arundhati Roy lives in New Delhi. She is the author of "The God of Small Things" and "Power Politics" (South End Press).Copyright Arundati Roy 2003.

    For fair use only/ pour usage équitable seulement .

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/ROY306A.html
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Excellent flash presentation which questions whether a plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11.

    http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/august2004/240804perspective.htm
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Fox "Journalists" Calmly Discuss Killing People to Help the Stock Market

    http://www.prisonplanet.tv/articles/august2004/082404killingpeople.htm
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    CNN: 'Hijacker' Visa Found in Flight 93 Wreckage



    Paul Joseph Watson | August 23 2004

    CNN is reporting that 9/11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah's visa was found in the remains of Flight 93 which went down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

    Even if we are to entertain the notion that this piece of paper supposedly in the pocket of the suicide pilot who survived a crash which left aircraft parts strewn eight miles apart, do the two photographs shown above even represent the same person?

    Ziad Jarrah's family provided evidence days after 9/11 that Jarrah wasn't even onboard Flight 93 and that if he was, it was only as a passenger who was just as much of a victim as the rest of the people on the plane.

    The FBI has been evasive on whether or not other hijacker's passports were found in the wreckage of the World Trade Center but the 9/11 commission has now presented photographs which they say show the charred paper visa.

    A few days after the attack, several newspapers reported that a paper passport had been found in the ruins of the WTC.

    A month ago new photos were released which apparently showed Flight 77 hijackers Nawaq Alhamzi and Salem Alhamzi undergoing security screening at Washington's Dulles International airport.

    This is of course to reinforce the official story of 9/11 which is crumbling under the weight of 9/11 research and activism. At least a third of the WTC victim's bodies were vaporized and many of the victims of the Pentagon incident were burned beyond recognition. And yet visas and paper passports which identify the purpotrators and back up the official version of events miraculously survive explosions and fires that we are told melted steel buildings.

    The government's desperation to prove the involvement of the named hijackers contrasts with evidence that several of them are still alive, and even Mohammed Atta's father still insists he talks to his son on a regular basis.


    http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/08/22/911.commission/index.html

    http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/august2004/230804visafound.htm

    -------------------------------------

    Hijacking suspect's family claims mistaken identity

    September 18, 2001 Posted: 11:03 AM EDT (1503 GMT)
    Ziad Jarrah


    BEKAA VALLEY, Lebanon (CNN) -- The family of suspected hijacker Ziad Jarrah contends there may be another man with the same name who was responsible for hijacking one of the four flights involved in last week's terrorist attacks on the United States.

    The family also said they do not even believe that Jarrah, 26, was on board United Airlines Flight 93 when it crashed in western Pennsylvania on September 11.

    ...

    http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/meast/09/18/inv.terror.jarrah/
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Život po ropné krizi

    Sledujme drama rozvíjející se před našima očima

    http://www.zvedavec.org/zpravySQL.php?clanek_id=955
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Bude mít každý člověk těle čip?

    Malé a zároveň cenově dostupné nosiče informací pracující na principu radiofrekvenční identifikace (RFID) se začaly masivně využívat již počátkem devadesátých let minulého století. V současné době je RFID na celém světě považována za klíčovou technologií.



    Ačkoliv si to mnohdy ani neuvědomujeme, je technologie radiofrekvenční identifikace již masově rozšířena, a to v mnoha oblastech běžného života. Pravděpodobně nejpopulárnějším tématem několika posledních let je možnost identifikace osob a jejich případného sledování pomocí implantovaného RFID čipu.

    vice:

    http://www.rf-hobby.cz/21stoleti/clanek.php?clanek=421


    Human chips more than skin-deep

    Advocates of technologies like radio frequency identification tags say their potentially life-saving benefits far outweigh any Orwellian concerns about privacy. RFID tags sewn into clothing or even embedded under people's skin could curb identity theft, help identify disaster victims and improve medical care, they say.

    http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1103-5319869.html
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam