TUHO: Něco nového a zajímavého oproti [ TUHO @ Dezinformace o klimatu // Dark Money and the Science of Deception ], nebo víceméně same old, same old?

Fosilni prumysl se snazi vytvorit si svoji Gretu Thunberg...

„Domnívá-li se člověk, že může emisemi oxidu uhličitého zničit klima, tak těžce přeceňuje své síly,“ prohlásila Seibtová na Konferenci konzervativní politické akce na konci února v Marylandu.
Zdůrazňuje význam jiných činitelů, jako např. sluneční energie, které považuje za skutečné hnací síly globálního oteplování. Přitom množství sluneční energie dopadající na Zemi od 70. let 20. století klesá, jak ukazují měření prováděná mj. americkou vládou.

Mladá Němka je zrcadlem dnešního Německa i Evropy | iUHLI.cz
https://iuhli.cz/mlada-nemka-je-zrcadlem-dnesniho-nemecka-i-evropy/

Zacina vychazet novy casak Hrot. Takze myslim, ze budeme moct ocekavat dalsi hromady debilit :))

This type of partisan scientific divide isn’t new. Stephan Lewandowsky, professor of psychology at the University of Bristol in England, argues that coronavirus denial is similar to climate change denial. It’s also perpetuated by the same cast of characters. “Online, some of the ‘professional’ climate deniers are also now professional downplayers of COVID,” he said. “They perceive it as a threat, in the same way that climate change is — not just to the economy, but also to the way in which the economy operates.”
Lewandowsky thinks that certain political views can drive rejection of scientific evidence. People who champion individualism, idolize the free market, or take an anti-big government stance may find it easier to downplay the severity of these crises than to imagine a world in which economically devastating work stoppages — or even carbon taxes — are required.

‘Misinformation kills’: The link between coronavirus conspiracies and climate denial | Grist
https://grist.org/...information-kills-the-link-between-coronavirus-conspiracies-and-climate-denial/

Issue frames portraying climate science as uncertain are cited as a key impediment to new climate change and energy policies. However, some have recently argued that the debate over policy impacts, especially policy impacts on consumers, has become more politically salient than the debate over science. This study applies qualitative content analysis to 340 documents from the conservative think tank, the Heartland Institute, to test whether certain policy frames have become more common among leading opponents of climate policy in the United States. The results indicate a continued reliance on science framing, with more directed attacks on climate scientists and fewer frames stressing the uncertainty of climate science. An increase in the use of policy frames related to effects on consumers also suggests that opposition to climate policy is taking new forms as the political debate evolves, with ramifications for climate change policy opposition on an international scale.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09644016.2018.1439353?journalCode=fenp20

TADEAS: Prý skutečná postava, která nesnáší ekology, ale spíš to vypadá, že to sama nepíše, nechává to na profesionálech.

https://www.protiproud.cz/...undeswehru-rebelove-pripoutani-ke-strakovce-co-by-na-to-rekla-greta.htm

In Virginia, a conservative think tank is now touting a biased analysis, dismissed by critics as misleading “scare tactics,” authored by anti-environmental attorney David Schnare, that questions Virginia’s legal authority to participate in the regional program.
The Transportation and Climate Initiative aims to reduce carbon emissions from on-road vehicles by up to 25 percent over 10 years through a cap-and-invest model, whereby fuel suppliers and distributors would purchase allowances allocated under the cap, and proceeds would be invested into clean transportation initiatives. The program is modeled after the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative for the power sector, which is expected to result in CO2 emission reductions of 45 percent below 2005 levels by this year. But critics of the TCI proposal, many of whom also opposed RGGI, claim that it will do little to cut emissions and is just a scheme to raise gas prices, equivalent to a gas tax.
According to a legal analysis on Virginia’s participation in the program, published by the Thomas Jefferson Institute for Public Policy, “TCI proposes rationing gasoline and diesel fuel sales and initiating a per gallon gas tax hike.” David Schnare, who wrote the analysis, claims that the program would impose not a fee but a tax and therefore requires authorization by the state legislature. Virginia’s governor, Schnare says, does not have unilateral authority to join TCI. Schnare also threatens to sue should Virginia attempt to join TCI without authorization by the legislature.
“We hope the Governor simply chooses to withdraw,” Schnare said. “But any effort to impose TCI unilaterally without the General Assembly will certainly be met with appropriate legal action.”
“Nothing in the TCI program would ration gasoline and motor fuels. TCI would simply put a limit on climate pollution,” said Mark Kresowik, eastern region deputy director of the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal campaign, emphasizing that TCI is not a tax by any legal standard.

Longtime Climate Science Foe David Schnare Uses 'Scare Tactics' to Bash Transportation Climate Initiative for Koch-Tied Think Tank | DeSmog
https://www.desmogblog.com/...s-scare-tactics-bash-transportation-climate-initiative-koch-tied-think