Brahman, Purusha, citta, prakrti, no-self, heuristics

let me explain… what we call a person is a collection of cells, nothing more; the mind, perceptions intellect and mental functions are the activities of the billions of neurons controlling brain activities. The self is an illusion generated by the brain. There is no single self that can do practices nor one that can be liberated. How do you liberate an illusion that neurons generate?
In Advaita there are no individual autonomous self agents. Brahman is all inclusive of everything including cells, neurons and atoms. Mind, intellect, personal self, mental processes, thinking, remembering and all actions including matter, energy and space are all “prakriti”. You can’t rearrange prakriti to become Citta, Cit or the Awareness of Purusha. Nothing affects Purusha and no other self exists that can morph into Purusha. Purusha IS Brahman always. You can’t sneak up on jñana or gnosis by trying to transform prakriti into its most sattvic form via study or practice. Sattvic prakriti is still never Purusha. Only viveka is needed, but not needed by anyone, because there is no self to be rescued. Only Brahman is Real. (JP)

Drazí přátelé, pracuju teď s Viliamem Poltikovičem na dokumentárním filmu o Míle a Eduardu Tomášových a byli bychom vám moc vděčni za jakoukoliv podporu a sdílení s vašimi přáteli. Film můžete podpořit zde:

Hithit - Šťastny ať jsou všechny bytosti - Míla a Eduard Tomášovi
https://www.hithit.com/cs/project/10208/stastny-at-jsou-vsechny-bytosti-mila-a-eduard-tomasovi

Trailer:

Šťastny ať jsou všechny bytosti - Míla a Eduard Tomášovi na chatě a v Lucerně - Trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCrGXf8Okx8


Oficiální stránky: https://www.facebook.com/Stastny.at.jsou.vsechny.bytosti

KEIKIN: SAibaba mne na tom videu velmi zaujal. Vždy si záhadně otíral ruce do kapesníčků svých asistentů a pak najednou čaroval:D Pěkný dokument. Hodně pěkné moudra celým dokumentem proplouvají:)

"Where is the "me"? The "me" is always associated with the body and the body as seen through the microscope is nothing but a play of cells being created and destroyed."

"Truth or Reality is itself a concept. When you are in the truth or in deep sleep, which is only a pale reflection of the real, in that state of deep sleep is the Truth. And in that Truth there is no experience. In the waking state, the state of deep sleep is a concept. In deep sleep it is the Truth. But the moment you think of Reality, the moment you think Subject, the moment you think of the Absolute, the moment you think of the Truth, it is a concept. It is only when the thinking totally stops that Truth exists."

"When we talk of time and space, we say infinite space and eternal time. It is still a mental concept of total space and total time. But the mind cannot conceive of that state prior to the arising of the space-time. The moment you think of Reality, the reality is a concept. You are the Reality of which the split-mind makes a concept. You are the Reality, but not as the "me"

"It's very simple. Don't think about what you have heard here. Just don't think about what you think you've understood. And then that understanding will have a chance to flower. But the more you think about what you have understood, the more it's wasted."

"All there is, is Consciousness. And the mind is merely a reflection of that Consciousness."

"What is the significance of the statement 'No one can get enlightenment'? This is the very root of the teaching. It means that it's stupid for any so-called master to ask anyone to do anything to achieve or get enlightenment. The core of this simple statement means, according to my concept, that enlightenment is the annihilation of the "one" who "wants" enlightenment. If there is enlightenment - which can only happen because it is the will of God - then it means the "one" who had earlier wanted enlightenment has been annihilated. So no "one" can achieve enlightenment and therefore no "one" can enjoy enlightenment."

"The joke is even the surrendering is not in your control. Why? Because so long as there is an individual who says "I surrender" there is a surrenderer, an individual ego... What I'm saying is that even the surrendering is not in [your] hands."

("Who cares?", pp. 6 - 22)

Ramesh Balsekar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramesh_Balsekar

DAWYT: :D No já ti sem nanejvýš hodila, že je ten člověk moc ukecaný:)))

ERIDANI: To je! Asi už dosnídal:)Ale takhle v sobotu rano si to poslechnout není špatný. A nikdo sem nic nehází :)

Breakfast With Mooji - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZY8LX9Bheo