btw sledujete meltdown muska kolem twitteru? co o tom myslite?

Twitter, a place I’ve called my digital home for just over a decade now, is being eaten alive by billionaire child-king Elon Musk. He’s gorging on it so he can enter his next stage of evolution: Eco-Fascist Joffrey Baratheon.

Out of his depth, mean-spirited and watching his genius myth dissolve, Musk’s mask has slipped. It’s clear to more each day he’s an enemy of the climate movement – his achievements are severely exaggerated and his efforts in support of fossil fuels and fossil-loving political parties like the Republicans are getting worse. He’s pouring toxic waste into an irreplaceable space for climate activism and networking, and he’s happy about it.

Elon Musk’s far-right lurch helps the fossil fuel industry – Ketan Joshi
https://ketanjoshi.co/2022/11/26/elon-musks-far-right-lurch-helps-the-fossil-fuel-industry/

trochu abstraktneji o “miliardarskem” problemu

Because contemporary climate change is driven by anthropogenic forcings, it is necessary to factor humanity’s impact into climate models. Given that not all humans are responsible for current climate change, and that many people are already unequally impacted by climate change, it is necessary to develop a more nuanced understanding of the human in climate modeling. Without this nuance, future climate policy, as determined by climate modeling, will potentially replicate historic inequalities that are already present in attributions to and impacts from a rapidly changing climate. This paper begins by briefly outlining how climate models are built, and the ways they are used in climate politics. Then, borrowing methods from climate modelers, this paper turns towards Sylvia Wynter’s work to model the human. The ultimate aim of this paper is to think more expansively and creatively about how genres of humanity can better be represented in climate science and policy with an eye towards more just futures.


https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/2373566X.2022.2043764?src=&journalCode=rgeo20

TADEAS: ted jsem doposlouchal a docela zajimavy :)
typkobi nedavno vysel paper na tohle tema

The Curse of Conservation: Empirical Evidence Demonstrating That Changes in Land-Use Legislation Drove Catastrophic Bushfires in Southeast Australia
https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/scholarlywork/1711475-the-curse-of-conservation--empirical-evidence-demonstrating-that-changes-in-land-use-legislation-drove-catastrophic-bushfires-in-southeast-australia

z global greening se stava global browning….


https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022EF002788

The ideology of wilderness 'destroying this continent' - ABC Radio National
https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/ockhamsrazor/wilderness-destroying-continent/101689004

What does a natural landscape look like to you? Maybe you think of a dense forest, or a sparkling body of water. Somewhere untouched by humans, right? Maybe the word "wilderness" comes to mind.

Today we're hearing from someone who wants you to think twice about this idea of wilderness.

Michael-Shawn Fletcher is a geographer and a descendant of the Wiradjuri – and he wants to challenge the idea that country that's untouched by humans is a good thing.

Ta Koubova je nejvic

Společnost založená na strachu a potlačování svých pocitů není odolná. Právě odolnost je ale cestou z krize. Filozofka Alice Koubová v rozhovoru odmítá myšlenku, že člověk má vydržet vše, a vysvětluje, proč tento přístup k řešení problémů selhává. "Na jedné straně je takzvaně přecitlivělá generace a na druhé ta, která nás dovedla na pokraj ekologického kolapsu a geopolitické záhuby," říká.

Míříme ke kolapsu klimatu a geopolitické záhubě. Nevytěsňujme krize, říká filozofka - Aktuálně.cz
https://magazin.aktualne.cz/krize-patri-k-zivotu-k-jejich-prekonani-je-treba-odolna-spol/r~00a2d19a6a5111eda25a0cc47ab5f122/

SHEFIK: myslim ze je to (od tadease) mineny tak, ze klasicky postup v techto vecech je, ze jsou dve nebo vice loby, treba pesticid-loby, farma-loby, agro-loby atd a ty bojuji proti sobe o zisk. bojuji jako by pomoci argumentu, ale dulezite jsou vztahy k politikum, kdo co prosadi. kolem toho jsou aktivisti (proti hladu, proti GMO, proti...). neni to nijak zvlast racionalni.

versus kdyby byl fakt nejakej jasnej plan co chceme od ekosystemu, co s cim souvisi, jaky strategie chceme pouzivat k dosazeni jakych cilu... a od toho odvozovat jaky chceme nebo nechceme GMO. dala bych to do kategorie Vykrik. neco jako kdyz ja chci plan kolem stabilizace klimatu

SHEFIK: cim vic jidla, tim min jidla