Největší část uhlíkové stopy obyvatel Prahy tvoří spotřeba masa, ukázal výzkum
https://www.czechsight.cz/...i-cast-uhlikove-stopy-obyvatel-prahy-tvori-spotreba-masa-ukazal-vyzkum/

jakub udělal clanek podle pruzkumu Arniky, kterej teda zrejme vychazi uplne jinak, ze co razim ja podle nazoru lidi z Veronicy ("pokud malo jezdis autem, 70 procent tve uhlikove stopy je vytapeni"), ale podrobne jsem nestudovala

TUHO:

In our collective, we have mapped four denials that severely restrict the capacity of those of us socialized within modernity-coloniality to sense, relate and imagine otherwise:

the denial of systemic, historical and ongoing violence and of complicity in harm (the fact that our comforts, securities and enjoyments are subsidized by expropriation and exploitation somewhere else);

the denial of the limits of the planet and of the unsustainability of modernity-coloniality (the fact that the finite earth-metabolism cannot sustain exponential growth, consumption, extraction, exploitation and expropriation indefinitely);

the denial of entanglement (our insistence in seeing ourselves as separate from each other and the land, rather than “entangled” within a living wider metabolism that is bio-intelligent); and,

the denial of the magnitude and the complexity of the problems we need to face together (the tendency to look for simplistic solutions that make us feel and look good and that may address symptoms, but not the root causes of our collective complex predicament).
One final denial is denial of the ways that these four denials are all interconnected. It is common for critical educational initiatives to address one or maybe two of these denials at a time, but we have thus far not encountered any initiatives, especially in the context of low-intensity struggles, that seriously engage with all four

Preparing for the end of the world as we know it | openDemocracy
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/preparing-end-world-we-know-it/

LINKOS: u nás toho bio zase není nijak závratné množství. Větší množství typický králíkův hajzlik končí v bio popelnicí v drtivé většině. Sem tam ho hodíme na kompost na chatě. I ten se nestarám nijak. Sypu tam klasický zahradní binec. Akorát do něj vždycky hledím nalít pár kyblíků vody. Nesmrdí a dole je fakt substrát.

Zizalovy kompostér z kyblíků má bratranec. U nich na firmě jsou plastové kyblíky odpad.

Climate science and nuclear weapons testing have a long and surprisingly intimate relationship. The global networks that monitored the Fukushima radiation plume and forecasted its movement are the direct descendants of systems and computer models developed to trace fallout from weapons tests. Tracing radioactive carbon as it cycles through the atmosphere, the oceans, and the biosphere has been crucial to understanding anthropogenic climate change. The earliest global climate models relied on numerical methods very similar to those developed by nuclear weapons designers for solving the fluid dynamics equations needed to analyze shock waves produced in nuclear explosions. The climatic consequences of nuclear war also represent a major historical intersection between climate science and nuclear affairs. Without the work done by nuclear weapons designers and testers, scientists would know much less than they now do about the atmosphere. In particular, this research has contributed enormously to knowledge about both carbon dioxide, which raises Earth’s temperature, and aerosols, which lower it. Without climate models, scientists and political leaders would not have understood the full extent of nuclear weapons’ power to annihilate not only human beings, but other species as well. In the post-Cold War era, US national laboratories built to create the most fearsome arsenal in history are now using their powerful supercomputers, their expertise in modeling, and their skills in managing very large data sets to address the threat of catastrophic climate change.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0096340212451574

A jeden z prvnich general circulation models z pocatku sedesatych let

One of the first general circulation models was developed at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory by Cecil “Chuck” Leith in the early 1960s. Unlike the NOAA model mentioned above, Leith’s model only simulated the atmosphere. What make Leith’s work so remarkable was that he was the first to produce a computer animation based on the model output. Watch the video below to see how these wobbling yet compelling animations looked.

Earth Matters - See One of the First Climate Models
https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/...gs/earthmatters/2015/05/21/see-one-of-the-first-climate-models/

The grandfather of today's climate models
http://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=79&v=rSyuWVrFSyo&feature=emb_title

A jeste neco o klimatickem modelovani

Simulating a Climate-Changed Earth Atop the Seinfeld Diner
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfzOaAxicDk