Sasa, sasa jede

The second claim, that wind turbines are net-negative sources of energy, is just a flat out lie. Multiple peer-reviewed studies have shown that wind turbines generate about 25 times more energy than they consume during construction. On average they have an energy payback period of 5 to 6 months.

But the first claim, that coal is used to make wind turbines is technically true. While companies are working on making steel out of green hydrogen and renewable electricity, virtually all the steel components in wind turbines are made using coking coal.

However, like many anti-renewable messaging and memes, this one lacks some very important context.

Once a wind turbine is built, it can displace coal-powered electricity. So the question we have to ask is how much coal can a turbine save over the course of its life? The answer is a lot more than 255 tons.



This Anti-Renewable Energy Meme Is Absurd
https://www.distilled.earth/p/this-anti-renewable-energy-meme-is?

SEJDA: No, svet je slozitej :) Tech argumentu je tam vic. Kazdopadne nehodlam tady stavet zadnej tribunal kolem Muska. Nicmene to, ze po jeho zasahu se na Twitteru zacina rust dosah klimatickejch dezinformaci je vec, ktery zachycuje uz vic analyz.

Filozoficka reflexe teorie vedy v otazce debaty kolem satelitniho mereni dat #MSU

Climate scientists have been engaged in a decades-long debate over the standing of satellite measurements of the temperature trends of the atmosphere above the surface of the earth. This is especially significant because skeptics of global warming and the greenhouse effect have utilized this debate to spread doubt about global climate models used to predict future states of climate. I use this case from an understudied science to illustrate two distinct philosophical approaches to the relations among data, scientist, measurement, models, and theory. I argue that distinguishing between ‘direct’ empiricist and ‘complex’ empiricist approaches helps us understand and analyze this important scientific episode. I also introduce a complex empiricist account of testing and evaluation, and contrast it with the basic HypotheticoDeductive approach to the climate models used by the direct empiricists. This more developed complex empiricist approach will serve philosophy of science well, as computational models become more widespread in the sciences

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252495508_The_debates_about_satellite_MSU_data_and_climate_models_the_role_of_simple'_empiricism

KEB: No, nekdo sbira znamky, ja tyhle kydy.

NYRLEM: Kdyztak dej vedet, jestli neco odpovedeli :) Dik!

TUHO: TUHO: NYRLEM: Pripadne jeste tady .)

UQx DENIAL101x 3.3.3.1 Reinforcing feedback
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=dHozjOYHQdE&embeds_euri=https%3A%2F%2Fcrankyuncle.com%2F&source_ve_path=MzY4NDIsMjM4NTE&feature=emb_title

NYRLEM: Tam odkazuje k tomuhle - v minulosti se casto stavalo, ze nejdriv vzrostla teplota, potom CO2. Ale to neznamena, ze soucasna vlna otepleni neni zpusobena rustem CO2, to je proste cira demagogie.

Increasing concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere increases global temperature. Increasing global temperature also increases the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. Yes, you can have both. Antarctic ice core records of past climate change help us understand earth’s climate system and show that human-caused climate change is fundamentally different from natural glacial-interglacial climate cycles.

CO2 lags temperature - what does it mean?
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-lags-temperature-intermediate.htm

KEB: Uvedomuju, ale myslim, ze treba oproti PPF, ktera do IVK nalila pres 100 mega je moje kliknuti celkem nepatrna podpora .-))

TUHO: uvedomujes si, že klikáním toho starýho zmrda podporujes že ano?

Neklikat, necist, důsledně ignorovat, to je jediný způsob jak se ho zbavit...

po delsi dobe zase neco od vaska

Institut Václava Klause
https://www.institutvk.cz/clanky/2302.html