• úvod
  • témata
  • události
  • tržiště
  • diskuze
  • nástěnka
  • přihlásit
    registrace
    ztracené heslo?
    TUHOKlimaticka zmena / Destroying the Future Is the Most Cost-Effective


    "Given the sheer enormity of climate change, it’s okay to be depressed, to grieve. But please, don’t stay there too long. Join me in pure, unadulterated, righteous anger."


    "I don’t want your hope. I don’t want you to be hopeful. ... I want you to act. Once you start to act, the hope is everywhere."

    "Our best scientists tell us insistently that a calamity is unfolding, that the life-support systems of the Earth are being damaged in ways that threaten our survival. Yet in the face of these facts we carry on as usual."

    Rostouci hladiny oceanu, zmena atmosferickeho proudeni, zmeny v distribuci srazek a sucha. Zmeny karbonoveho, fosforoveho a dusikoveho cyklu, okyselovani oceanu. Jake jsou bezpecnostni rizika a jake potencialni klady dramatickych zmen fungovani zemskeho systemu?
    Ale take jak funguji masove dezinformacni kampane ropneho prumyslu a boj o verejne mineni na prahu noveho klimatickeho rezimu post-holocenu.
    rozbalit záhlaví
    PAN_SPRCHA
    PAN_SPRCHA --- ---
    TUHO: paradoxně je to zrovna osa Írán-Rusko která je odpovědná za většinu propagandy popíračů klimatické změny.
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    Btw Iran mel minuly rok katastrofalne nizky srazky, Tehran (14 milionu obyvatel) celil velmi realnymu riziku evakuace. Takze ty protesty maj i klimatickej rozmer. A jako obvykle to klima neni jediny, protoze Iran ma taky katastrofalni water / land use management, takze ta diktatura se ukazuje neschopna celit vyzvam spojenym s klimatickou krizi.
    Ta nakonec muze fungovat jako demokratizacni faktor, coz mi prijde docela zajimavy. Ale dosta zlaezi na tom, jak se to vyvine, protoze zkusenosti ze Syrie (nastup Daesh), muze taky ukazat, ze jedna diktatura bude nakonec misto demokratizace ci svobodnejsi spolecnosti nahrazena jeste silenejsi...
    Nicmene nesledujete nekdo v situaci v regionu?

    Earlier this month, Iranian officials warned that Tehran could run out of drinking water within two weeks due to a historic drought. In the past year, the country’s average annual rainfall has dropped to 45 percent below normal, and nineteen of its thirty-one provinces are in a severe drought. The dams and reservoirs that supply the capital have dried up and are operating at minimal capacity, with some at only 5 percent of reserve capacity. Fears of an emergency evacuation of the capital are mounting, and taps are running dry.

    https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2025/11/iran-water-crisis-warning-climate
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    Once beset by pollution, Beijing's skies are clearer than ever thanks to EVs | Electrek
    https://electrek.co/2026/01/08/once-beset-by-pollution-beijings-skies-are-clearer-than-ever-thanks-to-evs/
    TUHO
    TUHO --- ---
    TADEAS: Po netu beha ovsem tohle, ale v tyhle scene se nevyznam, nevim, co si myslet...

    💙💛 Regina Laska
    @Sunnymica
    Translated from German
    Volcano Group: Nah, that wasn't us! ☝️
    That's a gamechanger.

    If the statement is genuine – and it's on Indymedia, so the right channel – then here's what we're seeing:

    ▸ The real Volcano Group from 2011 is explicitly distancing itself
    ▸ It says: "The texts and actions of recent years don't come from us"
    ▸ It reflects on the changed context since 2014 (Ukraine) – that infrastructure attacks can now become "part of a general destabilization"
    ▸ It criticizes that its name "is being used to legitimize, explain, or politically charge current attacks"


    What stands out:
    The tone. It sounds exactly like in earlier texts: reflective, self-critical, politically nuanced. They position themselves against Putin and Trump. They explain why they've withdrawn. It has intellectual substance.

    The key sentence:
    "With Russia's attack on Ukraine in 2014, the context fundamentally shifted."
    That's an analysis no Russian troll would ever write.

    Why only now?
    They've stayed silent because they've seen that infrastructure sabotage since 2014 exists in a completely different context. That someone – presumably Russia – might have co-opted their methods and name to carry out destabilization.

    And they didn't want to:
    ▸ Be part of it
    ▸ Legitimize it through their own actions
    ▸ Provide a stage for it

    The problem:

    Their silence is exactly what enabled what they wanted to prevent – someone else hijacked their name.

    The uncomfortable implication:
    If that's true, then the attacks from 2018, 2021, 2024, 2025, and now 2026 – so over a decade – weren't from them.
    That would mean: The domestic intelligence service has been chasing a group for years that no longer existed in that form. And possibly classified Russian operations as "left-wing extremism."
    That would be a failure on multiple levels.
    The question remains: Can they substantiate that? Or is it just their claim against the authorities'?

    And of course: This statement could theoretically be forged too. The question is just – who would have an interest in faking a disavowal?

    That makes the false-flag theory more plausible, not less.

    Dobrindt has a problem now.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    climate terrorism

    Trump pulls US out of 66 international bodies, including key UN climate treaty | Donald Trump | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/07/trump-international-groups-un
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    DZODZO: to uz by ale levice nebyla levici
    DZODZO
    DZODZO --- ---
    TADEAS: nie, skor prist s riesenim, to ze tu je nejaka klimaticka kriza si uvedomuje uz aj mainstream, uz netreba tolko ukazovat prstom, ale si konecne aj vyhrnut rukavy a trosku maknut, ale na to nie je dnesna spolocnost zvyknuta, vsetci chcu vysledky teraz! hned! ako male decko, co tak vystudovat si nejaku ekonomiku a pravo, dostat sa do tych skostnatelych struktur a spravit vitr priamo tam, kde sa robia rozhodnutia? ale to je beh na dlhu trat, to sa nikomu nechce, takove to lead by example, mozno som len prilis velky idealista ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    DZODZO: myslis to tak ze je lepsi jet luxusnim prasecakem a nedelat bordel aby te nehodili do znevyhodnenejch sekci? :) z kratkodobeho pohledu mas samozrejme pravdu

    jinak pisou ze chteli zpusobit skodu te energetivke firme aby musela nakupovat drahou energii na burze, nechteli to shodit uplne. njn, levicovi extremisti, rusej nas luxusni prasecak. vyhodit!
    DZODZO
    DZODZO --- ---
    tento zaujimavy jav sa ale odohrava akurat v zhyckanej EU, pohodlnejsie je zapalit par kablov ako priniest nejake konstruktivne riesenie

    v autokratickych rezimoch v USA, Cine ci Rusku by si to nelajzli a to su ovela viac fosilne rezimy ako Nemecko
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    BRETA: vysvetlujou to v tom dopise https://archive.md/xO0zg

    me ty nasilny klimaticky protesty prijdou vzhledem k situaco v podstate podreprezentovany, divim se, ze se do prasecaku nastupuje tak klidne
    BRETA
    BRETA --- ---
    jako lol, proč radikální enviromentalisté ničí infrastrukturu zrovna v zemi, která je lídrem v zelené tranzici?
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    SHEFIK: vs fosilni anarchie
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    TADEAS: 'We don't claim to know the way out.'

    Levicova anarchie :)
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    TADEAS: aneb naznaky klimatickeho povstani, pro mainstream levicova anarchie.


    We can no longer afford the rich.
    We can initiate the end of the imperial lifestyle.
    We can stop the plundering of the Earth.
    In the greed for energy, the Earth is being drained, sucked dry, burned, abused, razed, raped, and destroyed. Entire regions are rendered uninhabitable by the heat. They simply burn up. Or habitats disappear beneath the waves during floods or due to rising sea levels.
    Shutting down fossil fuel power plants is a task that can be accomplished by hand. Have courage.
    We know we must interrupt this destruction. We know we are not alone. Don't give up hope for a world where life has space, not the greed for money, power, and destruction.

    ...

    Last year, the CO₂ concentration in the atmosphere rose to 423.9 parts per million, a value that surpasses all previous records. At the same time, climate scientists agree that the massive transatlantic ocean currents will collapse sooner or later due to global warming. This collapse of ocean currents, which has so far afforded the North a mild climate, is only one part of the catastrophe that awaits us. The extent of this devastation is simply ignored, abstracted, and discussed at global climate conferences until the scale of the destruction disappears into tables and declarations of intent.
    But the insatiable hunger for energy is eating its way through the Earth's crust and our lives, among other things to feed artificial intelligence, which then spouts stereotypes and absurdities, confusing, disorienting, and/or manipulating us. Meanwhile, with each new "learning" of the AI ​​using previous data, language, expression, and vitality are increasingly reduced, mutilated, and limited.

    ...

    We don't claim to know the way out. But we do know we must stop this destruction. Hedonism can no longer hold us captive once we've tasted the sweat of fear that spreads when there's no way out. No going forward, no going back. Only the horror of where we, as humanity, have ended up. When the question falls back on us, what did you actually do to prevent what was coming? You saw it coming, the survivors, the next generations, ask us. Please don't bring up the political parties. Please don't bring up the brown-shirted alternatives in pinstriped suits and dresses. And not the Greens or the Left either. Don't bring up the economy, whose free market will supposedly solve the problem. Economics and politics deal with death every day. With dictatorships and butchers. Their concerns vanish into thin air when it comes to satisfying our energy needs, for example. Russia is still supplying gas to Europe via Nord Stream 1. And the US wants Venezuela's oil. That's why military attacks are now taking place. And fracked gas arrives by ship from all over the world. Currently, 79% comes from the USA! Fracking is extremely environmentally damaging in its production. Even during extraction, a methane loss of 6 to 10 percent is assumed, which further warms the atmosphere.

    95% of the gas burned in Germany is imported. At climate summits, only tactical lip service is forthcoming because the oil-producing countries are not interested in climate protection but in money. Because the major cities base their policies on money and growth, lobbyists in Europe are being handed the end of the combustion engine phase-out.

    For example, the German Minister of Economic Affairs, Katharina Reiche, was State Secretary in the Federal Ministry of Transport, a lobbyist for the Association of Municipal Enterprises (VKM), and a manager at the E.ON subsidiary Westenergie. Minister Reiche presents herself as a supporter of hydrogen but primarily relies on natural gas. She intends to issue tenders for additional gas-fired power plants with a capacity of 10 gigawatts, which are to be connected to the grid by 2031, corresponding to approximately 25 new power plants. 20 billion euros are earmarked for these new gas-fired power plants.

    Reiche would prefer to postpone Germany's climate neutrality target from 2045 to 2050 anyway.

    The main culprits behind human-induced climate destruction are not those who suffer the most, those who pay with their health and their lives. The people of the Global South are already paying the highest price. The countries of the Global North, and soon China among others, are deciding the fate of everyone. China, as a communist, racist, and patriarchal dictatorship, can use "rare earth elements" to blackmail countries that don't toe the line, gradually weaving countries, cultures, and political systems into the cocoon of this new dictatorial world power. Over 85% of the world's refined "rare earth elements" come from China. And it is the rich who are the problem. It is the super-rich who are setting the world ablaze. In the East, in the West, in the South, and in the North. Sixty percent of the super-rich's investments worldwide go into gas and oil. And around 300 super-rich countries emit more CO₂ than the 110 poorest countries in the world. These criminals know it. They don't care. Their greed for even more wealth and power sets the standard by which everyone else follows
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    violent resistance, aeznam zpravam z toho to "act of self-defense and international solidarity with all those who are defending the Earth and life" trochu vypadlo


    Nejdelší blackout v Berlíně od konce války. Kdo stojí za sabotáží vedení - Seznam Zprávy
    https://www.seznamzpravy.cz/clanek/zahranicni-stredni-evropa-nejdelsi-blackout-v-berline-od-konce-valky-kdo-stoji-za-sabotazi-vedeni-295591

    Co Vulkangruppe hlásí?
    Z prohlášení k sobotnímu žhářskému útoku vyplývá radikální odpor k moderním technologiím. Autoři mluví o lidech jako o „vězních digitálního systému“, kritizují umělou inteligenci, cloudové služby i spotřebu energie.

    Vyzývají k sabotážím téměř celé moderní infrastruktury, od energetických sítí přes datová centra až po automobilový a zbrojní průmysl. Zároveň se omlouvají za dopady výpadku na zranitelné skupiny obyvatel, například v domovech seniorů a nemocnicích.


    Vulkangruppe - Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulkangruppe

    ] In a statement[22] following the event, Vulkangruppe framed their action as an "act of resistance" concerning "greed for energy ... that is sucking dry, burning, maltreating, raping" the Earth.[19] Vulkangruppe claimed that their action was "aimed at the common good" and was an "act of self-defense and international solidarity with all those who are defending the Earth and life".[23][20] Reporting in Der Tagesspiegel also associated the group's actions with an opposition to artificial intelligence.[20]


    https://archive.md/xO0zg
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Science of Superforecasting - Global Warming Rise: we blew past 1.5C, how about 2C, 2.5C, to 4C?
    https://youtu.be/JxE6XFKOaRM?si=mBQ30943n5zCpOgS


    We already passed 1.5C - happened, in last few years

    When do we pass 2.0C. Group spread is 2034 to 2039 with mean of 2037. Beckwith guess 2033.

    How about 2.5C. Group spread is 2044 to 2052 with mean of 2048. Beckwith guess is 2041.

    OK, what about passing 3.0C. Group spread is 2054 to 2065 with mean of 2060. Beckwith superforecast is 2050.

    Anybody for 3.5C. Group spread is 2065 to 2077 with mean of 2072. Beckwith guess is 2058.

    Finally, when will we cross 4.0C. Group spread is 2075 to 2090 with mean of 2084. Beckwith guess is 2066.

    Of course, a supervolcano (natural or induced:) will negate all this since humanity likes to eat food...
    ERGOSUM
    ERGOSUM --- ---
    SHEFIK: Jak se v tom projeví cusík ve vodě - > řasy ?
    SHEFIK
    SHEFIK --- ---
    CO2 can stimulate plant growth, but only when enough nitrogen is available—and that key ingredient has been seriously miscalculated. A new study finds that natural nitrogen fixation has been overestimated by about 50 percent in major climate models. This means the climate-cooling benefits of plant growth under high CO2 are smaller than expected. The result: a reduced buffer against climate change and more uncertainty in future projections.

    Plants can’t absorb as much CO2 as climate models predicted | ScienceDaily
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/01/260104202809.htm
    SCHWEPZ
    SCHWEPZ --- ---
    :: OSEL.CZ :: - Globální emise oxidu uhličitého už (možná) klesají
    https://www.osel.cz/14432-globalni-emise-oxidu-uhliciteho-uz-mozna-klesaji.html


    Emise oxidu uhličitého z fosilních paliv a výroby cementu měla podle prognóz z konce roku 2025 v loňském roce stoupnout o 1,1 % a dosáhnout rekordních 38,1 miliard tun oxidu uhličitého. Ve hře je ale možnost, že celkové množství emisí oxidu uhličitého už o něco málo kleslo. O tom se kromě jiného rozhodovalo na frontě, kde běží boj o odlesňování a hospodaření se zemědělskou půdou.

    Většina odborníků se ale zdráhá pokles emisí oxidu uhličitého připustit a dál počítají s jejich kulminací až někdy kolem roku 2030. Jedním dechem dodávají, že za deset let od slavné konference v Paříži, jejíž účastníci se shodli, že se na Zemi neoteplí o víc než o 1,5 °C, se roční emise oxidu uhličitého zvedly o desetinu. Splnění závazku z Paříže se zdá stejně reálné, jako kdybychom se chtěli kousnout do vlastního lokte.

    (...) Čína má na svědomí třetinu světových emisí. Hlavní zásluhu na tom mají čínské uhelné elektrárny, které ročně spolknou 2,3 miliardy tun uhlí. To platilo donedávna. Situace v Číně se ale rychle mění. Čína se stává velmocí číslo 1 v produkci energie z obnovitelných zdrojů. Produkuje elektromobily, vyrábí zařízení pro sluneční a větrné elektrárny a také je ve stále větší míře sama využívá. Do roku 2035 by měla klesnout v Číně produkce všech skleníkových plynů o 7 %.

    Odborníci připouštějí, že až budou kulminovat emise oxidu uhličitého v Číně, dojde k jejich kulminaci i v globálním měřítku. Takový je vliv Číny na bilanci skleníkových plynů. Je docela reálné, že k tomu již došlo. A to dokonce už v roce 2024. V loňském roce klesly čínské emise možná o 1,2 %. Za hlavní faktor považují experti pokles poptávky po cementu a oceli. V kombinaci s narůstající produkcí energie z obnovitelných zdrojů v tom odborníci vidí záruku, že čínský pokles emisí oxidu uhličitého nepředstavuje pouhý výkyv, ale setrvalý trend. Nejasný je ale v Číně vývoj emisí dalších skleníkových plynů.
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    Test of faith: Reviving religion in the age of climate breakdown | Rupert Read
    https://youtu.be/z4MpHw-r7tg?si=IkR2E5oqATClVd8A
    TADEAS
    TADEAS --- ---
    FB IMG 1767374216708
    Kliknutím sem můžete změnit nastavení reklam