• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHOKlimaticka zmena / Thank you so much for ruining my day
    JINDRICH
    JINDRICH --- ---
    @Fbeyeee
    V Jakutsku hoří už 2,1 mil ha a 1,5 mil a lesů je zničených. Okolo města Jakutsk to hoří z obou stran.
    Лесные пожары в Якутии: "Гринпис" не ждет улучшения ситуации до середины августа - BBC News Русская служба
    https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-57900808
    GLOBETROTTER
    GLOBETROTTER --- ---
    KEB: Transformací myslíš výstavbu nabíjecích stanic a posílení rozvodné soustavy a výroby elektřiny? Lusknutím prstů samozřejmě ne, ale ten vývoj by měl jít rovnoměrně s rozvojem elektromobility. A to jak na straně provozovatelů nabíjecích stanic (stimulem ze strany státu), tak i na straně státu. Pokud stát (a nadstátní organizace - EU apod.) udělá A, tedy podporuje elektromobilitu a hází klacky pod nohy výrobcům aut se spalovacími motory, tak musí udělat i B, tedy podporovat nabíjení.

    PER2: Základní manuál? Seděl jsi někdy v Tesle? Myslíš, že někdo, kdo mí na prémiovou Teslu, má čas po nákupu si vzít týden dovolené a studovat to celé? :-)
    Oceňuju, že jsi tak vzorný člověk, že jsi nikdy nejel k pumpě s půl litrem v nádrži a že se Ti nikdy nevybil mobil :-)

    Omlouvám se za flame a končím.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Deep crisis: Deep adaptation… | Polity – Blog
    https://politybooks.com/deep-crisis-deep-adaptation/

    https://www.wiley.com/en-cz/Deep+Adaptation%3A+Navigating+the+Realities+of+Climate+Chaos-p-9781509546855

    As we begin to emerge from a dark period of history dominated by the devastating Covid pandemic, many of us are therefore taking this opportunity to reassess things we previously took for granted: What parts of society really matters? How important is stuff? Love? Life itself? How should we work? How can we respond to future challenges? It is due to this new moment of reflection and re-consideration that I don’t think there could have been a more fitting time to release Deep Adaptation: Navigating the Realities of Climate Chaos, the new book I have co-authored with the originator of the deep adaptation concept, Jem Bendell. This will be the first book on the controversial subject of Deep Adaptation, and will advance from Bendell’s 2018 article “Deep Adaptation: A Map for Navigating Climate Tragedy” which has been downloaded more than a million times.

    Deep adaptation is an emerging philosophical and social movement that is concerned with how to prepare ourselves to minimise the damage of the potential (and increasingly likely) social, political, and environmental collapse the future threatens us with. As I see it, it by no means constitutes us giving up on trying preventing these calamities, but it is a reasonable and necessary philosophical and practical exercise to undergo when we are honest with ourselves about the pretty desperate situation we are in.

    2021 is a critical year in the future of the human race, and one that we are now almost halfway through. If the post-Covid ‘reset’ is not green, if it does not seriously confront the challenges and take swift measures to curtail the worst of pollution, emissions, and environmental destruction, then we accelerate toward collapse. With this in mind, how do we begin to talk to each other, reorganise communities, and learn to live under the shadow of the all-too-realistic possibility of societal collapse? This is quickly becoming one of the most important questions to ask, and humanity must come up with an answer. The conversation that our book attempts to spark is one that will deal with these issues head-on.

    Deep Adaptation is a growing school of thought, and the idea of adaptation is creeping steadily up the international agenda (it is a headline item at the autumn’s COP, for the first time ever). Despite this, it is still being taken nowhere near as seriously as ‘mitigation’/prevention. Why?: because once we start talking about or even doing adaptation, we can no longer deny how bad the situation is. And that is what most people are still uncomfortable doing. This failure to engage seriously with adaptation, let alone deep adaptation, risks being a form of tacit/soft climate-denial in action.

    Let me be frank: It’s time to prepare for the worst. But that is because, if we don’t prepare for the worst, we could get burnt the worst. I’m not giving up on the fight to stop our society undermining its own future existence, far from it! On the contrary, when I contemplate the likelihood of collapse, and the need therefore for deep adaptation, it makes me all the more determined to try to stop collapse, even if the chances of succeeding in doing so seem slim. But: not being willing to be honest enough to contemplate it isn’t going to help us.

    ...

    This book is systems-thinking for our time. It opens up a space for a debate that has been avoided for too long. We hope deeply that you will take up the invitation it offers.

    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Dr. Britt Wray @brittwray

    This is a really important article digging into how adults offload their climate anxiety into kids and how kids are demanding adults get behind them and stop being so delusional, all while taking enormous hits to their mental health.

    How do kids feel about climate change? | Popular Science
    https://www.popsci.com/environment/kids-climate-anxiety/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    2021 Green Moral Hazards

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21550085.2021.1940449

    Moral hazards are ubiquitous. Green ones typically involve technological fixes: Environmentalists often see ‘technofixes’ as morally fraught because they absolve actors from taking more difficult steps toward systemic solutions. Carbon removal and especially solar geoengineering are only the latest example of such technologies. We here explore green moral hazards throughout American history. We argue that dismissing (solar) geoengineering on moral hazard grounds is often unproductive. Instead, especially those vehemently opposed to the technology should use it as an opportunity to expand the attention paid to the underlying environmental problem in the first place, actively invoking its opposite: ‘inverse moral hazards’.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Reality Blind Volume 1 is out. Deep time, brain/behavior, ecology and energy/money/economy.

    Reality Blind - Vol. 1
    https://read.realityblind.world/view/975731937/
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    jake otepleni zazijete za vaseho zivota



    https://twitter.com/Hamburg397/status/1416776393673826309
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    hyperpredator, hypercivilizator, ultrasocializator .)


    The ultrasocial origin of the Anthropocene - ScienceDirect
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0921800913002632

    - Human ultrasociality shows the same pattern as other non-human ultrasocial species.
    - Exploring ultrasociality can offer insights into the current human predicament.



    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Blow for CCS: Chevron's giant carbon capture project falling short of targets
    https://www.upstreamonline.com/energy-transition/blow-for-ccs-chevrons-giant-carbon-capture-project-falling-short-of-targets/2-1-1041696

    US supermajor Chevron has failed to meet its emission reduction targets at its Gorgon liquefied natural gas project in Western Australia after a troubled start to the carbon capture and storage (CCS) facility.

    Chevron confirmed on Monday that it was not going to meet its promised injection rates, with the project only capturing a fraction of the carbon dioxide expected during its first five years of operation.

    ...

    “It’s a shocking failure of one of the world’s largest engineering projects. But, given the lack of rigour and testing around the technology that was used, I cannot say it is unexpected,” chairperson of Sustainable Energy Now, WA, Ian Porter said.

    “Chevron needs to face significant fines and be forced to offset the more than 6 million tonnes of unauthorised legacy carbon dioxide releases. Gorgon’s failure poses a major problem for any oil and gas company betting on CCS to meet net zero.”

    Porter added that he believed oil and gas companies were being “overly optimistic” in their assumptions for the potential success of CCS in order to argue for the expansion of oil and gas extraction.

    “CCS simply does not work at the scale and at the price needed to undo the damage that will be created by these projects,” he claimed.

    “I sincerely hope CCS does work one day. Ultimately, we need it. But until that time, it is reckless and disingenuous for the industry to keep pretending that it can expand operations and reach net zero.”
    SCHWEPZ
    SCHWEPZ --- ---
    Tracking sustainable recoveries – Sustainable Recovery Tracker – Analysis - IEA
    https://www.iea.org/reports/sustainable-recovery-tracker/tracking-sustainable-recoveries

    Objem emisí skleníkových plynů dosáhne v roce 2023 opět na dosavadní maximum a poté bude dál narůstat, odhaduje v nejnovější zprávě Mezinárodní agentura pro energii (IEA). Důvodem je zotavování ekonomik po koronavirové krizi a to, že státy investovaly do čisté energie pouze dvě procenta pandemické pomoci.

    Loni se kvůli protiepidemickým opatřením snížila globální produkce oxidu uhličitého související s energií na 31,4 miliardy tun. Letos to však podle nejnovější studie IEA vypadá na druhý nejvyšší meziroční nárůst produkce v historii, kvůli ekonomickému zotavování. Emise vzrostou i napřesrok a v roce 2023 pak překonají dosavadní rekord z roku 2018, odhaduje agentura.

    Ani tam se však podle ní nárůst nezastaví a v následujících letech bude pokračovat, což významně ohrozí snahu o uhlíkovou neutralitu v roce 2050, k níž se hlásí drtivá většina států. Prohlášení vlád z celého světa, že po pandemii bude budoucnost „čistější”, tak podle šéfa IEA Fatiha Birola zůstala pouze u slibů.

    https://www.idnes.cz/ekonomika/zahranicni/klimaticka-zmena-energie-obnovitelne-zdroje-iea-emise-uhlik.A210720_140605_eko-zahranicni_mato
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    JINDRICH: haha, demence hlavni havlickova pracovni napln
    KEB
    KEB --- ---
    RADIQAL: nesměřuj to na mne ale na id bobash. Narazis na něj v auto auditkach :-)
    MARSHUS
    MARSHUS --- ---
    Thread o zaplavach z ciny. Vsechno je tam vetsi, I prusery.

    https://twitter.com/AkshatRathi/status/1417492233432014874?s=19
    RADIQAL
    RADIQAL --- ---
    KEB:
    Top!

    “Takže i vy budete jednou jezdit na elektřinu, protože přijde chvíle, kdy budete sami chtít. A že vám to chce EU vnutit, vám může být buřt. Sami totiž nejspíš budete chtít dřív, i když si to teď možná ještě nemyslíte.”

    @GT: omen nomen, globalni troll ;)
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    JINDRICH: to sedi
    JINDRICH
    JINDRICH --- ---
    TUHO: uz to havlicek dementoval...
    PER2
    PER2 --- ---
    GLOBETROTTER: fakt, novy auta nehorej?
    Rare Brand New McLaren 765LT Burned To The Ground Just After Owner Bought It
    a mohl bych pokracovat cely den....

    btw ten pozar se porad vysetruje, takze asi vis neco vic, jen tak mimochodem si muzu taky zaspekulovat:
    "owner of the Model S Plaid is Bart Smith, who is the head of the digital asset group as Susquehanna International. Bloomberg stated that Smith’s firm owned around $1.1 billion worth of Tesla shares as of March 31. Things get a bit interesting here, though. @WholeMarsBlog shared on Twitter that there was a possibility that the global quant trading firm, which does trade Tesla’s stock, could hedge a short"

    "a je problém se z nich dostat ven?"
    hold je dobry, kdyz si neco koupis, precist si k tomu taky zakladni manual

    ale jsme tu s tim ot

    na prvni odkaz: nevidim nejak poroblem v tom nabit si auto o dve hodiny jindy, hold to chce i uloziste energie, verim, ze nemci se k tomu dopracujou, narozdil treba od nas ... nebo cekas, ze prejdeme na elektromobilitu ze dne na den bez jakychkoliv problemu?

    GLOBETROTTER: si doma taky nechavas auto s prazdnou nadrzi/uplne vybity? nebo proc bys mel chodit pesky?

    TUHO: na uhli at tu nikdo nechmata!
    "Jedním z předpokladů pro výstavbou dvou reaktorů v Temelíně mělo být snížení podílu uhelné energetiky a pomoc severním Čechám, které se ještě v devadesátých letech dusily pod exhalacemi z hnědouhelných elektráren. Už v září 2000 však ČEZ oficiálně oznámil, že žádné tepelné elektrárny neodstaví. Ani to nebylo v plánu. Po spuštění nových reaktorů se Česko zařadilo mezi největší světové vývozce elektřiny a v této pozici zůstává i dvacet let po spuštění a ČEZ začal vydělávat na exportech."
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam