• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    GORGworld conspiracy // 911 // new world order ... part 3 :: Love your local Illuminati :)
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    no oni uz jich par postavili, "stare" guantanamo je jejich prace

    http://www.google.com/search?q=Halliburton+guantanamo+cheney
    GORG
    GORG --- ---
    Halliburton bude stavet vezeni? tak to nema chybu
    TOMAN
    TOMAN --- ---
    Dve videa odkudsi z hlubin internetu:

    G.W.Bush-Speech you didn't hear
    http://tradada.chytrak.cz/G.W.Bush-Speech_you_didnt_hear.wmv (4,5MB)

    G.W.Bush-invigorating Americas youth
    http://tradada.chytrak.cz/G.W.Bush-invigorating_Americas_youth.avi (9MB)

    potlesk a respekt tomu klucinovi :o)
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    404
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Halliburton to build new $30 mln Guantanamo jail

    Reuters | June 17 2005

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Halliburton Co. unit will build a new $30 million detention facility and security fence at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where the United States is holding about 520 foreign terrorism suspects, the Defense Department announced on Thursday.

    The announcement comes the same week that Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld defended the jail after U.S. lawmakers said it had created an image problem for the United States.

    Critics have decried the indefinite detention of Guantanamo detainees, whom the United States has denied rights accorded under the Geneva Conventions to prisoners of war. The prison was called "the gulag of our times" in a recent Amnesty International report.

    An air-conditioned two-story prison, known as Detention Camp #6, will be built at Guantanamo to house 220 men. It will include exercise areas, medical and dental spaces as well as a security control room, the contract announcement said.

    The contract announcement did not specify whether the new prison would also hold foreign terror suspects.

    Under the deal with the Norfolk, Virginia-based U.S. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic, the work is to be wrapped up by July 2006. It is part of a larger contract that could be worth up to $500 million if all options are exercised, the Defense Department said.

    The project is to be carried out by Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root Services of Arlington, Virginia. It includes site work, heating ventilation and air conditioning, plumbing and electrical work, the Pentagon said.

    The first prisoners arrived at the prison camp in January 2002 after the Sept. 11, 2001, hijacked airliner attacks on New York and the Pentagon.

    The Pentagon has said about 520 detainees from more than 40 countries are being held at the prison, without giving a precise figure.

    Rumsfeld said on Tuesday U.S. taxpayers had spend more than $100 million on construction costs and no other facility could replace it.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050616/ts_nm/security_guantanamo_halliburton_dc_1
    TANTRAMAN
    TANTRAMAN --- ---
    ANGLAN: tak rovnou rozdávej vizitky s web adresou :-))) myslíš, že američani maj něco jako vlastní názor ? rozumný ? založený na faktech a ne na pocitech ?
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Bush pressed to answer `Downing Street Memo' questions

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/krwashbureau/20050617/ts_krwashbureau/_bc_usiraq_memo_wa_1
    ANGLAN
    ANGLAN --- ---
    JAXXE: ; ) taky jsem hlasoval...

    normalne nerad se k tomu priznavam pac to neni slusny ani vkusny.. ale posledni dobou cimdal vic ztracim zabrany kdyz mluvim s americanama v praze...
    kdyz jsem JO napitej.. tak jdu k baru, otocim se na particku pozdravim, zeptam se odkud jsou.. "oh we're from the states" s usmevem mi reknou.. kuknu na ne a zeptam se jich co delaji v praze a nesireji demokracii v Iraku nebo jinde... jindy zase dost mile a dost mile se jich zeptam jestli nekdy cetli www.whatreallyhappend.com ... 100% mnou dotayanzch amiku nema paru o tom co to je ya stranku !!!! wow.. tak jim to doporucim dost nalehave.. oni odkejvou a z dalky jsem videl jak jsou zhulenz a uplne jinde.. tak kurna jdu a popisu jim A4ku .. mile, nalehave, omlouvave... ale zadam je tam aby se kurva na to koukli..
    ty vado, nachytavam se takhle casto ze to ze me leze uplne samo.. jen jak zjistim ze jsou Emerican....
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Do you believe President Bush misled the nation in order to go to war with Iraq?

    18365 responses

    Yes 94%
    No 6%

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8248969/#survey
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    'Child sacrifices in London'

    By Richard Edwards Crime Reporter, Evening Standard

    16 June 2005

    Boys from Africa are being murdered as human sacrif ices in London churches.

    They are brought into the capital to be offered up in rituals by fundamentalist Christian sects, according to a shocking report by Scotland Yard.

    Followers believe that powerful spells require the deaths of "unblemished" male children.
    Police believe such boys are trafficked from cities such as Kinshasa where they can be bought for a little as £10.

    The report, leaked ahead of its publication next month, also cites examples of

    African children being tortured and killed after being identified as "witches" by church pastors.

    http://www.thisislondon.com/news/articles/19328071?source=Evening%20Standard&ct=5

    Police Report On Child Sacrifices In London'

    David Icke has been writing and saying for more than a decade that widespread human sacrifice is a fact. Many just laughed and dismissed him as a nut. But now ...
    JDEE
    JDEE --- ---
    TAK NAM UMLCELI SADDAMA
    http://zvedavec.org/clanky_1235.htm
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Americký gulag


    Ak ste si náhodou nevšimli, tak Bushova administratíva na každú kritiku zásadne reaguje útokom proti kritizujúcemu. Tie útoky ad hominem majú, samozrejme, účel vyhnúť sa téme, ktorej sa kritika týka. Taká taktika sa veľmi páči fotelovým patriotom so skamenelými mozgami.
    Pravdou však je, že Bushova administratíva vytvorila gulag, ako to nedávno povedela Amnesty International. Ten istotne nie je taký rozsiahly ako Stalinova sieť, ale sériu väzení na Kube, v Iraku, v Afganistane a na iných, skrytých, miestach, kde ľudí držia neobmedzene dlho bez toho, aby ich oficiálne obvinili a dokonca aj bez prístupu humanitárnych organizácií, možno opodstatnene označiť za gulagy.

    Tento úpadok amerických morálnych štandardov, ako to vo väčšine prípadov býva, začal zneužívaním jazyka. Fráza “nepriateľský ozbrojenec” značí jednoducho osobu, ktorá proti vám bojuje. Ale keď tú osobu dolapíte, potom už nie je nepriateľským ozbrojencom. V tom prípade je to už vojnový zajatec. Lenže Bushova administratíva, ktorá nechce byť viazaná medzinárodným právom tvrdí, že “nepriateľský ozbrojenec” je nová klasifikácia. To teda značí (podľa Bushovej administratívy) osobu, ktorú možno uväzniť na neurčitý čas bez obvinenia. Táto nečistá prax nám spôsobila oveľa viac škody, hoci Bushova administratíva sa nazdáva, že z toho získa.

    Pozrite sa, máme zákony proti terorizmu. Nuž ak sa v Guntanamo nachádzajú väzni, vinní z terorizmu, tak ich zažalujte, postavte pred súd, odsúďte a potrestajte. Ak sú to len vojnoví zajatci, podriaďte sa Ženevským konvenciám. Ja neviem, ako by toto mohlo ohroziť našu národnú bezpečnosť.
    I keď minister obrany Donald Rumsfeld, ktorý nemá takmer žiadnu dôveru hovorí, že osoby v Guntanamo, to sú veľmi zlé a nebezpečné osoby, faktom je, že my sme v Afganistane ponúkli vojvodcom platby za každého Talibanca a člena al-Kájdy, ktorého nám odovzdajú. Toto je detinské. Tým sme predsa každého ozbrojenca finančne motivovali odovzdávať nám hocijakého chudáka z ulice, predávať ho Američanom. Napokon, ako by sme my mohli vedieť, či je to člen Talibanu alebo al-Kajdá alebo nie? To my nemôžeme vedieť.

    Toto isté robila CIA vo Vietname. Istého priateľa, ktorý velil skupine žoldnierov Nung, poverili vyplácať 5 dolárov za hlavu každého člena Viet-kongu, ktorú by im odovzdali. Samozrejme, tí sa zakaždým vracali s vrecami plnými vietnamských hláv, ale boli to skutočne členovia Viet-kongu alebo len nevinní Vietnamci? To nikto nemohol vedieť. Zakaždým, keď sa pokúšame hrať imperialistickú hru sa zdá, že máme viac peňazí, než rozumu.
    Iný priateľ z El Salvadoru sa vždy zvykol smiať, keď sme financovali vojnu proti tamojším guerillám: “ Bože dobrý, veď tých je len 7 tisíc !”, hovorieval s úsmevom “ ale kým nám platíte milión dolárov denne za to, že proti nim bojujeme, my si nemôžeme dovoliť nezabíjať ich .”

    Ale predpokladajme, že niektorí z tých v Guntanamo sú naozaj zlí. Tak ich súďme, odsúďme a uväznime v amerických väzeniach. Ja sa stavím, že naši domáci zloduchovia by si poradili s hocijakým výtržníkom z al-Kajdy alebo z Talibanu. Chcete vidieť nejakých skutočne nebezpečných a hrôzu naháňajúcich ľudí? Choďte sa pozrieť do amerických väzení.
    To by malo byť očividné, že vojnu proti terorizmu nemôžeme vyhrať bez toho, aby sme si nezískali srdcia a mysle ľudí, keď už máme použiť v jednej vete dvakrát klišé. Porušovaním medzinárodného práva a štandardov ľudských práv prehráme v bitke na poli vzťahov s verejnosťou. A prehra v tej bitke bude znamenať viac úmrtí našich vojakov v zahraničí v skutočných bitkách.
    Ale zdá sa, že náš prezident, nech ho Boh žehná, je presvedčený, že čokoľvek povie, je to tak. Inými slovami, on je presvedčený, že môže zmeniť realitu slovami. Toto možno funguje so zástupcami tlače s laptop počítačmi vo Washingtone, ale ostatný svet sa díva na fakty a tie v tomto prípade nie sú na našej strane.

    My v Guntanamo a v iných utajených väzniciach porušujeme ľudské práva a medzinárodné právo a s tým by sme mali okamžite prestať. Je v našom vlastnom záujme to urobiť.

    _______________________________________________

    Charley Reese, Anti-War
    http://www.antiwar.com/reese/?articleid=6291

    http://www.prop.sk/americky_gulag.htm
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    TWIN TOWER COLLAPSE WAS CONTROLLED DEMOLITION

    Video backgrounder about ludicrous official story of 'pancake collapse'. ¨
    http://www.ericblumrich.com/swf/wtc.swf
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    Former Bush Cabinet Member Appears On Alex Jones Show; Says Government Complicit In 9/11

    Prison Planet | June 16 2005

    Former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds has made waves in the past few days after writing a detailed article stating tha the official explanation for the collapse of the twin towers and Building 7 was bogus.

    United Press International picked up on the story today and this forced a response from the Texas A&M University, at which Reynolds holds the title of Professor Emeritus-an honorary title bestowed upon select tenured faculty, who have retired with ten or more years of service.

    Dr. Robert M. Gates, President of Texas A&M University stated, "The American people know what they saw with their own eyes on September 11, 2001. To suggest any kind of government conspiracy in the events of that day goes beyond the pale.”

    All the American people saw on 9/11 was planes fly into buildings. As we have relentlessly documented, the government explanation as to how and why this happened is provably ridiculous.

    Furthermore, Americans saw the unprecedented event of multiple steel buildings supposedly collapsing from fire damage, the first time this happened in history.

    Reynolds appeared on the Alex Jones Show to discuss his article and the reaction he received after the mainstream media picked it up.

    The four potential explanations behind 9/11 were listed.

    1) It was entirely the work of Al-Qaeda and Arab hijackers.

    2) The government had prior knowledge of the attack but their incompetence allowed the attack to happen.

    3) The government knew the attack was coming and consciously allowed it to happen.

    4) The government ran the entire operation.

    Reynolds stated, "I'd have to say that the evidence points to the last."

    He later stated that the official explanation of the attack was "full of holes, everywhere you look it just doesn't hang together."

    Click here to listen to the clip and Reynolds' own definitions of the different possible explanations, plus discussion of the explosives within the building and the whitewash commission.

    Reynolds was on the broadcast for over an hour and discussed how he woke up to the lie, the collapse of the buildingsin depth and the wider issues surrounding 9/11. He describes his mixed emotions about stepping out from the shadows and standing up for the truth at the risk of alienation from his peers.

    Prison Planet.tv members can listen to the whole interview by clicking here. Subscribe online by clicking here.

    Alex Jones appears Thursday June 16th on Coast to Coast AM for a much anticipated 9/11 debate. The question, did Muslims act alone on 9/11 or not? The evidence is clear that they didn't and in Reynolds we have another credible whistleblower bravely stepping forward in the name of the truth and the future of America and the world.

    Related: Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse? By Morgan Reynolds

    Related: The controlled implosion of WTC 7

    Related: Prison Planet 9/11 Archive

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/160605governmentcomplicit.htm

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    UPI Hears...

    By John Daly
    UPI International Correspondent

    Washington, DC, Jun. 13 (UPI) --

    Insider notes from United Press International for June 8

    A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling." Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."

    http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    The Sunday Times - Britain

    June 12, 2005

    Patients get 999 chip implants

    Jonathan Carr-Brown

    DOCTORS are to implant computerised sensors into patients to enable them to monitor chronic conditions minute-by-minute from miles away.

    The sensors detect tiny changes in metabolism and transmit data, via a mobile phone, to the patient’s doctor.

    Scientists at Imperial College London who invented the device believe it will enable some patients to lead a normal life while being kept under constant watch.

    It has the potential to be developed into a complete body sensor that could be implanted into normally healthy people to pick up early signs of disease.


    The sensor, which includes a Pentium microprocessor just 2mm square, will initially be implanted in diabetics.
    ...

    He added: “Our aim is eventually to get the cost of each sensor down to £1 so that the technology is available to everybody.”

    The Imperial team has developed four other prototypes that rest on a patient’s skin. They include sensors to detect heart disease, high blood pressure and hypothermia and motion sensors, used to monitor housebound old people.

    Scientists in America implanted microchips containing medical records under the skin of human guinea pigs last year. The records could then be read by a doctor using a scanner.

    Another American company has placed a microchip on a pill bottle, which plays back spoken prescription advice through a speaker.

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1650905_2,00.html
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    GPS for your own good

    ZD Net | June 15 2005

    Last year, a UK insurance company tested a "pay as you drive" insurance system that uses a GPS receiver package to track exactly what distance a car is driven and set each month's premium accordingly. It's a sensible idea: If you leave your car in the garage for a month, there's no reason why you should be charged the same as someone who drove 500 miles over the same period. Even better, because the instruments are transmitting (not just recording), if your car is stolen it can easily be tracked and the miscreants apprehended.

    So what?

    The system has some interesting potential side effects. For one thing, the police (or an estranged spouse) could easily subpoena your "travel records" for use in an investigation. The insurance company could also start charging based on where your car spends time: Long periods in high-crime neighborhoods would affect your premium accordingly. Even more provocative, companies could begin collecting data on their customers' driving habits: when and how much they speed, how often they change lanes, their tendency to accelerate rapidly or slam on the brakes, and other features of their driving performance that could (potentially) correlate with accident data.

    Really good analytics might even indicate when someone is driving in an impaired state (such as he just saw his latest premium notice and is in shock). But the most intriguing and perhaps lifesaving possibility comes when you hook the insurance company's server to a SPAM phone dialer and arrange for a deep, authoritative, machine-generated voice to call and remonstrate with customers who are speeding or otherwise driving recklessly. (Of course, you'll be able to cut the irony with a knife if answering the phone distracts you so much that…you get the idea.)

    http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/index.php?p=1499
    JAXXE
    JAXXE --- ---
    NeoCon Global Government

    by Rep. Ron Paul, MD

    Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.

    This week Congress will vote on a bill to expand the power of the United Nations beyond the dreams of even the most ardent left-wing, one-world globalists. But this time the UN power grabbers aren’t European liberals; they are American neo-conservatives, who plan to use the UN to implement their own brand of world government.

    The “United Nations Reform Act of 2005” masquerades as a bill that will cut US dues to the United Nations by 50% if that organization does not complete a list of 39 reforms. On the surface any measure that threatens to cut funding to the United Nations seems very attractive, but do not be fooled: in this case reform “success” will be worse than failure. The problem is in the supposed reforms themselves – specifically in the policy changes this bill mandates.

    The proposed legislation opens the door for the United Nations to routinely become involved in matters that have never been part of its charter. Specifically, the legislation redefines terrorism very broadly for the UN’s official purposes
    – and charges it to take action on behalf of both governments and international organizations.

    What does this mean? The official adoption of this definition by the United Nations would have the effect of making resistance to any government or any international organization an international crime. It would make any attempt to overthrow a government an international causus belli for UN military action. Until this point a sovereign government retained the legal right to defend against or defeat any rebellion within its own territory. Now any such activity would constitute justification for United Nations action inside that country. This could be whenever any splinter group decides to resist any regime – regardless of the nature of that regime.

    What if this were in place when the Contras were fighting against the Marxist regime in Nicaragua? Or when the Afghan mujahadeen was fighting against the Soviet-installed government in the 1980s? Or during the Warsaw Ghetto uprising? The new message is clear: resistance – even resistance to the UN itself – is futile. Why does every incumbent government, no matter how bad, deserve UN military assistance to quell domestic unrest?

    This new policy is given teeth by creating a “Peacebuilding Commission,” which will serve as the implementing force for the internationalization of what were formerly internal affairs of sovereign nations. This Commission will bring together UN Security Council members, major donors, major troop-contributing countries, appropriate United Nations organizations, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund among others. This new commission will create the beginning of a global UN army. It will claim the right to intervene in any conflict anywhere on the globe, bringing the World Bank and the IMF formally into the picture as well. It is a complete new world order, but undertaken with the enthusiastic support of many of those who consider themselves among the most strident UN critics.

    Conservatives who have been critical of the UN in the past have enthusiastically embraced this bill and the concept of UN reform. But what is the desired end of “UN reform”? The UN is an organization that was designed to undermine sovereignty and representative government. It is unelected and unaccountable to citizens by its very design. Will UN reform change anything about the fact that its core mission is objectionable? Do honest UN critics really want an expanded UN that functions more “efficiently”?

    The real question is whether we should redouble our efforts to save a failed system, or admit its failures – as this legislation does – and recognize that the only reasonable option is to cease participation without further costs to the United States in blood, money, and sovereignty. Do not be fooled: it is impossible to be against the United Nations and to support “reform” of the United Nations. The only true reform of the United Nations is for the US to withdraw immediately.

    June 14, 2005

    http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul255.html
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam