• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    KERRAYoO( ) psychedelické memy ( )O๑.. ॐ ..๑O( ) psychedelic memes ( )Oo
    JUSTIF
    JUSTIF --- ---
    Maria: You have a kid?
    William: Yeah?
    Maria: Chico or chica?
    William: Chico.
    Maria: I bet he's special.
    William: He *is* special.
    Maria: Everybody's children are so special. It makes you wonder where all the ordinary grown-ups come from.


    Maria: If we had enough information, we could predict the consequences of our actions. Would you want to know? If you kissed that girl, if you talked to that man, if you take that job, or marry that woman, or steal that papel? If we knew what would happen in the end, would we ever be able to take the first step, to make the first move?

    a vubec. celej film stoji za shlidnuti: http://www.csfd.cz/film/91620-kod-46/
    AIM_FREEMAN
    AIM_FREEMAN --- ---
    YouTube - George Carlin's Greatest Moment
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wV1lZMTCqf8&feature=related

    jednu klasiku
    NYA
    NYA --- ---
    BENJAMMIN
    BENJAMMIN --- ---
    Dan Gilbert asks, Why are we happy? | Video on TED.com
    http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/dan_gilbert_asks_why_are_we_happy.html
    AIM_FREEMAN
    AIM_FREEMAN --- ---
    Možná právě tohle je opravdová spravedlnost - být schopen poděkovat těm, kteří to s vámi mysleli dobře a pomáhali vám, a nelíbat ruce těm, kdo vám způsobili újmu. Vypadá to hrozně jednoduše, ale často se člověk hloupě zachová opačně a ani neví proč.

    (nevím už odkud jsem si to vypsal)
    OBCANKAA
    OBCANKAA --- ---
    Umíral jednou jeden muž a těsně před smrtí řekl: ,,Aha, tak tohle byl život!" ...
    NYA
    NYA --- ---
    PERPLEX
    PERPLEX --- ---
    Jak formu manipulace veřejným míněním lze doporučit pro vzdělanější vrstvy obyvatelstva ?
    Docela jednoduchou. Na základě principu "efektu třetí osoby" postačí vhodně nakombinovat pochlebování kritickému myšlení respondentů s vyvoláváním paniky před údajně zmanipulovaným míněním příznivců opačného názoru, než který se pokoušíme dotyčnému vsugerovat.

    W.Phillips Davison ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_person_effect )
    (objevil jsem v posledním Novém Prostoru v článku nazvaném "Neposlušná poslušnost" věnujícímu se Miligramovým experimentům http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment )
    MUTEK
    MUTEK --- ---
    [koukaji na fotky]

    - is that you?
    - yeah.
    - you were so cute. too bad you had to grow up.
    - yeah, i know. i was so happy than. and i didn't know it.
    - maybe you're happy now, you just don't know it.

    palindromes (tod solondz, 2004)
    KERRAY
    KERRAY --- ---
    SINECURVE
    SINECURVE --- ---
    YMLADRIS
    YMLADRIS --- ---


    u nas na zastavce saliny
    KERRAY
    KERRAY --- ---
    YouTube - How TV Ruined Your Life - 3. Aspiration - S01E03
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CP6L5S14ygY
    PEPAZDEPA
    PEPAZDEPA --- ---
    Surviving the World - Daily Lessons in Science, Literature, Love and Life . . . Updated Seven Days A Week
    http://survivingtheworld.net/

    ARFEA
    ARFEA --- ---
    Two Riddles
    We begin with a couple of simple queries about familiar phenomena: “Why do babies not remember events that happen to them?” and “Why does each new year seem to pass faster than the one before?”

    I wouldn’t swear that I have the final answer to either one of these queries, but I do have a hunch, and I will here speculate on the basis of that hunch. And thus: the answer to both is basically the same, I would argue, and it has to do with the relentless, lifelong process of chunking — taking “small” concepts and putting them together into bigger and bigger ones, thus recursively building up a giant repertoire of concepts in the mind.

    How, then, might chunking provide the clue to these riddles? Well, babies’ concepts are simply too small. They have no way of framing entire events whatsoever in terms of their novice concepts. It is as if babies were looking at life through a randomly drifting keyhole, and at each moment could make out only the most local aspects of scenes before them. It would be hopeless to try to figure out how a whole room is organized, for instance, given just a keyhole view, even a randomly drifting keyhole view.

    Or, to trot out another analogy, life is like a chess game, and babies are like beginners looking at a complex scene on a board, not having the faintest idea how to organize it into higher-level structures. As has been well known for decades, experienced chess players chunk the setup of pieces on the board nearly instantaneously into small dynamic groupings defined by their strategic meanings, and thanks to this automatic, intuitive chunking, they can make good moves nearly instantaneously and also can remember complex chess situations for very long times. Much the same holds for bridge players, who effortlessly remember every bid and every play in a game, and months later can still recite entire games at the drop of a hat.

    All of this is due to chunking, and I speculate that babies are to life as novice players are to the games they are learning — they simply lack the experience that allows understanding (or even perceiving) of large structures, and so nothing above a rather low level of abstraction gets perceived at all, let alone remembered in later years. As one grows older, however, one’s chunks grow in size and in number, and consequently one automatically starts to perceive and to frame ever larger events and constellations of events; by the time one is nearing one’s teen years, complex fragments from life’s stream are routinely stored as high-level wholes — and chunks just keep on accreting and becoming more numerous as one lives. Events that a baby or young child could not have possibly perceived as such — events that stretch out over many minutes, hours, days, or even weeks — are effortlessly perceived and stored away as single structures with much internal detail (varying amounts of which can be pulled up and contemplated in retrospect, depending on context). Babies do not have large chunks and simply cannot put things together coherently. Claims by some people that they remember complex events from when they were but a few months old (some even claim to remember being born!) strike me as nothing more than highly deluded wishful thinking.

    So much for question number one. As for number two, the answer, or so I would claim, is very similar. The more we live, the larger our repertoire of concepts becomes, which allows us to gobble up ever larger coherent stretches of life in single mental chunks. As we start seeing life’s patterns on higher and higher levels, the lower levels nearly vanish from our perception. This effectively means that seconds, once so salient to our baby selves, nearly vanish from sight, and then minutes go the way of seconds, and soon so do hours, and then days, and then weeks...

    “Boy, this year sure went by fast!” is so tempting to say because each year is perceived in terms of chunks at a higher, grander, larger level than any year preceding it, and therefore each passing year contains fewer top-level chunks than any year preceding it, and so, psychologically, each year seems sparser than any of its predecessors. One might, somewhat facetiously, symbolize the ever-rapider passage of time by citing the famous harmonic series:

    1 + 1/2 + 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 + 1/6 + 1/7 + 1/8 +...

    by which I mean to suggest that one’s nth year feels subjectively n times as short as one’s first year, or n/5 times as short as one’s fifth year, and so on. Thus when one is an adult, the years seem to go by about at roughly a constant rate, because — for instance — (1/35)/(1/36) is very nearly 1. Nonetheless, according to this theory, year 70 would still shoot by twice as fast as year 35 did, and seven times as fast as year 10 did.

    But the exact numerical values shown above are not what matter; I just put them in for entertainment value. The more central and more serious idea is simply that relentless mental chunking makes life seem to pass ever faster as one ages, and there is nothing one can do about it. So much for our two riddles.

    Presidential Lectures: Douglas R. Hofstadter: Extras
    http://prelectur.stanford.edu/lecturers/hofstadter/analogy.html
    TLUSTEI
    TLUSTEI --- ---
    "You have much more power when you are working FOR the right thing than when you are working against the wrong one."

    Peace Pilgrim
    JUSTIF
    JUSTIF --- ---
    ATOMINATOR: kdybych uz byl moc off-topic, smazte.
    JUNIOR
    JUNIOR --- ---
    No garden, no gate

    Pohwa
    TLUSTEI
    TLUSTEI --- ---
    "If you know but don't do, you are a very unhappy person indeed."

    Peace Pilgrim
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam