TUHO: SL: How do you feel about the work you did in those years?

JT: I regret a lot of it. I wish I had taken more care and done more due diligence on the arguments I had been forwarding. I also introduced one of my brothers, James Taylor, to the folks at the Heartland Institute. Heartland’s rise to dominate market share in climate denialism largely occurred under my brother. Boy do I regret that.

SL: And he still is still a climate denier. So what is that like? Do you talk about climate change at Thanksgiving?

JT: We agree to disagree and don’t discuss it. And we don’t spend a lot of Thanksgivings together.

Zajimavej pripad, konvertovany skeptik, Jerry Taylor, byvaly viceprezident Cato institute... Jak zjistil, ze mu vesi buliky na nos

How a Professional Climate Change Denier Discovered the Lies and Decided to Fight for Science
https://theintercept.com/2017/04/28/how-a-professional-climate-change-denier-discovered-the-lies-and-decided-to-fight-for-science/

Mapping the climate sceptical blogosphere

While mainstream scientific knowledge production has been extensively examined in the academic literature, comparatively little is known about alternative networks of scientific knowledge production. Online sources such as blogs are an especially under-investigated site of knowledge contestation. Using degree centrality and node betweenness tests from social network analysis, and thematic content analysis of individual posts, this research identifies and critically examines the climate sceptical blogosphere and investigates whether a focus on particular themes contributes to the positioning of the most central blogs. A network of 171 individual blogs is identified, with three blogs in particular found to be the most central: Climate Audit, JoNova and Watts Up With That. These blogs predominantly focus on the scientific element of the climate debate, providing either a direct scientifically-based challenge to mainstream climate science, or a critique of the conduct of the climate science system. This overt scientific framing, as opposed to explicitly highlighting differences in values, politics, or ideological worldview, appears to be an important contributory factor in the positioning of the most central blogs. It is suggested that these central blogs are key protagonists in a process of attempted expert knowledge de-legitimisation and contestation, acting not only as translators between scientific research and lay audiences, but, in their reinterpretation of existing climate science knowledge claims, are acting themselves as alternative public sites of expertise for a climate sceptical audience.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959378014000405

Jeden z top postav klimatologie (dnes jiz zesnuly) Stephen Schneider rozebira Bjorna Lomborga.

Sci-Hub | Misleading Math About the Earth. Scientific American, 286(1), 61–71 | 10.1038/scientificamerican0102-61
https://sci-hub.se/10.1038/scientificamerican0102-61

Anatomy of Dissent: A Cultural Analysis of Climate Skepticism
Based on findings from ethnographic analysis of U.S. climate scientists, this article
identifies largely unrecognized sociocultural dimensions underpinning differences in
scientists’ perceptions of anthropogenic climate change. It argues that culturally laden
tensions among scientists have influenced some to engage with the antienvironmental
movement and, as such, influence U.S. climate science politics. The tensions are rooted
in broad-based and ongoing changes within U.S. science and society since the 1960s
and propelled by specific scientific subgroups’ negative experiences of the rise of
environmentalism and of climate modeling, in particular. Attending to these and other
experience-based cultural dynamics can help refine cultural theory and enhance
understanding of the deeper battles of meaning that propel climate science politics.


Sci-Hub | Anatomy of Dissent. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(6), 732–753 | 10.1177/0002764212469799
https://sci-hub.se/10.1177/0002764212469799

TUHO: Russian scepticism is not, as in many other nations, a reaction to a mature, developed environmental movement, with a vocal presence in public and media discourse: it is a manifestation of competing pressures on (and internal debates within) a closed elite. This means that approaches adopted to study climate scepticism in the USA, Australia and the UK, which draw heavily on social movement approaches, are often inappropriate in the Russian context. Many of the expectations about how climate scepticism will manifest and how it can be studied are therefore confounded when looking at Russia.