• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    GORGworld conspiracy // 911 // new world order ... part 3 :: Love your local Illuminati :)
    BEEJBI
    BEEJBI --- ---
    no sice uz sme na hranici OT, ale jo, 44% rozpoctu ide na zemedelstvi...je to moc...ultraliberalni stat = korporatni anarchie :) ale niektore ultraliberalne myslienky nie su zle...

    kazdopadne EU planuje dotace znizovat v nasledujucich rokoch (myslim ze tak do 2010) aspon na 38% rozpoctu a mozno aj nizsie...a zvysne prachy pouzit na rozvoj venkova (cestovny ruch) a preorientaciu napr. na technicke plodiny (konope, repka...)
    BULHI
    BULHI --- ---
    taky si myslim ze ultraliberalni stat by nakonec spatne dopadl, ale udrzovat umele na zivu nejakou produkci, i kdyz je to natolik tradicni a stezejni odvetvi jako zemedelstvi, je zcestny.. samozrejme ze by reforma byla dost drasticka, ale usetreny penize by jiste dokazaly pri vhodnym vyuziti ekonomiku katapultovat kupredu neuveritelnym zpusobem... z rozpoctu eu jde skoro 50% do zemedelstvi, cili neco kolem 40 mld eur! ale je to jen o politicky odvaze, bohuzel..
    BEEJBI
    BEEJBI --- ---
    regulacie nie su dobre, na druhej strane prilis malo kontrolovany trh, resp. velka liberalizacia zase dava vacsiu moc do ruk korporaciam...je to bludny kruh, imho nieco regulovat treba a nieco nie, vystihnut spravnu mieru je ale skoro nemozne
    JDEE
    JDEE --- ---
    Jestlize jsem psal o zruseni dotaci, mel jsem na mysli jejich postupny(spis, ale ryhly rekneme na skale 10 az 15 let) prechod k nule.Jsem presvdcen o skodlivosti veskerych regulaci.
    BEEJBI
    BEEJBI --- ---
    so zemedelstvim je to daleko zlozitejsi problem...keby sa ceny znizili, tak skrachuje spuysta malych zemedelcu...keby zrusili dotacie, stane sa to iste...viete ze napr. v polsku ma zemedelstvi az 29% zamestnanych ludi? a francie je na tom podobne...preto sa boja znizovat dotac3e alebo ceny, lebo by okamzite bol strajk, zase by zablokovali dalnice a pod...fer to nie je, ale riesenie nie je take jednoduche
    BULHI
    BULHI --- ---
    to nadbytecny obili je proste objem, kterej se pri soucasny cene neproda.. je to objem, kterej trh nechce a pokud bychom ho chteli vyvazet nekam mimo Evropu, tak to jeho cenu jeste zvedne a bude uz uplne neprodejny, leda ze by se na nej dala dalsi dotace a to uz je fakt lepsi to spalit...
    JDEE
    JDEE --- ---
    GYD: To obili zplesnivelo, nebot se zbytecne valelo ve skladech aniz by se nekdo zabyval myslenkou jeho prodeje(Omezeni direktivami EU) pripadne resenim a predchazenim nadprodukci(zruseni dotaci do zemedelstvi, ktere nici trh).
    GYD
    GYD --- ---
    JAXXE: ja bych rekl, ze tady Zvedavec prestrelil - taky mi to znelo divne. Pak jsem si zapatral a ukazalo se, ze to obili, co chteli spalovat, je nepouzitelny jako potravina.
    JDEE
    JDEE --- ---
    Topeni obilim, vysoke dane na tabakove vyrobky jsou jeste mnohem absudnejsi, vezmeme-li v uvahu zemedelske dotace v ramci EU.
    PS. Ano, v EU se pestuje i tabak a jsou na neho poskytovany vysoke dotace.
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    must see

    George Galloway on Iraq and US War Crimes: Full Testimony to the US Senate

    http://globalresearch.ca/articles/GAL505A.html
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    v UK bude vlada regulovat teplotu vasi vody, abyste se nahodou neoparili ! ;))

    There is a new danger coming to your bathroom: John Prescott is getting into the plumbing.

    Under plans to be decided in detail with industry leaders this week, the Government is preparing to control the maximum temperature of Britain's baths.

    Regulations will require that devices limiting the temperature of water available from bath taps be fitted in all new homes. The law, which the Government says is "essential" to prevent scalding, is expected to take effect in 2006.

    The measures brought criticism from both the Conservatives, who spoke of "nanny state interference", and plumbers, who called the plan "bathwatergate".

    http://news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/05/15/nbath15.xml
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Topit obilím?
    (19.5.05)

    Pamatuji si, jak někdy v sedmé třídě základní školy nám učitel vyprávěl o kapitalistech, kteří polévají úrodu pomerančů naftou a pálí ji, aby nemuseli snížit ceny. Myslel jsem si tenkrát (v podstatě až do dneška), že to byl výplod zuřivé protikapitalistické propagandy.

    Dnes mi někdo poslal článek z Lidovek ČEZ nebude spalovat obilí v elektrárnách. Praví se v něm, že ač ČEZ o této možnosti uvažovaly, nakonec obilí spalovat nebudou. Nicméně existují v Čechách prý desítky obcí a stovky domácností, které obilím běžně topí. Je to prý velmi ekologické. A není na tom nic špatného.

    Jako důvod se uvádí nadúroda, která je prý stejně škodlivá jako neúroda.

    Také máte pocit, že je něco shnilého v systému, který ničí přebytky vypěstované z půdy, namísto aby je prodal či rozdal nebo zlevnil potraviny z nich vyráběné?

    A to už nemluvím o tom, že například omezení pesticidů, herbicidů a hnojení by rovněž vedlo ke kýženému snížení úrody. A ještě by to bylo levnější a šetrnější k planetě. Ale tak daleko nikdo z magorů orientovaných na profit zřejmě nedohlédne.

    Zdroj: http://lidovky.centrum.cz/clanek.phtml?id=356885

    http://www.zvedavec.org/vezkratce_1002.htm?PHPSESSID=710770895759ce92b52e81ad4e25d0e9
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Darth Vader and the New World Order

    Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith mirrors reality

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2005/170505nwodarthvader.htm

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2005/190505perspective.htm
    BULHI
    BULHI --- ---
    tady je o dost lepsi clanek

    Bush likely to back weapons in space
    BULHI
    BULHI --- ---
    Neni to sice uplne k tematu, ale ukazuje to na vzrustajici sebevedomi americkych vojenskych predstavitelu, kteri zrejme citi historickou sanci prosadit neco, co by pred par lety bylo naprosto nemyslitelny. Kdo vi ceho se jeste dockame, myslim ze neni daleko doba, kdy nekdo prijde s tim, ze jaderny testy jsou potreba a jejich zakaz je poslapani prava americkych obcanu na obranu svoji zeme.

    USA chtějí umístit zbraně ve vesmíru

    (link prevzat z jine diskuze)
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    'Superpower behind' Burma blasts

    The government says the terrorists and explosive came from abroad

    Burma's government says rebels trained abroad by a "superpower" were behind last week's bombings at three shopping centres in the capital, Rangoon.

    Nineteen people are known to have died in the blasts, with 69 injured.

    The explosives used were not available in the country, and the plot was funded by a "world famous organisation", the military government said.


    The junta said it believes the attacks were led by the Thailand-based All Burma Students Democratic Front.

    "It is crystal clear that the terrorists... and the time bombs originated from training conducted with foreign experts at a place in a neighbouring country by a world famous organisation of a certain superpower nation," Information Minister Kyaw Hsan told reporters.

    He also accused the unnamed organisation - based in Washington - of having given $100,000 (£54,000) to a dissident group led by a cousin of pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi.

    The group then sent a group of saboteurs to Burma to carry out the attacks
    , helped by ethnic Shan, Karen and Karenni rebels, the minister added.

    The three minority ethnic groups have denied any involvement.

    Even though the minister refused to name the suspected country and organisation, correspondents believe he was referring to the United States and the CIA.

    The bombs went off at two supermarkets and at a conference centre in Rangoon on 7 May.

    The Thai-based National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma, which has led a government in exile since 1990, has alleged the government might have had the bombs planted to blame the opposition.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4549109.stm
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Neuromarketing: Peeking Inside the Black Box

    by Karl Moore

    The field of marketing research marches onward year after year, with new techniques and new approaches.
    For example, I remember when "garbology" first came out. Many found much amusement in the idea of rooting through someone's garbage to better understand their consumption patterns. Today, it is much more accepted, though still assigned to more junior market researchers.

    A type of marketing research that has recently garnered considerable attention is "neuromarketing." What set off this interest was a study published in the October 14, 2004 issue of Neuron. Researchers monitored brain scans of 67 people who were given a blind taste test of Coca-Cola and Pepsi. Using brain scanners, they could see that each soft drink "lit up" the brain's reward system.

    Participants were evenly split about which drink they preferred. However, when the same people were told what they were drinking, activity in a different set of brain regions were engaged. Three out of four said they preferred Coca-Cola. This demonstrated in a fairly dramatic way that brand matters.

    For as long has I have been a student of marketing, we have regarded the human mind as a "black box," something which was rather mysterious. We marketers do our thing: beaming advertising, direct marketing pieces, a sales pitch or what have you to our target market.

    We can measure the results of that marketing effort, in terms of sales, awareness, liking and so on. We understand reasonably well the beginning and end of the process—but not the vital part in the middle. That is, what goes on inside the mind of the consumer.

    This is what is changing with neuromarketing. First, let me take a run at defining it.

    The basic fundamental science underlying neuromarketing is neuroscience, which is the study of the how the brain gives rise to the mind. In other words, neuroscience is how the brain enables us to perceive, think, make decisions, feel emotions, communicate (i.e., the neural basis of human experience).


    Techniques used by neuroscience are psychophysics (reaction times/detection levels), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). The most interesting of these to neuromarketing is fMRI scanning. I am sure we all have seen these on ER or other television shows, where the patient is slid inside a machine that hums and makes various other noises.

    Neuromarketing is the application of the techniques of neuroscience to marketing stimuli—in layman's terms, to see how the brain "lights up" when exposed to our marketing efforts.

    Science has made a great deal of progress in understanding our brains. Many called the '90s the "decade of the brain," and in the last 20 years there have been more than 100,000 scientific publications on this most complex of organs.

    It is early days for neuroscience. But what research has been done has stirred up a considerable amount of interest in the idea of neuromarketing. It is being touted by some as the next big thing. If marketers can use science to locate consumers' "buy buttons," then we have gotten closer to opening the "black box" of the consumer's mind.

    The best use of neuromarketing is in predicting behavior
    —spotting the advertisements that people remember, selecting the media format that works best and how what consumers actually do differs from what they tell focus groups. Other uses I have seen or read about include reactions to movie trailers, choices about automobiles, the appeal of a pretty face and visceral reactions to political campaign advertising.

    Neuromarketing has critics. I share some of their fears. Neuromarketing raises the possibility of a too-useful tool for Big Brother, for example. Other concerns include the costs and the unpleasantness of a scan.

    Dr. Gemma Calvert, cofounder of Neurosense Ltd., a neuromarketing consultancy, noted in a recent issue of the London Times: "MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) is not as expensive as people think and is only slightly more expensive than the average cost of conducting focus groups...and OK, it is not pleasant, but it isn't unpleasant either. We have never had a problem getting people into scanners; most have read about brain imaging and are really keen to have a go."

    At this point, brain scanning is being used as an adjunct to traditional market research techniques, including focus groups. In the future, perhaps 5-10 years off at this point, I think brain scanning may well become a routine part of corporate marketing strategies.
    MarketingProfs.com

    http://www.marketingprofs.com/5/moore1.asp
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Americká armáda čelí dezercím

    Seržant Kevin Benderman nemůže ten obraz ze své hlavy dostat: Vybombardované vesnice a zoufalí lidé. Psi ohlodávají těla vržená do masových hrobů. A nejhorší vzpomínka ze všech – irácké děvčátko, ne víc než osmileté, se spálenou rukou plnou puchýřů, které plné bolesti křičí a sténá. Letos v lednu se staly tyto vzpomínky pro seržanta nesnesitelnými, zažádal proto o propuštění a o to, aby byl považován za odpírače. Armáda jeho žádost odmítla a obvinila jej z dezerce. Hrozí mu až sedm let ve vězení. “Myslím-li upřímně to, co říkám, a mají-li moje kroky takové dopady, jsem připraven si za nimi stát. Mám-li jít do vězení kvůli tomu, že nechci nikoho zabíjet, tak to tak bude,“ říká Benderman. Není přitom sám: na dezerci z armády se podle aktivistů dramaticky podepsala takzvaná válka proti terorismu. Aktivisté tvrdí, že po 11. září 2001 se počet volání na pomocnou linku pro dezertéry a odpírače zvýšil o polovinu. Loni aktivisté přijali více než 30 tisíc volání. "Lidé nám volají proto, že to je skutečný problém,“ říká Robert Dove, který v jedné takové organizaci na pomoc vojákům pracuje. Lidé, kteří dobrovolníky kontaktují, zahrnují veterány, jako je seržant Benderman, i lidí, jako je Jeremiah Adler, 18letý idealista z Portlandu, který do armády vstoupil, aby změnil vnitřní kulturu, která v ní panuje. Během několika dní v přijímacím kampu ve Fort Benningu však zjistil svůj omyl: seznal, že armáda z něj prostě chtěla udělat „nelítostného, chladnokrevného zabijáka“. Jeremiah Adler tedy požádal o to, aby byl poslán domů, dokonce tvrdil, že je homosexuál. Nakonec s dalším odvedencem uprchli a kontaktovali právě horkou linku na pomoc lidem, jako jsou oni. “Byla to samozřejmě děsivá zkušenost, ale nyní jsem rád, že jsem jí prošel,“ říká Adler s tím, že ve vojenském táboře potkal jak lidi s ušlechtilými důvody, tak zabijáky, kteří chtěli prostě jen vraždit Araby. V jednom dopise svým rodičům píše, že byl zděšený, když se odvedenci bavili o věcech, které by v civilním životě znamenaly, že dotyčný bude vyloučen ze společnosti jako psanec. V dalším říká, že v noci slyší pláč některých svých kolegů. „Slyšíte, jak lidi, kteří se snaží, aby to nebylo slyšet, pláčí pod dekami,“ píše svým rodičům. Šestadvacetiletý Jeremy Hinzman, který má za sebou službu v Afghánistánu, se rozhodl opustit armádu poté, co byl přidělen do Iráku.
    Vzal ženu a dítě a odletěl do Kanady, kde žije na padesát tisíc Američanů, kteří se tam odklidili před odvedením do války ve Vietnamu. Právě narůstající dezerce, stejně jako rostoucí míra zabitých amerických vojáků, stojí za problémem, jemuž americká armáda doma čelí: má problém zrekrutovat dostatek lidí. Poslední skandály v tomto ohledu odhalili, že vojenští činitelé, kteří nábor provádějí, sahají i k falšování dokumentů nutných pro přijetí, aby poptávku státu po mladé vojenské krvi uspokojili. Navíc, aby rekruty získali, slibují jim lživě, že jim přidělí místo, odkud do Iráku nebudou vysláni. Pentagon se však na dezertéry dívá jinak. „Drtivá většina těch, kteří dezertují, tak učiní proto, že spáchali nějakou trestnou činnost, nikoli kvůli politickým či uvědomělým důvodům,“ tvrdí jeho mluvčí Ellen Kremle.

    http://news.independent.co.uk/
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Where's The Media Retraction About Mr. Al-Qaeda Number Three?

    The terrorist they didn't catch but tried to fool the American public with a spelling mistake

    Paul Joseph Watson | May 18 2005

    This website has documented many times before the fact that whenever an arrest of a high level terrorist suspect is announced in every single case they’re either dead, they’ve already been arrested or they pop up a week later in a different country.

    In the case of this latest arrest the US government has successfully hoodwinked the entire nation into believing that a person is someone they’re not.

    He was presented to us as Al-Qaeda number three, closely associated with bin Laden, someone who had recent contact with bin Laden and someone who could lead us to bin Laden.

    Fox News revelled in it for days, another sign that Bush is winning the war on terror. I watched the snivelling Neo-Con John Gibson’s show and they had government officials and current CIA agents on snickering about how they wished they were in the interrogation room with the Pakistanis so they could torture this guy.

    And it turns out of course that our friend Mr. Al Libbi is not Al-Qaeda number three at all. The London Times described him as among the flotsam jetsam of the organization.

    Al Libbi is spelt L I B B I and the real Mr. Al Libby is spelt L I B B Y – so on the basis of a misspelt name this flotsam jetsam becomes Al-Qaeda number three, becomes a justification that the war on terror is real in the first place, becomes justification that Bush is winning the war on terror and that sacrificing our rights is working, becomes justification for renewing the Patriot Act and becomes part of the script they’re working on for when they capture their friend Osama.

    All that on the basis of a spelling mistake and yet the American people are none the wiser because it’s only in the European newspapers.

    We’re going to be hearing about the Newsweek retraction about the Koran story for weeks. Where’s the retraction that they captured Al-Qaeda number three? Because they didn’t.

    They captured a nobody with a similar sounding name.

    They have to keep faking these arrests because people are starting to get wise and ask a simple question - if we’re in a war on terror then why haven’t we been attacked for four years. Ah... because we’re winning of course. We’ve smoked them out and got them on the run.

    When they bring out Al-Zarqawi it will be the reward for staying the course in Iraq, for re-upping the stop loss because we caught the killer. And no one will mention that major newspapers all over the world keep reporting he’s either been killed or captured over and over again but the Pentagon pays no attention to it because if he’s going to be captured then he’s going to be captured by them and no one else.

    They need the gas mileage that staged capture will give them to stay in Iraq and establish the military bases needed to launch the attack on Iran.

    It’s all theatre, all the time.

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/may2005/180505mediaretraction.htm
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam