2019 The Origins of Planetary Ethics in the Philosophy of Russian Cosmism
https://www.amazon.com/Origins-Planetary-Philosophy-Russian-Cosmism/dp/154349420X

vernadsky jako myslitel planetarity

2014 150 Years of Vernadsky: The Noösphere
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1500605395/ref=pd_aw_sim_14_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=VC2RKYA4A6T0E2HAJ5FD&dpPl=1&dpID=51H-AfwHj0L

2014 150 Years of Vernadsky: The Biosphere
https://www.amazon.com/150-Years-Vernadsky-Biosphere-1/dp/150060514X

2015 The Study of Life and the New Physics
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1514637103/ref=pd_aw_sim_14_2?ie=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=EK0XTZRCSF9V20TEVFE0&dpPl=1&dpID=31Y9Ug%2BPvML

The author was clearly one of the early pioneers along the path to a new way of perceiving reality. Clearly not the only one, he belonged to the first first straggling nodes of the emerging global network that would slowly set in motion the dynamics that would generate a perception of the cosmos as a stochastic process that has neither beginning nor end and the human species as being amongst a myriad perceptual mechanisms generated by this process in order to perceive the potential pathways to its own becoming, being and non being, and which at the time included such elements as Fitjof Capra, Arne Naess, James Lovelock, Lynn Margulis, Humberto Maturana, Francisco Varela and a few others.

The history of the emergence of this unitive or non dual perception of the cosmos is a long one that goes back to the beginning of the emergence of homo sapiens, that has as yet to be told and when it finally is set down in writing Vernadsky's contribution will surely find acknowledgement therein. While the emergence of such a history may not be far away the works of Vernadsky will have to await its coming in order to take its due recognition as an important step in the evolution of human perceptual capacity.

The network of those with such perceptual capacities (sometimes wrongly called systems thinkers) is growing and the collective perceptions that it has begun to generate have begun to surpass anything that the perception of any single human individual is able to generate. The pathway to the recognition of this network and its engagement of earthprocesses has been laid by the concept of the United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network now actively functioning with global scope. Vernadsky may never have realized that his perceptions of the cosmos were the precursors of a new world that would lead to a new lease of life for the human species and an opportunity for the transformation of its global civilization into a sustainable one and for the facilitation of lifes conscious evolution through and beyond human being and its spread throughout the cosmos

paliativne-regenerativni proces

paliativni proces

THINKING CATASTROPHIC THOUGHTS: A TRAUMATIZED SENSIBILITY ON A HOTTER PLANET | SpringerLink
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s11231-022-09340-3

While catastrophizing has traditionally been pathologized within psychoanalytic traditions, in this paper I suggest that cataclysmic realities of climate change call upon all of us to cultivate catastrophic thinking. Our new climatic normal demands of us not only new concepts and language, but also a new sort of thinking, building on Wilfred Bion’s ideas that to think is to use our mind’s capacity to be in touch with internal and external realities. I suggest that sometimes people are able to learn from their experiences of trauma in ways that disrupt the culturally dominant anenvironmental orientation, that is, an orientation that brackets out the more-than-human environment. Instead, they develop a capacity to think catastrophically about and to be permeable to the more-than-human environment. What I call their “traumatized sensibility” can offer guidance as we come to co-exist with and respond more consciously to our hotter planet

2014 Satellite Planetarity and the Ends of the Earth
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275445137_Satellite_Planetarity_and_the_Ends_of_the_Earth

This essay examines the militarization of extraterrestrial and extraterritorial spaces such as the high seas, outer space, and Antarctica since the onset of the Cold War. While environmental studies has generally focused on national topographies, this essay instead imagines the earth through visual tropes of the extraterrestrial. Mapping these “outer spaces”—terrae incognitae—within and outside the earth has been key to our modern understanding of the planet and to visualizing the global environment, including climate change. Turning to the militarization of outer space and Antarctica, the essay examines satellite vision produced by the Cold War systems of surveillance, particularly as inscribed by New Zealand author James George. The conclusion of the essay turns to ways these technologies are constitutive of visions of the global in the Anthropocene.

YEETKA: Jsou. Omlouvám se. Já myslel, že je to odpařováním, ale asi to bude jak říkáš. :)

YEETKA: vic kysliku ney flora vuprodukuji oceany

klima lidske mysli a habitabilita

(PDF) From Our Global Capitalism Towards Integrative Thriveability: No Sustainable Mental Health in Our Unsustainable Worlds | Gerard Bruitzman - Academia.edu
https://www.academia.edu/39889333/From_Our_Global_Capitalism_Towards_Integrative_Thriveability_No_Sustainable_Mental_Health_in_Our_Unsustainable_Worlds

(PDF) Exploring Mount Thriveability: Towards Integrative Thriveability, Pt. 2 | Gerard Bruitzman - Academia.edu
https://www.academia.edu/40505199/Exploring_Mount_Thriveability_Towards_Integrative_Thriveability_Pt_2

Gaian Systems — University of Minnesota Press
https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/gaian-systems

Gaian Systems is a pioneering exploration of the dynamic and complex evolution of Gaia’s many variants, with special attention to Lynn Margulis’s foundational role in these developments. Delving into many issues not previously treated in accounts of Gaia, Bruce Clarke describes the history of a theory that has the potential to help us survive an environmental crisis of our own making.

Planetary negative commons | Cairn International Edition
https://www.cairn-int.info/journal-multitudes-2021-4-page-117.htm

While reflections on the Anthropocene tend to evoke new “spatial” divisions, other schools of thought, centered on the concepts of collapse or the threat of extinction, prefer temporal paradigms. Whether Bruno Latour’s Terrestrial attractor or the contemporary reworking of concepts like “the time of the end” or the idea that it is “too late” to act, the coordinates used to think about the future from either perspective seem to be thoroughly orthogonal. Nevertheless, in recent years another attractor has emerged to complicate the picture. Authors as diverse as Dipesh Chakrabarty, Benjamin Bratton, and Lukáš Likavčan are now emphasizing the specifically “planetary” dimension of current problems.

This short text is an attempt to investigate this claim through the prism of our work on negative commons. As Chakrabarty—one of the first to explore the idea—himself admits, one of the challenges of Planetarity is the extreme difficulty of politicizing the issues at stake on the spatial and temporal scales with which the concept confronts us. In our view, the notion of negative commons opens up a line of thought that reveals new levers of political action situated right in the interstices between the Globe (manifestation of the classic figures of empire, capital, etc., on which criticism usually exerts its grip) and the Planet.

The questions posed by these categories, and the horizons they look to, differ considerably. We will start with the Globe, the more or less spatial translation of the concept of Modernity, itself an era or a temporal structure supposedly characterized by new sciences and, more broadly, a relationship to the world, a novel way of inhabiting and conceptualizing it

planetarni pece

2019 From the human to the planetary: Speculative futures of care
http://concept.lib.ed.ac.uk/index.php/mat/article/view/4960

This is largely a theoretical, speculative essay that takes on the question of what ‘care’looks like at a moment when climate change is increasingly taking center stage in public and political discussions. Starting with two new practices, namely, humanitarian care for nonhumans and One Health collaborations, I seek to determine what forms of political care can incorporate the well-being of future generations and future iterations of the earth. After an exploration of One Health as an approach to planetary care, I ask what its parts enable us to think, despite its limitations; I focus on the new human-nonhuman assemblages connected through different biosocial models, such as neuroscience or immunology, to see how these scientific theories might enable new possibilities. I argue that a focus on biological ecologies at different scales–as opposed to ethicomoral categories like humanity–can open the way to a larger imaginary of human and nonhuman flourishing and a space for nonmoralistic politics.