2009 Super Wicked Problems and Climate Change: Restraining the Present to Liberate the Future
https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/159/

To be successful over the long term, climate change legislation will need to include institutional design features that insulate programmatic implementation to a significant extent from powerful political and economic interests propelled by short-term concerns. Such design features should include a variety of asymmetric precommitment strategies, which deliberately make it hard (never impossible) to change the law in response to some kinds of concerns while simultaneously providing avenues for change in response to other longer term concerns that are in harmony with the law’s central purpose—to achieve and maintain greenhouse gas emissions reductions over time. The traditional objection to lawmaking precommitment strategies—that the present should not be allowed to bind future lawmakers—also has little force in the climate change context, where the purpose of such strategies is not to protect the present at the expense of the future, but the precise opposite: to protect the future at the expense of the present.

TUHO: btw neni nekde srovnani poklesu emisi v dusledku nejakejch regiinalnich kolapsu/soc. transformaci vs. ty zamerny transformace prumyslovy infrastruktury?

TUHO: tak to bylo hlavne odsireni uhelnejch elektraren a podobny srandy ne?

Takze uhlie nahradime primarne plynom jo (pdf):

https://bit.ly/ZelenaRevoluce

YMLADRIS: kolik je podle hallama potreba procent pro změnu?

TUHO: maju najviac uhelnych elektrarni, tak maju reciprocne aj najvacsie prirodne katastrofy