• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHOKlimaticka zmena / Thank you so much for ruining my day


    "Given the sheer enormity of climate change, it’s okay to be depressed, to grieve. But please, don’t stay there too long. Join me in pure, unadulterated, righteous anger."


    "I don’t want your hope. I don’t want you to be hopeful. I want you to panic. I want you to feel the fear I feel every day. And then I want you to act. Once you start to act, the hope is everywhere."

    "Our best scientists tell us insistently that a calamity is unfolding, that the life-support systems of the Earth are being damaged in ways that threaten our survival. Yet in the face of these facts we carry on as usual."

    “We’ve got to stop burning fossil fuels. So many aspects of life depend on fossil fuels, except for music and love and education and happiness. These things, which hardly use fossil fuels, are what we must focus on.”

    A nejde o to, že na to nemáme dostatečné technologie, ty by na řešení použít šly, ale chybí nám vůle a představivost je využít. Zůstáváme při zemi, přemýšlíme až moc rezervovaně. Technologický pokrok to sám o sobě nevyřeší. Problém jsme my, ne technologické nástroje.

    Rostouci hladiny oceanu, zmena atmosferickeho proudeni, zmeny v distribuci srazek a sucha. Zmeny karbonoveho, fosforoveho a dusikoveho cyklu, okyselovani oceanu. Jake jsou bezpecnostni rizika a jake potencialni klady dramatickych zmen fungovani zemskeho systemu?
    Ale take jak funguji masove dezinformacni kampane ropneho prumyslu a boj o verejne mineni na prahu noveho klimatickeho rezimu post-holocenu.
    rozbalit záhlaví
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    TUHO: jenze ne lokalne, tam kde se dela elektrolyza

    a z more je potreba resit filtraci, odsolovani stoji mraky energie... pokud vyresi odsolovani a elektrolyzu vodiku jednou ranou, tak je to win-win. ale spis mam dojem, ze se k tomu bude pouzivat pitna...
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    SHEFIK: tak vody je asi v norsku dost ne? plus spalovanim vodiku vznikne zase voda :)
    KEB
    KEB --- ---
    SHEFIK: předpokládám že z moře. Tam je jí dost a ještě získají mořskou sůl.
    DZODZO
    DZODZO --- ---
    SHEFIK: vezmu zo starych vlhkych barakov pomocou takej tej cisticky vzduchu, ta tu vodu kondenzuje
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    tohle zni krasne, dokonce i z nasich CEZkych koncin. jen by me jeste zajmalo, odkud se bude brat "obnovitelna" voda pro elektrolyzu

    ČEZ pomůže snižovat emise v letecké dopravě, letecký benzín má nahradit vodík | Hybrid.cz
    http://www.hybrid.cz/cez-pomuze-snizovat-emise-v-letecke-doprave-letecky-benzin-ma-nahradit-vodik
    XCHAOS
    XCHAOS --- ---
    DRSH: no tam je ekologické riziko hlavně když v místním klimatu, které utáhne nejvíc tak step, že stromy vysuší půdu, pak stejně odumřou, ale nevrátí se tam ani ta step a změní se to v poušť. Tohle se prý reálně na pár místech stalo jinak snaživým Číňanům, kteří v oblasti stepí bojují s rozšiřováním pouště Gobi, ale konkrétní lokace teda neznám... umím si to ale představit, uschlých stromů jsem viděl v takových oblastech hodně, samozřejmě se ale poučili a vymýšlejí pro ty pouštní lesy různá zavlažování a tak.

    Ten článek popisuje spíš politická rizika... pokud někdo použije peníze na výsadbu nových stromů tak, že nejdřív pokácí stávající les, tak to je fakt no comment a mělo by se to rozmáznout....
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    pro zaryty sledovace atmosfery

    Meteomapa Windy získala nové vrstvy. Ukáže požáry a nebezpečné látky ve vzduchu – Živě.cz
    https://www.zive.cz/...-vrstvy-ukaze-pozary-a-nebezpecne-latky-ve-vzduchu/sc-3-a-204762/default.aspx
    DRSH
    DRSH --- ---
    Plošné zalesňování nemusí být vždy prospěšné, varují vědci ze Stanfordovy univerzity | Plus
    https://plus.rozhlas.cz/...zalesnovani-nemusi-byt-vzdy-prospesne-varuji-vedci-ze-stanfordovy-8243073
    KEB
    KEB --- ---
    David Hanslian a Pavel Sedlák: Větrné elektrárny - klimatické pohroma? - Ekolist.cz
    https://ekolist.cz/cz/publicistika/nazory-a-komentare/vetrne-elektrarny-klimaticka-pohroma
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TUHO: "read fast, die old" :D
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TADEAS: Doufam, ze v duchodu budu mit cas v podzemnim bunkru prelouskat vsechny ty prispveky, ktery jsem ti tady olajkoval :D
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Where there’s muck, there’s brass | Rothamsted Research
    https://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/news/where-there%E2%80%99s-muck-there%E2%80%99s-brass

    Soil as an extended composite phenotype of the microbial metagenome
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-67631-0

    “Despite carbon’s critical role, the mechanisms underlying carbon dynamics and the link to soil water were poorly understood,” said Neal. “Society struggles with the concept of what soil is and how it can be managed effectively because it is such a complex combination of biological, chemical and physical processes.

    “We took inspiration from a theory proposed by Richard Dawkins in the 1980s that many structures we encounter are in fact products of organisms’ genes – Dawkins used the examples of bird nests and beaver dams. This view helped us understand soil as a product of microbial genes, incorporating organic materials from plants and other inputs to create all-important structure.

    “We have shown for the first time a dynamic interaction between soil structure and microbial activity - fuelled by carbon - which regulates water storage and gaseous flow rates in soil with real consequences for how microbes respire.”

    ...

    In healthy soils, relatively low nitrogen levels limit microbes’ ability to utilise carbon compounds, so they excrete them as polymers which act as a kind of ‘glue’ - creating a porous, interconnected structure in the soil which allows water, air, and nutrients to circulate.

    Writing in the journal Scientific Reports, the researchers reveal that the Victorian-era switch from manure to ammonia and phosphorous based fertilizers has caused microbes to metabolise more carbon, excrete less polymers and fundamentally alter the properties of farmland soils when compared to their original grassland state.

    Lead researcher Professor Andrew Neal said: “We noticed that as carbon is lost from soil, the pores within it become smaller and less connected. This results in fundamental changes in the flow of water, nutrients and oxygen through soil and forces several significant changes to microbial behaviour and metabolism. Low carbon, poorly connected soils are much less efficient at supporting growth and recycling nutrients.”

    A lack of oxygen in soil results in microbes having to turn to nitrogen and sulphur compounds for their energy – inefficient processes, he says, which result in increased emissions of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide among other issues.

    The closed soil structure also means microbes need to expend more energy on activities such as searching out and degrading less easily accessible organic matter for nutrients.

    Conversely, in carbon-rich soil there is an extensive network of pores which allow for greater circulation of air, nutrients and retention of water.

    “Manure is high in carbon and nitrogen, whereas ammonia-based fertilisers are devoid of carbon. Decades of such inputs - and soil processes typically act over decades - have changed the way soil microbes get their energy and nutrients, and how they respire.”

    ...

    long term addition of nitrogen and phosphorous fertilizers has caused microbes to burn more of these carbon compounds for energy, an activity that has increased emissions of CO2.

    Ploughing has also increased the availability of this soil carbon to microbes, further decreasing its levels in the soil.

    As carbon stocks decline, less EPS is produced, and the soil loses the beneficial porous structure
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    No a tady zajimavej clanek: kdy bude severni pol v lete bez ledu?

    Since satellites first began monitoring the Arctic in 1979, the average area covered by sea ice has shrunk by at least 40%. The average thickness of the ice has fallen by more than half over the same time period.
    These rapid changes have left climate scientists facing an urgent question: when will Arctic sea ice disappear?

    When will the Arctic see its first ice-free summer?
    https://interactive.carbonbrief.org/when-will-the-arctic-see-its-first-ice-free-summer/

    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Zack Labe
    @ZLabe
    To emphasize again, this is a pretty terrible weather pattern for sea ice. The anomalous high pressure will contribute to widespread melting in the Central Arctic over at least the next week. Stay tuned.

    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Two of the world's largest energy companies have sent their strongest signals yet that the coronavirus pandemic may accelerate a global transition away from oil, and that billions of dollars invested in fossil fuel assets could go to waste.
    This week, Royal Dutch Shell said it would slash the value of its oil and gas assets by up to $22 billion amid a crash in oil prices. The announcement came two weeks after a similar declaration by BP, saying it would reduce the value of its assets by up to $17.5 billion. Both companies said the accounting moves were a response not only to the coronavirus-driven recession, but also to global efforts to tackle climate change.

    BP and Shell Write-Off Billions in Assets, Citing Covid-19 and Climate Change | InsideClimate News
    https://insideclimatenews.org/news/01072020/bp-shell-coronavirus-climate-change
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    For decades, people have asked me why the oil companies don’t just become solar companies. They don’t for the same reason that Facebook doesn’t behave decently: an oil company’s core business is digging stuff up and burning it, just as Facebook’s is to keep people glued to their screens. Digging and burning is all that oil companies know how to do—and why the industry has spent the past thirty years building a disinformation machine to stall action on climate change. It’s why—with the evidence of climate destruction growing by the day—the best that any of them can offer are vague pronouncements about getting to “net zero by 2050”—which is another way of saying, “We’re not going to change much of anything anytime soon.” (The American giants, like ExxonMobil, won’t even do that.)

    At the Core of the Climate Crisis | The New Yorker
    https://www.newyorker.com/...s-of-a-warming-planet/what-facebook-and-the-oil-industry-have-in-common
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    pohled zpet na rockstromuv 2017 A roadmap for rapid decarbonization
    A roadmap for rapid decarbonization | Science
    https://science.sciencemag.org/...tent/355/6331/1269.full?ijkey=E5//r8tjQmw6c&keytype=ref&siteid=sci

    ... jak jsme na tom?


    2017–2020: NO-BRAINERS
    Annual emissions from fossil fuels must start falling by 2020. Well-proven (and ideally income-neutral) policy instruments such as carbon tax schemes, cap-and-trade systems, feed-in tariffs, and quota approaches should roll out at wide scale. Even these will be challenging in the emerging global political climate. The European Union emissions-trading scheme requires kick-starting through an appropriate floor price (>$50/metric ton CO2).

    The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) should transform into a vanguard forum where nations, businesses, nongovernmental organizations, and scientific communities meet to refine the roadmap. It is evident that the current national commitments under the Paris Agreement must be strongly enhanced at the first ratcheting-up cycle in 2018 to 2020.

    Fossil-fuel subsidies, currently $500 billion to $600 billion per annum, must be eliminated by 2020, not 2025 as agreed by the Group of Seven (G7) nations in 2016. An immediate moratorium on investment in new unabated coal-based energy would minimize future stranded assets. China’s greenhouse gas (GHG) output must continue to decrease over the coming years, through aggressive funding of renewables, by abandoning coal expansion, and by closing mines. The richer coal-intensive countries must spearhead the coal exit, and countries like India and Indonesia must follow suit.

    By 2020, all cities and major corporations in the industrialized world should have decarbonization strategies in place. The 49 countries already committed to be carbon neutral by 2050 should have expanded to >100 countries by that time, and implementation should be under way. The gravest risk is that emerging economies, such as South Africa, are driven down the conventional growth path by sheer inertia. International efforts must incentivize lowcarbon development as a priority.

    Food production contributes to >10% of global GHG emissions (4) and weakens natural carbon sinks yet has vast potential for biological carbon removal. Innovative financial mechanisms are needed to incentivize carbon management in the food system. Agro-industries, farms, and civil society should develop a worldwide strategy for sustainable food systems to drive healthier, low-meat diets (7) and reduce food waste (8). Health and sustainability cobenefits— such as obesity and disease abatement, pollution reduction, and ecosystems preservation— should spur action.
    PAD
    PAD --- ---
    Climate Change AI | Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning
    https://www.climatechange.ai/
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam