Irácký konflikt z hlediska mezinárodního práva – kdo je teroristou?

Richard Král 24.10.2004

V souvislosti s Irákem se v médiích často hořekuje nad "popravami rukojmích" a krvelačných "teroristech". Jak je tomu z hlediska platného pozitivního mezinárodního práva?

Nezávislý pohled na irácké tažení z pohledu mezinárodního práva dává profesor Michael Dorf z Kolumbijské univerzity. Nejde až do důsledků, neboť by potom asi přestal učit, ale drží se platného mezinárodního práva, které USA nerespektují.


Útok na Irák je učebnicovým případem tzv. útočné války jako ozbrojeného útoku - agrese, jak je definovala rezoluce VS OSN ze dne 14. prosince 1974. Čl. 2 této rezoluce praví, že "použití ozbrojené síly státem v rozporu s Chartou (OSN) zakládá zřejmý důkaz útočného činu?" Čl. 5 odst. 1 rezoluce praví, že "žádná úvaha jakékoli povahy, ať politické, hospodářské, vojenské nebo jiné, nemůže sloužit jako důvod k ospravedlnění agrese". Z toho vyplývá, že americké pohádky o zbraních hromadného ničení, ohrožení amerických národních zájmů atp. jsou naprosto liché a bezpředmětné. Dále cit. Čl. 5 odst. 2 rezoluce - "Útočná válka je zločinem proti mezinárodnímu míru. Agrese zakládá mezinárodní odpovědnost." OSN, jak víme, mlčí a dokonce se nesměle snaží na irácké anabázi také přiživit.

USA zaútočily a Irák se bránil. Stále pokračuje odpor kombatantů proti okupačním silám, přičemž o nich nelze hovořit jako o "teroristech", jsou to osoby podléhající ochraně dle Ženevských úmluv (právo na status válečného zajatce), útočí-li na americké cíle či americkou okupační správu. Ve smyslu čl. 44 8. Dodatkového protokolu k Ženevským úmluvám nejsou kombatanti povinni nosit uniformy či se permanentně označovat či odlišovat od civilních obyvatel, postačí, že během každého vojenského střetnutí a před ním nosí veřejně zbraň. Slovo "terorista", tak hojně používané a nikde platně pozitivně nedefinované, lze použít na bojovníky útočící proti civilním cílům, na které však útočí především američané (ať již úmyslně či neúmyslně, své pohnutky z hlediska práva neprokážou, podstatné jsou fakta). Dokonce ani pana Abú Zarkávího, kterého američané tak fanaticky nenávidí, neboť proti nim organizuje efektivní odpor, nelze paušálně označit za "teroristu". Pokud byl najat nebo má slíbenou odměnu, účastní se nepřátelských akcí, není občanem strany konfliktu a neútočí na civilní cíle (policejní stanice jsou součástí okupační americké správy), spadá do definice "žoldnéře" podle Ženevských úmluv a i on má právo na ochranu, tj. status kombatanta nebo válečného zajatce.

Čl. 53 8. Dodatkového protokolu k Ženevským úmluvám výslovně zakazuje mj. "provádět jakékoli nepřátelské činy proti místům konání bohoslužeb".

Z hlediska mezinárodního práva nedošlo k řádnému vyhlášení války, tento institut, který byl respektován po staletí USA ignorovaly, což dává iráckým bojovníkům výhodu neomezených legálních útoků, neboť z hlediska mezinárodního práva válka sice započala (náhlým přepadením jednotkami USA), ale legálně neskončila a stále trvá. Iráckým kombatantům se tak otvírá prostor pro "Útoky" ve smyslu čl. 49 8. Dodatkového protokolu k Ženevským úmluvám.

Taková je tedy situace z hlediska mezinárodního práva veřejného.

http://www.zvedavec.org/clanky_1003.htm

Rudolph Giuliani, the police commissioner,the fire commissioner,and the head of emergency management were TOLD the WTC was going to collapse

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_giuliani.html

Terror-tech used in office sex snooping

London Times | Oct 24 2004

TECHNOLOGY used to track down Al-Qaeda terrorists is being offered to employers as a means of stamping out sexual harassment and other abusive behaviour in the workplace.
The new snooping software will allow companies to monitor all their employees’ e-mail, enabling them to ban even innocent social chitchat and to identify friendships and relationships among their workers.

The software has been developed by Autonomy, a Cambridge company that is a world leader in analysing and recognising patterns in otherwise unstructured information.

America’s Department of Homeland Security and 20 other government agencies are using Autonomy’s technology in the battle against terrorism.

Autonomy is now offering a version to investment banks and other large employers who fear being hit by multi-million-pound claims for sexual discrimination and harassment.

..

Barry Hugill of Liberty said: “By going down the route of constant monitoring you are creating a culture of surveillance.

“What might start out as something easy intellectually and morally to justify — such as monitoring someone who was sexually or racially harassing somebody by e-mail — very soon becomes checking people’s work patterns and work routines. It can become in itself a form of harassment.”

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1325491,00.html

v poho, nekdo to urcite jeste nevidel :)

PETVAL: sorry, hledal jsem to ve filtru, ale nenasel.. :-/

ad posledni odkaz, jde o znamy 16MB flash s pentagonem, at to nekdo z vas neotevira zbytecne.

JAXXE --- --- 13.25:10 23.10.2004 heh hustyy...zda sa ze nie vsetci kongresmani su uplne vymleti :)

a ten Ledeen je teda pekny fasoun tyve...mu to studium fasizmu asi trochu vyvarilo mozog :/ a takyto ludia ovplyvnuju politiku US...ble :(

Michael Ledeen: "Fašistického nacionalismu lze úspěšně využít k moderním politickým cílům"

Michael Ledeen, čelný americký neokonzervativní myslitel i praktický politik hojně využívá ve své teorii i praxi mechanismu fašistické, nacionalistické mytologie, i když se ostře staví proti nacismu i fašismu. Ledeen (nar. 1941) studoval historii na University of Wisconsin u George Mosse, uprchlíka před německým nacismem. Mosse studoval způsoby, jímž nacisté a fašisté získávali podporu občanů nikoliv prostřednictvím myšlenek, ale mistrovským zvládáním masových veřejných rituálů a politických "představení". Ledeena toto Mosseho studium zaujalo jako aktivistu, který měl velký zájem o uplatnění posvátné nacionalistické mytologie pro současné politické účely. Ledeen si uvědomil, že masová politika, jak ji prováděli nacisté v Evropě v první třetině dvacátého století, může být dobře použita jako zdroj pro obnovení současného středostavovského nacionalismu ve Spojených státech, píše americký list Boston Globe.

Michael Ledeen zastával vysoká místa v Reaganově vládě a v současnosti má velmi blízko k Bushovu poradci Karlu Rovovi. V současné debatě o Iráku podporuje Ledeen intenzivně agresivní americkou politiku, jejímž cílem má být svržení vlády muslimských kněží. Ledeen je přesvědčen, že Amerika musí provést "globální demokratickou revoluci" a její válka v Iráku je jen malou součástí tohoto celkového plánu.

Ve své knize Universal Fascism (Všeobecný fašismus, 1972), spojil Ledeen dva zdánlivě odlišné intelektuální proudy: fašistický kult mládí a pokusy, k nimž došlo v polovině třicátých let, vytvořit fašistickou internacionálu. Obě tendence byly důsledkem deziluze mladých italských intelektuálů s prvním desetiletím Mussoliniho vlády. Až italský básník Gabriele D'Annunzio, který stál v čele vojenského puče, jehož účelem bylo ovládnout v roce 1919 přístavní město Fiume, získal obyvatele města na svou stranu sérií inovativních rituálů, včetně "denních pochodů na venkov, ... projevů, přednášených z balkónu a dialogů s davem." D'Annunzio pomohl vynalézt moderní politiku, píše Ledeen: politiku masové manipulace, politiku mýtu a symbolu. A ta se stala normou v moderním světě.

Americká demokratická revoluce musí zvítězit po celém světě, argumentuje Ledeen: "Nesmíme zapomínat, že revolucionáři a státníci v 18. století, kteří vytvořili USA, si uvědomovali, že je nemožné, aby demokracie vzkvétala, pokud bude omezena jen na malou část světa. Jinými slovy, musí docházet k vývozu revoluce."

Poprvé Ledeen prosadil tuto argumentaci za vlády Ronalda Regana. Požadavek, aby se Spojené státy postavily do čela globální křižácké výpravy "za šíření demokracie", se stal jedním ze základních rysů neokonzervativní ideologie, opojné směsice amerického nacionalismu a křižáckých výbojů do zahraničí "za demokracii", které jdou mimo jakékoliv dělení americké politiky na pravici a levici.

"Máte-li být efektivním vedoucím politikem," argumentuje dále Ledeen, "nejmoudřejší je zajistit, aby se vás lidé báli. A tento strach v nich vyvoláte jedině tak, že musíte dokázat, že ti, kdo na vás zaútočí, budou usmrceni."

Ledeen pociťuje zvlášť silné pohrdání vůči politikům, které považuje za slabé či zkorumpované, jako je podle jeho názoru Bill Clinton. V roce 1999 Ledeen napsal: "Je zapotřebí nových vedoucích politiků železné vůle, kteří vykoření korupci a buď obnoví morální stát, anebo vytvoří nový. Pokud propadneme falešnému pocitu bezpečí a přestaneme být bdělí a ostražití, hniloba se rozšíří a zničí celou společnost. Jakmile k tomu dojde, pouze násilné a nesmírně nepříjemné metody nás dokáží přimět, abychom se vrátili k morálce."

V roce 2003 odmítl Ledeen obavy, že by se americká veřejnost postavila proti válce, kdyby bylo při útoku na Irák usmrceno příliš mnoho lidí. "Všichni velcí vědci, kteří studovali americké vlastnosti, dospěli k závěru, že my jsme válečnický národ a že válku milujeme," zdůraznil Ledeen. "Nevadí nám mrtví a ranění. Vadí nám prohra."

Ledeen prosazuje demokracii, ale požaduje železnou politickou disciplínu. Tuto argumentaci zakládá na "obvyklém machiavelilistickém paradoxu: Donucování činí lidi vznešenými a umožňuje jim, aby zůstali svobodnými. Naopak příliš velká možnost volby je nebezpečná, vede k chaosu a způsobuje, že se lidé stávají obětí svých nepřátel." Ledeen se obává, že některé části společnosti už zapomněly, jak zdravé je být subjektem donucování. "Generálové, podnikatelé a atletičtí trenéři si toho jsou dobře vědomi, ale političtí představitelé a novináři na to často zapomínají."

Ledeen argumentuje, že jsou jeho názory naprosto obyčejné, normální a mainstreamové.

Jeho podstatným vlivem na americké neokonzervativce i na současnou americkou vládu se zabývá i Adam Curtis ve filmu BBC The Power of Nightmares. Ledeen je ve filmu interviewován.

http://www.blisty.cz/2004/10/22/art20242.html

--------------------------------------------

JAXXE --- --- 10:52:13 2.7.2003
book

Michael Ledeen: The War Against the Terror Masters

...

Creative destruction is our middle name, both within our own society and abroad. We tear down the old order every day, from business to science, literature, art, architecture, and cinema to politics and the law. Our enemies have always hated this whirlwind of energy and creativity, which menaces their traditions (whatever they may be) and shames them for their inability to keep pace. Seeing America undo traditional societies, they fear us, for they do not wish to be undone. They cannot feel secure so long as we are there, for our very existence—our existence, not our politics—threatens their legitimacy. They must attack us in order to survive, just as we must destroy them to advance our historic mission.

...

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly
This occasionally simplistic polemic calls for a "revolutionary war" on the "coherent terror network" organized by the governments of Iraq, Syria, Saudi Arabia and the "driving force behind international terrorism," Iran. Ledeen, a member of the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute and a former National Security Council consultant, persuasively details the links between these regimes and terrorist groups, and castigates previous presidents (particularly the "corrupt" and "self-indulgent" Bill Clinton) for discounting the terrorist threat and tolerating the complacency and bungling of U. S. intelligence agencies. His unnuanced theory of terrorism, however-the "terror masters" are "tyrants" who loathe America because of its mere "existence" as a symbol of freedom-downplays political complexities and ignores America's tarnished record in the Middle East. And while Ledeen urges the United States to help the citizens of terrorist states overthrow their despotic rulers, he warns that to do so-i.e., to be ready for war-Americans must give up their faith in "radical egalitarianism" and "the perfectibility of man" in favor of Machiavellian principles ("The only important thing is winning"; "It is better to be feared than loved"). Some readers will applaud Ledeen's hard-nosed demand to "reconcile our democratic values with the necessity of imposing our will," but others may think the compromise too great.

Copyright 2002 Reed Business Information, Inc.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/031230644X/qid=1057135548/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-2729586-5675955?v=glance&s=books

s timhle typkem asi brzo spadne letadlo...

http://homepage.mac.com/njenson/movies/timryanlow.html

Yale Holds Secret Spot in Bush, Kerry Pasts

Fri Oct 22, 2004 11:02 AM ET

By Greg Frost

BOSTON (Reuters) - Conspiracy theorists, rejoice: the man elected president on Nov. 2 will be a member of an elite secret cabal with tentacles that reportedly stretch into all layers of American society.

We're not making this up.

Despite their ideological differences, Democrat John Kerry and Republican George W. Bush share much in common. Each was raised amid wealth and privilege in the northeastern United States, and each attended Yale University in the 1960s where they joined the same secret society: Skull and Bones.

Founded more than 150 years ago, Skull and Bones is shrouded in the kind of mystery befitting the Gothic, Ivy League campus where its members meet behind closed doors in a windowless structure known as the tomb. It started admitting women in 1991.

Only 15 Yale students are tapped to join Skull and Bones each year. They spend their senior year forging close ties with fellow Bonesmen -- reportedly through the sharing of sexual histories and ceremonial rites -- and eventually become part of an elite association with friends in high places.

"Initiation rituals involve morbid admission of personal sexual experiences and coerced displays of sophomoric masochism and mystical mumbo jumbo, hooded robes and members carrying skulls," independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader said this month citing video footage of a Skull and Bones ceremony.

At a news conference in front of the tomb earlier, Nader urged both Bush and Kerry to answer questions about their involvement in the group, specifically about their code of silence and how their allegiance to Skull and Bones influences their oath to serve the country.

Author Alexandra Robbins, whose 2002 book "Secrets of the Tomb" was based on interviews with some 100 Bonesmen who broke their vows of secrecy to speak with her, agreed with Nader's concern about the role of Skull and Bones in a democratic society.

"It's disturbing that the presidential candidates are both members of (Skull and Bones) because it seems that they're prioritizing the interests of a secret society above the interests of the rest of us," Robbins told Reuters.

FRIENDS IN HIGH PLACES

Although conspiracy theorists have linked Skull and Bones to everything from the assassination of John F. Kennedy to the Watergate scandal, Robbins dismissed the paranoia and said the society is mainly an alumni network bent on getting -- and keeping -- power.

"The only agenda for Skull and Bones is to get its members into positions of power and then to have those members hire other members. It's a society of connections," she said.

Bush, whose father and grandfather were also Bonesmen, has done an expert job of relying on those connections throughout life, she said. Members invested in Bush's businesses and at least one was involved in his 1989 deal to buy the Texas Rangers baseball franchise, Robbins said.

In return, Bush has awarded Bonesmen with appointments in his administration. Among them, she said, are Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Bill Donaldson, Department of Homeland Security lawyer Edward McNally and Associate Attorney General Robert McCallum.

Kerry, on the other hand, has not exploited his Skull and Bones connections to the same degree -- or at least that's what Robbins' sources told her.

"If the past is any indication ... I would guess we would see fewer Bonesmen in a Kerry administration," said Robbins, who also graduated from Yale and belonged to another secret society, Scroll and Key.

Each candidate has referred obliquely to his membership in Skull and Bones.

In his 1999 autobiography, Bush wrote: "My senior year I joined Skull and Bones, a secret society so secret I can't say anything more."

When an interviewer asked Kerry what it meant that both he and Bush were Bonesmen, the Democrat replied, "Not much, because it's a secret."

© Reuters 2004. All Rights Reserved.

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=2YOKDGQUNGFXACRBAEKSFFA?type=domesticNews&storyID=6584137&pageNumber=1

The Truth About Beslan “Too Scary” to Reveal — Parliamentary Committee

Created: 12.10.2004 20:26 MSK (GMT +3), Updated: 20:26 MSK

MosNews

The parliamentary committee appointed to investigate the Beslan tragedy may keep the results of its investigation a secret, simply because they are too scary.

Over 330 people — half of them children — died in the three-day hostage drama in a school in southern Russia after up to 30 militants stormed the building on the first day of class.

“The truth about the real organizers of the terror attack may be so scary that revealing it would lead to new, bloody conflicts,” Newsru.com quoted Duma deputy and committee member Yuri Savelyev as saying at a press conference in St. Petersburg.

Earlier this week, committee chairman and Duma speaker Alexander Torshin announced that new videotapes found in Beslan over the weekend shed light on the events of September 1-3.

The committee also plans to meet Thursday with former president of Ingushetia Ruslan Aushev, who was instrumental in negotiating with the terrorists on the second day of the siege, leading to the release of dozens of children.

“We have a lot of questions for Aushev, in particular, why he got involved in the investigation, why he led 26 people out of the school [on the second day of the siege] and who they were,” Newsru.com quoted Savelyev as saying.

...

http://www.mosnews.com/news/2004/10/12/beslan.shtml

Teroristé v beslanské škole byli nadopováni - ale čím?
(21.10.04)

Experti, zkoumající ostatky několika zabitých zločinců, kteří počátkem září obsadili školu v Beslanu, jsou nejistí, co se týče drogy nalezené v jejich krvi.

Původně se domnívali, že šlo o heroin a morfin, ale bylo tam zřejmě ještě něco jiného. Totiž dávky heroinu, které v sobě někteří vrazi měli, překročily mnohonásobně normální dávky. V takovém množství je heroin už smrtelný.

Pitva rovněž odhalila, že někteří zločinci brali drogy delší dobu a byli na nich závislí. U některých se v průběhu obléhání projevil absenční šok způsobený zřejmě tím, že jim drogy došly.

Senátor Alexander Torshin, který vede vyšetřování tragédie v Beslanu, se domnívá, že samotný heroin a morfin nemohly vyvolat takové chování zločinců, jaké jsme zažili. Konkrétně citoval jejich schopnost bojovat i po těžkém zranění. Zřejmě měli něco, co snižuje vnímavost na bolest.

"Myslím, že použili něco úplně nového," řekl Torshin, který rovněž naznačil, že to, co dosud zjistili, je tak strašné, že to zřejmě nikdy nezveřejní.

Zdroj: http://www.mosnews.com/news/2004/10/19/smoking.shtml

Are you a terrorist?

by An Australian Terrorist



Edited from the newswire... ARE YOU A TERRORIST? New "terrorism" laws have been recently pushed through Parliament.

Answer this 5 point quiz:

1. Have you ever disagreed with any government policy and joined with others to express this by sending emails or phoning any politician, government department or bureaucrat?
2. Have you ever joined or been associated with the activities of a trade union, local protest group, or political or religious organisation?
3. Have you ever participated in a non-violent protest, rally or strike?
4. Have you ever donated money, bought raffle tickets or in any other way supported an international environmental, political or human rights organisation such as Amnesty International or Greenpeace?
5. Have you ever provided any professional advice for any political or religious organisation?
If you reply "YES" to any one of these questions the Government could brand you a 'terrorist' using this legislation: http://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/agd/www/nationalsecurityHome.nsf/headingpagesdisplay/9F291545F46DC7B9CA256E43000565D4?OpenDocument

The definition of 'terrorism', includes actions made 'with the intention of advancing a political, religious or ideological cause'. It is so broad that it would cover civil disobedience by peace groups, M1 and other anti-globalisation blockades, union pickets and strikes, actions to stop logging in forests and similar activities. The demonstrators who pushed over a fence at the refugee detention centre at Woomera would be defined as 'terrorists'...

ASIO has moved from being a spy agency, and has become a secret police. With new powers it is now able to:
* Arrest and detain people for questioning for 48 hours. Detention warrants can be renewed every 24 hours which means detainees could be held indefinitely.
* Detainees would have no right to a lawyer.
* Detainees could be held incommunicado with no contact with family and friends.
* Detainees could face up to five years in jail for refusing to answer questions.
* There are no rules for interrogation of detainees. Will torture be used?

http://perth.indymedia.org/index.php?action=default&featureview=129

FARMERS NOT ALLOWED TO SAVE SEED IN IRAQ

Do you get it yet? The ability to grow food in a sustainable manner is dangerous to the machine:

When the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) celebrates biodiversity on World Food Day on October 16, Iraqi farmers will be mourning its loss.

A new report by GRAIN and Focus on the Global South has found that new legislation in Iraq has been carefully put in place by the US that prevents farmers from saving their seeds and effectively hands over the seed market to transnational corporations. This is a disastrous turn of events for Iraqi farmers, biodiversity and the country's food security. While political sovereignty remains an illusion, food sovereignty for the Iraqi people has been made near impossible by these new regulations.

"The US has been imposing patents on life around the world through trade deals. In this case, they invaded the country first, then imposed their patents. This is both immoral and unacceptable", said Shalini Bhutani, one of the report's authors.

The new law in question heralds the entry into Iraqi law of patents on life forms - this first one affecting plants and seeds. This law fits in neatly into the US vision of Iraqi agriculture in the future - that of an industrial agricultural system dependent on large corporations providing inputs and seeds.

In 2002, FAO estimated that 97 percent of Iraqi farmers used saved seed from their own stocks from last year's harvest or purchased from local markets. When the new law - on plant variety protection (PVP) - is put into effect, seed saving will be illegal and the market will only offer proprietary "PVP-protected" planting material "invented" by transnational agribusiness corporations. The new law totally ignores all the contributions Iraqi farmers have made to development of important crops like wheat, barley, date and pulses. Its consequences are the loss of farmers' freedoms and a grave threat to food sovereignty in Iraq. In this way, the US has declared a new war against the Iraqi farmer.

http://www.todaysalternativenews.com/index.php?event=link,150&values%5b0%5d=&values%5b1%5d=1942

The blaze began before midnight Saturday on the 34th floor of the East Tower in the complex, Briceno said. By Sunday afternoon, it had burned for more 17 hours and spread over 26 floors, reaching the roof. The complex was built in 1976 and is considered a Caracas landmark.

But once again it was proven that modern steel-beam buildings do not collapse due to fire.



http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/10/18/world/main649824.shtml

Jak neokonzervativci a islamisté vytvořili nový "svět globálního terorismu"

V minulosti nám politikové slibovali lepší svět. Měli různé způsoby, jak toho dosáhnout, ale jejich moc a autorita pocházela z optimistických vizí, které nabízeli svým občanům. Tyto sny selhaly. A dnes lidé už ztratili víru v ideologie. Politikové jsou stále častěji dnes už považováni jen za manažery veřejného života. Avšak oni nyní objevili novou roli, která jim navrací jejich moc a autoritu. Namísto toho, aby pro nás plnili sny, nám politikové slibují, že nás ochrání – před nočními můrami.

Tvrdí nám, že nás dokáží zachránit před strašlivými nebezpečími, která nevidíme a jimž nerozumíme. A největší hrozbou ze všeho je mezinárodní terorismus – mocná a zlá mezinárodní síť, rozprostírající se všemi zeměmi světa. A proti této hrozbě je nutno vést válku proti terorismu.

Avšak většina této hrozby je jen fantazií, přehnanou a zkreslenou politiky. Je to temná iluze, kterou, nezpochybněnu, šíří vlády po celém světě, bezpečnostní služby i mezinárodní sdělovací prostředky.

Toto je soubor filmů o tom, jak a kdy byla tato fantazie vytvořena a komu přináší prospěch. Jádrem tohoto příběhu jsou dvě skupiny: američtí neokonzervativci a radikální islám. Obě skupiny byli idealistické. Obě vznikly ze selhání liberálního snu vytvořit lepší svět. Tyto dvě skupiny skutečně změnily svět, ale nikoliv tak, jak zamýšlely. Společně vytvořili dnešní vizi noční můry tajné mezinárodní organizace, která ohrožuje svět. Je to fantazie, o níž politikové pak zjistili, že jim vrací jejich moc.

pokracovani:

http://www.blisty.cz/2004/10/21/art20236.html

Cheney: Terrorists May Bomb U.S. Cities

CARROLL, Ohio (AP) - Vice President Dick Cheney on Tuesday raised the possibility of terrorists bombing U.S. cities with nuclear weapons and questioned whether Sen. John Kerry could combat such an "ultimate threat ... you've got to get your mind around."

"The biggest threat we face now as a nation is the possibility of terrorists ending up in the middle of one of our cities with deadlier weapons than have ever before been used against us - biological agents or a nuclear weapon or a chemical weapon of some kind to be able to threaten the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans," Cheney said.

"That's the ultimate threat. For us to have a strategy that's capable of defeating that threat, you've got to get your mind around that concept," Cheney said.

...

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20041019/D85QOUF80.html

dlouhe ale stoji za precteni !

Government Insider Says Bush Authorized 911 Attacks

From Thomas Buyea
9-17-4


Keep in mind when reading this, that the man being interviewed is no two-bit internet conspiracy buff.

Stanley Hilton was a senior advisor to Sen Bob Dole (R) and has personally known Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz for decades. This courageous man has risked his professional reputation, and possibly his life, to get this information out to people.

The following is from his latest visit to Alex Jones' radio show.

Forwarded with Compliments of Free Voice of America (FVOA): Accurate News and Interesting Commentary for Amerika's Huddled Masses Yearning to Breathe Free.

Note: All honor to Stanley Hilton for risking his life so that we may know the truth of 9/11.

The Bush Junta Unmasked

"This (9/11) was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder." --Stanley Hilton

Alex Jones interview of Stanley Hilton, attorney for 911 taxpayers' lawsuit

Alex Jones Radio Show September 10, 2004 Transcription by 'RatCat'

AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole's chief of staff, very successful counselor, lawyer. He represents hundreds of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing Bush for involvement in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out - half of New Yorkers think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for the next 35 minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it's great to have you on with us.

SH: Glad to be on.

AJ: We'll have to recap this when we start the next hour, but just in a nutshell, you have a lawsuit going, you've deposed a lot of military officers. You know the truth of 9/11. Just in a nutshell, what is your case alleging?

SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject - how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years.

AJ: That's right. They were all Straussian followers of a Nazi-like professor. And now they are setting it up here in America. Stanley, I know you deposed a lot of people and you've got your $7 million dollar lawsuit with hundreds of the victim's families involved.

SH: 7 billion, 7 billion

AJ: Yeah, 7 billion. Can you go over some of the new and incriminating evidence you've got of them ordering the attack?

SH: Yes, let me just say that this is a taxpayers' class action lawsuit as well as a suit on behalf of the families and the basic three arguments are they violated the Constitution by ordering this event. And secondly that they [garbled] fraudulent Federal Claims Act, Title 31 of the U.S. Code in which Bush presented false and fraudulent evidence to Congress to get the Iraq war authorization. And, of course, he related it to 9/11 and claimed that Saddam was involved with that, and all these lies.

AJ: Tell you what, stay there. Stanley, we've got to break. Let's come back and get into the evidence. BREAK

AJ: All right my friends, second hour, September 10th, 2004, the anniversary of the globalist attack coming up tomorrow. It's an amazing individual we have on the line. Bob Dole's former chief of staff, political scientist, a lawyer, he went to school with Rumsfeld and others, he wrote his thesis about how to turn America into a dictatorship using a fake Pearl Harbor attack. He's suing the U.S. government for carrying out 9/11. He has hundreds of the victims' families signing onto it - it's a $7 billion lawsuit. And he is Stanley Hilton. I know that a lot of stations just joined us in Los Angeles and Rhode Island and Missouri and Florida and all over. Please sir, recap what you were just stating and then let's get into the new evidence. And then we'll get into why you are being harassed by the FBI, as other FBI people are being harassed who have been blowing the whistle on this. So, this is really getting serious. Stanley, tell us all about it.

SH: Yeah, we are suing Bush, Condoleezza Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Mueller, etc. for complicity in personally not only allowing 9/11 to happen but in ordering it. The hijackers we retained and we had a witness who is married to one of them. The hijackers were U.S. undercover agents. They were double agents, paid by the FBI and the CIA to spy on Arab groups in this country. They were controlled. Their landlord was an FBI informant in San Diego and other places. And this was a direct, covert operation ordered, personally ordered by George W. Bush. Personally ordered. We have incriminating evidence, documents as well as witnesses, to this effect. It's not just incompetence - in spite of the fact that he is incompetent. The fact is he personally ordered this, knew about it. He, at one point, there were rehearsals of this. The reason why he appeared to be uninterested and nonchalant on September 11th - when those videos showed that Andrew Card whispered in his ear the [garbled] words about this he listened to kids reading the pet goat story, is that he thought this was another rehearsal. These people had dress-rehearsed this many times. He had seen simulated videos of this. In fact, he even made a Freudian slip a few months later at a California press conference when he said he had, quote, "seen on television the first plane attack the first tower." And that could not be possible because there was no video. What it was was the simulated video that he had gone over. So this was a personally government-ordered thing. We are suing them under the Constitution for violating Americans' rights, as well as under the federal Fraudulent Claims Act, for presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress to justify the bogus Iraq boondoggle war, for political gains. And also, under the RICO statute, under the Racketeering Corrupt Organization Act, for being a corrupt entity. And I've been harassed personally by the chief judge of the federal court who is instructing me personally to drop this suit, threatened to kick me off the court, after 30 years on the court. I've been harassed by the FBI. My staff has been harassed and threatened. My office has been broken into and this is the kind of government we are dealing with.

AJ: Absolutely and now it has come out - five separate drills of flying hijacked jets into buildings that morning - which you told us about before it even broke in the Associated Press. They were trying to get out ahead of you. You talked about how you interviewed military people who were told it was a drill that morning. Then to get out ahead of that, the news finally reported on it. Now, we've learned that all these operations - I want to get into that, I want to talk about the new incriminating evidence of ordering it and how they had drilled on this, how Cheney was in the bunker controlling this. That has even come out in the mainstream news but they won't release the details of that, Stanley. But what type of FBI harassment are you going through?

SH: First of all, my office was burglarized in San Francisco several months ago. Files were gone through and some files were seized - particularly the ones dealing with the lady that was married to one of the hijackers. Fortunately, I had spare copies in a hidden place so nothing disappeared permanently. But more significantly, FBI agents have been harassing one of my staff members and threatening them with vague but frightening threats of indicting them. And it's just total harassment. They have planted a spy, an undercover agent, in my organization, as we just recently discovered. In other words, these are Nazi Germany tactics. This is the kind of government you have in this country. This is what Bush is all about.

AJ: Stay there, Stanley, Bob Dole's former chief of staff. We'll come back after this quick break. Please stay with us. BREAK

AJ: All right, eight minutes, 25 seconds into the second hour. Stanley Hilton, political scientist, lawyer, Bob Dole's former chief of staff, is suing the government for 7 billion dollars for carrying out 9/11 and for racketeering. And he joins us now. During the break, I first really did the big interview with Stanley Hilton after I saw him attacked on Fox News. And that interview got massive attention. And then he kind of went underground for a while because a judge, we're going to talk about that, ordered him to not do any more interviews. And now he's back doing interviews. He's had his office broken into, FBI threats and harassment. Bottom line, he has deposed military individuals, wives of hijackers, you name it, it was a government operation. It has even come out in mainstream news, a piece here, a piece there. They had drills on 9/11, that's why NORAD stood down. Cheney was in control of the whole thing. Stanley Hilton has now gotten documents about how Bush ordered the whole operation. And I'll tell you right now, his life is in danger, folks. And he's got so much courage. He went to school with these neocons at the University of Chicago. He wrote his thesis on how the government could use terrorist attacks to set up martial law. He is the man for the time and folks wondered why he disappeared for a while and just did his lawsuit and wasn't doing interviews, it was because he was ordered to. Stanley, can you get into that for us?

SH: I did an interview with you, Alex, back in March of 2003, about a year and a half ago, and literally two weeks after that, I was contacted by the emissary of the chief judge of the federal court where I have the lawsuit. And I was warned not to publicize it but to keep it quiet and threatened with discipline. And it remained quiet until a couple of months ago and then I got on the air on some programs and some publicity and July 1st, I was threatened directly by the chief judge here, threatened with court discipline. This particular judge has been circulating communiqués to the other federal judges seeking anything negative she can get against me to try and discipline me after I've been on the court here for 30 years with no disciplinary problems at all. This is suddenly happening. And her assistants who are on the committee of the court met with me on July 1st in Palo Alto, California, and threatened me directly. They handed me a copy of the lawsuit and said that the judge wants me to dismiss this. What's this? She doesn't like the content of it. This is politically incorrect. This is outside the norm. I said I represented more than 400 plaintiffs, how am I going to dismiss this case? And they threatened me directly and they said, "the next time you'll be disciplined." And also they've threatened me not to go public, etc. And this is just outrageous.

AJ: It's all color of law. No direct orders, just all in your face.

SH: They sent a letter out, and of course they deny it's because of the political content of the suit but they told me directly on the phone that it is because of this suit and this judge is very, very angry, apparently has been in contact with Ashcroft's Justice Department. I got a call from Ashcroft's Justice Department a few months ago about this, demanding that I drop the suit, threatening sanctions and all kinds of things. I refused to drop it. AJ: Now let's go back over, you had them break into your office, harassment. Let's go over that in detail.

SH: My office was broken into about 6 months ago. The file cabinets - it was obvious they had been rifled through. Files were stolen. Files dealing with this particular case and particularly with the documents I had regarding the fact that the - some of these hijackers, at least some of them were on the payroll of the U.S. government as undercover FBI, CIA, double agents. They are spying on Arab groups in the U.S. And, in effect, all this led up to the effect that al Qaeda is a creation of the George Bush administration, basically. That the entity that he called al Qaeda is directly linked to George Bush. And all this stuff was stolen. Fortunately, I had copies. But this was just part of the harassment. The FBI has also been harassing some of my assistants and has planted a spy in our midst. And it is just outrageous that these Nazi tactics are being used - and the obstruction of justice, these people are criminals. And that's what's happening under the tremendous pressure here to just drop it. Or to shut up now and just go away.

AJ: Now, let's talk about what they want you to drop. Let's talk about, without giving names, the people you deposed, what really happened, the picture you've got. You said earlier that Bush ordered this, they were simulating this which they now admit there were simulations on that morning. Let's go over what they don't want you to talk about, Stanley.

SH: We have evidence both documentary as well as witness sworn statements from undercover former FBI agents, FBI informants, etc., that other officials in the Pentagon and the military and the Air Force that deal with the fact that there were many drills, many rehearsals for 9/11 before it happened. Bush had seen this simulated on TV many times. He blurted this out at a press conference in California a few months after 9/11 where he said he had, quote, seen the first plane hit the first building on the video. And that's not possible because there was no official video of that. There was one of the second plane not the first one. He had seen the first one. We do have some incriminating documents that Bush personally ordered 9/11 events. It was well planned. A FEMA official has admitted on tape that he was there the night before - September 10th, that is

AJ: And now Mayor Giuliani, a few months ago in the 911 Commission, admitted that - Tripod II. They had their whole command post already moved out of Building 7. Now, this is very, very important. This is a key area of this whole event. You said months before it came out on the CIA's own website and the Associated Press, you said I deposed people. They said there were drills that morning and exactly what happened, happening - that was the smoke-screen for the stand-down. And then to get out ahead of it, the CIA comes out and said yeah we were running a drill that morning. Now, we've learned that five, possibly six, were confirmed. Five of these - one drill with the exact same thing happening that actually happened, at the exact same time in the morning. That's why NORAD stood down with 24 different blips on the screen. You've said this. You brought this up first. Now, I know you can't get too much into detail but can you tell us how you learned of this?

SH: I have interviewed individuals in NORAD and the Air Force. I personally toured NORAD many years ago around the time that I worked for Dole. I'm very familiar with the operations at Cheyenne Mountain at Colorado Springs, where NORAD is. Individuals that work in NORAD as well as the Air Force have stated this, off the record, but the point is, yes, this was not just five drills but at least 35 drills over at least two months before September 11th. Everything was planned, the exact location

AJ: But five drills that day.

SH: That day, that day, and Bush thought it was a drill. That's the only explanation for why he appeared nonchalant

AJ: We also had NORAD officers and civilian air traffic controllers going, "Is this part of the exercise? Is this a drill?"

SH: Yes.

AJ: On the tapes and in TV interviews, they thought it was, quote, a drill.

SH: That's right. That's exactly what I said long before it became public. I've known about this since earlier in March of '03, as I stated before. This was all planned. This was a government-ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder. And now, obstruction of justice by attempting to use a federal judge and FBI agents to inhibit a legitimate civil lawsuit in this country, in federal court. Even a chief judge in this court tried to harass and threaten me personally for representing legitimate plaintiffs. And they got Clinton for allegedly lying under oath about Paula Jones and now - look what's happening now. And Ken Starr used to be across from me in Duke Law School in the early `70s and it´s interesting that he got away with trying to get Clinton impeached, so we have a far worse criminal sitting in the oval office today - somebody guilty of mass murder as well as obstruction of justice.

AJ: Well, I mean look, they say they never heard of a plan to fly planes into buildings - said it all over television - Rice, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft. And then we find out they were running all these drills that morning. Even if they weren't involved, that proves they were liars about ever hearing of such a plan.

SH: Well, I'm trying to take their depositions - I've been trying to take their depositions for months. They've been trying to object to it. They will have to admit they were either lying then or now. It's clearly perjury either way. They are liars and perjurers; that's what they are. These are the people that we have running this government and, of course, they knew about it. How are they going to claim now that they didn't know about these drills? Their idea is that nobody knew anything. It's the old know-nothing mentality. And how anybody considers this believable is beyond me.

AJ: All right, now people ask how could a huge organization, how could the AWACs, how could the military let this happen; whereas before, if your Cessna got off course for five minutes, they would launch F-16s on you. It's real simple. It's what Stanley Hilton said here a year and a half ago. It's what came out in the news after that. The military, good people, were told this was all a drill. And it was not a drill. And ABC News admits that Cheney was in control of [?] out of the White House [?] and that he ordered the military to quote "do something." Our inside sources from Hilton and others say it was a stand down and they admit they will not release that under national security. Stanley?

SH: Well they are going to admit it, they're going to release it in the court case because if you demand it under subpoena powers and they must release it. And part of our lawsuit is brought in the name of the U.S. because under the federal fraudulent [Claims Act], we accuse the Bush Administration of presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress. And under the statutes of Title 31 of the U.S. code, they must release this information. That's why they are trying to threaten me, harass me, invade my office, steal my files, commit blatant obstruction of justice and other crimes to try and prevent a legitimate civil suit from exposing these criminals and their acts of treason and mass murder.

AJ: I think you need to publicly tell folks that you are not planning suicide. Would you like to tell folks that?

SH: (laughs) I'm not planning suicide. I've got family and I'm not planning that but I don't like the threats I'm under - but I can tell you this, it's taking a toll emotionally on me and my staff. And particularly, when you get a threat from the chief judge of your own court.

AJ: Why have you decided to go public again after a year of being under the radar? SH: Because the more and more evidence that I've been adducing over a year and a half has made it so obvious to me that this was now without any doubt a government operation and that it amounts to the biggest act of treason and mass murder in American history. I mean George Bush makes Benedict Arnold look like a patriot. He makes Benedict Arnold look like George Washington. I mean that's what we have - a criminal and a traitor sitting in the White House pretending he's a patriot, wrapping himself in the flag. And it's pretty disgusting because the other side of the so-called opposition, the Kerry camp is just saying nothing because they're afraid to speak.

AJ: Stay right there. We'll be right back.

BREAK

AJ: Stanley Hilton will be with us for another 15 or 16 minutes. Then he's got to go into court. Bob Dole's former chief of staff, political scientist, lawyer, represents 400 plus plaintiffs - most of them victims of 9/11. When I was in New York last week, everybody I was talking to, I mean 90 plus percent of them at ground zero - "I had family, I worked in the buildings, my son's a Navy Seal - he called the night before and said don't go to work." You know, all of this, and then now they never had any idea - and it turns out they had all these drills - and one drill of hijacked jets flying into the World Trade Center and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning. That morning - come on people! And Stanley Hilton brought all this out on this show before it was in the mainstream news. And I was talking to him during the break. I mean, the harassment, the moles, the threatening of his staff, the judge threatening him. Stanley, let's get specifically into the documents that you have now got that they have now been robbing you for, that you luckily, thank God had copies. Specifically, Bush ordering this. Can you get into that for us - ordering 9/11?

SH: National Security Council classified documents which [garbled] and it's was part of a series of documents that were involved with the drill documents. This was all planned - they had it on videotape. These planes were controlled by remote control, as I stated previously a year and a half ago, there's a system called Cyclops. There is a computer chip in the nose of the plane and it enables the ground control, the military ground control, to disable the pilot's control of the plane and to control it and to fly it directly into those towers. That's what happened. It's also a technology used on what's called the Global Hawk, which is an aircraft drone - a remote- controlled aircraft. And they were doing it. We are talking about National Security Council classified documents that clearly indicated that [garbled] had a green light to order this to go and this is no drill. These drills that were running were clearly a dress rehearsal and this was a government operation. You wonder why these people are trying to threaten people and trying to intimidate people who have written this suit, I guess if you murdered 3000 of your own citizens, in conjunction with the corrupt Royal family of Saudi Arabia as Bush did. And if you then waste billions more on a worthless garbage war in Iraq, I guess you've got something to worry about and you want to threaten people to prevent it from coming out.

AJ: I mean let's look at this. Not only are there dress rehearsals, they are smoke screens so the good military stands down and doesn't know what's happening. But it's now coming out, even in mainstream news, that yes these drills were going on. Yes, and some of these drills, quote, passenger-type jets were under remote control - this is decades old technology. In 1958, NORAD was [ ] old jets and using them for target practice. Decades ago they flew jumbo jets from LA to Sidney Australia. So since that's going on, everybody knows that. And it's the same MO. Just like the first World Trade Center [bombing] where they get two retarded men who followed this blind sheik who had a tiny mosque above a pizza parlor. And they set them up as the patsies. Then the FBI cooks the bomb, trains the drivers. This informant goes, "You're not going to bomb the building? They go "Yeah, we're letting it go forward." He tapes them to protect themselves. The two retarded gentlemen, thank God, didn't park it up against the column, as the FBI instructed them to do, so it didn't bring down the tower - because you have to be right up against the column. That doesn't happen. Yet, it's the same thing with 9/11. You've got these CIA agents, these Arabs, who were trained at U.S. military bases, Pensacola Naval Air Station - mainstream media, out creating their legends for this background. They're on board the aircraft. My military sources say nerve gas kills everybody on board the plane - nerve gas packets. Then they fly the planes into buildings. From your inside sources, is that accurate?

SH: It's one of the things that we are looking into - that nerve gas or something else disabled people. It's possible. I can't say for sure to be honest with you

AJ: All you know is they were government agents and they were on board and the planes were remote controlled.

SH: Yeah, it was basically a smokescreen. I mean, the events of the hijackings, how someone snuck in those cutters, it was a plant. It was like a classic decoy. I've got some military background. And it's called decoy. It's a decoy operation. You make the people focus on the decoy to avoid looking at the real criminals. So they are focusing on these so-called nineteen hijackers and saying, "Oh, it must have been these Arabs. When, in fact, the guilty person is at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue - sitting in the oval office. That's the guilty person. That's the one who authorized it. There is only one man who could have authorized this operation and that's Bush. And anyone at NORAD will tell you as I have been told personally at NORAD in the war control room, there is only one man who has the power to do this kind of thing and that's Bush. Even though many believe he's a puppet. And I think in many ways he is. The fact of the matter is where was [ ] Cheney, Rumsfeld and these other traitors. The fact is Bush personally ordered and he's guilty and liable and he's going to be re-elected apparently because the media's asleep and [garbled] for Bush. AJ: Well, the media is owned by the same military industrial complex that carried out the attacks.

SH: Yeah, the media is only interested in maintaining the official government fantasy that this was a little lone Arab. These Arabs couldn't even steer that plane down a runway.

AJ: Stay there Stanley, final segment coming up. BREAK

AJ: Mr. Hilton, when you talk to these FBI agents, when you talk to these military men and women, what's their attitude? They've got to be pretty freaked out to have the big picture and know what actually happened on 9/11.

SH: Yes, you know it's like clouds just before a thunderstorm in the sense that they are sort of pregnant with rage. They are just enraged at the criminal politicians who have perverted and misused the government to murder its own citizens and pursue these dubious political ends. And many of them, in increasing numbers, are willing to talk and will talk under subpoena - but only under subpoena because the official party line of the government is shut up and don't talk to the trial lawyer. But more and more, they are very outraged that part of the government has done this to its own people, to its own people. I mean you have to go back to Stalin to see something - not even Hitler did this to his own people. You have to look at Stalin who murdered the Kulaks, the Russians for his own dubious gains. Also we've got - we have a Stalinist mentality in this country. And, if these people pose as patriots and wrap themselves in the flag, it's disgusting. I wanted also to point out that the Japanese television network, Asahi, is going to be airing a special on primetime tomorrow, on September 11th. They interviewed me for eight hours a couple of weeks ago. I'll be on that. I wish - of course, the America media don't care so they are not going to care. But in Japan, people are very serious in interviewing me and others. And we have a website now, called deprogram.info, if more people are interested: www.deprogram.info. But the other thing, I just wanted to say that if anything happens to me - and I don't know why - because I'm being threatened here now. And it seems you can't bring a case in this country anymore against criminals in power without being threatened. And this is how they operate. The stakes are pretty high when you've got a world historical level of treason and fraud by this government against it's own people. I guess this is what you have to expect.

AJ: Stanley, the globalists, the new world order crowd, definitely intend to carry out more terror attacks. I know they would have carried out more attacks if we wouldn't have done what we've been up to, if you wouldn't have been out there boldly speaking out and many others. And then their electronic Berlin wall has a bunch of cracks in it now. Thanks to good people like yourself and many others who are speaking out and telling the truth. But do you think that they may carry out what they've been hyping - a suitcase nuke attack, a biological release to try to smokescreen all of this? I know it's a catch 22, you've got to expose the murderers. We've got to get the word out on this but some government people that I've talk to say, "Yeah, but if you do that, they are going to go even more hard core and must totally try to take over." But I say regardless, they are already doing that. So what do you say to that?

SH: Well, yeah, I think they have an agenda. They have contingency plans. I think they are laying low now because there are an increasing number of people, like myself, who are openly challenging them and accusing them of criminal conduct. I think they would have done it again if we had not spoken up. I think they're planning, what they would like to do is silence any dissenters. That's why we are trying to get the Patriot Act declared unconstitutional in this lawsuit also.

AJ: Let's talk about polls. In the beginning a patriot is a scarce man, hated and feared, but in time when his cause succeeds, the timid join him, because then it costs nothing to be a patriot. You are one of those guys who hit the barbwire for us, or figuratively jumped on the hand grenade for America. But when you've got a Zogby poll, who is highly respected, half of New Yorkers believe that the government was involved. When you have a Canadian poll, 63% on average believe that the U.S. government was involved. And some groups, as high as 76% in polls believe the government was involved. European polls, two- thirds show the same thing. We have German defense ministers and technology ministers and another member of their government now, three of them going public, known conservatives, and progressives. You have an environment minister, Michael Meacher, saying that if they didn't do it, they sure as hell knew what was going on. Look, if anybody who is a thinking person looks at the evidence, their official story is impossible. Then you investigate and they are involved in it. Comments to this massive awakening and what's happening.

SH: Well, I think that's why they want the Patriot Act to suppress political dissent. They have to, they're anticipating, they are not dumb individuals. I know these people personally, Wolfowitz. These are criminal individuals but they are smart and so they anticipated political dissent. And that's why, like the Nazis, their forebears, and their blood brothers, the Nazis and the Stalinists, they're all for political repression. Every corrupt and criminal government has done this - they suppress their own people: Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, Mao Tse-Tung, that's why we have the Patriot Act. So it's hand in hand. They had it planned to go right up to September 11th, this was all part of the plan. You have to do it. It was part of my senior thesis. You must follow through the terrorists attacks with a political suppression mechanism in the law. And that's why they want Patriot I and Patriot II and their plans are to continue launching more terrorist attacks to justify even more repression. The goal is to make this a one party dictatorship in this country, to pursue their dubious ends with their blood brothers like the Saudi Royal family. And also, historical blood brothers, such as the Nazi Germany and the Communist Russian. That's the goal

AJ: You've got to go in just a minute or two. But I wanted to also tell you about New York. Sound cannons that are used in Iraq, they're against us. Men in black ski masks. 41,000 police, accredited media being arrested randomly. Children being arrested, people in wheelchairs, 2000 plus people put in a camp with barbwire fences inside with no bathrooms. You had to have permission to go to the porta-potties. Police screaming at you. It had nothing to do with terrorism. They are openly setting the precedent for martial law.

SH: Well, that's right, the word terrorist is now being overly broad and overly defined [garbled] and also, you know, it's like the word communist was used for anything during the McCarthy witch hunt. And anybody can be called a terrorist by Bush's definition. But the irony is that the number one terrorist in the world is living at the White House at the oval office today. That's the real irony. For sheer hypocrisy, I think he deserves the world prize and ought to be in the Ripley book, Believe It or Not, and the Guinness book of world records for sheer brazen chicanery and fraud.

AJ: Let me ask you a question on this because this is the experience that I had. Watching television, watching the killers, watching those that are guilty, stand up there as our saviors is incredibly painful. It's like watching Ted Bundy being the judge at his own trial. I mean it is just painful to know who these people are. To see them putting America in a shredder. Now we are going to have forced psychological testing of every American, forced drugging, you know Pan-American unions, I mean it's just all happening, it's in our face, Stanley.

SH: Yeah, it's very disturbing and as one who has studied the theory and concept of dictatorships, I personally interviewed Albert Speer, who was Hitler's armaments minister. I interviewed him in 1981 in Munich. And I've studied the psychology and history of totalitarianism and there is no question that it's very frightening. And it has, today, with high technology, albeit for the first time in history, the chance of having a world empire dominated by corrupt, technologically oriented government - an elite government. And they've got now what people like Napoleon and Hitler didn't have, which is the technological means to dominate not only their own country but others - the world.

AJ: The answer is to expose them as the terrorists, to show how PNAC [Project for the New American Century] said we need helpful Pearl Harbor events, to show how Northwoods called for the exact 9/11-style attacks, to show their own plans. And to force people to face this horror. What are they going to do in a year or two when 80% of us, not half of us, know the truth?

SH: Well, that's why they want repression and, then again, the ancient old diversion, launch another terrorist attack to get people to pitch it away. I mean who knows what they'll do next. I mean their capacity for ingenious creation of these events is sort of unraveled. I mean there is no limit. My guess is they are going to try another stunt - maybe a stunt just before the election to justify getting Bush reelected. Although it seems like he is running against a straw man or a ghost right now, anyway. But, my guess is they'll try some other tactic to get people's attention away from 9/11 if it gets to be too much attention. What you really want is for the public to just lose interest because the public - and it's like remember the Alamo, you know, people don't forget things like that. To me it's like the Alamo, remember 9/11, that ought to be the slogan for this outrageous act of treason. That's what it is. It's not

AJ: We are at a crossroads, I don't think they anticipated this much resistance, Stanley.

SH: Yeah, I hope they are truly wrong and as incompetent as they are corrupt and guilty. That means their incompetence is exceeded only by their corruption and their guilt. And eventually, if enough people are going to get outraged enough, these people in the bureaucracy and in the civil service and our military, and eventually we can get people under subpoena these individuals will be exposed.

AJ: Stanley, their whole operation hinges on us being naïve and not recognizing evil. This is what they got with Hitler and others. People couldn't recognize evil so they continued to repeat succumbing to it. We are recognizing it this time. We are putting our lives, our treasure, our future on the line for freedom because we cannot let these blood-thirsty control freak terrorists capture us and use us and turn us into the empire and have a draft and use us as their slaves to invade the planet. And that's their PNAC plan. Stanley Hilton, I know you've got to get to court. God bless you. I want to thank you for being here with us today. Can we get you back on next week?

SH: Sure, just give me a call.

AJ: God bless you my friend. Any closing comments?

SH: My closing comments would be, I think people ought to just think about the consequence of having someone like Bush in the White House and the danger for the future that these sorts of individuals pose. This is not just a historical event of the past. This is part of the plan and the camera is still rolling. They have an agenda. These individuals are extremely dangerous. They are armed and dangerous. They pose a clear and dangerous threat to every freedom-loving person not only American but in the whole world.

AJ: You are absolutely right Stanley Hilton. They have captured the government. They have not captured the peoples' minds and they are counting on us not facing up to it.

SH: And they are counting on the repressive Patriot Act and threats and chief judges and FBI agents threatening people who are exposing them. That's what they are counting on.

AJ: But you're not backing down are you, my friend.

SH: No, I'm not

AJ: Well, we all stand with you, my brother, and God bless you.

SH: All right. Thank you.

To hear Alex's interview with Stanley Hilton -
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/091204hilton.htm

http://www.rense.com/general57/aale.htm

BREAKING NEWS: The Dirty Bomb may be a Neocon "Strategery" to Stomp US [you and me] into Submission

http://karmakat.typepad.com/picasso_dreams/2004/10/breaking_news_t.html

Top 10 Pieces of 9-11 Evidence

Frank Levi (16 Aug 02) - updated 29th Sept

Overwhelmingly convenient pieces of evidence which mostly came to light very quickly after 9-11. The fact is - before going to war the public need to be thoroughly convinced that the war is really necessary. In my opinion the majority of the following pieces of evidence are just too coincidental to be anything other than psychological propaganda: Arabs + pilots = suicide hijackers

If you think about it - all the evidence we have that those 19 suspects actually committed the crime is circumstantial at best. Even the flight attendant who supposedly gave the seat numbers the hijackers came from gave different seat numbers to those of some of the suspected hijackers

1. Mohamed Atta's Luggage
2. Ziad Jarrah's Letter to his Girlfriend
3. The Letter from the Ringleader
4. The Magic Passport
5. Ziad Jarrah's Passport Photo
6. DIY Arab Hijacker Kits left in Cars
7. DIY Arab Hijacker Kits left elsewhere
8. Arabs Starting Fights Next to Cars full of DIY Arab Hijacker Kits
9. Copies of the Koran left in Strip Clubs
10. Ziad Jarrah builds a replica of a Boeing cockpit in his apartment

1. Mohamed Atta's Luggage

Mohamed Atta , we are told, brought not one but two suitcases with him on his final suicide trip. Some might say it was a little convenient for the FBI investigators that these two suitcases did not make it from his connecting flight onto his suicide flight.

What was apparently in the bags: Numerous documents including a letter of recommendation and education related documents. (In other words, stuff you would bring to a job interview, not a suicide attack). A handheld flight computer, flight simulator manuals, two videotapes about Boeing aircraft, a slide rule flight calculator, a copy of the Koran, his will and presumably a lot of socks and underpants. All this stuff would have been in the luggage hold, so why bring it? If he was really committing an act of suicidal Jihad he would have brought his Koran on board.

http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/atta/resources/documents/fbiaffidavit1.htm

The link above has a scanned copy of the FBI affidavit detailing the contents of Atta's car and his luggage. It doesn't mention the letter he apparently wrote to the other hijackers.

UPDATE:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=28904

Read the above article carefully. Notice in particular:

"Because of an American policy instated just before Sept. 11 to curb baggage-related flight delays, Atta's two checked bags – which had been held up from an earlier flight – were left behind in Boston" - another one of those changes which took place just before Sept 11th. Like Jeb Bush adding the clause about terrorism to his Executive Order just before Sept 11th

"the Dallas-based carrier, which continues to gag all employees from talking about the Sept. 11 hijackings." - what are they hiding?

"As it happens, Atta was the only passenger among the 81 aboard American Flight 11 whose luggage didn't make the flight"

What are the odds of that? The chances that the left luggage was Atta's is 81 to 1. The chances of the two pieces of luggage being left behind both being Atta's (please correct this if you are a mathematician) 81 times 80 which is 1 in 6480. Multiply this by the odds of any luggage being left behind, decrease this slightly by the likelihood that a person's luggage items are quite likely to be close to each other in the plane. All the same, you're still looking at odds of thousands to one.

Notice also the list of things which were in the suitcase. Someone pointed out that the hijackers would have brought luggage so as to appear normal. Why bring a video about Boeing aircraft?

2. Ziad Jarrah's Letter to his Girlfriend

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/1664161.stm

Jarrah apparently wrote a farewell letter to his girlfriend - but in spite of having been with her for several years, he managed to send it to the wrong address. So the letter ended up in the hands of the FBI. How lucky is that !

Relatives think that the letter to the girlfriend is a fake.

3. The Letter From the Ringleader

This is the letter apparently from Atta giving last minute encouragement to his pals before going to Allah. Conveniently Mohamed left a copy in his suitcase , someone else left a copy in their apartment for the FBI to find, and miraculously, a third copy was found amongst the tiny pieces of debris at the Flight 93 crash site.

Robert Fisk wrote an article in the Independent last September which effectively ridicules this particular piece of "evidence"

http://www.eionews.addr.com/psyops/news/atta_lastletter_questions.htm - this is a copy of the original article. Read it.

4. The Magic Passport

Many people have pointed this one out since last September. How is it that the FBI found an intact passport belonging to one of the hijackers "several blocks away" from the World Trade centre when all the indestructible black boxes in the aeroplanes were destroyed or lost?

What's really scary is that people actually believe this....

5. Ziad Jarrah's Passport Photo








A fragment of a hijackers passport photo was found at the flight 93 crash site. Just as a side issue - why did they insist on bringing passports when they were on internal flights - AND on suicide missions???

CNN reported it was Jarrah's passport: http://europe.cnn.com/2002/US/08/01/cia.hijacker/

I got this photo from the Google Cache for the FBI Lab site: www.google.co.uk

The FBI found a fragment of one of the Hijackers passports (supposedly Ziad Jarrah) at the Flight 93 crash site. If you look closely at all the faces here you will see it's not any of these people. It's not Jarrah (right), the face is a completely different shape. And its not Alnami (top right) the eyebrows are wrong and the gap between nose and lips is larger. This could be further evidence that the hijackers were all using fake ID's. If we don't know who they were, we don't know who did it.






6. DIY Arab Hijacker Kits left in Cars

Another car (not Atta's rental car) was found at Logan airport containing Arabic-language flight training manuals. If Atta was the pilot, why did anyone else need to bring flight manuals with them? A bit of last minute revision?

7. DIY Arab Hijacker Kits left elsewhere

http://www.augustachronicle.com/stories/091601/ter_124-7402.shtml

Boeing 757 manuals, three illustrated martial arts books and an 8-inch stack of East Coast flight maps

Al-Shehhi checked out last Sunday without taking a three-ring binder full of handwritten notes, an English-German dictionary, an airplane fuel tester, a protractor, tote bag, aircraft manuals, maps and books, Surma said.

This is a real "When I grow up I want to be a hijacker" set.

8. Arabs Starting Fights Next to Cars full of DIY Arab Hijacker Kits

http://www.abqtrib.com/archives/news01/091201_news_boston.shtml

The above link mentions this story - anonymous person leads FBI to car were he remembers getting into an argument with some Arabs earlier on. Obviously trying very hard not to draw attention to themselves, these Arab-suicide-hijackers.

9. Copies of the Koran left in Strip Clubs

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/14/national/main311268.shtml

"Kap said he gave the FBI credit card receipts, photocopied driver's licenses, a business card left by one man and a copy of the Quran - the sacred book of Islam - that was left at the bar."

Yeah, yeah - devout Moslems like Atta really go to strip clubs and really leave copies of the Koran at the bar. Not to mention all the other convenient stuff.

10. Ziad Jarrah builds a replica of a Boeing cockpit in his apartment

http://www.boston.com/news/packages/underattack/news/planes_reconstruction.htm - mentions the replica cockpit built by Jarrah

What would you actually gain from this as a suicide hijacker? This is the cockpit, here is the door, here are the pilots. Not massively complicated. More likely to be done by a twelve year old obsessed with planes or an FBI agent trying to pin the blame on someone?

(Would you believe he built it entirely out of cornflakes packets, egg boxes and toilet-paper tubes. He cut them up very carefully with a box-cutter knife. (Ziad made sure he had adult supervision first which you should do too if you want to build one.) Next week: Ziad builds a radioactive dirty-bomb out of used matches.)

http://www.libertyforum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=consp_911&Number=293035561#Post293035561