FRONEMA: imho to je fer, pokud je poselstvi knihy zmareno skutky jejich hrdinu. bud je chyba v onom poselstvi anebo v hrdinech, kontradikce jak znamo neexistuji :)

kdyz jsem cetl knihu ja, taky me to bouchalo pres oci. ale nejvic asi ten zjevny rozpor mezi poselstvim racionalismu a jejim nepokrytym idealismem (viz I trust that no one will tell me that men such as I write about don't exist. That this book has been written-- and published-- is my proof that they do. a na mnoha dalsich mistech).

_BENNY: no to bych asi mohla, ale myslim ze by to byla typicka rozplizla diskuze ktera by neskoncila nicim dobrym.
stejne bys mohl rozebrat i Hobita. nasel bys tam propagaci koureni, zajem o mrzky mamon a urcite dalsich par veci.

nejdivnejsi je bod Bad guys get their way through democracy; good guys get their way through violence.
Kdyz Equalization of Opportunity Bill a dalsi veci se kteryma z vlady prichazi nejsou nic nez nasili. Reardenovi patenty ziskavaji pomoci vydirani atd atd.

Gotta love her:
Famous Novelists on Symbolism in Their Work and Whether It Was Intentional | Mental Floss
http://mentalfloss.com/...30937/famous-novelists-symbolism-their-work-and-whether-it-was-intentional
My definition of symbolism as used in this questionnaire is represented by this example: In The Scarlet Letter there are four major characters. Some say that Hawthorne meant those four to be Nature, Religion, Science or other similar symbols in disguise. They apply the actions of the four in the story to what is presently happening or will happen to Nature, Religion, Science, etc.”
Ayn Rand: “This is not a ‘definition,’ it is not true—and therefore, your questions do not make sense.”

_BENNY: title="In a cavern deep below the Earth, Ayn Rand, Paul Ryan, Rand Paul, Ann Druyan, Paul Rudd, Alan Alda, and Duran Duran meet togther in the Secret Council of /(\b[plurandy]+\b ?){2}/i." alt="Ayn Random" (uhm? aha, regexp)