TUHO: v ramci sirsiho ramovani je potreba se ptat po ty informacni infrastrukture spolecenstvi, vazbe k institucim / rozsirenosti praktik, casovym horizontu jejich transformaci. ptat se, co je to dezinformace (zamerna), co je feature/bug ty informacni infrastruktury

Neco ke "Great Warming Swindle"

So Friis-Christensen and another author developed yet another means of demonstrating that the Sun is responsible, claiming to have discovered a remarkable agreement between cosmic radiation influenced by the Sun and global cloud cover(6). This is the mechanism the film proposes for global warming. But, yet again, the method was exposed as faulty. They had been using satellite data which did not in fact measure global cloud cover. A paper in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics shows that when the right data are used, a correlation is not found (7).

So the hypothesis changed again. Without acknowledging that his previous paper was wrong, Friis-Christensen's co-author, Henrik Svensmark, declared that there was in fact a correlation -- not with total cloud cover but with "low cloud cover"(8). This too turned out to be incorrect (9). Then, last year, Svensmark published a paper purporting to show that cosmic rays could form tiny particles in the atmosphere(10). Accompanying it was a press release which went way beyond the findings reported in the paper, claiming it showed that both past and current climate events are the result of cosmic rays (11).

As Dr Gavin Schmidt of NASA has shown on www.realclimate.org, five missing steps would have to be taken to justify the wild claims in the press release. "We've often criticised press releases that we felt gave misleading impressions of the underlying work", Schmidt says, "but this example is by far the most blatant extrapolation-beyond-reasonableness that we've seen."(12) None of this seems to have troubled the programme makers, who report the cosmic ray theory as if it trounces all competing explanations.


The Great Global Warming Swindle
https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/the-great-global-warming-swindle/234125

Marc Morano ma druhej dil Climate Hustle, ani jsem nevedel. Z roku 2020

Climate Hustle 2 Intro Trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=XxOkMH1Xqkg&feature=emb_title

Woods states that there’s no question it is, and that “it was always understood that CO2 in the atmosphere had potential for warming.”

This statement is true, scientists have known for a long time that CO2 increases warming and that humans are causing this. But Woods blatantly ignores a half-century of Exxon’s efforts to cast doubt on climate science, which it is currently being tried in court over and which McCoy admitted to in Greenpeace’s investigation. Exxon knew climate change was happening and lied about it, and Woods not only doesn’t acknowledge those lies, but claims Exxon never told those lies. Which is, itself, another lie.

Exxon CEO says no new gas cars globally by 2040, goes wolf-in-sheep's-clothing about CO2 - Electrek
https://electrek.co/2022/06/26/exxon-no-new-gas-cars-by-2040-wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-co2/

Several Conservative MPs and peers cited the 2019 report by Policy Exchange in parliament and the home secretary, Priti Patel, repeated its claims about the climate campaigners being “extremists”.

A new investigation by the news website openDemocracy reveals that in 2017, the thinktank received $30,000 (£25,000) from US oil company ExxonMobil.
Policy Exchange and Exxon declined to comment.

Thinktank that briefed against XR given $30k by ExxonMobil in 2017 | Extinction Rebellion | The Guardian
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jun/15/thinktank-that-briefed-against-xr-given-30k-by-exxon-mobil-in-2017

TUHO: Kremlik koukam delal i vystavu o globalnim oteplovani pro Muzeum v Sumperku.

Last week we exposed how ExxonMobil poured in over $4 million into 1,211 climate change misinformation and greenwashing ads that have received over 100 million impressions on Facebook and Instagram - despite their CEO’s statement last month that the company “does not spread disinformation regarding climate change.″

Alongside their own targeted ad campaigns, fossil fuel companies including ExxonMobil fund trade organisations to do the same. In this data drop we expose how the American Petroleum Institute (API), alongside other industry groups, is using Facebook ads on a vast scale to target national and state-level climate-change and environmental legislation in the US.

Eco-Bot.Net’s AI system retrieved ad data from Facebook's APIs from 1st January to 21st October this year. These political and issue ads are then moderated, verified and investigated by independent journalists using academic definitions of climate disinformation and greenwashing.

Eco-Bot.Net: Exposing climate change disinformation and corporate greenwashing on social media during COP26.

https://eco-bot.net/